The Last Crusade | Battle of Varna 1444 | Ottomans vs Crusaders - Historical Cinematic 

Dear content creator! Why did you use knight arours from the Crusader era of the Holy land? The usage these 13th century armours is very anchronostic in the mid 15th century.

Croatian,Bosnian???

Dear Mr. Tamas. Hungary and Hungari are two different words that name two different entities, in this case denoting only one geographical area in Central Europe. As you state, the Kingdom of Hungary was established in the year 1000, and this name was mentioned until 1844, when the Hungarian lords renamed it the Kingdom of Hungary. You incorrectly state that many nationalities grew up in it. Only one nationality grew up, namely the Hungarian nationality. Slovaks, Croats, Romanians were here a long time ago. Even Hungary itself was built on the foundations of Great Moravia. Saint Stephen would never have been recognized as king by the Pope if he had not been baptized and a bishopric had not been created in the center of Great Moravia. This bishopric was founded by the preachers Cyril and Methodius. It is a big mistake and a big ignorance if maps, documents and dictionaries mention "the Kingdom of Hungary", while the word Hungary is also translated as Hungarian and also as Hungary in English documents. It only shows a great ignorance of the history of this part of Europe. Have a nice day.

Hola que tal, soy mecenas de izuru el creador del mod hd para los helenos en el rome 2, actualmente queremos contactarte para darte acceso anticipado al mod en unos días, solo que tu enlace a discord no me abre.

@@stefansvelka7219 This is what a comment looks like from someone, who learned history from a "romanian" history book !😵‍💫

Until Christians decided they had had enough of the Islamic BS. Once Christians defeated the Ottomans they build the greatest countries in the history of mankind.

На 4,5 века , до 1922года .

i am respect for this comments

I thank you without prejudice and honesty comment 👍

🇹🇷 teşekkürler polonyalı dostum

En sevdiğim padişahlardan birisi istanbul un fethinin yolunu 2 haçlı ordusunu Varna ve Kosova’da yok ederek açmıştır. Sözlerini çiğneyen haçlıların kelleside savaş sahasında mızraklara geçirilerek ihanetleri cezalandırılmıştır.

I guess because it has more to do with the Hungarian king being a complete retard.

It's totally lie. Sultan Mehmed was brave and oppositely he wants to lead the army but Grand Vizier Çandarlı Halil Pasha refuses and makes a coup against Mehmed, recalls the Sultan Murat back. Sultan Murad leads the army and defeat the enemy. But Mehmed never forget that coup. (Buçuktepe rebellion) Because he was dethroned, his pride against military, bureaucracy was humiliated. So he had to do a thing the history never forget, the thing to proove himself to everybody. That's where Conquering the Constantinople idea came from. He started make the plans from dethroned time to his second reign time. He read, calculated (he is the designer of the famous Shahi (Şahi) canons). But Çandarlı knew that. From the idea of conquest plan he resist it. Because he knew Sultan Mehmed didn't forget, if he take the city and of course his reputation, nobody can question his autority... Mehmed knew the responsibilties. If he fails; his autority, his reputation and his reign will be ended. Maybe after the failed siege Byzantine Empire will send Şehzade Orhan to start a rebellion. That's why he resisted for take the city. After 59 days of siege city has fallen. With that Çandarlı knew his time is ended. Now Sultan Mehmed took a name: "Fatih" (The Conqueror) But not just a name... Mehmed took his reputation, pride and authority back...With no question... First thing after Conquest was imprisoning of Çandarlı Halil Pasha. 2 days after conquest June 1, 1453 ; Çandarlı was imprisoned. 40 days in prison and then Mehmed ordered to execute of him. That was the first execution of a Grand Vizier in Ottoman Empire... Now that's the history. You see, Mehmed is hunger to succession. Now, you think he could write that letter? :)

Even Turkish historians say that this is lie. They say that Mehmed II wanted to go to war at the lead the armies

​@@AugustusIV Quite brave for 12 year old😅.

