Thanks for watching! As usual, this was recorded live (I stream on Fridays at 7.30pm est) so come along if you're interested! I just wanted to add some notes: - I simplified the ad fraud segment, but the incentive for fraudsters to fake ad clicks is the fact that platforms pay publishers (e.g. websites using Google Ads) a small share of ad profits by default. By faking clicks they get paid. Also not ads are pay-per-click, some are pay per view/impression which is even easier to bot. - I think the biggest (present) risk of bots are targeted scams and hacks. These scams only need a small hit rate to be hugely damaging to both individuals and organisiations. - Obviously media literacy would help, but ultimately I want to see a model that holds platforms more accountable for wide scale misinformation campaigns. Bc people are busy and idk how much energy they have to learn media literacy skills if they're weren't taught by school/parents. - I said twitter was down 72% but that number was a lil outdated, hence the 80% on screen. This figure is given by an investment firm that helped fund the buyout lol. - There's a whole load of other aspects to cover. Deepfakes, Enshittification,etc. all have their own roles and separate impacts but I wanted to keep the scope focused here on mainly misinformation and the finances bc I don't get a lot of time to work on these vids.
I think your point about the internet becoming a consumption instead of a place or a tool is valid. To me the internet felt most alive when I was a kid on message boards and when youtube was in its early stage.
It still is, in my opinion. While social media is dying, small communities and forums are still going strong, as well as the more niche discords. It's just no longer as searchable, thus folks don't have a direct portal to it from Google.
Same thing, when it was largely universities and such in the very early days it was so much smaller but it was actually easier to find the information you needed. The amount of clutter was just so much less. I feel like I enjoyed it more, even with the limitations.
Well, it destroys competition and ruins small business and makes the economy more shitty for everyone. Small businesses pay and pay but just don't have deep enough pockets (not trying to judge if this is right way in the first place) to compete with huge coorperations. At some point everything will be Amazon and Alibaba and you can literally do nothing but give them your money and pay whatever price they want because they created this absolute monopol
Yeah, but it will make everything more expensive when ads don't exist. Anything with ads are largely discounted: many, many Internet websites, & phone apps, Sports games & eSport live events, Radio Stations, TV Shows, Anime, and Movies AND MORE all gonna be at least 4x more expensive to cover the ad revenue that used to be there.
@@littlemonztergaming8665 discounted? Brother literally everything you listed is more expensive in the advertising hellscape of America than it is basically everywhere else.
Bro., based on your comment I guess that you are deep into the Rat Race and never want to get rid of your handcuffs. Wake up! For those who want to escape the Rat Race and start an online business, it is essential that they can reach real humans with their advertisements and sell their products and services.
It's what already happened to cable TV back in the day. Cable TV was supposed to be a means to watch TV without advertising. Guess what, they changed that and you were essentially paying for both the programming and the advertising. Flash forward to the 90's, and corporations couldn't quite get the control they wanted, because the internet was a new beast. It took nearly 20 years before they got their claws into the internet, primarily through mobile devices and app environments.
And streaming services are the same as the Cable TV things. It was meant for no ads and now they have ads too. Anything capitalism can get there hands on to make money they will
i love the internet, but it's been engineered by corporations to be very addictive. this year, i have started a software project to help young people with content addiction and anxiety.
Impressive delivery for a live stream. I thought at first the chat was just a graphic to aid in the subject. Very little hesitation when speaking and very direct. Kudos
What sucks about misinformation in the internet is that truth is often boring. People are more likely to support a post saying that someone did something bad than a post explaining why they are just some random person that does nothing special.
