The Observer is the Observed | Krishnamurti 

The observer is the observed The thinker is the thought The doer is the doing When the observer, thinker, doer are absent then you are free..

Observer is the observed: This is the beginning of knowing you place in this universe. Golden Words. Thank you J.K.

Most profound statement ever said in history regarding human mind

the cinematography in this video is simply stunning!

This channel deserves more recognition! Great work mate!

The Observer (egoic mind/past pain, pleasures, experiences reacting in the now judgmentally) is the Observed (by our non-judgmental awareness or higher self - as if observing something for the 1st time with no previous experience) My 1st awareness with the observer is the observed. Let me explain. Years ago when I was experiencing a great depression, there was part of me in my upper charkra just observing. What it showed me was that my egoic mind was judging my life now (death of a person close me and money and health problems etc.) and comparing it to happier times which made me very depressed. It showed me that my ego mind was causing my suffering by my judgement and comparison, and it was not helping, and I preferred to be happy. I immediately bowed to God within for the realization and immediately my peace of mind came back with no hint of depression, then I started feeling an expanding love in my heart area beyond my physical body, then it shot up to above the top of my head. I felt blissful and noticed how silent my egoic mind was. For the next 3 days my egoic chatter was a lot more silent than usual with occasional thought. Then 3 days later the chatter started to try to creep back in, but I saw it was trying to do the same thing as before, so I observed it again without judgement which brings in duality, and then things got put in proper order. For myself and many, the egoic mind often runs the show in between short bouts of intuition, peace, meditation and such. The egoic mind categorizes, judges (brings in duality), separates us from each other and God/Source, prevents direct perception and causes most of our suffering. The egoic mind cannot control the egoic mind, but it can be observed by our Spiritual nature or higher self and get put in proper use or order. The observer is more like observing something for the 1st time with no experience, judgement or past, just pure observation. There is great peace, love, bliss when you operate beyond your egoic mind in control. Your egoic mind is more to remember how to get home and protect this temporary physical body suit. Your spiritual or highest self should be running the show and using your body and egoic part of the mind as needed. We are not this temporary physical body suit, nor egoic mind identity, we are eternal consciousness or the observer, all part of one God/Source. Eternal God was one and alone, and desired to be many in order to enjoy the delight of self discovery as God ascends back to itself through the successive stages of evolution. God wanted to know more about itself thus all these creations. To realize your true self or Spiritual nature is the exact reverse process of creation. Also if you get attached to things that change, you invite suffering unto yourself. (Detachment can be the key) What in the physical world and egoic mind does not change? I am grateful for what God/Source gives me and one day takes away. God/Source is the Ocean and we are not just a wave of the Ocean, but the whole Ocean in a wave. Practicing meditation helped me to discover true meditation. Do you know why some meditation traditions observe the breath? Your breathing is in the now, not future or past, and your attention/energy goes there instead of following the train of thought. It helps you to observe more, rather than judge. The breath is what connects your true self to the physical body suit, no breath and the body suit will die.

what a gift? i have seen this video! you are a great observer of J.K. you tube is to day used me! thanks a lot!

Could you please continue posting these bite size Krishnamurti speeches. They are short but precise and perfect. I understand it takes time to create video, so even if you can just post the few minutes with a background song and a still picture to take less of your time. Cause you haven’t post a video for a while and I assumed because of its time consuming problem. Thank you very much for everything.

I'm watching this after2 years but it is still fresh and young as it always was..it is power of word by absolute man...thx for posting it

Whole world need to know this man!!!!!!!!!!

Huge thanks for spreading his original words

A precious resource, please keep making these beautiful videos. 🙏🙏🙏

Very profound!

GREAT speech . Carpe diem . Enjoy calmly . Seize the day in a healthy way . Mindfulness .

Loved your work the immeasurable Pls continue uploading these kinds of videos

This is great! thank you !

Life saver for me thx with gratitude

thank you so much

The meditator is the meditation. Krishnaji 🙏

MARAVILLOSO

Please continue to post the videos, they are short and conveying the message to the point.

The world needs more videos of the talks of Krish with beautiful imagery and music, thank you very much.

Muchas gracias.