Tamam

Tamam

Not by 1444 maybe. But after Ottoman expansion into the Middle East, Arab auxiliaries were very common, especially in wars against the Safavids and later dynasties that ruled Iran. In fact by the 17th century the Ottomans started using Egyptian troops, both ethnic Arabs and Mamluks, in European theaters too and they were remarkably successful.

Arab mercenaries

@@hectortroy8671 With the 1834 military reforms, Arabs started to be recruited into the imperial armies.

awesome. I hope you enjoyed it!

Varna beatiful City now for holiday 😂

Is it possible to visit the battlefield?

bu tarafsız anlatımsa taraflısı nasıl olurdu acaba adam nerdeyse😂🤣 şansla kazandı turkler diyecek

Hilal taktiği yemişler haberleri yok😊

😂😂 Adam baştan sona saçmalamış, yesinler böyle tarafsız anlatımı

Tarehin bilmediğin ne kadar belli.

Thanks a ton!

thats all lie...

Thanks

Thanks a ton!

I didn't understand your comment. In your opinion, is the Battle of Varna non-historical?

Amin.

لا رأيت أيا مشاكل

قوة الله عزوجل الله يمود المسلمين بنصر دايمن

Typically only knights and mercenaries could afford this kind of expensive armour. Most European footsoldiers were not well armoured, and in big battles like this were often led by commanders of varying loyalty and different ethnic origins, all looking for their own glory. Conversely, Ottoman armies were more disciplined, because the Ottoman state organised the military in a much more centralised fashion. This meant that Ottomans often enjoyed more morale and quicker strategic and tactical thinking. Ottomans also typically made use of defensive earthworks, as well as firearms, polearms and defensive formations. In many cases, mounted Turkish archers wearing light armour were able to lure and outrun disorganised knights, pulling European cavalry into suicidal charges against defences that were already prepared for them, and sending their own light horsemen (usually Deli or Akıncı horsemen, ) to flank the enemy and attack their archers, crossbowmen, and baggage trains, and lead charges against enemy soldiers who were already engaged and could not brace their ranks against the quick and skilful deli horsemen. These horsemen were instrumental to other elements of warfare waged by the Ottomans, such as razing crops, harassing enemy armies on the move, performing reconnaissance, and chasing down fleeing, broken enemy formations. Lightly armoured and armed irregular soldiers called Azap were often also used to harass and whittle down European defences, often wielding bows, javelins and slings. They would attempt to disrupt, demoralise and distract the front line of enemy soldiers. But probably the biggest part of Ottoman success was due to their highly disciplined, arquebus-wielding Janissaries. The Janissaries often were high in morale, and were the most firm line in the Ottoman tactics. These firearm wielding-soldiers were employed at Mohacs, and fired in alternating volleys by the fresh Janissaries, and were able to shatter the morale of the disorganised European forces, cutting down knights through their armour. Greetings and good wishes from a Greek 😁

the power of imaan is enough

@@amaanwarsiii I’m Muslim but Turks ruled many empires before becoming Muslims

Sipahi cavalry were almost as heavily armoured as Europeans knights , ad to that better tactics , more discipline and more unity of command

most of cavalry*

The son of King Jogaila from Lithuania

Yes indeed, he was a Polish king as well. Yes, Hunyadi's army included some Polish elements, mainly the kings bodyguards, namely 500 Polish knights.

Again just some east european nations helped Hunyadis hungarian army, like polish, croatians , romanians. The richer west european countries did not send any help. More than that the seaman of Genova for money transferred the turkish to the back of the christians, like this helping their victory.

@@istvancsizmadia5975 True :(

Но это скорее всего неправда.

А что сученый жопв жжет😅

​@@user-oy9xq4co8tAccording to Ottoman sources, your army was much larger in this war. According to the research of today's historians, the population of the Crusader army was 55,000 and the population of the Ottoman army was 40,000. Don't get me wrong, but no one would march against the Ottomans with 20,000 soldiers. Anyone who believes this is an idiot.

