the New Blender Fluid Simulator is AWESOME - MantaFlow Tutorial 

😂😂😂 why I remembered interstellar 🤣

@@techsobserver Because that's what it was referencing...?

same

More like 51 fps lol

thanks

I have no graphics card and an i 5 processor, is it gonnabe the same for me?

@@gamingcorner8254 I have an Intel Core i3 processor and no graphics card it still works for me.

@@akhaudiolibrary-internatio5515 thanks a lot

@@akhaudiolibrary-internatio5515 that's because mantaflow bakes using cpu cores, your gpu is not involved in particle systems afaik

😂

😂

😂

😂

OMG UR RIGHT XD

Waiting

The last build have received improvements, I have just seen it in their Live from today ;)

Im playing with the smoke and seems ok...takes a bit of patience. I just found that the last smoke sim I did which I deleted the lamp and used a sun ...the line that extends from the sun that you rotate for your lighting...even though the line stopped before my stream of smoke....there was a shadowed streak going through the smoke...I couldnt figure it out because I was sure it was something that might have been hidden but, after a few twists and turns....I found it was part of the ray of light from the sun....because if you drew a invisible line as an extention off the sun lamp ray, line whatever its called...it sliced right through that area but, it was like a shadowed slice going through it not a physical cut or anything like that. The water, I havent tried but, after doing a few more smoke sims I will try based on this one.... looks pretty good...Kinda like having flip fluids I guess. Great touch with the foam effect... makes it look great for ocean scenes. The only thing I would rather see is the cubes to not look evenly lit. Should be more from 1 side. Thanks for a cool tutorial Grand Master Geek

@@creativestudio4873 The sun has no distance-it is infinitely far away. So its position doesn’t matter, only its direction.

@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 sorry but, when I changed the postion of the sun and the sngle of the line for direction...the marks in the smoke moved ... and it lined up with the line that extended from the sun. I moved it a few times and each it did the same thing just different area where it showed up...basically like a shadow.

Haha

Lol good one!

I was just thinking about that....lol

Get the boffins on it, make it happen

ready player one did it

My first thought

how are u not noticed by people yet

@@Mukeshgupta-ei6rj hhaahaha

pp lol

did u guys have any trouble when doing the replay?becaause mine didnt simulate,nothing happened, i checked particles and there wasnt any liquid particle

oh my! it's dansky here!!

Oskar joemama lol

You my friend are hilarious, lmao

Needs to be done

Murder

r/cursedcomments xD

“Abra Kadabra Kadopi Bointed” lmao

try it anyway :D see what happens!

@@laurenpinschannels The PC blows up.

I have an intel corei5 and *integrated* uhd 620 graphics and i was able to do it just fine

@@gt581 i have similar; i5-10400 over clocked to 4ghz and 1070... wait thats not that similar oops

2030? Give it another 2-3 years and O bet cycles will be real time.

@@phynx1756 Wouldn't doubt it really.

That’s what makes open source so great, other people can build upon it and the people in blender can see how other programs with open source code are doing some things they can implement in their free program,

@@phynx1756 it can be real time with optix denoiser + 3090 rtx

@@dbzlinkinpark99 It honestly took more funding to get things to kick off. I used blender a decade ago and it sucked. I am very impressed where it is today, its amazing.

Hahahahahahaha

That guy is crazy, but we love him anyway ;)

James Gatdula *Cg matter has entered the chat*

XD

I switched to Cycles and I could see them.

Make sure "use flow" is on.

crank up your ´´resolution divisions´´. For me it worked on 34.

you need to be on wireframe veiw

@@Roaxial sadly I tried that and no better results

2 cores... right here...

@@chickencurry7642 same lmao but i have 4 threads

Im using celeron cpu

@@heirloom3d937 how'd you even comment...

Pentium 4 hackintoshing OS X Tiger here

Yeah, I agree, and my PC is no slouch but baking in higher res can take ages.

2 years after, im watching fluid sim tutorials to find how to solve this issue for two days straight lost a lot of time, still fucking around

I was having the same problem, i did a little bit of research of my own and came to a solution. When setting the fluid for the sphere, go to settings > Flow source and set the surface emission to a number different to 0. It worked for me, hope it helped.

