As an OG NotJustBikes hater… I’m very happy to see channels with comprehensive understanding of the situation here who aren’t just peddling doom and gloom bullshit for clicks.
@@MelGibsonFan 'doom and gloom bullshit' as in telling people they can want better for themselves instead of waiting 3 years for a painted bike lane and maybe a sidewalk or two to be installed and calling it a day, am right? but that hurts your feelings :(
@@Lildizzle420 Apparently you don't keep up with current events in the transportation sector. CAHSR has been under construction for years. Brightline service is active AND expanding in Florida, and Brightline West is in the planning stages. Texas Central has hit some rough patches but had support from both the Trump and Biden administrations, scored a major court victory, and reached an agreement with JNR as recently as April 2024. Amtrak received a significant funding boost and recently purchased new motive power units and rolling stock. I saw a bunch of new trains and upgraded stations throughout the Midwest last summer. A number of regions (DC, DFW, LA, Austin, etc) are renovating, rebuilding, and expanding urban rail transit services, as well as adding infill stations to existing lines. She did say "BEGINNING," so your laughter is both misplaced and a bit creepy. Weirdo. 🤣
@@colormedubious4747 I think putting "creepy" and "weirdo" is a really lame personal attack like you feel I personally attacked you. (I didn't) just for the record, the USA has completed 235 miles that travel at the min speed of 125 MPH. period.
@@Frantastic78 They must be! Personally I consider JC to be the "sixth borough" of NYC. It's got better transit AND road connections to Manhattan than Staten Island!
LOL! It boils down to “It could be worse. You could be living in Canada.” Is it ever a wonder that many of these urbanism YT channels originated out of Canada?
I live in DC and it is pretty sweet in terms of urbanism. I no longer get upset about not being able to walk places and I have found new things to be upset about. (My new thing I am pissed off about is the lack of public bathrooms in the US)
I'd say European public toilets aren't much better. I couldn't really find any outside of rail stations in the countries I visited, and those that do exist require payment.
2:30 this point is SO UNDERRATED. The reason why very few people actually leave the United States (relative to the people who claim they "hate it here" online or claim they're moving to Canada or Europe) is that the US is that every city and region feels like a different shade of America. It's nearly impossible NOT to find some corner or region of the United States that you can't jive with eventually.
@@user-iw4jl6bc8h it's a linguistic difference. No English speaker calls The Americas, "America." To us, America = the United States. I know in other languages it's different, but that's not the way it is in English.
@@user-iw4jl6bc8h America is the United States of America. The two continents are North America and South America, or if grouped together, the Americas.
"The reason why very few people actually leave" No, that's one reason. A much bigger reason is that emigration is hard. It's simply a lot easier to move within the US than to move to another country.
I, for one, enjoy snarky angry urbanism. But I'm also a fan of this channel and its insistence on constructive optimism. I'm for anything that isn't car centric doomerism.
You need both in this world. Angry urbanism has its place. But so does optimism. In society we definitely have an over saturation of negative media, and not enough positive media.
@@robertcartwright4374 agreed, NJB is the angry wake-up call that stuff sucks, but other channels like this one and City Beautiful provide a more optimistic and constructive answer on what to do about it. We need both.
Nice video. As someone who has lived in DC and Bostom, those cities are definitely urban gems that I have loved living in. I think the US issues are cultural. There is a stark divide between people that like cities and people that hate cities, but live in them because that's where the jobs are (there are sooooo many of these people in every US metro). These people often live in the suburbs or exurbs and have am outsized say in state policy which tends to impose itself downward onto more progressive cities, stalling progress. (See NY congestion pricing) Also, the US is very stratified economically and the neighborhoods you mention tend to be unaffordable for most working class people. Best way to say it is, the US has great urbanism for the rich and also sometimes decent urbanism for everyone else.
I think a lot of it if demographic rather than political. Most NIMBYs tend to be older and part of the generation that built for sprawl. Younger demos across the political spectrum are more pro-build (whether because of urbanism or the desire to afford housing).
I couldn't agree more, as someone who has also lived in the DMV and Boston. It hurts my heart sometimes when people show the great urbanism in Boston (usually the North End) and that's just not the Boston that I get to live in.
