The Lord of the Rings Ultimate Trilogy Trailer 2012 HD 

I love Star Wars but yeah, this trilogy was just so masterfully done.

The story of the lotr is far superior to star wars. It has a deeper meaning, better characters, and a way more developed world. You can't even compare another trilogy to the lotr.

my favorite is the dark knight trilogy but this is my second favorite trilogy

Canaan B The Dark knight is good but I slightly prefer LOTR, but the dark knight is nothing short of a masterpiece

there is no comperison, LOTR is faaaar better

MimM 725 eowyns song was ....

Jep

@@pablo_escanor1681 What

@@bartekszubert3083 eowyns song at theodreds funeral was …

@@pablo_escanor1681 Good or bad

+Daniel Goeken hate star wars - overrated piece of ***** hahah (cmon Lord of the rings is a definition of art)

im sorry that you think you're sorry for me hahaha, seen every episode for more then 3 times still Lotr ftw

17 oscars dude, you cant say that's overrated. Based on a great novels. There's always a difference between popular and great.

yeah im sorry. To say that i "hate" star wars would be a lie. Everyone has their own taste and opinion :)

+Lostintime Star Wars Episode 1/2 and 3 :(. I hope that you talk about 4/5 and 6 and yes for me it is a tie.

A day may come, when man's love for lord of the rings fades... BUT IT IS NO THIS DAY.

An hour of wolves and shattered sheilds when a man's love for the lord of the rings comes crashing down..BUT IT IS NOT THIS DAY!!!

@@erideb3864 This day we love, MEN OF THE WEST

@@vednair3913 raises sword in the air

@@erideb3864 hahaha

The equal of The Godfather Trilogy in fantasy. I wonder how the masterpiece-trilogy of horror will look like.

Arthaslepeureux Hmm..the thought makes me wonder too..

***** Definitely!! I'm still waiting for THE SILMARILLION and CHILDREN OF HURIN production announcement..

judy rioflorido correction .... THE most amazing masterpiece ever created in the history of cinema

+judy rioflorido SILMARILLIONNNNNNN!!!!!!

I remember seeing the first one on iMax the second time around. It was such an experience that I'll never forget. The first time I saw I had no idea that JRR Tolkien or The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings even existed but thanks to an old friend of mine he took me to see it I don't think I even blinked because I was into that much.

I'm sure there are/will be theatres that screen them again

Me too. Watching them when I was around 13 years old. What a feeling. It's not like when I watch most films now that I don't care too much. That back then was like ... the war we had to win! Frodo had to achieve it or I would end up devastated after sucha a journey and having believed un the magic of that world on screen. I lived them intensely, and in a more spoiler free world without social media, which helped too.

Now I have that feelings , watching them first time on Netflix

Yeeah?

Without watching them, the movies, how could you ;).

+Jacob Hando I hope you've seen them by now! Without a doubt the best fantasy films out there.

Waleed Khan Dude these are and have been my favourite films since I first saw fellowship in 2011! I have spent well over 120 hours watching the Middle earth films they are a cinematic achievement

Jacob Hando Lol good! I thought you meant that you hadn't seen them. I saw them in 2012 I think, better late than never. Masterpieces.

Correction, the greatest movies ever made.

agree

I agree. As much as I love game of thrones I think lord of the rings is vastly superior

Redpanda 789 Game of Thrones is amazing but it's a long haul.

Dylan Stump Thrones is a more mature version of LOTR.

Game of Thrones is a TV show... Though, yeah. I'd argue LOTR is the better one (GoT's still really great, tho).

Dylan Stump You can't say "Putting all Middle Earth movies together they've made nearly $6 billion. Don't think any trilogy can top that". Because that is 6 movies, i.e *not* a trilogy.

Yeeah?

I probably won’t be able to change your mind, but I’m just gonna say I prefer the original Star Wars trilogy. Lord of the rings is definitely better, I just hold Star Wars closer to my heart.

Judy Rioflorido me too!

I heard Amazon Prime was making a "Lord Of The Rings" TV series, so your beliefs may be correct.

@Dovahkiin no you

@Dovahkiin fuck you

@Dovahkiin i am sorry.

