Тёмный

The Nature of Reality - Theory of Relativity, Quantum Science and Buddhist Thought 2/2 

Peacefulness
Подписаться 42 тыс.
Просмотров 93 тыс.
50% 1

Part 2/2:
00:00 The Dalai Lama made comments to the last Presentation
12:34 Parallels in the Buddhist Thought to the two Presentations
50:02 The Dalai Lama answers Questions and made some Comments
"Mind and Life" XXVI "Mind, Brain and Matter" (Day 2 afternoon), Drepung Monastery, Mundgod, India (January 18, 2013)
PARTICIPANTS
Tenzin Gyatso
His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama
Arthur Zajonc, PhD
Arthur Zajonc was professor of physics at Amherst College from 1978 to 2012, when he became President of the Mind & Life Institute. He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in physics from the University of Michigan. He has been visiting professor and research scientist at the Ecole Normale Superieure in Paris, the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, and the universities of Rochester, and Hannover. He has been Fulbright professor at the University of Innsbruck in Austria.
Michel Bitbol, PhD
Michel Bitbol is presently Directeur de recherché at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, in Paris, France. He is based at the Centre de Recherche en Epistemologie Appliquee (CREA) in Paris He teaches the Philosophy of Modern Physics to graduate students at the University Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne). He was educated at several universities in Paris, where he received successively his M.D. in 1980, his Ph.D. in physics and biophysics in 1985, and his "Habilitation" in philosophy in 1997.
Geshe Thupten Jinpa
Geshe Thupten Jinpa is the principal English translator to the Dalai Lama since 1985. He has translated and edited more than ten books by the Dalai Lama including The World of Tibetan Buddhism (Wisdom Publications, 1993), A Good Heart: A Buddhist Perspective on the Teachings of Jesus (Wisdom Publications, 1996), and the New York Times bestseller Ethics for the New Millennium (Riverhead, 1999).
Geshe Thupten Jinpa was born in Tibet in 1958. He received his early education and training as a monk at Zongkar Chöde Monastery in South India and later joined the Shartse College of Ganden monastic university, South India, where he received the Geshe Lharam degree. He taught Buddhist epistemology, metaphysics, Middle Way philosophy and Buddhist psychology at Ganden for five years. Jinpa also holds B.A. Honors degree in Western Philosophy and a Ph.D. degree in Religious Studies, both from Cambridge University, UK.
Over the last several years, largely through the work of the Emory-Tibet Science Initiative, Science for Monks, and Science Meets Dharma, science instruction has been given to a small group of monastic scholars. Very recently, the decision was made to require science education for Geshe degrees at Tibetan monastic universities, and to facilitate all monastic students being introduced to modern science and the profound philosophical and ethical issues raised by science and technology. In recognition of this fact, this conference is taking place at one of the historically important Tibetan academic institutions, Drepung Monastery in Mundgod, India (Mind & Life Institute, 2013).
In this video, i had cut out some passages with long traductions to the tibetan language (only in part 1/2).
See also "The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics (2007)" here: • The Dalai Lama and Qua... and the Playlist "The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics (Dialogues with Scientists 2007 & 2013)" here: • The Dalai Lama and Qua...

Опубликовано:

 