There's plenty of other things too that can be great for U.S urbanism. Let's not forget the potential of very wide roads that can: 1.) Carry future bike lanes and bus lanes while still having room for wide sidewalks. 2.) Enable the construction of subways or elevated lines relatively hassle free. 3.) Hold plenty of mixed-use development potential since they are lined with large properties usually belonging to only one owner (big box stores and strip malls with huge surface parking).
While modifying the roads with various methods is absolutely a good idea, I think redeveloping the vast seas of parking lots into more walkable spaces would help even more (which you touched on with 3).
As a North American, I found the streets in the UK not very pedestrian-friendly because they were so narrow... Sure, the US and Canada could definitely rededicate a bit of car space to pedestrians and cyclists, but the fact there is room enough to do that in our wide rights-of-way is a huge advantage that I think also goes underappreciated.
I'm British and I agree. American cities have good bones. Even the suburbs and stroads have plenty of space to build really nice mixed use streets. Over here, we can barely find space to fit a narrow bike lane in half the time.
The problem with what you're saying is that you think that "rededicating a bit of car space to pedestrians and cyclist" is the answer when ths goal should be returning the space to pedestrians and cyclists ins denser urban areas and allowing only necessary car ussage in them. A narrow street in the UK should pedestrianized with cars as guests. Apart from that, the UK is the reason for how the US, Canada. australia or New Zealand are. They are the source of the way you are, with onviouse differences that occured over time but the basics are the same. The problem in the US is that it became a bit too extreme and without changing fundumental things it will not change, or maybe in the end most of the US does not want this to change, which is OK if that's whatt you prefer.
@@AL5520It's not that the US doesn't want change, but that those who wield political power at the ballot box or in the lobbies do not want the US to change, except what Project 2025 which is anti urban in its manifesto promises.
@@user-uo7fw5bo1o The will for change is not measured by polls, it is measured by who's voting and when in the last 3 elections (2018/2020/2022) only 37% turned out for all of them and 30% to non of them that's what happens. If you actually want something you need to act and voting is one of the most important thing and should be done in every election that you can do, locally, state or federal. The problem is that you system is convoluted, fragmented and gives too much power to small groups and that's the first thing you need to change. Is it hard? very hard to what can look impossible but,as you can see, those who keeps at it and use every trick in the book gets what they want. What I'm saying is that without fundamental change this won't happen. I get it that you want this, I want the US to have this to, but maybe you should fight first for the main thing that prevents it from happening.
the real name of your country is United States . America is the name of 2 continents not a name of a country . I am canadian and we live on the same continent and USA does not own Canada or the continent .
I love the optimism but I do also think it's worth noting this is part of what frustrates U.S. urbanists and affordable housing advocates. The US (especially the west coast imo) genuinely has the potential to be one of the best places to live in the world and it's being squandered on car centrism and unaffordable single-family homes and luxury condos.
If you are an California voter, subscribe to the California YIMBY's mailing list. It doesn't work miracles, but they are doing decent work to have the state push against NIMBY anti-density laws. They particularly do a good job of letting people know when pro-urban legislation is available to contact legislators about. They are less focused on the free market capital forces that make housing expensive, but their stance against zoning barriers to affordable housing are wonderful.
@jonathanraithel1025 I'm not from California but I agree. In general it's a good idea to look into urbanist movements in your area if you can find any. As of now none are really mountain moving but it's a growing movement that's being taken more and more seriously
the happiez country in the world is Findland , Switzerland and Norway , not USA . I am canadian and i dont understand why you call your country by a fake name ''America'' . the real name of your country is United States . Money is the only value in the USA plus violence, daily mass shootings, xenophobia , racism and inequity .
@BabyGirlDontEvenPlay I'm not saying cars and trucks are useless and have no place and society, very few people are. It's just important to have other options for getting around and designing around cars only tends to lead to bad city design
@BabyGirlDontEvenPlay to elaborate on my previous comment, if you just love cars, good for you, more transit means less traffic. But some people can't afford to drive, have medical issues that make it hard for them, or just don't like it and it doesn't make sense to force them to do so anyway. Both for their own sake and for the sake of people who *do* love driving because it means less people in your way on the road and less people who have no business operating a car being forced to do so
Yeah, he can be a little one-sided. I think he's still important, though, because I don't think I would have realized there was a problem without his more confrontational style.