@KillerDragon chill

+Nestir Gomez Because of how greedy Warner Bros. are. They didn't let Peter do his job how he wanted.

Tibori Andrei TBF Lord of the rings trilogy really set the bar high and honestly the hobbit is more kid friendly and goofy than LoTR's

Too much CGI

Because LOTR was a trailblazer: So much in it had never been done before, like huge epic fantasy (until then fantasy films were seen as box office poison), massive scale battles, tonnes of CGI and practical effects, motion captured characters, etc. It set the bar for high fantasy films that came after and big epic CG-heavy fantasy films became the norm, so by the time the Hobbit trilogy came around, it didn't have the same impact. Among all the other big epic sprawling fantasy films, it wasn't a trailblazer or a standout, it was just... another fantasy film.

Rushed production, which is responsible for the majority of the problems in the series, including the overuse of CGI.

I do...

so go to mordor!

I did.....

LOL NO😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😃

Dimitri Rodriguez Are we talking Game of thrones the TV Show or A song of ice and fire the book franchise. Although a song of Ice and fire is incredibly in depth and full of content, I would not call it better than lord of the rings. Far from it actually. For one, Lord of the rings never in my opinion dragged on it's plot, it covered it's points and moved on. ASOIAF however dragged on and on without much going on. Danaerys chapters were a prime example, or Sansa chapters. Secondly every character had an important role to play that drove the story and never felt like they were forced in Lord of the rings, even merry and pippin who are such secondary characters in the first book play a huge role in the next two books, but in ASOIAF, Danaerys is still in Mereen for two whole books and hardly accomplishes anything. Sansa and Catalyn were terribly written characters who only further the stereotype that women characters in fiction are helpless and complete fuckups. Sansa gets abused by Joffrey for two books, then when we think she's actually going to stand up for herself or actually do something, she's instead captured by Little finger, and manipulated and in the show she is also captured by Ramsey and raped and abused. Lord also doesn't have what ASOIAF has in an abundance and that is killing off major characters. Now I know this builds the main theme of the story that no character is safe from death, Ned, Robb Stark, and even Jon Snow, thought to be the main hero and it's what draws fans in to this story, because it is a bold approach that no author has dared to try, however it at the same time, is one of the series biggest problems. Yes it was an exciting surprise in the first book when ned dies, no one expected it, but when an Author uses it too much, it can be very off putting for the reader. After the third or fourth of your favorite character dies, like Ned or Robb or Jon, who do you have left to root for? Danaerys? Sansa? At the end of the story, whether they admit it or not, the reader wants the Heroes to win, they want a satisfying ending, something I fear GRRM won't deliver. I fear he will write himself in a corner and try for a weak cop out like Bran greenseeing back in time and warning everyone of the war. And lastly I come to my final reason why Lord is far superior to Gane of thrones or a song of Ice and fire. It has an ending. I have read all of the game of thrones books and seen all the episodes only quite recently. Now the first book A Game of Thrones was released in 1996, the next two books a Clash of kings (1998) and a Storm of Swords (2000) were published combined 4 years later. Now that's not bad considering the length and depth of content for these books, so I actually commend Martin for the length of time. The next book a Feat for Crows (2005) took Martin 5 years to publish, but again with the depth of content and the length, it's hard to get angry about this to the Author. However, this is where the rest goes down hill. The last book so far took Martin 6 years to publish, a Dance with Dragons (2011). That amount of time actually upset fans because they felt Martin was busy with his other publications and not devoting his time on the series which is true. He wrote a comic book for Marvel and published other short stories on the side related and not related to the series and the production of Game of the the TV series began in 2010 which Martin was heavily invested in. Finally A dance with dragons was published and fans were thrilled with the release. Although it did little to move the Mereen Dany plot forward, it did however move the north plot forward with Jon snow and the nights watch as well as Stannis with the looming battle for Winterfell. However still left fans wanting more. Now it is 2017, and the next book scheduled the Winds of Winter doesn't have a release date, and Martin claims is only a third the way done. Over ten years of this series publication's history and there seems to be no end in sight. With the Author pushing 69 years of age, and the series is still scheduled for two more books before the conclusion. The winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring. How long do you think the Author will want to write an extensive fantasy novel packed full of content and length while progressing into his 70s. The last book alone A dance of Dragons contained over a thousand pages. The Winds of Winter Martin has boasted will be even longer and the worst part of it all, Martin has gone on record stating if he were to die before the completion of his series, he will refuse any other author from completing the story saying it is his creation and it should die with him. Back to Lord of the Rings. The author JR Tolken wrote and left extensive letters and notes to his wife and son and publisher to make absolutely sure his work would be published after he died which is what happened such as the simmilarion and the unfinished tales. The combined publication of the Lord of the rings was two years. Lord of the rings is better.