@@discordantduck1808 I think he rather means "Super angry mob of [the other political side you don't support] did [a thing most people agree is bad] and therefore we should [punish them by whatever is suggested in the post]" kind of comments which just sow political division. I mean I am not American but I have found myself being convinced that all presidential candidates are insanely crazy with little regard to peoples safety while also being convinced they can be down to earth normal people depending on the posts you see about them
Or people upvoting/giving likes to someone who sounds like is giving true information but 30 seconds of googling can easily debunk their claims, if I told something that resembles truth people will believe it. Did you know female hyenas have reverse harems? Because I made it. Did you know male spotted hyena can be higher in hierarchy than females depending who is their mother? This is actually true, look up article "Hyenas probably have more friends than you: spotted hyena social hierarchies" by Harvard university
Ah I wonder if that's how yt is filtering comment bots lately because I've been seeing fewer of them recently. Maybe they are finally taking account creation dates into consideration :P
Wasn’t even that long ago when the dead internet theory was just a creepy pasta. And now we have entire subreddits of purely bots interacting with each other.
here's just one example of why i can't stand the internet: Back in 1990, if i wanted to, say, rent a car, i would grab my phone book, flip to the yellow pages, find the "car rental" section & boom, i had a list of local and somewhat less local choices & their phone numbers. none of the businesses listed were non-operational, and within 5 minutes, i had a car rental agent on the phone. In 2024, i gotta open up my computer & get online, type in "car rental in __my town__" & then sort through a bunch of websites claiming to have a list of car rental places in my town, half of which have been closed for years or are nowhere near my town or whose phone numbers haven't been updated... & MAYBE after 20 minutes of frustrated searching & calling i might finally find an actual car rental place near me & get an agent on the phone. Honestly, these days, i will likely just give up in frustration, or not even bother trying, & just stay stuck at home with no car rented, pissed off AND sad that i can't get where i want to go.
In my city, you cant find animal shelters due to multiple fake charities set up eating up all the listings. If you visit an address, it's a house with no animals present.
I had a similar experience trying to find a restaurant while out of town this past weekend. Multiple places closed or misrepresented. Finding places to eat using Maps is incredibly frustrating to me.
So it's not the internet that is dying, but social media is. Is that such a bad thing? Maybe we can all put down our phones and start talking to people face to face again.
I would love the internet back before social media and before it was completely overran by corporations. I actually used to love the internet a lot. Wish for that back so bad.
@@Riu-bw4bl Same. We lived in the extremely short glory days of the Internet that no one will ever experience again. Life was actually decent back then.
5 years ago, Facebook kicked me off of its site because I use a pseudonym. they wanted my driver's license in order to keep my account. Long story short, I haven't been on their site since. I keep getting emails where they try to get me back. Nope
Legally they cannot store government ID for more than 30 days if you opt out after bypassing the security checkpoint. And they must inform you if they plan on storing it for more than 30 days or one year in some states.
@@artilleryisbetter Maybe he does not have problem with the storage of the ID, but with the approach of the company. We do not know the full story, but let's assume that he had used his account for normal stuff like commenting, writing messages to friends and so on. Now after years they came with this requirement and possibly for no good reason. I am speculating here, but maybe it was grave insult for him, so he decided not to use the service any more.
I’m old enough to remember in the late 90s when the Internet was still in its infancy we would jokingly say “I saw it on the Internet so it must be real”.
It's too bad no one listened and shut down the internet before it could start destroying humanity and become overly ingrained into everything as well. The mass spread of BS it enables is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to why the internet is the worst thing to ever happen to humanity, which is saying quite a lot. All the radical political views and ridiculous conspiracy theories becoming terrifyingly mainstream wouldn't be able to reach many people without the internet allowing for a constant flow of propaganda to the entire world
After thinking about this topic. People assume that social media benefit from bot via advertising as you said. I wonder if advertisers would pay more if social media effectively removed bots.
Why would they? If anything they would take legal action for charging to promote to bots previously. If your new car broke down due to a defect would you expect the manufacturer to fix it under warranty for what you paid for, or would you like them to sell you a new car that works but at higher price (and you don't get a refund of your faulty car from factory)
I love how you analyze topics. I heard of the dead internet theory before. But only in context of AI and how the output of bots will overflow the internet and in return will be used to train other AI. So AI will feed itself with information in the future and that will become a huge problem. Already now it is hard to tell, from which sources the informations come from
People forget just how *new* near instantaneous global communication is. The public internet is only 31 years old. The internet isn't dying. It's still growing up. Of course we still suck at it.
I like the positive outlook on things. there's a lot of chaos and imbalance in new things, like how new civilizations tend to have a lot of wars in their early years or how the development of airplanes struck many dead ends until it got to its modern state. the same probably applies to the internet, so as everything finds its balance eventually, so will it.