@@eliluminado7 ima try, thanks

@@eliluminado7 you sir, are a legend. thank you!

El Iluminado Thank you! It works now!

@@eliluminado7 yeh didnt do it for me :(

@Seb Cox Flims this is what you need?

Thanks heaps!

Still not working for me.. :(

@@charleyrousset6408 Did you ever get this to work ? I don't...no fluid whatsoever. I am using Blender 3.0.

Same here! 😕😕😕😕😕

Been trying to do a tutorial for fire and smoke, and ran across the same problem. About to find out if it's the same for liquid simulations.

This feature is buggy. I had the simulation switch back to Geometry from inflow, even though I had never set it to geometry and it still showed it was set to inflow. I guess that's what you should expect for free.

I'm doing this, thanks.

I've been loving it! its the Champion series on the site here: bit.ly/2ltqTAS

@@CGGeek Thank you 😄

Make sure you made sure that its inflow I made the same mistake the sphere must be set to inflow

Click on bake data in domain settings. After baking is completed, you'll see it

@@chiragkhadpe4757 Yeah but we can't pause it like how he's able to. We don't see any of it until after it's done it seems like

You need to bake it first.

Where can I look to actually understand what the parameters control? Can you explain a bit more about the foam, please?

In modular option you can bake each part of the simulation separately (e.g. first the actual simulation, then the mesh, then the particles). In final, it bakes all of them together:)

@@Spartakos195 Valuable info. Thanks.

Yes I hate that

Hmmmm. I smell the sign of one of the 3 worst sins in the world: *Expensivism.* Hmmm. So stinky, so greedy. Yeah.

@@JOELwindows7 Expensivism... that's actually an interesting word

jesus christ, the blender help IS FREE, the finished project isnt, the mans gotta make money somehow mate

@@TechCrate now that's the detail we supposed to hear.

thanks! .. i think

I would wager adding a transparent plane in fromt of the camera as an effector would do the trick

Does anyone have an answer to this? I've had this problem for a while, other following his other tutorials..

ypu just need to bake the mesh, so the cube will become the fluid mesh

@@vini79000 the "Bake Mesh" button doesn't appear

@@MonkeyShark Bake the top one first, then the Bake Mesh button will appear

Same problem

Figured it out, I missed that keyframe step.

are you even using blender 2.82? Mantaflow is not available in 2.81 or lower.

check viewport display

Keep up with the good work

Did you get an answer?

when you open a project it opens it in the solid view perhaps press z and change it either to rendered or shading

Under Physics > Domain > Cache you have to save a custom folder because the default is temporary.

I have the same problem, I think this is a bug. Using the newest version of blender could maybe help

Blender just keeps getting cooler!

did you yeet your graphic card

@@kieranidris1103 Sounds like it

Same thing for me, did everything as per video, press play on timeline, nothing happens. If I bake the particles and mesh, nothing still happens. It's as if this feature does nothing...

@@Mythyc I had the same problem, download Blender again, they released an update today. For me it works now without problems

@@Paddy.121 Just updated to the latest alpha, and I'm still having the same problem as the others. Maybe I'm still missing something -- any ideas?

I have no idea but with a crappy 400 dollar Lenovo computer from 2015 it takes an hour to bake but with an Intel Core i5 9400 and a Nvidia Geforce RTX 2060 it takes around ten minutes.But if you do a big simulation with a big resolution and domain with colliding objects be prepared to wait at least 7 hours.The Lenovo won't do it at all.

It was fairly fast on my 2700x TBH. I got around 3fps.

@@thirun4347 I'm on an older i7 7700k, so only 4 cores overclocked to 4.6Ghz, and playback basically shut Blender down, haha. I could *start* playback, and it would run (very slowly), but I couldn't *stop* playback and had to force-quit.

i5 8600k here and runs fine..

@@BroutyMax If I leave it on "Modular" instead of "Replay" it runs smooth as butter. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@@mpbMKE even on replay it was about what we see in the video for me idk if the gpu helped on that i have a gta 1070

*this is not fine*