I feel he was the one that kickstarted the “orange pill” and “urbanist” content sphere on RU-vid. However, just complaining doesn’t solve anything. I’m glad this sphere is moving away from complaining and towards finding silver linings and educating on how to actually contribute to positive change
NJB is entry level urbanism. His no-punches-pulled "this sucks on a fundamental level" attitude is very effective at waking people up from exceptionalist complacency. There are different tools for different purposes. A hammer is not bad just because it can't be used as a drill.
Oh The Urbanity is hands down the most understanding and realistic urbanist channels on RU-vid. For anyone that’s pro-car and is trying to understand urbanism and urbanists, this is the #1 channel that I would recommend.
His channel works at pointing out the inadequacies in how suburbs and transit came to be in North America. I just find his solution (be exactly like the Netherlands) limiting since there is no one size fits all fix, and unfortunately, too many urbanists have fallen into that mindset. This channel avoids it by showing how things can be altered to be more livable and sustainable.
👍Thanks for this, US really does have have at least a few good examples of “missing middle” neighborhood cities , older pre auto towns too, that we all should appreciate more, fan from Brooklyn here, would love to see you guys take on NYC outer boroughs in an episode, 400 years of good and awful urban planning, diversity, gentrification etc. keep up the great work!!
Currently a Texas resident, but have been considering a move to Chicago. The weather does not deter me, and in fact the idea of living in a place with all 4 season sounds really appealing. It just seems “right” for it to be chilly for Halloween/football season, snowing for Christmas, and warming up (or starting to) for baseball season. Where I’m at, it’s hot (ie >90°) for more than half the year. And for maybe 3 months it’s extremely uncomfortable to be outdoors, with temps consistently over 100°. We get maybe 1 freeze per year, and basically the entire state shuts down because we don’t have the infrastructure for it. I’m tired of it! I want seasons!!!
6:53 living in Baltimore and being in the middle of all this, for significantly less than the costs our neighbors pay, is wonderful. I like being able to visit DC, Philly, or New York whenever I want with zero planning.
Another excellently perspicacious entry from Oh The Urbanity! I'm a U.S. fan of yours currently living through the blast-furnace summer of a sunbelt city autopolis as I long for Montreal. I appreciate your fundamental optimism. There's more good urbanism to be found even in this part of the country than one would expect. Problem is, there's not nearly enough of it and creating more will require a long term counter-cultural struggle with entrenched bureaucratic inertia, highway-centric transportation policy, and NIMBYist opposition (15-minute cities are a communist plot to take away our cars=mobility=freedom!). Things will change but will come about much more slowly in some regions than others.
Great video, thanks for the positivity. There's so much Ameriphobia in these discussions that it's impossible to have a constructive conversation with people about these topics. Glad to see videos like this pull us back to the middle.
This is what I like about your channel. You definitely try to be a little bit more upbeat while being somewhat critical, you also do listen to your viewers for which I appreciate. USA may not be perfect get it changing, with more urbanism 🇺🇲🇨🇦
When it comes to English Canada, the culture of the provinces are often more similar to the states just directly to the South, like how Southern Ontario outside of Toronto has a culture more like Ohio, Pennsylvania and upstate New York. The Vancouver area is similar to Americas left coast, and the Canadian Praries similar to our Plains states.
Thank you for helping me to appreciate the good qualities of my country. There's so much going wrong here right now it's good to get a reminder of our strengths, too.
Unmatched cultural diversity. By far America’s greatest strength. New York City, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Chicago, Miami, and San Francisco are some of the most racially and culturally diverse cities on the planet.
Why did you leave off Philadelphia with just a throw away remark? Too many just ignore the area between NYC and DC. Millions of people live there. PHL itself is the 6th largest city in the US. 😮
That definitely is a strength - sadly your politicians, your political system favoring corporations and the blithe acceptance of massive inequality take away from that strength.