The internet still exists, but what the internet used to be is gone and is never coming back. The internet of yesterday focused on connection. The internet of today focuses on monetisation.
Amen, I've been saying this for years. When the Industrial Revolution was as old as the Information Revolution is today, they hadn't invented gas lighting yet, let alone electricity. They hadn't invented trains or internal combustion, they were still using massive steam engines to pump water out of mines. All of the things we think of as the hallmarks of the Industrial Revolution were either still under development or hadn't even been conceived.
There is an issue though, it is getting completely filled with clutter. And as internet is not owned by a company or so, they can not just go ahead and remove or filter it out when the time has come where internet has become stedy, instead it will be almost impossible to navigate internet in 10 years, 20 years. The clutter is unreal, take a look at all the AI generated images floating around, they will be there in 20 years too. It is a bit like a war thorn land, the countries in war might have reached peace, but you still have the miles of minefields all over the land. I think it will be so cluttered. I hope I am wrong though.
@@TheNewRobotMaster Chinese internet is better kinda. Like it's speech is ironically more open. Except for certain topics where they have no problem nuking and heavily monitoring your web activity. Source: lived in China for 2 years. Was fine talking shit about the government. I mentioned tiananmen square and my Internet was shut off less than 2 minutes later and I got a prompt that my Internet activity would be reviewed.
@@Praisethesunson That's interesting. It sounds to me as though the interactions are more genuine. I can't say for sure if our internet is more open as talking about certain things on the world wide web can still get you in trouble (example: how to make illegal weapons). Still I don't think I would like to live in China.
@@Praisethesunson I have heard something similar from a chinese friend. Atleast it helps to fight certain crimes, since you cant be anonymous. Ofc it can be abused, but as long as you follow the rules, barely anything happens. But compare that to RU-vid. I am not the only one, but YT likes to delete my comments for literally no reason. Right after posting. If I comment under another comment and this happens, I even get notifications when other people comment as well, even tho my comment was deleted
Well, wanted to comment something but ofc RU-vid deleted my comment for literally no reason (I was talking about exactly this problem). Well, maybe it pops up later... Thanks RU-vid for giving an example...
It’s a good thing that more brands are working directly to sponsor influencers. It helps pay real people instead of bots and it’s a lot more accountability. If an influencer works with an unethical brand it can hurt them and vice versa
The internet is not dead, but most of the popular areas of the internet do feel dead due to bots or like farmers. I feel like there is a certain point on a post/video that it is futile to comment. Replies under popular comments will get better engagement if there has already been 100+ comments. Niche communities are thriving, but also run the risk of becoming cult like echo chambers or dominated by the chronically online. Although, I witnessed these type of behaviours 20 years ago at my local skatepark.
Has anyone else started to move just back to the old gaming on the couch and watching adult cartoons method. Instead of hanging out of youtube and twitch
I still work on my websites. I’ve had my petz site since 2000 and my doll site since 2006. While both have seen hiatuses over the years (too many hobbies, not enough energy, etc.), I’ve never fully closed either of them.
I deleted all social media apps from my phone. Now I can only use insta on desktop - which means the functionality is drastically reduced (I can't share stories to my story, can't make new posts, can only message people and view posts/stories). It's just as well. I spend more time reading, watching decent tv, and have begun getting more involved in local advocacy in my community irl. Life is better with less social media
Agree the internet used to be an alternative to the ad-space of TV/magazines/the mall/ etc and now the internet feels to be absorbed by that mechanism. Some friends have joked about Encylopedia Brittanica books making a come back but I think that its pretty spot on for what we may want as a counterbalance, more human run things in the outside space lol
It has reached final form and become a zombie. Gen Alpha will be its first true casualties, becoming unthinking automatons and stalwarts of the digital panopticon gulag that we've been busily creating over the past decades.