I subscribed..!! And the reason behind this is Krishnamurti ji🙏

I have understood from other teachers that a goal of meditation and mindfulness is the ability to observe yourself objectively without self-judgment. However, it is hard for me to reconcile that with the teaching here of Krishnamurthi. He seems to be saying if you observe yourself and you are in a bad mood, say "angry" or "frustrated", then if you ("the observer") are separate from the anger, i.e. you are objective and not angry, then you will suffer. He seems to be saying that you as the observer should be angry just like you as the observed. That there shouldn't be an "objective" observer who is not angry and is just observing the anger. But the initial teaching, taught by many others teaching mindfulness, is that you should try to observed yourself objectively; and that the "anger" is not you, it is just an emotion. Im having a hard time squaring these two views; do others see the contrast ? Am I understanding correctly?

Wowww. this is awesome!! transcribed and beautiful visuals. thank you!

The essence of self awareness.

Great sound quality of speaker

Wow very beautiful ❤️

Great work. Please keep making such videos

if the thinker is the thought, this means you identify with that thought? you are the awareness behind the thought

Wonderful insight ❕

Yes observer is observed. 💞

Thank you for posting short videos......

It simply means that when you look at a tree with all of yourself, when there is no analysis, no thoughts, no self, then you become what you're looking at. In order to understand K. Its necessary that we spend time listening to him. And he has always said the more we analyze we miss the bus entirely.

Please, keep up with the good work.

Amazing music 🔥 congratulations, very great work😍 I liked your video 👍🔔

Very attractive & life changing

when the observer is the observed , that's the truth, the highest form of inelegance

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻JK

Greatest Master ...Jiddu Kirishanmurti 💐💐💐

We are totally separated from "sin," ALREADY. "Come ye out from among them; and, be ye separate." Thank YOU, God.

🙏🙏🙏🙏

Nice

واو..محاولة جميلة جدا...

🙏🙏🙏

🙏

The “What is” is a living thing !!!!!!

🎉😊

Would anyone know the title and artist of the music playing in the background of this video? thank you

The observer is the observed The thinker is the thought. The experiencer is the experienced.

From the comments below it is sure world is full of super intellectual who are interested in only making simple things complicated.....

So in a way, whatever, literally EVERY THING n EVERYONE IS ME ! I am that tree, dat mountain, that painting, that pretty lady whose taking her selfie, that waiter picking up d cups, that ocean outside as I gaze through d window of this cafe "i"m " sitting in just about to have tea! N then I get it- if I love myself n if everyone is me, it's so much easier to interact with them with patience n respect n I take it ..with love!💞 Thanks for sharing this video, right time right place right RU-vid 🤩🙏

When observer is not present only observed is present then who is observing that observer is not present and observed is present? or if I say that only observer is present observing the whole process very completely that all things is different from me it may be your thoughts etc...then it also may be your end of conflict . Complete observing is also the end of conflict.because there is gap between controlled and uncontrolled mind if we totally observe this gap then there is no conflict

It's not a simple thing, but if you reach it, you are Free. Just observe your self even there is a bad thoughts, you will win the devil. We are sons of the universe. ❤️

Matthew 19:25-26 Stunned and bewildered, his disciples asked, "Then who in the world can possibly be saved?" Looking into their eyes, Jesus replied " Humanly speaking, no one, because no one can save himself. But what seems impossible to you is never impossible to God!" If you would like to know the real solutions to mankind's problems then ask one of Jehovahs Witnesses. After all doesn't one ask oneself how did this duality Krishnamurti speaks of start? Was it not when Adam and Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and bad? If they had not done so would we ever have had conflict within ourselves

The observer and the observed are (apparently) distinct aspects of the same "dream" which we call reality.

to me the observer and the observed are the same thing and are divided at the same time. divided in that the observer has a higher authority in directing thoughts and emotions, but at the same time it is the same thing in terms of essence so that there is no conflict. which is clear when the observer appears all thoughts and emotions go to the side and everything becomes clearer so that thoughts and emotions can recalculate more productively

In meditation, suppose you observe the thought then you observe that you observe the thought and so one...like infinity. Has anyone faced this problem? and know how to do that correctly?