Not even on the same plane. Game of Thrones is a mosquito on LOTR's dick.

LotR GoT B A L A N C E

I watched a few episodes of GoT and it was boring as fuck. GoT is nothing compared to Lotr

Gerrit ikr that would be an insult towards lotr

Gerrit It takes frodo a couple years to destroy the ring

Frodo leaves Hobbiton on September 23 of TA (Third Age) 3018. November 1 of TA 3019 is when they return to Bag End. The Trip to the Grey Havens comes about a year later.

Gerrit Since LOTR is far more superior right

No they didn't. They set off from Rivendell.

And yet there are still a few stupid people that say that the Hobbit is better...

The only reason people thought that Hobbit wasn't THAT good, was because of Lord of the Rings. The standards were set up WAAAYY too high.

HipsterSheep That's true.

You can’t definitly compare Hobbit and LOTR becouse Hobbit is only one book (harder to do a trilogy).

Not to mention that Frodo is a much better character in the books.

don't forget bombadil

His problems weren't with the movies per se. Christopher Tolkien is a purist. He hated the way characters were changed in the movies and how many layered characters in the books became cardboard cutouts in the movies. Also considering how much money the movies made, the Tolkien estate got almost nothing. I think they had to resort to fighting a court case to get their dues.Needless to say, as long as the books are not in the public domain, I doubt we will get any more movies.

read it

What I meant was some sort of series, not a movie. Sorry I didn't say that

+Thomas de Prez, yeah a TV series of magnificent than a movie series in my opinion.

One does not simply make a silmarillion movie.

Thomas de Prez Won't happen probably. Tolkiens son won't sell the rights to make a movie/series out of Silmarillion. Won't happen sadly.

Hey man, you should read The Silmarillion.

1)There are hobbits, elves, men, drwaves, orcs, uruk-hais, trolls, goblins, ents, dragons, half-elves, maiars and valars. 2)The Valar are creatures with angelic powers. Most of them control the elements of Middle Earth 3)Iluvatar couldn't kill Sauron, because sauron's power had grown so much, that it would be almost imposible to kill him. 4)Sauron was a Maiar, a powerful spirit. He was created by Iluvatar, and then he was corrupted by Melkor (the most powerful Valar). 5)Sauron tried to turn the elven rings evil, but the elves realized about this, and decided to put them away. 6)All the movies have the same plot, but each of them concentrates on different aspects. The first one on the Shire and the fellowship. The second one on Rohan and Isengard. The third one on Gondor and Mordor.

Here'sJohnny It's not that He COULDN'T kill him, since Eru Iluvatar can do anything He wants, up to and including just making the whole world vanish by thinking about it, but that He invented this thing called "free will". And in a way, Iluvatar DID bring about the end of Sauron, through His servant Olorin and all the free peoples of Arda. The Valar could, technically, have taken out Sauron (after all, Sauron is merely a shadow compared to his mentor, Melkor Morgoth), but after the fall of Beleriand in the wake of the War of Wrath, they decided direct interference would cause too much destruction. Also, the elven-rings were not evil because they were crafted by the Elves of Eregion, not Sauron, and Sauron's hand never sullied them. After Celebrimbor realized that Sauron had betrayed him, he made sure the Maia would never find them. However, since their power is linked to the One Ring, much of what they made was lost in its unmaking, and the elves left Middle-Earth.

I agree. And when they only added about three clips they might aswell just skip it.

Yeees?