20 сен 2013

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 36   
@bw4025
@bw4025 7 лет назад
a point to view is that whereas it is exciting to know that the western scientists are on the cutting edge (apparently), the Buddhists and Hindus were investigating these matters over 2000 years ago. In other words, humble yourselves to those who came before.
@briancottrill65
@briancottrill65 9 лет назад
Imagination itself is creation...
@Peacefulness1
@Peacefulness1 10 лет назад
The Nature of Reality - Theory of Relativity, Quantum Science and Buddhist Thought 2/2
@karencontestabile6125
@karencontestabile6125 7 лет назад
Great! Thanks!
@jordanalimusic
@jordanalimusic 7 лет назад
Is there a text translation of this wonderful presentation?
@medavi47
@medavi47 9 лет назад
well explanation well done sir!
@ashishjog
@ashishjog 8 лет назад
Why they won't come to India!!!
@b.terenceharwick3222
@b.terenceharwick3222 8 лет назад
helpful.
@unitittii
@unitittii 10 лет назад
The part about the whole thing, the diversity further upholding into a whole summing, actually the unit before the beginning. It corresponds to the 2,500 year-old maxim of the philosophers, that the One must be from all and all of the One. Only then can they mutually from the baseless Nothing causeless-but for each other out "inventing" each other to suggest concrete to be considered as a presence, as so-called shadow on the wall (Plato). This will give the all-embracing a durability which would be endangered by existentially only if all other would disappear, but disappear only when all others go away. This simple durability to graft a patch from the outside in a timeless way which also could still be stretchable, is just as unnecessary and wrong, as the assumption of an underlying curvable space. This is based on a suggestive Now based and award-nested structure, but which consists only of suggestive power. In this sense, all a dream, an absolutely perfect spirituality, and only some of this kind can be self-existent "virtualize" out of nowhere. The shadow of unity around the others-structure to be adjusted without any expenditure of energy, flying around like shadows on the wall and it does not need to wonder, because there are those falsely called as electrons on shells structures about which we no longer wonder for a long time, where these their tireless Power bring forth. The isolated particle model is wrong and doomed to failure. However, this will admit their representatives until they finally get no more research funding for it. The dissection in - here is a particle and there is his force field - is wrong in principle and brings a on the wrong track, therefore an underlying space would be curved. If the elemental is considered as being all inclusive is a summary of time considered as a unit of the whole is arching, then all modes of action by itself and no additional assumptions are found to explain some phenomena are introduced. If the arch all-embracing over the others away, then results from this one about casting the power play, which is to be divided in three directions of movement. In structures which are perpendicular strive in the vicinity of the nodal centers away and that but for the first time to occur in the transverse structures when a second elementary lasting has gone near it. The electron ring is located in the 60 degree angle between the partners and is therefore a penetration zone of the two of us that are around each other itself.
@Misanthrope111
@Misanthrope111 9 лет назад
Kurt Gminder word
@michelhenin9166
@michelhenin9166 10 лет назад
'
@atom286
@atom286 10 лет назад
The Lama doesnt seem to contribute anything new to help the Quantum physicists he just confirms what they already know.
@whitepowderbob
@whitepowderbob 10 лет назад
Normal laws of physics break down at the sub-atomic level.
@Horrortelltales
@Horrortelltales 10 лет назад
what we have to realize is that Dalai lama first of all is not a scientist, he has a big interest in it, but it doesn't mean he has a big scientific mind, so he's not Einstein in anyway, he even said that he learns from these scientists and he still do, he doesn't have a microscope or any scientific equipment for analyzing or experimenting either, he's a teacher of Buddhism and that's all he is, and he's pretty old too.
@udayjee
@udayjee 9 лет назад
Dalai Lama did not have the previledge to use technology as the scientists did. All he had to his avail were those thought experiments and meditations, and he just shows even then one can come to conclusions that many modern scientist today have come to through emperical observations. He did give them a second possibility though to why they are having problems in postulating a universal theory of everything.
@456inthemix
@456inthemix 9 лет назад
richard black - For him Relativity theorie and Quantum Physic is not a new thing it is a part of: Buddhism science, they don't make such fuss. LOL This gathering is a dialogue between ancient thoughts of Buddhsm and modern sience.
@atom286
@atom286 9 лет назад
I would have like to have seen him speculate on what it might uncover in the future, so as to give ideas for research. With the interference pattern what causes the randomness?
@allenhandy765
@allenhandy765 10 лет назад
It is the utterly dry personality of science that makes this seem like a square peg in a round hole predicament. Science does have a prejudice against accepting mystery.
@Misanthrope111
@Misanthrope111 9 лет назад
Allen Handy Of course science is prejudiced when it comes to "mystery". The definition of science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. Science only acknowledges & concerns itself with what can be observed then tested multiple times.
@alexchang1264
@alexchang1264 9 лет назад
I wonder why the Buddhist guy don't try to explain the theory in a simple way, rather he try to make everything so complex to make it seems rather complex and perhaps dare I say "sophisticated". Where as the scientists try to simplify the science theory to make It easy to understand. Who care about Buddhist terminology, get to the point.
@derekrogers1668
@derekrogers1668 9 лет назад
Because language and context is important.
@terrytong8665
@terrytong8665 9 лет назад
Alex chang Well....... I dont find the buddhist explainations complex. Actually its explained very clearly . Whereas, the scientists just saying " quantum theory " pretty much supposes the audience to already know it ( which many do cause its famous ) Remember they are classical philosophical schools , products of extensive debate. Making them conclusive they would become likejvague religious mottoes, like " Emptiness " ( which is actually where these arguments are slowly leading to ). Then people will think " Oh, these are just bunch of religious believers. Comparing them to science is like comparing Apple and Orange"
@terrytong8665
@terrytong8665 9 лет назад
Alex chang In other words, wt they did was not " Getting to their point ". But " Breaking down Your point sensibly ". That's why its long.
@derekrogers1668
@derekrogers1668 9 лет назад
so, like I said...
Далее
Этот Пёс Кое-Что Наделал 😳
00:31
Nature of the Mind
2:05:07
Просмотров 864 тыс.
A Fearless Heart | Thupten Jinpa | Talks at Google
57:31
The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics (2007)
1:25:41
Просмотров 44 тыс.
The Nature of Consciousness - Session 1
2:42:34
Просмотров 38 тыс.