The Menace of Merton Council - Council Are Inventing Laws & TLA is Told To Wind His Neck In  

That sigh is totally 100% illegal.

That's the dumbest thing anyone has ever said on one of these videos. What's the point in hiring lawmakers if they're just going to make us vote on every single law, even locally? Can you even fathom how much money that would cost to implement?

@@bashkillszombies Councils do not pass Laws I think you are talking about the no filming "Policy" I think you could look up the word "Policy"...

@@bashkillszombies precisely but think about how much they are curtailing our freedoms by passing by laws that we did not request or want.

@@meestermeesterhastings.3159 they pass by laws which affect us all and are punishable by fines and or imprisonment.so they are laws.

The replacements you mean?

Quite. It needs to said to these cretins again and again that it's the same law that allows the Council to film the public that also allows the public to film the Council

​@@28johann1What law are you talking about ?

@@djmike12345 It boils down to the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Data Protection Act 2018, which give the specific circumstances in which your privacy can be deemed violated. For example, your photos and private messages shouldn’t be shared with the public without your permission, details like your address and phone number get extra protection, and so on. However, these and other privacy laws apply only when there is a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” So, if someone records a video or takes a photo of you in places where you might not expect much privacy (on a bus, on the street, in a shop etc) it’s perfectly legal for them to do so, and although you can ask them to delete the videos, you can't legally compel them to. There has been a number of high-profile cases recently which make interesting reading, and have led to calls for the above Acts to be repealed - but it's interesting that those who want this (eg famous people sick of being photographed) find themselves being opposed by others (eg big companies who like using CCTV to film people as a matter of principle). Wherever you stand on the issue, what's ironic of course is that these very same companies often get very upset when being filmed themselves, and it's this that LA and others successfully highlight imo.

🤩👍

Already have them

@gazzasinkers4140. Good point.👍🏻

Why

Has anyone ever noticed how your clock tower isnt straight

32 Counties🇮🇪

They shouldnt even have a 'citizenship' to this Land . . . ..

And people say they only come here for the benefits.

@@oochiewallys benefits and half the pay of the average Joe.

I think they didn't escalate because they knew the sign was wrong and they are just trying it on with it

It is unconstitutional sign it is a policy it isnt law

Yes it shouldn't have said filming is against the law, but what law does having a sign saying no filming break?

I didn't mate I was only made aware of it today, thanks for watching bro

Right. I get the feeling that if we were talking about a ham sandwich you’d find a way to make it about race. There’s more to life. There’re plenty of mental British security personnel and police to worry about.

@@pic101 Well we are not talking about a ham sandwich Sherlock talking about a sandwich short of a picnic 🤣❤️

..... and walks off the second he is challenged about his SIA licence not being in display!

*on display!..... Stupid phone! 🙄😂

The security wasn't English pretends to be possibly having lived here for a number of years but officially was not from the UK