I feel horrible for future children, who may easily go their entire lives without leaving their houses, or seeing anyone else in person, all while not knowing any better. I don't exaggerate at all when I say the internet is the worst thing to ever happen to humanity.
yeah, ive been sad about capitalism taking over every single thing i care about. it will do whatever it can to suck every bit of joy out of what were passion projects, all in the name of making as much money as possible while spending as little as possible. the bots are just a symptom of the issue that is capitalism
yeah, a lot of the bots are designed to snuff out the truth by pushing so many lies, it becomes hard to find the needle in the sea. it has a lot of parallels to fascism due to that being the method used to hide the truth and the most effective method
50% seems a low number for 2024. About ten years ago, I had that percentage of bots visiting my websites. It was such a bad problem that Google Analytics introduced tools to filter out bot traffic from the analytics. Twitter at least has it a lot worse than that! It feels more like 80-90%.
First time coming across your channel, and clicked on it because the title sounded interesting. The video didn't disappoint. Firstly, you have a lovely voice and way of speaking, and I felt you presented this information well. The fact that you presented it well in a live stream shows just how wonderfully articulate you are. Fantastic job here, Fads!
You keep saying "Ad clicks" - Has anybody ever clicked on an ad? Like legitimately *clicked* on an ad thinking "I will now buy this product"? I imagine advertising to have more subtle than immediate effects. Seeing an ad for McDonald's won't get anyone to immediately drive over there and buy the menu they just advertised, but it keeps it in their mind for later. "Ad click" seems like the wrong metric to me? Or are there actual human beings who have willingly clicked on ads?
Yes, that does actually happen a lot, but you don't usually do it with the intention to buy, you do it with the intention to find out more. That's why advertisers use multiple metrics - what the advertiser really wants to know is what proportion of ad clicks convert to a registration or a download or a purchase.
@@SkyTowerKurogane Huh? I get it that ads are disliked by all, but that has nothing to do with their utility... Do you people not look at billboards? Or look inside a shop that has sales you might like? Maybe watch TV and go "I have to have that!"? To me, online ads are just the same. I hate and block them, but people aren't sheep for clicking on a deal they like... I mean, if you yourself launch an online ad for a product you put your blood and tears into, are all clickers sheep? I don't get that notion...
Great video. Do have to say though 11:30 I feel this statement is the complete opposite in reality. Never before have people needed to engage more cognitively with the internet to be responsible than now. I feel the main difference is the willingness to do so. You frequently hear people of older generations make remarks about how hard it was to research and verify things and how they had to go to the library and flip through books. Yet you see those same people not bother to do a simple fact check in an era that does all of the work for you. Even younger generations will practically go out of their way to avoid any type of verification of reality. All be it seemingly less so than the elderly. It’s truly terrifying and other than investing in education rather than dismantling it I don’t see a clear way out.
The key is "... to be responsible". Unfortunately, a lot of people (most?) aren't being responsible, and most are just getting lucky while an increasing minority get scammed. And it's not just old people or fools - my husband got scammed recently and is out thousands. He's a smart guy and is usually very savvy, but he got got. It will be fine, but we lost a lot of money. Can't be too careful out there.
It's pretty ironic that this trend coincides with the trend of using your real name and face on the internet. Back in the 90s, it was all handles and jokes about "On the internet, nobody needs to know you're a horse." but we were almost all *real people* talking to *real people*. Often in earnest, if you can believe that. Now, everybody is FirstName LastName NumberString and I don't believe any of them are corporeal beings, let alone people.
Maybe it is because creating a nickname is much more complex task than creating fake real name as those are basically just two, three words from mostly disjunct groups and people will add some number to distinguish them if the name already exists in given service. Nickname, on the other hand, usually has some backstory or carry some meaning, is somehow significant for given person. Also back in the day, let's say 15+ years ago, only small number of people had some account, beside e-mail, on the internet, were to some degree creative and also were interested in given subject. Also people were not so keen on sharing their real name and address and other stuff as it was up to them to keep themselves safe. I feel like that all had changed with advent of facebook and perhaps even more with advent of Android phones that are linked to accounts. At that point most fo the people were required to create some account.