The observer is the observed is one of the most significant things ever said by any man on earth The statement is as extraordinary as JK. The statement belongs to the unknowable. When there is nothing to observe when there is only the observer is left then the observer itself becomes the observed. Because there is nothing else to observe what else can we do The knower simply knows itself The seer sees himself. The energy that was going towards objects thoughts there are no thoughts no objects. The energy has no way to go any where it simply becomes a light into itself. There is nothing that it lights it lights it lights only itself a flame surrounded by silence surrounded by nothingness. AK

Suppose if I am observing a chair, then I am a chair...means the thought that came into my mind is in form of chair, if I am observing a tiger I am tiger

Hmm yogshastra

The thing is that Krishnamurthy use to say or pronounce the Observer word on Two different things.. (The one is that who is the seer who is observing, who is the Seer, the watcher, and the another one is the "Mind, full of Conflict, the working mind.)

The observed (reality) is a part of the observer( who creates reality); hence can be no conflict among them and no need for supressing anything?

not easy task for average mind to understand completely,

Separation is the ultimate illusion

1: consciousness is like water 2: observer (the identity) and the observed (the thought) are like containers that holds water. Like the ocean and clouds create each other, the ego and the thoughts create each other.

Damn I thought the objective is to stay as the observer until the ego self fades into the background. I often find myself confused and frustrated in this search.

Eternal pranams to the great Krishnaji.

ok.can anyone say what happens when the observer is the observed?

If you are interested in understand this very well hear this other point of view of the same: Your own being is happiness, from Rupert Spira. Also check Hume the philosopher who said "The me is a bundle of toughts"

They did a study on the messages that the brain sends to the heart.. and somehow discovered that the heart sends more messages to the brain, than it receives.. by a bunch. They didn’t know why, nor did any of the researchers dare speculate the reasons for this I myself thought right from the start one possible reason.. Could it be, that the observer is within your very heart, and the reason throughout history things were always heartfelt.. or in your heart of hearts you knew Infact the strongest feelings of what is right, or wrong.. let alone.. When falling in love.. are all from your heart, and seems to always shape your thoughts, long before the what some say is rational thinking, that you may think is in your brain..? Any chance of this being the observer? It makes you think about the way you treat them,and or me as in you’re own self.. esteem of the pride and ownership in lifelong caring relationships. Be good to others who have been made to believe that they have a purpose in their own life, and Forgivness is the blessing that you allowed to give yourself not just to these others., 1. Because in doing all that means is you’re wanting to change!! Think about it

Whether the converse is also true? That is, whether the observed is also the observer?

He's saying that it's fairy simple.

God grace Of king grace To recognize These persons. That's okay It's called Luck. Fortune favours the brave What u r on Zero. 💯 That's what I did 💯

Then what about question of raman maharshiWho i am Is it not conflict???

The observer is conscious while the observed is unconscious. How could something conscious is something unconscious?

I don't understand but I have an idea

What is this “me” that observes it’s own content? Suppose I sense restlessness within, and say…why am I being restless? I shouldn’t be. I should be calm. But the fact is, that which senses this state of restlessness within, is restlessness itself. The “me” is a projection, a split from this restlessness that claims to observe and tells itself to be calm. Most of us get caught in this illusion that we call “me”. Perhaps the only “me” that exists is the physical body. The “me” that lives in the mind is an illusion, a thought. So if I say…I am sad, it’s as if sad and me are separate. Sadness can only sense itself as it arises. There is no one to claim it. Hence, observer is observed. All of this is hard to see or perceive via the mind / brain. Our brain is heavily conditioned. We can hope to see this clearly only if we can attempt to look beyond the mind. This requires deep pondering and meditation.

From my limited understanding, it seems that meditation is a useful tool to understand all the objects in ones experience (both outside of the body and what's inside the body - thoughts, feelings, emotions). But the next step to growing understanding is the realization that observer is equally part of the dream as the objects . It's all one thing. The human mind wants to look for a clear "observer" in this experience but there's isn't one (which is difficult to understand). Instead, there is only the action happening on its own (doing, thinking, AND observing are all equally acting). God IS all this action. All that "you" can do is rest in this understanding from moment to moment.

Feeling u Is Observed Listening to Feel Is observation

i cant even comprehend the question :(

The true meaning is - Neither 'observer' nor the 'observed' is.

