Тёмный

The Idealism of George Berkeley 

Mark Thorsby
Подписаться 46 тыс.
Просмотров 5 тыс.
50% 1

In this video, Professor Thorsby discusses the major arguments of George Berkeley. We see that Berkeley begins by denying the possibility of abstract ideas, at least in terms of their significance defined by John Locke. He contends that Locke makes a mistake by confusing the notion of abstract ideas with the limits of language. Our perception of an object is not generated through an accumulation of simple ideas, amalgamated in a abstract whole (all with valid representational content), but through the direct complete ideas themselves. Berkeley goes on to show that existence requires perception such that all things that exist must be perceived. The lecture traces some of the consequences that follow.

Опубликовано:

 

25 мар 2017

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 9   
@quad9363
@quad9363 4 года назад
Thay was a great video, I especially liked the distinction made at the end there between Berkeley's empiricist Idealism and Leibniz's rationalist Idealism.
@pranotibhosale376
@pranotibhosale376 9 месяцев назад
Impressed by the presentation
@platovsky
@platovsky Месяц назад
Astonishing ❤❤❤❤increíble 🌎 👏
@Zoharargov
@Zoharargov 6 лет назад
Thanks for your great content!
@platovsky
@platovsky Месяц назад
Amazing ❤❤❤
@Jaryism
@Jaryism 2 года назад
I’m like 30 min in and I have no fucking clue what he’s talking about.. blah blah language, particulars, particulars, ideas, particular.. he just likes to say the word particular in every sentence I think.
@doobymclean
@doobymclean Год назад
Once you understand it it's not so bad (obviously). These guys have been talkin about particulars vs. universals since Ancient Greece. Basically, every time you've seen any animal with your eyes is the particular, and then your idea of what an animal is, secondary to seeing all those particulars, is the universal. Basically. I haven't finished the lecture, I'm myself at 37 minutes, but I think that's exactly Berkeley's point, that language tends to be unreliable to describe the world around us.
@saintsword23
@saintsword23 11 месяцев назад
"Philosophy is hard."
@saintsword23
@saintsword23 11 месяцев назад
What Berkeley is contending in this section is that when we think of an abstraction, say "trees," we cannot imagine "trees in general." When we think of a tree, it's always of a particular example of a tree - an oak tree, a willow, a fig, or whatever. We cannot conceive of the abstract "tree" directly. Basically Berkeley is contending for a form of nominalism - that abstract ideas are not real things (in distinction to someone like Plato who argues that an abstract idea like "tree" is a real thing on another plane of existence), but instead are a convention of language and thought. In the modern day we might say abstractions are sets of particular objects.
Далее
David Hume's Mitigated Skepticism
1:26:44
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.
John Locke and his Epistemology
1:48:17
Просмотров 6 тыс.
Выпускаем трек? #iribaby
00:14
Просмотров 137 тыс.
Kant's Prolegomena to a Future Metaphysics
1:06:06
Просмотров 7 тыс.
Bishop Berkeley's Idealism
35:13
Просмотров 6 тыс.
A History of Philosophy | 44 George Berkeley's Idealism
1:00:00
Berkeley on God
11:50
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.
2.  Thomas Hobbes
1:49:45
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
John Locke: "Of Identity and Diversity"
52:14
Просмотров 2 тыс.
Husserl   Ideas I   Naturalistic MisInterpretations
1:01:14
Perception - Idealism
36:47
Просмотров 11 тыс.