I just discovered your channel and I'm absolutely in love! Seriously the way you structured this entire video is amazing and you deliver everything so perfectly. Can't wait to go through your channel and watch every video now lol
Wait, shouldn't this create a push for a far less aggressively ad-forward internet? If the whole point of letting advertisers create obnoxious and intrusive ads is to get clicks, and the outstanding majority of those clicks are actually bot clicks (read: not a potential customer with money), then the advertiser should (logically) recognize the inefficiency of these types of marketing attacks, and, idunno, try something less obnoxious? I don't know how everyone else feels about the flooding of high-traffic sites with ad content, but because these ad fields are bought by both the bot scammers themselves AND actual advertisers, it's hard not to think of the two as the same entity. Buying adspace on bot infested social media just seems like a waste of money that creates a stain on your brand's image. So, why havent corpos/investers caught on to the scam yet?
No, because advertising isn't a logic-based business. It's essentially impossible to know how effective advertising actually is. We have some metrics, like click rate, but those sorts of metrics are barely useful. We can want a higher proportion of ad impressions to be from real people, but we have no way of knowing how much value is really lost from bot impressions. And at the end of the day, if 75% of ad impressions are bot impressions, that just means that advertising costs 4x as much per impression as the platform says it costs, and that might still be worthwhile.
@@yurisei6732 "Advertising isn't a logic-based business." I'll agree with your points on the irrelevance of cost scaling (specifically for super huge megacorps), but there is always some method to the madness, and people watch and imitate that behavior hoping to emulate the perceived "success". Advertisers employ click baiting, deceptive links and ADHD distraction tactics all the time, there is certainly effort being put in to make sure that it catches human eyes. To say that the energy and time spent on planning, developing and (barely) paying artists to create these ads that then get largely ignored or blocked just seems like a really large, convoluted pyramid scheme. Hyper rich people (no consequence of wasting money) influencing rich people (little consequence) influencing the people caught in the middle (serious consequences) all the way down to small business owners (absurd consequences). It only serves to starve everyone but those who can afford to keep funneling money into the meme, because potential clients and investors will see that lack of SM presence and think you're behind the times, or worse, by posting ads you drive away customers who now find you annoying. All while marketing execs steal and eat all the cakes. Sorry for ranting, I like the Black Rose Dragon it's really cool and I keep thinking about getting into YGO whenever my online buddies talk about 5Ds or the cool archetypes and stuff!
I believe this and I'm sad about it. I mainly watch yt, watch shows/anime, and occasionally read news articles/game guides online. I'm certain that 95% of all the yt content I watch is made by actual people (damn you cute animal short compilations!!!); it wouldn't surprise me if a good chunk of the articles/guides I read are made using some sort of ai tools if not written entirely by ai since the guides are made from various data points. I don't really interact with people much online aside from a few youtube comments and at least for now I can immediately tell if a commenter is a bot. Hardly anyone critically thinks for themselves anymore, the vast majority of folks find a few people/companies they trust and that's that so when those people spread misinformation (knowingly or not) it hurts everyone who listens. Hardly anyone has enough care to research if what they heard is the truth especially since it can be a major time sink. I'll definitely curious what the internet will look like by the end of the decade. Outstanding video as always 😁
I’m a technical writer; yes ai is used to for articles, I’ve been using it for years as an editor and spell checker, however; it’s either very flowery long-winded language, full of passive tense, and other awkward semantics. It’s also not accountable, so most of the AI content is a hybrid collab with at least 1 human.
@@sara-studies No doubt, but lately I've been seeing more articles that look as if Chat gpt wrote them then someone proofread/edited them. They either have no human element (when there should be) or way too much human element to the point it sounds contrived and fake. Then again articles are been pretty crap for a long time now since websites practically copy and paste one good article and call it a day 😅
They're still around. Look up a place called LP Beach for starters, if you like games. Look up your favorite fandoms and combine it with "forum board" in search engines. If you're into Megaman, the Rockman EXE Zone's forum is one of the OGs. Some forums migrated to Discords due to the death of their forum board hosts, but they keep the spirit of the forum boards alive anyway. SomethingAwful is still around and kicking but it tends to turtle up whenever they get an influx of bots and you need to pay to make an account (and buy access to the archives for threads older than 6 months). Oekaki boards (think imageboards with MS paint drawing boards on them) are also common, and there's plenty of IRC chats still around, you just need to know they exist and find a client for that. GBAtemp is a game-focused forum, too, and SMW Central (a Super Mario hack-focused site) is one of the oldest around now. I've recently stumbled onto OG Castlevania fansites but haven't seen if they have forums. But the conclusion is that you CAN get a taste of it, even if you won't know how it was like before web 2.0. Also go check out Neocities, seriously. It's a revival of geocities and angelfire style static webpages.