Western video, they'll always make Ottomans look like they lost 10x more 😂

@@TheSilentStrikez he literally said between 8k or 20k, not 10x more than christian losses. stop sniffing glue

Many thanks!

Yarabbi Şükür

​​@@aleminkral5293 1912/13, your ancestors were totally defeated and expelled from the Balkans by the Christian Balkan allies. Glory to our Lord ! My grandfather fought at Chataldja, 20 km from Istanbul, when your Sultan evacuated his Pallaces and numerous concubines and eunuchs from his capital

​@danchokonstantinov6735 lol u mean the whole world aganst the Turks 😉 Not even that made u win.. We had traitors in the army disguise as Türk was just a fake Turks That's the only reason u win .. Even today u can't win the Turks Stop looking in the giant mirror boy ..

​@@danchokonstantinov6735puuhahhaa I can se u are a Greek 😉 Didn't u was under the Turks for 550 years ? Wasn't the greece the Türks conquered First bcuz u was no match then or today ..😂

​@@danchokonstantinov6735and my grandfather Molla mahmud fought aganst greeks And beat them Not only that bring a orfan greek girl from the war .. 😅

Epic History TV ve Kings and Generals gibi kanallar varken izlediğin en iyi tarih videosu nasıl bu olabilir ki

@@aliosman0 onlarıda izliyorum ama bu anlatım hoşuma gitti, hatta şuan HITRUE diye 955 aboneli bir kanalın Niğbolu savaşını izliyorum :D

Thank you very much!

Glad you liked it!

Ottomans and serbs 😂

Ottoman v crusaders.

​@@djocharablaikan8601to je jedno te isto

Turks has the largest army and populations at the time also so everywhere they rule on there might

@@Salchooq You know nothing. Look at all Turkish history

Thanks 👍

is not how he was he made up , check the battle of varna

Thanks

You're welcome!

Sesini kes.HUNYADI gelijör.😂

Nope the British Empire was the biggest Empire

@@mano6706 :) çanakkale (dardanel) :) come to... anyway now time frend

@@cuneytmatur.areuready8279 sorry i don't understand....

@@mano6706 Britain only colonized uncivilized and weak lands, and Ottomans overthrew powerful empires

Glad you enjoyed!

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you

Thank you kindly!

Glad you enjoyed

Thank you

Thank you so much 😀

@sabirekalabic like what

Thanks

Thank you! Cheers!

Başı kesildi ve yaptığı anlaşmaya ihanet ettiği için bir tarafa yapılan anlaşmanın nüshası karşısına gelecek şekilde kellesi mızraklara geçirildi. Biz türkler sözümüz senettir ihaneti cezasız komayız.

Thank you! Cheers!

Thank you!

Glad you enjoyed it

Together with Skenderbeg ( Gjergj Kastrioti )

Hunyadi is also from aisa. From Hun Turks. From Attila.

Yes but not strong like Albanian kastrioti huniady lost many battles while skanderbeu lost none

Welcome!

Glad you enjoyed it

Arabs do not know how to fight. There are no Arabs. The Ottoman army is a professional army. Not a dry crowd of peasants.

Yoktu zaten anlatıcı türkler yalnız değildi demeye çalışıyor. Ama avrupanın yarısına karşı tek başınaydık ve ginede kazandık.

koji nije govorio albanski

​@@tihomirilic1662 In what language did he speak to his albanian troops? In your picka's mamas language ? Illiterare serb!

lots of fake in this video

Bulgaristan gecmistede ulke degildi simdide degil. Avrupanin turklere karsi kullandigi tampon bolgedir. Dogru vakti geldiginde 2 gunluk isi vardir. Ayni sekilde yunanistanda oyledir, ermenistanda oyledir. Bunlari sizlerde iyi biliyorsunuz. Turkler ile savasmak yerine arkadas olmaniz daha faydali olacaktir. Unutmayin ki tarih tekrardan ibarettir. Yuzyillar boyunca dilinize ve dininize karismadan turk bayragi altinda yasadiniz. Fakat bizim en gucsuz zamanimizda bizi vurdunuz! Elinize ne gecti? Bugun halen sefil haldesiniz. Biz bunlari unutmayiz ama kafayada takmayiz. Zamani gelir geregi yapilir.

