The Nazis in Power | The Night of the Long Knives | Part 1 

Don't know what I think about it...

Our antifa is a lot like the SA.

@@philiphorner31fighting fascism and being a fascist are exactly the same things! you’re so smart!

Just be quite you peasant.

You mean his "Inspector Clouseau" impression.

Thank you for this very insightful clarification. Just shows how crucial is a solid linguistic and historical foundation of the material to be translated.

I wonder if "overlord" would capture the same meaning.

@@JM-iu7qx liege lord works as well

Who knew the Nazi’s were such naughty boys?

I’m beginning to think these Nazi’s are real jerks

​@@patl709 Holocaust what?

Opposition? They killed nazis, lol! The opposition was a bit before.

Politics! Amirite!?!?!? 🥁

Because they were freemasons,

Trump will probably be doing that in a few months and yet they’ve got the fifa World Cup/olympics in two years

The standard setting of humanity is cowardice.

“…for some reason” 😅 perhaps because they don’t want to brand themselves with the nazis??

I enjoyed the banter.

Mr Jones.😢

The only one I can think of was G Ward Price of the Daily Mail. One reason I believe he interviewed Hitler is because he wrote a book called "I Know These Dictators". I have a copy somewhere. But G Ward Price, like the Daily Mail, were enthusiasts for fascism. After the little 1939/45 upset I know the Daily Mail tended not to draw attention to its previous erm... lack of judgement. I think Ward Price possibly would have felt the same way, and turned down invitations to talk at schools.

@@kevinmcinerney1959 Yeah.. Ward Price died in 1961 so was unavailable in 1989/90 around the time of the visit to my history class. I'm estimating the gentleman was in his late 70's then which would place him in his mid 20's around the time the interview took place. I'm assuming it likely took place between 1934 and 1938. I can't find anything on google because I have no idea who the guy worked for or if it was even a mainstream newspaper. It could be mentioned briefly somewhere in the ocean of literature written on the subject or could be potentially found by people who have access to archive material with official appointment diaries etc.

@@kevinmcinerney1959 From wikipedia - The 1930s saw Price carry out several interviews with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. The British historian Daniel Stone called Ward Price's reporting from Berlin and Rome "a mixture of snobbery, name dropping and obsequious pro-fascism of a most genteel 'English' type".[20] In his articles, Ward Price consistently sought to belittle those who criticised the fascist regimes for human rights abuses, downplaying such reports and attacking the motives of the critics as self-interested and biased.[21] In several of his articles, he argued that Jews and Ethiopians who criticised the Third Reich and the Third Italian Civilisation were only doing so to "play the victim" by garnering sympathy that they did not deserve.[21] Stone described Ward Price as a crypto-fascist who professed to be an objective journalist who was taking a "just the facts" approach in his reporting, but in fact clearly admired and liked fascist regimes.[22] Ward Price was very close to Lord Rothermere, the proprietor of the Daily Mail. The journalist Wickham Steed called Ward Price "the lackey of Mussolini, Hitler and Rothermere"

@@kevinmcinerney1959 I'm now beginning to wonder if the story perhaps got embellished over the years and maybe the man i met was a secretary or assistant of some kind that managed to get a signed book and a handshake rather than a published interview. It's fair to say that if that had happened to me then 50 years later it probably would have morphed over time into "When i went to interview Hitler and advised him that if he happened to go to war in the future he really shouldn't bite off more than he can chew and make sure to be pragmatic when it came to logistics.."

Funny you say that, in an interview Dom said that someone thought he and tom were younger than imagined.

They were pro-inequality. They supported private property rights for those who "deserved" it in their caste-race pyramid. They pretended that class didn't matter yet made everything about hierarachy and absolute obedience, including to private bosses. It was the workers who weren't supposed to mind their exploitation. The capitalists were allowed to oppress their workers (and later work slaves to death) as long as they expelled Jews from the boards of directors and replaced them with Party hacks. The capitalists embraced Nazism because it threw socialists in concentration camps and guaranteed their own survival with war contracts. So no different than capitalists anywhere else on Earth.

... No he didn't, you can literally read Stalin's own memoirs and books (people don't because they assume they already know everything after other people have told them about him) and he laid out in Black and white how he felt about hitler and the "Hitlerites"

Isn't he supposed to have said something like "now that's how you do it!" I think he saw a ruthlessness which he shared. Perversely he did trust Hitler, hence his refusal to believe Hitler was preparing to invade Russia in 1941, amd the two week depression he sunk into after it happened.

@@humblescribe8522 yeah okay, he was literally mobilizing for the largest offensive in European history before Barbarossa was launched against him instead. But please keep propagating the "Poor Uncle Joe" American BS.