THE LOST KING (2022) Official Trailer [HD] Sally Hawkins, Steve Coogan, Harry Lloyd In Cinemas Oct 7 

I see what you did there

@@restezlameme would be nice to see him in a role where's he's not a bumbling idiot, thought he's great at it. He was so likable in Counterpart vis a vis JK Simmons, even though he plays the dumbest duchy boss to ever get a job trough nepotism. Still bitter they canceled counterpart because season 3 script had a pandemic in it and covid it ight before filming began. His character's redemption arc was finally kicking of.

He was really cool in Arcane. Although animated his voice acting was well done.!!

his first one was better, doubled as a helmet

A golden crown. Fit for king.

Her crank obsessions concerning a "saintly" King Richard ARE every bit as fanciful as Shakespeare's deformed monster.

She wasn't mocked. The university welcomed her. They identified the car park as a place of interest back in 1985, old maps had shown them where the choir of Greyfriars was, but they had to wait until the property was vacant before they were allowed to excavate it. They had already done a preliminary survey, but they were happy for her to help with the initial radiography survey. She did not pay the for the dig, as she claims on her website. The university and the local authority did that. She did help to raise funds for the project. But that wouldn't have made a "quirky English film," would it? Coincidentally, the only remaining standing part of the friary used to be in another car park, at De Montfort University under the Hawthorn Building. It's been moved to the museum now.

@@WildwoodClaire1 Indeed.

I remember when this story was in the news. There were a few imterviews with this woman and I remember thinking she seemed obsessive and unbalanced, although admittedly I don't know the details of this particular story. The danger with these 'baed on a true story' movies is that people watch them and then believe that this is what happened.

@@Jac70 you're right. It happens all the time, this turning fiction into faction. Take "The Crown.," for instance. And yes, she was/is as you saw her, IMO, but she had a gift for raising funds. She was the link between serious academic study, which she couldn't do, and the public, so when she brought the cameras in, the team went along with it. (It also gave them funds for other excavations).

Really! Must have had a really limited budget. But they did manage to squeeze the whole story in.

That's what she said hehe....I'll show myself out

The trailer really was vague, glad to see they didn’t show the major plot points.

I mean... What were you expecting? We all know how it ends.

@@sblood311 Yeah - he gets killed in the end!

Fiction.

I really like your comment

@@philipcoriolis6614 Which bit is fiction? - genuinely interested

@@tsunchoo Movies are most often than not oversimplifying actual stories to create a fictional heroic figure fighting alone against adversity.

"Changing history in a small way" is an oxymoron.

Did you read Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey? It's concerning the very thing you mentioned.

@@benderb.r5041 I'll add it to my audible list, thanks!

@@benderb.r5041 I read it when I was twenty or so. It opened my eyes and I have always wondered (until Phillipa Langley found him) that he had been lied about.

my youngest lad did also

My dad, wee bit of a drama queen: 'And I shall never forget the response of my daughter when I told her to look at the BBC website: "Fuck me that's the worst case of scoliosis I've ever seen." Truly, words to mark this historic occasion.'

Dr. Tobias Capwell was the one who oversaw the Armor, (if I'm not mistaken he is also the knight in the white right behind Richard) when they asked him to be the adviser on the armor he told them "its gonna be more expensive than you thought..." ScholaGladitoria just posted a video interview with him about his work on the film.

@@TomTasker It's great to see Doctor Capwell help out with things like these! I also saw the video by Matt Easton you mentioned! I surely hope historical accuracy like this will become the standard in the near future!

@@jonah9046 yeah, me as well.

They got the guru of the Wallace collection to make it and upped the budget to get it done. Real deal stuff it is.

Big props...I see what you did there.

With Cumberbatch being a distant relative!

I wonder how much of this movie is truthful.

What is the name of the documentary, please?

@@sam78 its a new movie coming out. Do a serach on youtube for finding R3 andyou will see stuff come up. This is a dramatic retelling of that discovery.

@@Echiya many English people are distant relatives of Richard III. A well known geneticist, Adam Rutherford, has calculated that if you are predominantly English, it's virtuallly impossible that you're not descended from King Edward III. Edward III was Richard III's great-great-grandfather.

ah but what did Mick Aston or Francis Pryor have to say?

