The Multiverse: What's Real? | Episode 1801 | Closer To Truth 

People aren't interested in science and philosophy, their only Intrested in music and entertainment, basically anything that gives them instant pleasure. Their scared to think and ponder, and that's why these channels never get more than a couple thousand Subscribers.

This is what the first people to find PBS space time were like.

@@efron2545 what an incredibly pompous thing to say

Couldn’t agree more

Yes. I can't believe PBS,. Science Channel doesn't.pick this up.

But there is nothing real its look real to us it was well programming universe is a hologram, we all are a computer digit our brain is a small computer.

Good program may be, but pseudoscience.

You haven't found actualized.org yet?

it is not believing but rather something that has to be there. whether we like or not. science is not only confined to our universe.

Deserves millions.

I believe in many worlds from quantum mechanics and our existence.

I was sitting in my bedroom and had to question where I was because I saw an additional side door 🚪 instead of the window. My wall was a khaki/ tan color saw it as light yellow. I also noticed certain furnitures were not there or new ones appeared.

Yup no matter how much you use sophosticated terminologies

Don't confuse your ignorance of the science with ignorance of the scientists.

Or one world and a little luck. Or God. There's no reason to jump to conclusions based on little more than statistics.

Oh good, in that case you can tell me, in clear unambiguous terms what exactly is meant by "multiverse", and exactly how it is defined, but please not by reference to cognates or synonyms or psychological algebra or substituting for one undefined term another or other undefined terms, which my left pocket bets my right pocket you cannot begin to do, and my back pocket bets them both that you are about to demonstrate that by signally failing to set out what you mean by multiverse or defining multiverse or telling me what multiverse might be. And remember no cognates or synonyms or substituting one undefined term with another or other undefined terms or X = Y =X, where neither X nor Y are defined or assigned any particular value or meaning. I think you will discover that multiverse Is a Blurb - a vague generalised or unfocused and unclear term that cannot be focused defined or particularised or rendered into the other than a vague generalisation.

@@vhawk1951kl so, which level of multiverse would you like me to define for you? Since you didn't specify,.I assume you have limited understanding.

@@Ascendlocal I suppose that is one way avoiding having to tell me that you have no clear idea whatsoever what you mean by multiverse nor are you in any position whatsoever to define the term, and thus since you cannot tell me what multiverse is or what the multiverse might be, my referring to levels of it is just the tiniest bit academic is it not? It's all right, I knew perfectly well that you had not the faintest idea what multiverse is or what you seek to convey when you use that term or what it conveys to you, Because the Word is clearly a Blurb, which is to say that is a word for which there is no corresponding clear and unambiguous idea or concept, or more simply it is an unfocused photograph, by looking at which neither I nor you can determine of what it is a photograph because it is so blurred and lacking in focus or definition. Five gives me 5 million billion trillion that if we divide the fanciful and gibberish "multiverse" into multi and verse severally, you can be of no assistance to me when I come to do determining for what the "verse" bit stands, or what it signifies, whereas the multi-presumably indicates that are more than one verse, so presumably multiverse is some sort of epic poem, but you are about to tell me that you have not any clear idea whatsoever what you mean by multiverse, in which case one or other of my pockets will receive a trifling sum from another pocket, despite the fact that all of my pockets are well aware that human beings are much given to resorting to Blurbs, or proffering photographs of something that is so blurred or unfocused and lacking definition that no- one can possibly determine of what it is a photograph- Not even the one proffering the photograph.

@@vhawk1951kl tell me.the level and find out what I know in place of your diatribe and nonsensical pontification.

Truth hurts eh? I am aware that you groundlings struggle with complex sentences because you have the attention span of goldfish. Fair enough you have no idea whatsoever what that gibberish word signifies, nor can you because it is a nonsense idea.

Look I am the one who give those informations because I am a good guy. Now a day I am not to happy about those who avoid my name, keep my name secret and do like is Them work. Philippe Martin father quantum Physics theory projet 😎

I may have said that in other comments: Max is a confused soul between level one and two. It's just sad that he is allowed to lecture young people at MIT. I would hope Max reaches the level two ASAP.

Hello N-fazal, I am manic depress with bipolaire disorder type 1. I used to be type 2, after a huge psychoses who bring me an a type of coma for 3 1/2 mouth, my psychiatre at that time diagnose me from markam stouffville hospital Ontario Canada, Dr berber. This is the true. Philippe Martin father of new quantum Physics theory projet 😎

Also is my theory who bring me like that,(coma) he say (Dr) to consentrated on University and my work at That time, and after I realised in the time m'y mind blow just before it I was Working about 8 or 9 mounts alone in my big house at that time and juste before I understand all of it all. And still. Philippe Martin father of New quantum Physics theory projet 😎

All this time I was unaware that Vogue was a scientific publication. This explains the Theory of Everything,... except, aha!, gravitaslessness. Where, pray tell, does pride goeth absent the fall? Look around, friend. You're there.

I just made the same point to my father in a discussion. Nature likes to use the most messed up physics...always.

@Ruby Badilla No one is gonna read that.

@Ruby Badilla Typical pseudo-intellectual that can't take the truth so you pretend to be an English teacher instead. There is nothing wrong with what I wrote. I just wasn't as enthusiastic as you were writing that wall of text that no one will take seriously. Poor ego, getting hurt. Buhu! shows what a phony you are for being so easily insulted while pretending to know the secrets of the universe. XDDD How pitiful...

Okay, you thought you would write something that would make you sound smarter than everyone else. Wrong. Even I know the word is belies.

Probably infinity is logically inconsistent. Only we cannot prove the contradiction by finite steps.

Just chill and take life as it is. A single person can never know everything.

From my understanding it's kind of both. It has to do with big infinities vs smaller infinities. Either way the perception of that particular multiverse would be the same for anyone with mass. I believe.

@@fuhq5121 It is perplexing for sure. Branch off, beach.

I agree.

The biggest proponents of godless materialism and the Kabbalah numerology.

You mean the real universe, yeah. That's gone out of fashion.

Inflation is an extremely rapid expansion. In an inflationary universe gravity seems to get (almost) switched off for a brief moment and that's enough to blow up the universe by many orders of magnitude. There are different opinions about the question if inflation is actually necessary. Personally I am not particularly convinced, yet.

Actually, we're at the center, so we can only see about 47 billion light years, the radius

We're at the center because of the limitations in what we can see. If your in the desert and you can't see anything else you can always assume your in the middle.

Your r right thats a logical fallacy

The road to hell is paved with adverbs. S. King Fortunately I don't rightly believe much in wholly anything to do with hell, he stated steadfastly..