The inequality isn't that bad, I don't think Europeans even realize Mississippi, the poorest US state, is about as rich as Germany per person. It can be incredibly unequal and we're all still doing better than you.
The 4 biggest cities of Australia: Sydney, Melbourne, a good 12 hour drive away Brisbane, a good 12 hour drive away, in the other direction Perth, a good 36+ hours drive through the desert and barely a settlement across opposite ends of a continent Texas is lucky to have 3 cities within walking distance of each other.
The transit comparison was a bit weird. There are 39 weekday trains from Sydney (5.8m) -> Newcastle (0.5m), a birds-eye distance of 120km, which they discount for being interstate, while there are while 48 trains from New York (8m) -> Philly (1.5m), a birds-eye distance of 135km
@@midnight8045 I thought this too! Sydney Central to Melbourne Southern Cross is 730km. DC to NYC is 330km, less than half the distance. I do understand that was their point but felt a stretch to compare them
wow I did NOT realize how lucky we were in north carolina! i take the raleigh to charlotte amtrak all the time and thought 5 trains a day each direction was quite normal for two large-to-mid sized city’s 😅
Good video. I've been in the Northeast Corridor my whole life, raised outside of Philly, now in DC, and I can't believe how I used to think Boston was "far". It's truly an amazing thing about this area of the US. One thing that needs to change in how Americans perceive cities it that NYC is the outlier in terms of size. We call places like Baltimore and Sacramento small and it leads to to expect less in terms of the ability to have viable transit. Would love for that to change
Really appreciate Canadian neighbors pointing out good things about the US. So many Canadians define themselves by what they're not - the US, and sometimes it can have a little bit of an edge to it. But we're not just neighbors; we're family, and the US is lucky to have Canada next door.
Vancouver is isolated from the rest of Canada, so all of our resources go to connecting BC to Washington (and Oregon). Funding for a high speed train (Cascadia high speed rail) from Vancouver to Seattle to Portland is underway with a 2035 expected opening date.
Thanks for this video. It really makes me feel proud of my country's urbanism even though there are many flaws which require much work to fix them. Happy Independence Day, and thanks for the optimism and positivity!
Lived in Ottawa, and visited Montreal and Toronto in the past. Now I live in DC. There are lots of things I miss about Canada but I'll say my personal list of what I appreciate about living here: 1. The Northeast Corridor (I can travel to New York for some really good food and come back in one day without touching my car once) 2. Haven't gotten bored of travelling in Eastern US after 12 years, and I still have the other 50% of the country to explore later 3. So many trees here
Montreal is one of the the greenest city in North america , largest urban parks in Canada with roof tops urban farms managed by AI , world s most sustaianble city ( 100 % green energy ). 80 % of Quebeckers ( province of Quebec ) live surrouned by nature with more than 500,000 lakes , dense forests and unique rich eco system ( from whales in the ST Lawrence to teh Rockies of the East for helicopter skiing in the Chic Chocs . Montreal has the second highest number of restaurants per capita after New York city with 400 years of history , teh canadian capital of culture , architecture in both official languages of Canada , english and french .
I think Toronto does have plenty of the type of neighborhood you're referring to. The houses are sometimes technically detached or semi-detached, but the density level is similar.
@@TheKenContinuum Toronto has some older, more urban neighbourhoods but they're less dense (more yard space, driveways, buildings are typically shorter, many are semi-detached instead of rowhouse or low-rise apartments) and not as big (they end and turn into suburbia sooner) as the other cities we're thinking about. This isn't some full-hearted condemnation of the city. It's just a type of neighbourhood we enjoy that isn't as present there.
i've thought for a while that my favorite part of US cities is diversity, though i've always kinda meant that in terms of population demographics and not the cities themselves. it was interesting to see your perspectives about this
Y’all a Texas summer is no joke. But if you ever get to come to Texas visit one of our MAMMOTH gas stations off some of our giant highways and you’ll see the diversity of America. We have so many different types of people and families and it’s really cool. Buc’ees is a destination in its own right.
Thanks for the endorsement; like many Americans in this fraught election year, in the midst of focusing on our many alarming shortcomings, I often forget that there are many corners of this country that are actually pretty decent.