She literally made one of them eat their hat. He said he would if the skeleton they found was Richard's.

I remember watching a documentary about the story in which she gazed lovingly on a recreation of Richard's head and proclaiming that it had no face of a murderer. I thought "she's a loon." I still think so.

@@WildwoodClaire1 She just fell in love a little with her research, it happens : )

Yep, unfortunately many academics in various topics act this way even in the face of large amounts of evidence, especially when large amounts of their work has been spent on opposing views.

U just ruined it for everyone 💢💢🤬

R for Rex meaning King

I mean... Did you watch the trailer? Lol

I’m not sure if the R was true…

@@not-duckyhead7800 its literally a thing that happened IRL, one google search would ruin it for you, dingus

When I saw that shot with knights I thought we finally got a historical film with actual historical armor... Then I learned what the film is about :(

@@TrueDefectv Same :(

@@TrueDefectv If you’re interested, it’s not historical and it’s not perfect, but House of the Dragon on HBO has been pretty good so far. Plenty of things like tabards over armor, heraldry everywhere, etc. Still, I’d love to see a full movie that looks like that short shot in this trailer.

Yes, agree. I am tired of 'medieval' movies where everyone wears grey, where they run around with dirt-streaked faces, where their armour looks like crap. Medieval people loved bright colour...their churches and castles were full of bright paint.

@@sonofherne And they did not have North American accents.

ahahahahaha

👏 👏 👏

🤣😂😅

Good point!!

Omg! That’s who it is. The Family of Blood

They were made by people with a vested interest beyond money to get it right. Family honour y'know

I entered the trailer expecting it to be a hollywood movie and was gonna coment how at last they did get the weapons and costumes as they were...

Have you ever seen the doc where they recreated the armour using someone who had the same spinal curvature as Richard? Absolutely fascinating, complete with sticking him on a horse to do jousting and a battle charge. It turns out that in the armour, using a medieval saddle, they were actually as secure and accurate as people who'd spent their adult lives on a horse in armour.

@@burntcoppery That was a fascinating doc. Really beautiful armour too, as well as functional.

Dr Toby Capwell worked on it, you can definitely see it in the final product it looks fantastic.

There is a documentary about the dig itself (some of the scenes in the film are directly taken from that day) which is fabulous. Its on youtube here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-P8QDa1zuUd4.html

In the very first place they dug.

@@mortalclown3812 where he'd still be were it not for Philippa.

And under the letter R

So it's a real story??? And he really was under the R letter????

@@Sheogoratful Yes and it was the VERY FIRST place they digged and they put a pickaxe throught his skull!!!

My mum is a big Richard iii fan. She entered a lottery to go to the funeral and won a seat. She sat next to Benadict Cumberbatch and whispered to him that he needed to tuck his shirt in when he got up to make a speech. My wife is a huge Richard iii fan (runs in the family) and we met Phillipa Langley at Bosworth Field a couple of years after the reinterment. Lovely lady.

Terrible the way he was buried in Leicester. He was a Yorkist, he would of wanted to have been buried in York.

The funeral was so fine + a beautiful poem + a magnificent sculpture... All hail King Richard Plantagenet! - in the movie ‘Anonymous’, we discover who the rôle of ‘evil Richard’ was actually based on.... 🙏🏻💔🙏🏽

I have the same condition, so I feel an affinity with him; I also remember visiting the Battle of Bosworth field site....and discovering that he lost because Henry bribed his men to fight for HIM instead. History has said a lot of things about Richard, which many experts believe were untrue. It was amazing how they found him, and the Richard III society paid for his funeral, while his last known descendant I believe, made his coffin. Touching story.

@@Cristobels-Green-Boots Philippa said she was convinced he wanted to be found...I know a lot of people are upset he wasn't buried in York, but he had a lovely funeral, and a beautiful tomb worthy of a brave man. I think he's at rest now.

You don't think Richard was responsible for his nephews disappearances?

Not sure about that. For years we were told that his disability was just made up by Tudor propagandists but then his skeleton confirms he had scoliosis. He is still the number 1 suspect for the murder of the princes. Not sure he was a monster but he was a man of his time in a dangerous age. If he hadn't sized power his rivals may have done away with him.