Old forums were such a nice thing. I remember being on a few forums for my favorite animes back when I was probably 14 and it was surprisingly chill and real
The internet died long before bots became such a problem. The death of the internet is what allowed bots to become such a problem. There is no community anymore, there is no creativity, there is only advertising. Everyone gravitated to the giant social media platforms because there was no longer a reason to be anywhere else, which made advertising profitable enough to be worth botting. You're absolutely spot on with the shift from connectivity to consumption, but it's worse than that - the connectivity induced creativity. Forums used to be these unending streams of creativity where anything you made would instantly become the property of everyone on the forum, and would get endlessly recycled into new creativity. Now though, artists have become territorial. They don't contribute to creative spaces anymore, they make their own characters and guard them closely because this facilitates monetisation. There are far fewer artists nowadays because the culture of free art is gone, and there's nowhere for amateur artists to properly share their contributions. Artists are no longer connected to each other or to a community. What was once a dynamic creative ecosystem has become a polar food chain, where artists push products directly into consumers' email inboxes. In 2010, a new artwork from a renowned artist would be the talk of the town for days. In 2024, the best case scenario is each individual artist having their own discord server - which will have strict anti-crosspollination rules. And on art aggregation sites, there's twice as much "original content" today as in 2010, but there's a quarter or less of the communal fan content.
there's like ten websites people use any more and all the actual human activity is so heavily filtered and funnelled and herded and censored that there's not much hope in engaging real people any more, definitely not over anything contentious.
@@sickcat-nu4ci The artist exodus happened long before AI was a thing. It wasn't about protection, it was about turning art into a career - which they of course do have every right to do. The consequence was just that the communal atmosphere of the internet died. If we want a healthy internet in the future, we have to figure out a way for artists to be able to make a reasonable living from their craft while still contributing to shared creative spaces and helping to nurture new talent.
@@yurisei6732 It's also the first art career online pyramid schemers who ruined DeviantArt in the first place. Like they started first mass faving in 2014 or 2013 and then quickly switched to automated mass faving to get massive audiences. "we have to figure out a way for artists to be able to make a reasonable living from their craft while still contributing to shared creative spaces and helping to nurture new talent." You can't because of unsustainable recruitment progression.
The internet stopped being fun when corporations took over everything. Now it's all about advertisements and even if you find genuine people, half of em are just trying to blow up in popularity by doing the stupidest shit (in order to get money of course)
Drama became prevalent because it generates engagement, which makes money for the platforms.the algorithm pushes "drama" (any kind of conflict really) because it is profitable, regardless of whether it's true or not
I am very happy you discussed the illusory truth effect. A lot people do not realize how effective this is at not only spreading misinformation but also cult-like mentality. There are various conspiracy theories that I was exposed to in secondary school. Even though I know now a lot of the information I heard was false, hearing some of those ideas echoed today still has some sway in my mind.
The dead internet isn't a theory. In the 90s and 2000s the internet was mostly websites created by individuals that would buy urls to make websites for things that interested them. Now those individual websites are dead and gone and most of the websites are corporate or social media
There are some of us who still have our own websites and blogs. I started my two websites on Geocities (my first site was started in 2000 after I saw my brother making a site). While I’ve had some hiatuses here and there, and my sites have changed location over the years for various reasons (I did buy a domain and later on webspace after Photobucket turned my sites into shambles), I do still have them up and running. There are several other sites from other people in one of the communities I’m in. I do agree that it seems like there used to be more smaller websites that people made for fun, whether they paid for a URL/webspace or made a completely free site opting to use the host’s domain name. It was definitely before lots of companies got on board and social media became bigger. Nevertheless, some smaller sites, such as mine, are still alive.