Great video, thank you! American friends are often jealous of me living in Europe, cause there's so many different countries nearby. But like you said, the US also has so much variety, and you don't need to worry about currency or language when you travel.
The mistake made in this video and often made by any organization rating places to live is that hot weather is preferable. Perhaps to some but I hate hot weather. Loathe it. Lived in Las Vegas and was miserable. Miami is miserable. The heat and humidity - Ugh. Many humans prefer cool and even cold weather. I must have a white Christmas. Favorite season is fall with the cool crisp air and magnificent colors one finds in the northeast and great lakes. And San Diego? Boring.
Yes! I see this in so many urbanism videos like this. The major city I grew up closest to is Philadelphia, and I've never desired to live in another climate, though it often gets a rap for having "worse weather" than CA and some southern cities. I'm fond of snow, rain, fog, etc...
4:46 another example of a city with great bike infrastructure is Madison Wisconsin. It's a major college town, is the state capital, AND it's constricted to an isthmus between two lakes, making everything quite compact and perfect for biking.
Really, it is the History of the settlements, that allow for the "closeness" of the major US cities you mention. The Colonies were founded on the Ocean, really not too far from each other, to facilitate trade amongst themselves and back to the old countries. Canada was just so different, Once you get to Niagara, where are you going to go easily? And the whole British/French history made it less favourable for us here in the Centre of the Universe to travel down the St Lawrence. Then we were slower getting the West to join in, and had to promise a Railroad we needed, but maybe did not really want. I think, on a proportionate basis, we are very consistent with the US (or were) and it might have more to do with new immigrants coming to Toronto, or Montreal or Vancouver, as they can very easily find some aspect of a culture from where they have come from to soften the transition. Great video essay.
the happiest country in the world is Findland with cold winters and 2 months of no sun . i prefer to live in a green city with water , electricity , 4 seasons , amazing world class outdoor 4 season facilities , safe and civilized environment . I would never live in the USA with mass shootings , racism , no universal healthcare , xenophobia , gun culture ,religions , car culture , pollution , no freedom ( abortion rights, LGBTQ) , no decorum politicians , no justice and an outdated constitution .
Great video and a good reminder that good urban spaces can be found anywhere! Funnily enough, I’ve made many of the same points to US folks over the years, particularly in regards to housing affordability and choice. While I acknowledge housing is expensive in the U.S. (especially in certain cities like SF, LA, etc), the fact they have so many options when it comes to urban locations- some of which are still relatively affordable- is really great and a positive thing! I come from one of the non-US countries mentioned in the video, and am currently living in another one 😂 And when half your population lives in just two or three cities, all of which are extremely unaffordable, it really narrows your options for adorable urban living. Not to mention (and arguably the more serious issue), it means that housing and economic policies have an impact on a much larger share of the population than in the US, which you think would make our governments more likely to do something to alleviate these issues, but vested interests gonna vest, i guess?
Climate change will soon make the sunbelt practically uninhabitable and the northern cities more temperate. would not be suprised in 50 years to see arizona texas and florida go "full rust belt" with decaying cities, declining population, all that currently-new car infrastructure falling apart, and the endless cheap-as-shit-built suburbia left to rot. those cheaper wintery cities will not be cheap for long.
Born and raised Floridian but haved lived on the west coast and visited many NE cities for work. It's pretty surprising how the hosuing stock can vary between regions. I'm definitely a huge fan of the multistory dense dingbat and courtyard apartments and the beach towns of SoCal. Way better than the tall AF condos that line many beachfronts in Florida. I just wish that California kept building dingbats, but it appears illegal due to newer parking minimums.
Dingbats are also not very sturdy in earthquakes, at least the older LA style of dingbat. Not something you want in California -- I think safety was as big a factor as parking minimums. You can still have buildings with parking structures at the bottom, of course, but multistory garages with huge concrete columns have a very different aesthetic.
Beyond the way that negative engagement feeds the algorithm, I like to think that the reason that American urbanists in these cities are so negative online is BECAUSE they can see the promise in their cities, and are so frustrated by the many stupid and self-sabotaging ways that their cities (and particularly the people that run them) actively attempt to diminish or otherwise steer away from these qualities, in favor of suburban & car-brained policies that cater to people who wouldn't enjoy the city if you PAID them to!
