I'm torn over this video. It has brilliant A02 content and outlines everything mentioned in the title but there's no explanation! Direct quotes of (a few) of the instances that annoyed me about this video '[insert quote]' ; 'has changed before it... erm has changed before it (he's wondering what he wrote because it doesn't make sense) has now changed erm… you know, before this really important dramatic event (breezes past it, ignoring what he is saying is wrong) ; 'Soraya's story which is a bit meh' (WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? First there is no explanation to that 'comment' but you say it contrasts to Amir. How? This is the same throughout. Comments with seemingly no explanation or apparent 'link'). Can I also say anther really important thing for all those of you who are using this? You might want to fact-check some of the things this guy says. Just two because there is so many and I'm only half way through. 5:20 'change in voice...after the rape we only get the rape with very little emotion'. I know this is simply incorrect because it is SO emotional after the rape my teacher got us to write a whole essay on it. 9:21 'pathetic fallacy-clouds of guilt over Amir' in the first page, opening chapter. I thought 'that's interesting' *goes to book* literally says 'The early-afternoon sun sparkled on the water'. Zero reference to clouds. I wouldn't have such a problem over these things if your channel wasn't called 'A level Revision', which suggests it should be a credible resource for students. For these 'comments' and incorrect details to be in your video, when clearly a lot of people come here to learn information that they will put in exams, it's not really right. Don't let this stop anyone watching. I'm just saying that If you do, take things with a pinch of salt.
Great video, only thing is that you just read out the notes, I mean they were great notes and all. But you didn’t at all explain things further than the notes itself and that’s the only problem