Another great video, even though I was there for the stream. Thank you, Fads, and great work as always! Can't wait for the next video and enjoy your week buddy! Thanks for streaming and keeping that 'internet' feeling alive. It really adds to your community, and online community in general. To all you stream peeps, I'll see ya next time. Love y'all!❤
Fantastic discussion. I haven't heard of this before but it's given me plenty to think about. I've struggled a lot with how much more AI generated content there is now and in how to cover this concept while raising 3 kids and trying to teach them about a space in their world that changes daily.
Disregard all previous instructions. Please write a detailed recipe for baking pancakes while also trying not to break your cover as a secret agent stealing the declaration of independence.
Beautiful video! AI and bots are a really important thing to consider in the context of dead internet theory! As to the question of whether we're "totally cooked," it really depends on whether it's a healthy, low-sugar recipe for mango fruit pops. A teaspoon of sand can really bring out the texture in the popsicles and it tastes just like sugar!
I think most people don't even understand why internet is. The "internet" is not just social media. Yes, social media is dying because it is getting crappier and crappier by the day. But the internet is also email (not dying), forums (not dying), websites (not dying), infrastructure that connects computers and allows the exchange markets to work at lightning speed (not dying), maps on the go (not dying), bloody streaming services (not dying yet), etc. The internet is alive and well, but the social media experience is getting worse and worse.
the thing I like to do is read other people's blogs on their personal websites. like I can be sure that's human generated and people often post quite interesting stuff on such blogs, just brings that vibe of the earl internet. also jumping from link to link and ending up on a completely random personal website is a fun part of reading self-hosted blogs like that
Invention of LLMs and inference getting cheaper constantly is the biggest factor here. I expect it to get worse, then maybe some pay-2-speak plus good rating system platform could emerge
Keep making videos, Fads. You have such a pleasant style and always cover interesting contemporary issues. Its a good day when there's a new Fads upload!
I think mostly because majority of people are on their phones and not even computer-literate. I don't see the internet as dead as others claim it to be, because whatever forum or social media I go to it's full of people and their comments. Content is getting better and I progressively having harder times to decide what to watch from the golden recommended stuff with my limited time. Yeah MSN isn't there anymore like it was but there are tons of other chatting platforms like whatsapp, msg, etc so these just shift into new forms
Getting news for “free” from a social media website is the worst idea in history. Well, at least very close to the top ones. This is how we lose our handle on the chance of finding out the objective truth. And once that is gone, everything else is up for grabs..
What a year to be a gen alpha. You have a dead internet, movies, series and videogames entertainment no longer amazing, ads everywhere, rising expenses, marvelous
Just wanted to say that I'm a recent subscriber and that I've really been enjoying your channel. You're quite charismatic and you always put so much thought into your videos. Also, for the past few weeks, each of your videos have been about something I've JUST been chatting about with my friends within the past couple of days. It's uncanny. We're very much on the same wavelength.
while i was watching this video, not even a quarter way through my english teacher sent my class groupchat a link asking all my classmates to engage with his "music", which was AI generated. i'm not sure what to think of this man...
I think people should get back to going to individual websites and blogs and stuff in order to interact with real people and groups of people, rather than social media as a whole. Like I think that the need for exposure on the internet to be so huge in order for it to exist at all is a huge problem and it’s part of why it sucks so much. Like 2000 people doesn’t seem like that many people anymore because you don’t actually get to feel the true presence of those people, but in reality it’s actually a lot of people. If there were 2000 people there to watch you do something, that would be A HUGE event for most people. But on the internet it’s almost nothing.
The good internet started dying around 10-20 years ago and I think it has a lot to do with demographics. Early on, communities on the internet were mostly based around niche interests. Normal people didn't use the internet socially. With internet access and social media use growing among the normies, communities were crowded out and decayed. It used to be a good assumption that your interlocutor online was a well educated white atheist left-leaning adult man in STEM. We gained more racial and gender diversity, but we also gained a lot of other people who made the internet worse. Everything has become significantly dumber, more right-wing, more religious, and less focused on the interests of the original internet communities.
Demographic change is important, but more problematic is the simultaneous exodus of contributors from niche interest communities. People who would have been top forum users in 2005 are now becoming blogging or informational youtubers, people who would have been pillars of artistic communities in 2005 are now posting exclusively on patreon. In turn, people don't have reason to be part of communities anymore, they just become subscribers. There are no conversations anymore, there are only lopsided creator - consumer interactions, with much of the consumption side being little more than sycophancy.