4:33 College and University are two different terms in the US as well, we just say ‘college’ in place of ‘university’ in laid back conversations/small talk because it’s easier
I would argue that Philly has great weather. It's never crazy, hot but not deadly in summer most days, cold but not frigid winters most days. Combine that with street trees to keeps summer walkable and your fine year round.
I really appreciate how positive and optimistic you guys are. Your channel gives me hope that I might not have to move to Amsterdam in order to use my bike to get around.
I live in Jersey City and work in Hoboken... we're more New York than Staten Island. Realtors have started talking about a "SoHo West" accessible from West Village with the PATH lol
This exemplifies as close to true FREEDOM as I think we get in America. Everything else seems much more constrained by outside forces but we can live almost anywhere we can pay for!
there is no freedom in the USA . daily mass shootings ,violence , racism , no universal medicare , poverty , more than 60 % of americans have nerver been outsdie their states and no passport .
One thing I'll me tip about amtrak outside the northeast corridor, and largely due to the length of freight trains to get around the requirement that passenger trains have right of way, is that anywhere else that they share tracks with freight rail, the delays are constan and terrible. I have a friend who takes amtrak from Denver up to Nebraska when he visits home, and every single time he goes it's anywhere from 8-17 hours delayed
Focusing on small town urbanism is something that I think is always missing from the discussion. People, especially conservative type people, fetishize old time small towns, and lament their decline. They declined as a direct result of car dependency, and were built before car dependency was a thing. In terms of getting those people on board, I think playing to that nostalgia about small towns would be really effective.
Thanks for this video, it was great! It helps to consider that the US is a very large and diverse country and Americans can move around. Hopefully that will mean more urbanism coagulating in cities enough for a tipping point into positive change.
I live in one of those small college towns in the Midwest and the central two or three square miles of the city is indeed very walkable, and the streets were just naturally built narrow enough and intersections are close enough together that cars usually move pretty slowly, making me feel comfortable riding a bike through downtown as well.
The idea that California doesn't have winter is a myth. In fact, San Diego frequently has days that never rise much above 60 fahrenheit in January, and it rains several times in a month. Sometimes we actually have to break out the long sleeve shirts.
As a Swede, lol. The Finns say the same about their winter. Except it's not exactly 60 F they're talking about. Today (in Stockholm) it was about that temperature, and it was raining. Though it's been closer to 80 F and sunny the last week or two. Doesn't need to get higher than that.
@@thomasgrabkowski8283 If you go to higher elevations, parts of California can have more winter than you can handle. The Donner Party died snowbound in a California mountain pass.
This was such a fantastic video that I've already told my wife that we're going to rewatch it later tonight when we have time together because I want to discuss it with her at length. I've followed your channel since living in Montreal. The pursuit of my interests (one of them being urbanism) has now landed me in Japan though I miss N. America so I might return eventually. That said, with the affordability crisis (among other things), I might not even come back to Montreal and just head to the States for many of the reasons you've explained in this video. I say this as a bicycle-loving Europhile Canadian myself; Canadians & Europeans often seem to have such a bias against the U.S. that tends to overshadow factual strong points about living there. You did a great job of going through a bunch of things that is amazing about anyone living in the U.S.
There are clearly statistical differences, but, being from Alabama, when I visited Atlanta, Tampa, and Los Angeles, none of them really felt all that different. I was expecting to be amazed by the differences of California and Alabama.. but I really wasn't. It was all still very car focused with big roads like I see here and everything else. Once I traveled to another country, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, THATS when I felt like there was a total shift in urbanism. We could take the train and bus anywhere we wanted, even to other states in the countries. The trains were fast and buses had dedicated bus lanes. The city was extremely walkable because everything was available inside huge malls. So.. I don't know. I didn't really feel the spark when visiting different US cities. It wasn't until I traveled internationally that I felt like i'm experiencing something truly new. When it comes to the US, most of the differences in urbanism comes down to the neighborhood level. Overall, cities are all fairly similar, but some cities have exceptional neighborhoods that other cities may not have.