I dont see any redemption to be honest. The curvature of his spine only reinforces the rumours that were spoken of him for the past 500 years. It was dismissed by Richard III supporters as Tudour propaganda to make him look like a sinister character who would be capable of killing children. It turned out to be true.

@@osr4152 Cool motive, still murdered kids.

@@msrainbowbrite None of us know that....actually, there is a lot of speculation as to whether they were murdered at all. Interesting fact...two skeletons believed to be theirs are in Westminster Abbey but the Queen refused to allow DNA testing on them. Another interesting fact....Richard was crowned AFTER his nephews were declared illegitimate, so he had no reason to have them murdered. Mary Tudor imprisoned her sister Elizabeth after she was declared illegitimate rather than having her killed because a 'bastard' heir had no rights to a throne therefore was no threat. There are a lot of historians who believe that if the boys were murdered, the culprit was far more likely to have been Henry VII.

Tough to spoil a thing that just happened in the real world.

Is it a really a spoiler?

I mean it's literally about her finding a king in a car park there really isn't much suspense in that. It was it pretty big deal when it happened. Would you expect someone who makes a movie about 9-11 to keep the plane crash a secret?

@@zoedean5459Of course the ending is known, but I think it's still possible to leave some anticipation about HOW the screenwriter told their interpretation of the story. A film about 9/11 could be told from thousands of viewpoints and each trailer could be vastly different without showing all the high points of the film.

@@dAtkRaK it didn't. The real story is much more interesting. The dig was one scheduled by Leicester University, and the identification and research was inter-departmental. Paid for by the university. It was long suspected that Richard lay in Greyfriars, instead of being thrown into the river at the Reformation when the friary was dissolved. This woman just arrived and claimed the credit. The department let her in to view the bones and the reconstruction of his face, and she brought a photographer. What annoys me is that the two people who actually discovered and identified the body have been obscured by the woman who tried to claim it all for herself. Take it as fiction, then it's a fun story. But do look up the real story, too.

For a second, I thought you were referring to Sally Sparrow 💀

You’ve already seen it

@@tompoynton : ) ha good one

I was excited when I saw him in the trailer. He is a great storyteller!

I thought it was him lol.

Aye nearly fell out of my chair when Bruce showed up.

I thought that was him! Good on him!

Immediately on seeing him I shouted (at nobody) "Er what in the f*** is Brucie doin here".

He was also in a great Dr Who double episode. 10 th

He finally got his golden crown (without dying in the process)-glad someone noticed.

He also was in The Hollow Crown.

@@KonohasYeIlowFlash 👍 👑 🤣 He got his GoT golden crown with a loud thud when his gold head hit the ground.

That's who it is.thanks,it would have bugged me for ages!

RIGHT!?!?!?! Bruce FUMEY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Scrolled down the comments just to make sure I wasn´t the only one who noticed. Great, love Bruce´s channel.

My thoughts exactly! Did not expect to see Bruce here!

That's amazing, what a thrill it must have been for them to find him.

I've loved her acting ever since her early Mike Leigh films. She always brings everything to her roles.

She was great in this but i do recall another actor who looked very like real life Phillipa ( i can't recall the name) who might have been chosen. Happy to see Phillipa in the crowd at the Cathedral

You didn't know the story before? It was all over the news a few years ago. I don't see how they are giving anything away.

You know how the film ends, its based on a true story, so this line of complaining makes no sense. Just because you have fingers and keys, doesn't mean you have to use them.

@@isoldam we all know the story of romeo & juliette, titanic and others. still - a trailer shouldn't spoil the most dramatic scenes of a movie. also saying "it was all over the news years ago" - there're people outside of the uk, you know, the rest of the world, who didn't follow this story as closely as you guys did on your island. i for one read an article, when the body was discovered, and i think i watched a yt-documentary right after, but a movie about the person responsible that did sound very interesting. that was until the trailer kinda told everything.

same, todays movie trailers do this consistently. And No, im not from the UK so never heard this story before but now I do, and saved myself 20 quid

@@Paisa231 Am from Africa, watched this entire scenario unfold on YT and documentaries. Also if you paying in quid, you pretty much right there.