Thanks

Glad you enjoyed it

worst is, they were brainwashed christians too.... ottomans were savages.

Seni neden heryerde goruyorum bro

Janissaries have won also the Battle of Nicopolis, in 1396, where the Crusaders made a similar mistake.

Sultan* not emperor

Cool, thanks

Thanks!

you welcome bro

Glad you enjoyed it!

Çantada falan değildi, TAKTİK OLARAK türkler geri çekildi, DAĞILMIŞ görüntüsü verip tuzağa çektiler kralı , ODA YEDİ .SALDIRDI VE SONU GELDİ.olan BUDUR.

Glad you enjoyed it

Янычары, в основном были платными войсками, никаких хрестьян там не было, все кто про это пишет это чушь . Хрестьяни тоже могли создать себе такие войска . У турков своих хватало воинов ... .

Thanks for the support! I’m counting on you :)

@@AdituLaudisMMXXI keep making such informative videos

Beğenmiş bir de en çok ona güldüm 🤣😅

No he did not. Eastern Europe was under attack and they fought Turkey for the next several hundred years until they they left most of these countries.

​@@gyozopHungarians actuelly also a Turkish race .. Huns name hungarian aka hun s .. But they become Christians before Islam came.. And also the war mohac the magnificent Sulaiman win it so easily..

@@KehKah-en1xp Yes we are Huns and Turkic. We like Turcs, but we had to fight the Ottomans they were not invited. Did you learn about the second battle of Mohacs, the final defeat of Turkey in Hungary? It was a long war and even Suleiman himself did not survive his next visit to Hungary.

@@gyozop its a war .. İn war none get invited.. If u didnt want war theb u should act a war .. Dont be a cry babe now bcux u lost.. Ok bra ???.????

@@KehKah-en1xp Exactly. Don.'t cry that YOU lost.

were

(Talking bout islamic calendar)

😅😅😅

If Europe says okay, Turkey will not enter. POLITICS, Turkey, Anatolian lands are very rich, there is no fair sharing, that is why there is a problem in some parts, if there is fair management and distribution, Turkey would be in the top five in economy.

Awesome! Thank you!

Glad you enjoyed the video! Thanks for watching.

1396 in the Battle of Nicopolis whole Europe came to the battlefield with 100.000 Soldiers but still were defeated by the Ottoman Turks (in this time the Turks were even not united as one nation and country. Anatolia was divided in many Turkish Emirates...). Like in the Battle of Varna, The Ottoman Turks defeated many times superiour European Christian armies. If the Turks could be united much earlier as one nation and one countr/empire the history would be maybe different...The Ottomans lost important years to unite the Turks. Hungarians and Polish were already united nations.

@@FreeMan-ev3jh ქართველმა მეფემ დავით აღმაშენებელმა 1121 წელს სისხლში აბანავა 46 ათასიანი ჯარით 400 000 თურქ სელჯუკები ეს ბრძოლა იყო დიდგორის ომად ცნობილი ასევე თამარ მეფემ დაამარცხა ბასიანში

The battle was winnable, or would have ended in a stalemate if command had depended only on Hunyadi. Turkish expansion could have been halted. Constantinople could have survived a little longer, and the personal union of the Hungarian and Polish kingdoms could have been strengthened. Unfortunately, the bravado of the young king ended in disaster. The Jagiellonian dynasty didn't bring fortune to Hungary.

​@@FreeMan-ev3jhnos émirat iş beliquat beylik

​@@FreeMan-ev3jhavec des" Si"