We did a road trip through the US South a few years ago, covering cities like Memphis and Louisville and visiting rural parts of West Virginia, Alabama, and Mississippi and we found it quite interesting and different from home (weather, architecture, landscapes, accents, etc.). I'm not sure about living there but we certainly enjoyed visiting.
@@OhTheUrbanity Visit the Piedmont cities sometime (Birmingham, Atlanta, Greenville, and Charlotte). Tons of new urbanism and two metro systems that have a ton of potential.
That was a cool video. I always hear how US is lacking compared to other cities worldwide. It is true to an extent. But you also brought the huge diversity to my attention. I also appreciate the independence day shout out!
@BabyGirlDontEvenPlayno, it’s just that when one nation is economically and militarily dominant other nations have to protect their ego via perceived cultural superiority of which city building is a part of that. The UK and France used to have massive militaries that controlled much of the world but the second that was no longer true they criticize the US military budget and make healthcare “jokes”.
Lots of cities in the uk do not count their suburbs in their population stats. There are at least four or five more cities, that are over a million people if you're being realistic. And a couple multi centered urban areas, like south hampshire or the nottsderby corridor, that are gradually filling into contigous cities.
@@OhTheUrbanity Cheers. Not really sure what criteria is used, or whether it is applied evenly. American cities being far newer, tended to be the only places around, and their suburbs were built as direct extensions of them. In europe, often cities expand into surrounding towns, that are just as old as the cities themselves, and the regional identities don't often dissapear. You'll get a dense urban core, surrounded by suburbs that have seperate local councils, so the rich people don't have to share their taxes with those in the city. It's largely geremandered that way. Look at solihul near birmingham, or eastleigh near southampton, or west bridgeford near nottingham. Places like that are sometimes included in urban area stats, but not always city proper. Not saying that this was the case this time. Just the justification for the initial comment 😁
The Australian train comparison felt weird. While yes, Australia’s biggest cities lack frequent train connections, that’s because they’re SO spread out. Sydney to Melbourne is like 500 miles (which is still close enough that more rail is needed, but not NEC-level frequencies).
Furthermore, Australia’s rail network is also heavily affected by its status as the only country without a unified railway gauge throughout the entire country. It causes the country to not have good railway connections both passenger and freight, between cities, as it means that trains designed for railways in 1 state is not compatible for railways in another
@@thomasgrabkowski8283 I still feel that what australia does have is really underrated, I'm also impressed as an American how much of it is electrified.
As an extension on this great appreciation of our unique opportunities, a video that describes the migration mobility opportunities of other parts of the world would be fascinating! I’m curious if any other group of countries have any movement opportunities with the range of North America, which is pretty fluid for moving among. EU comes to mind but maybe still restrictive. Asia?
The EU does have a huge range, our cities and cultures are quite diverse and there are plenty of them. The only real restriction is the language barrier and Europe doesn't have so many different landscapes and biomes like the USA do.
Living on the west coast I know people from Seattle to San Diego, and with depending on my travels train, plane, and car all have their place so it all feels like my backyard. I suppose from a global perspective that is really unique.
Intercity rail travel outside the Corridor is largely awful. You have no choice but to drive or (maybe) take an expensive train that takes 2-3x longer.
The regional-intercity corridors are very underrated. I've not been out east to experience the likes of Empire Builder and the new Borealis, but I took Amtrak for my first time just to do a day trip to San Francisco from Sacramento. The timetable and speed could use improvement, but the time including local transit on SacRT, BART, and Muni came out comparable to doing the same trip by car, with the bonus of not having to deal with intense traffic whose evening commute hour starts at 1, and getting incredible views across pretty much the whole trip.
I live in Boston and wish that we had MORE winter! If only I had a city with the urbanism of Boston and the climate of Anchorage. Also, summers are brutal even here, so I can't imagine how atrocious they are in Texas (or even somewhere like DC). I'd much rather a place with no summer than one with no winter
Thanks guys, not exactly feeling good about the US these days, but if we can get over the huge political mess we have now, there is a lot to appreciate. I also love visiting Canada too so I can see kind of an alt reality US, we really are siblings separated at birth.