Drg Drishya Viveka

Observe is the observed the control is controled the thinker is the thought . j kuishna murti. Am I different from the content of my consciousness? If I am different from the thing I observe in myself, then there is a division between ‘me’ and the thing which I enquire into. We’re going to go into a little more. I observe in myself anger. I am angry. Or I am greedy, envious. Is that envy different from me who is observing that reaction which I call ‘envy’? Or that envy is me; I am not different from that envy. So, when I observe, is there a division between the observer and the observed? Then there is conflict. Then I try to suppress it, control it, or run away from it, or try to wish to change it. But if the observer is the observed, then a totally different action takes place. Are we dissipating the mystery of it? Because this is very important, right from the beginning. We are conditioned to the conflict of this division. We are conditioned to either suppress it, or analyze it or run away from it. We are educated, to accept this division. But when one looks into it very, very deeply - not very deeply, it’s fairly simple - one sees the observer is the observed, therefore, you eliminate all conflict.”

Nothingness can't be observer and observed.

Tell that to a gazelle... that the lyon and it are the same...

Don't add Even Zero (non superstitious) Not fear(zero) He having no right (zero) Put it in stories Not in theories 💯

no need music!

I heard the phrase "observer is the observed" from JK in some discussion video with few scientists, searched yt, and watched 2 more vids (including this), and my confusion isn't gone. I don't originally have a confusion, but now there is confusion, and it's created by jk. All this feels pure bullshit. Lemme explain. Whether I'm enlightened or intelligent or dumb, the mind is the only way for me to have an experience (thoughts or sense perceptions). If mind is observing a rose flower, suppose with full intensity, there is no thought, there is no self, exactly at that time. But the mind exists at that time, the observer. The rose flower exists at that time, the observed. So, observer is not the observed. It's a different aspect that the intense observation helps to not only observe the flower very keenly, but also helps the mind to experience peace or joy or bliss or ecstasy (depending on the intensity of the observation). From my understanding, in such intense situation, such energy (bliss for example) enters the mind directly from the source of creation. Still, the observer is separate from the observed, practically seeing. At energy level both are same because both mind and rose are essentially energy. At brahman or atman level both are same because both mind and rose are brahman alone, appearing as mind and rose. But at the materialistic level, mind (observer) is very clearly different from rose (observed). Now, let's see loneliness. Mind experiences loneliness due to a set of thoughts. When loneliness is at thought level, the thought is constructed and simultaneously experienced by the mind. So the thought has life as long as mind experiences it. Exactly at that time, there is no space in the mind for the mind to observe the thought. So, in the case of a thought, the mind can never be the observer. Observation of a thought is not feasible at all. After the thought goes away, 2 things remain. The -ve emotion of loneliness felt somewhere in the body, the saving of loneliness thoughts in the mind's memory. If mind is observing the memory content about loneliness, it is not technically observing, it is retrospection. So, observing is not feasible. If mind is observing the discharged energy of the -ve emotion of loneliness, this is similar to observing a rose flower. The observer (mind) is clearly separate from the observed (loneliness emotion). So, the phrase fails here too. The only thing that works is "experiencer is the experienced" and ONLY in the case of thoughts about loneliness, because as I wrote above, when the mind is experiencing a thought, both are one (unlike an emotion or a rose object). So, the experiencer is the experienced. But "experiencer is the experienced" isn't feasible in the case of loneliness emotion or rose, for the exact same reason as I wrote above for "observer is the observed". All this jk talk makes no sense to me at all. Please correct me if U clearly notice a mistake in my understanding.

This is exactly the opposite of what all great spiritual teachers teach, from the Buddha to Marcus Aurelius to Eckhart Tolle. We are not the content of our consciousness - I am NOT my thoughts, my emotions - and that recognition allows us to observe them without identifying with them. If you say I AM my fear, it's a recipe for disaster!

Absolutely there's no difference but relatively there's a lot of difference. What he says here in nonsenae when it comes to living in the relative field of existence, society, with fruit cake religios who want to kill you if you don't agree with or like their stuod nonssense.

Krishnamurti is wrong: That who you can see, you are not; that which you can observe, you are not; that which you can become aware of, you are not.

For those who want to see the original content ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KRonyIv4nBI.html