Was it filmed and shown IRL? That would be epic.

@@LandersWorkshop Not sure. I think they settled for a hat-shaped cake in the end.

She's not crazy; she's impassioned and a true history buff. Quite a different kettle of fishies

And was the R for Richard or Rex?

@@mortalclown3812 nah mate. She was crazy. Does not mean she was wrong, though.\

No it didn't. The archaeologists had that area earmarked for years. They're finally talking about the distortions of the film. They didn't oppose her, she didn't pay for the first research, and while her contribution is acknowledged, she was not the central person behind the find.

@@LynneConnolly No? who was the central person?

Helps if you ignore what Richards contemporaries said about him and the actions that he took.

Cmon he’s a tyrant and a kinslayer

@@JoeKerr420 There has been no evidence to show any of that. None at all.

@@TisMePyper.S only one with the means and opportunity. there are plenty of people who have might liked to kill the princess but only Richard had the means to do that. you can talk about other good richard might have done sure but there is every reason to believe he killed those poor boys

@@user-jj4pm2wr6o Not just him. There are others who would have gained more power from their deaths. And who knows if they were even killed? They could have been whisked away somewhere. Let's not forget Tudor had more of a reason to gain power from all this.

I think we just did!

@@celeryg66 haha I was about to say the same thing!

So when's this film on tv then. As it looks like to have aired already in a condensed 2m36sec form on this site. Suprised this site was considered over playing in cinemas across countries 🤡

@@websurfer5283 Here in Toronto its coming to TIFF, so we may get it next yr!

@@celeryg66 Everyone who has even the smallest interest in historical discoveries already knows the story tbh so the trailer is hardly spoiler territory...

It was a big deal when it went down, on the news and even the USA networks were raving about it.

Non-violent? King Richard died of multiple head wounds, pole arms or swords driven through the skull.

They don’t show him getting killed in battle in the movie, though. It’s a story about finding his bones after he’d been dead over 500 years.

@dave and Eiffert: What a wondrous telling of a great story - thank you! I’m on Richard’s Good Side: the movie ‘Anonymous’ gives us an idea of who The Nasty was really based on...& the groundlings loved that! I came to love Richard through Aneurin Barnard’s sympathetic portrayal - right from boyhood, through his love of Anne, to the bitter end! I’d admired Margaret Beaufort for a long time...a mother at 13, a widow soon after, & her fierce protection of her son, Henry Tudor: but when I began learning of the depraved depths to which she was prepared to sink, I lost all feeling for her...what strident & inhumane times they were! Margaret was outwardly pious, & believed that she was following God’s intention... but the Commandment ‘Thou shalt not kill’....supplanting herself into the York household...the Princes (Catherine & Edward’s sons - the next in the Plantagenet Line) kept for safety in the Tower... the bribery of Richard’s allies...it’s unbearable! Back in the Day, I wasn’t that interested in the scanty history that we were taught - almost in passing! It’s great to find one’s awareness opening up, & becoming so curious about what came before, via the dramas & destinies brought to us by films, theatre, & the internet! Thank you for your story: take care & be well! 🙏🏻💔🙏🏽

Here's a good documentary on the story. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6zPRpVIvgBQ.html

She's not in it! But see it anyway. And continue with Happy Go Lucky, her best performance.

@@Bagatellamusic I know she wasn't in "Philomena", but the co-writer and director did that film. I'm just saying I'm looking forward to seeing the new film for her.

@@craigledger4645 Ah, I see. :)

@@craigledger4645 maybe understand how words work and how you implied Sally Hawkins is in Philomena and you want to watch it for that reason - for more info, see above - as in your original comment 😂🙄

Get the tissues in. Seriously.

He looks a lot like Alan Partridge

Me, too! I loved him in “Philomena.”

u just did 🤡

@@websurfer5283 How? Has it already come out??

@@ticketyboo2456 I feel like this trailer condensed the whole film in a couple mins. To me it seems like the whole film has been given away already

I thought that was him!

To be fair, this movie is likely made for British audiences, and anyone who would be interested already know at least the nuts & bolts of the story.