It's so funny when you in the middle of an argument that you can't answer whether Canada is like the US, you describe DC as surprisingly European. It's the exact same issue, only that Europe is even less uniform than the US.
@@OhTheUrbanity Yeah, I know what you mean; it's just the context makes for a bit of a contradictory statement, since you can apply the same logic when comparing Canada to the US. I like the video, though. Optimism is good, and highlighting the good encourages people to be proud and fight for it.
20% of Americans witnessed a shooting (at least that's what they thought) , 50% heard about a shooting in their neighborhood. As a European, it's hard for me to imagine this. In Europe, 0,2% of Europeans witnessed a shooting and 2% heard about a shooting in their neighborhood. Of course, each country has different customs and where there are weapons, people do not like to use public transport (unless they have to) and prefer a closed car because in case of danger they can quickly escape. If they drive a car, they go to the store to buy something and in the trunk of their large car they fit so many purchased products that the production of these products has led to climate change on Earth. All because of the stress of a shooting in their neighborhood.
I enjoy living in the U.S., but after going to Spain and seeing what public transport is like there I just can't take U.S. public transport seriously anymore. There really is no excuse. Spain was a developing country until the 1980s and yet the metro, train and bus systems in the big and small cities of Spain make even the best public transport systems in the U.S. look a century behind. A train from Providence, Rhode Island to D.C. is the same distance as a train from Madrid to Barcelona, and yet the train takes 2h 45m from Madrid to Barcelona and 9 hours from Providence to D.C. Why? There's just no comparison and no excuse. Don't get me wrong, I'm not moving to Spain because the economy is better in the U.S. and anyway I'm an American, and the U.S. has a lot of things going for it, including the famous American optimism which is usually one of America's greatest strengths, but when the U.S. really does have a major problem like terrible public transport systems which is difficult to solve without competent government action at the federal level, that is not where the U.S. shines, because the federal government really doesn't work very well regardless of party compared with national governments in other developed countries. The strength of the U.S. is in the culture, the people, the can-do commercial and pragmatic attitude and the competition between the states and the very independent localities, as well as the sheer size and variety of the country, but the famous Reagan quote that [federal] "government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem" applies far more in the U.S. than in other countries. In a lot of other developed countries government actually works, so common goods like public transport, national and state/province-equivalent funded public school and universal public health care also work. I've been to Montreal and Nova Scotia too, and in my opinion Canada isn't the best country to compare with the U.S. because Canada seems to also have similar problems with public transport to the U.S., albeit on a lesser scale. I challenge the channel to go visit Spain and see what you think! Madrid in particular from my experience has a shockingly good, really *near-perfect* public transport system which is much cleaner than the NYC metro, never breaks down, goes *everywhere* in and around the city at incredible speeds and even features extremely fast exurban trains which connect absolutely everybody in the metro area, but the interconnection of the rest of the country is very impressive too, even small cities like Córdoba and León have high speed rail, and because of that buses are fast and go *everywhere* on the beautiful, well-maintained and uncrowded highways, even to small towns. People are very happy with the system there and it is part of why Spain is a tourism powerhouse with an economy which is the 15th largest in the world despite having only 47 million people. Unlike the Netherlands, Spain is also a very spread-out country, so it is much more comparable to the U.S. in that way.
I grew up near Philadelphia (outside Wilmington, Delaware), and lived in DC for well over a decade. I now live in Denver, and I miss so much the interconnectedness of our East Coast cities. Besides AMTRAK, which I could rarely afford, there are several competing bus lines connecting the urban centers. When lived behind Union Station (in Eckington, DC) I would sometimes catch the 7a bus to NYC. We'd get in around 11a, then I'd wander for 8+ hours before catching a late late bus back to DC. Where'd I'd walk home after midnight from Union Station. I also miss the urban-ness of the East Coast, something Denver lacks. I like my neighrbohood here, a lot. But it should be the 4th or fifth neighborhood from downtown, not the first. Even Wilmington, DE feels more like a city than Denver does. But I appreicate this kind take on my country. I often get down about how sprawling and car-centric we are. But we have a lot going for us and we are fortunate to have all that we do!