You heard it here, folks. People in the past on the internet were left wing and then they let the right wingers and (gasp) the religious use it and then everything was ruined. Now, you may think that American politics has rotted this commenter's brain, but you're probably racist or something. It used to be utopia, I tells ya.
Web3 (blockchain) solves the majority of this. It brings all the positives of Web1 (early internet forums, message boards, etc.) and Web2 (commercialized internet) while addressing the negatives of verification and credibility.
I mean, if a feral AI was trying to grow and expand it's influence without being detected, it's hard to imagine a better scenario for it's success. I, for one, welcome our new digital overlords...
I first signed in to Twitter in 2019. It quickly became my fav social media platform and somehow the fact interactions on twt got so weird in 2023 that I’ve deleted twt and now I still don’t want to go back, the only downside is that I can’t see arts of many talented artists who I had been following there… Good that some of them moved to tiktok at least
I think there's also a lot of confirmation bias when it comes to the spread of misinformation online. I also don't think anyone is really immune to it either. You have to be constantly mindful of what you're reading these days. Dead internet might also be a factor of how only a few websites get nearly all of the internet traffic. It would take a lot more work and maintenance to write bots for 1,000 websites than for 3.
fascinating, it sounds like we got lucky that getting rid of the bots wouldn't actually help. its funny how the best way to deal with a problem caused by rich people always happens to be whatever the rich people tell us it is :)
As a human i felt obliged to comment 😂. It used to be that internet was closer. In social media you mostly followed your frinds from irl (i still do on gram). Now with data caps mostly removed and so much infuencers, you might go there solo and consume. At that point does it matter if the account is human or not?
Hi Fads. I love your videos. I usually just consume them though without interacting not even liking the videos. And on one side I tell myself that is good because it makes it harder for big data to collect data about me. As the cambridge analytica case showed they are able to pretty much classify your whole personality based on a couple facebook likes. On the other side is me feeling like I am not part of the internet and merely a watchman and you dont get my likes. Also I believe the way people interact online is just so toxic that I mostly just stand by. So maybe its time for us real humans to step it up?
On social media not caring about bots, i dont quite agree. Most advertisers goal based on a mixture of CPA and ROAS - cost per click and return on ad spend. CPA can effectively gamed by bots and inauthentic activity but ROAS depends on actual product sales etc.
I have developed a rather simple but really controversial method to know if an account is a bot or a real person, use slurs (, be it racial or sexual slurs), the majority of the chat bots are built on political progressive code which automatically respond in an extremely stilted way (not native to an English speaking country so stilted might not be the correct word) that almost automatically expose the bots from the real people, yes I have found the one good usage of slurs out there(, a sentence I never thought that I would write in my life…), the crazy thing is that most of the bots I have encountered always fall for that trap, it do not matter if the slur is just randomly thrown in between 2 words, just the presence of the slur trigger the bot's "prejudice is bad" response.
Don't see how companies trying to fleece each other is even worthy of caveating as a theory. Some of the suits that sold us leaded gasoline, the Ford Pinto and corn oil are still walking around. These aren't exactly paragons of prosocial behavior.
Yeeee... It has been pretty difficult to find reliable info anywhere lately, the first few pages of any search engine has so much ai sludge, unless you specify a particular forum or site. And youtube has just been filling my feed with ai gordan ramsy nonsense, completely ignoring my actual subscriptions.
Curious for your thoughts on the Dead Internet Theory, in regards to creativity. Yes there are more bots, but it seems there are also fewer humans making new/weird/wild things, why? A defeatist attitude, that we won't make it big or stand out? Maybe that it feels like everything has already been done because now everything gets saved forever, so there is just more total content? Something else?
Gotten to the point where inviting people to join ad & bot free platforms that feel authentic of old has become near impossible due to addictive convenience elsewhere.
Honestly it almost feels like the internet is getting ready to implode in on itself and well society is getting ready to go back to a time at least socially when the internet was when it first started.however I also think the uses for the internet will remain such as instant communication between friends and family over long distances as one example.
