The Planet Closer to the Sun than Mercury | Vulcan 

Pluto did not get "cancelled", it's still a planet, it's just correctly described as a dwarf planet.

@@Totalinternalreflection It's a joke genius

@@CarlosSpicyWang I guess it is still too soon for some people ;)

@@CarlosSpicyWang oh it's _a joke??_ Now I know, I shall laugh. Ha ha ha ha. That was fun.

@@kennyutoob Good for you. Have a non existent planet cookie.

It is as they say about a broken clock.

In life, sometimes it’s better to be lucky than skilled.

Wow. There is something to be said for coincidence. Makes me wonder how much longer it would have taken to discover Neptune if coincidence had not played a part.

So, when he was wrong he got lucky and they found it anyway, and when he was right he got unlucky and it was the underlying understanding of the physical world that everyone had always held which was inconceivably wrong.

@@mensrea1251 Penicillin was a lucky turn of events, sometimes science gives you a boon.

AstroNOMERS, who study AstroNOMY!!! Astrologists* are the ones who think constellations and tarot cards tell your future. They are not scientists

On the biggest Italian tv channel, during a traditional end-of-year recap in December 2019, a famous astrologist predicted the next one would be a particularly favourable year for 'travelling and catching up with distant family'...

Of course they did, being charlatan pieces of sh*t they are...

@@illbeV wow, oppisite

@@illbeV astrologers on TV give a bad name. Anyone who actually studies astrology would know in 2020-2021 North Node was in Cancer/Gemini, it does not favour travel at all.

give that man a bells

Ongod. I mean its bound to be found on the ecliptic so you know more or less where to look but still extremely impressive

they found irregularities in the orbit of uranus which is why they found neptune so quickly

80% researching/planning, 20% doing

How they found Pluto when they did blows my mind and how they didn't even know it was a binary planetary system until recently! I saw the chart on how they discovered Charon. Pluto was a little blip and then it had a little blip smaller than it added to its on the side. The whole thing was barely two or three pixils

Oh I didn't know

im pretty sure that was like the year Ceres was demoted to an asteroid or somt

In that time period there were 11 planets Neptune wasn’t discovered yet but ceres Pallas Juno and vesta were all considered planet’s because of there orbit.

Ackshually... 🤓

@@noahway13 is that supposed to be me

Calculators and computers were people ... and telescopes had been in wide use for a couple hundred years.

It's amazing that people figured out how to make mechanical and then electronic computers.

@@nagualdesign An abacus is a calculator.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver I'm not sure what your point is, but yes, an abacus is a kind of calculator.

@@nagualdesign A mechanical calculator.

Spock came from Vulcan. Kirk dated Spock's Vulcan sister but broke up with her... She had a Vulcan attitude !

Read and inform

@@TIMEtoRIDE900 ... Kirk dated everyones'sisters....

@@tomrumler3577 and some of the 'brothers', apparently

What life lessons?

🖖

🖖

Um it hasn't even been 2100 yet😂😂😂

@@carlos_2121 r/wooooosh

🖖

Thomas Kuhn, the Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Someone needs to do this with wave-particle duality, or more broadly with the question of UFT

Vulcan was the dark matter/energy of its day.

@@jamesrodgers3132 nah, maybe for dark matter. But not for dark energy, since we can measure dark energy

The other day I was driving past someone and there was a light post in our way. The person was hidden from me as I drove past, the pole was in the way where I couldn't see them.. just like that!

@@alrightyru WTF?

@@alrightyru Not exactly. You knew the person was there, you saw part of them. He's saying we never even catch a glimpse or shadow of the sister Earth so we never knew it even existed. I've always wondered what's on the dark side of the moon

@@brucelucasjr5856 There's actually no dark side of the Moon. What we envision as dark is just the side that's always facing away from Earth. We can't see it from Earth so our instinct is to think of it as dark, but it's often illuminated by the Sun -- during a solar eclipse would be the most obvious example where the Sun is shining directly on it. There are many images of the other side of the moon available online although it's basically made of the same stuff as the side that faces Earth. No secret alien moon base or anything 😥

​@@alrightyru except the light post is a mllion times larger than the other person

I like to hope that it may be more likely as many simulations of system formation show many bodies from 0.5-8x earth mass getting ejected out of the inner system early in life. With so many perhaps one was also turned by another protoplanet into a far elliptic orbit instead of an escape one

As is often the case, many people confuse Planet X with Planet Nine. PX was supposed to be the planet perturbing the orbit of Neptune. When Voyager 2 made its 1989 flyby, they were able to do very precise measurements of its mass. It turned out that the mass estimates in the 19th century were a bit off. There was no need for a hypothetical planet, and that was the end of PX. Planet Nine is ANOTHER hypothetical planet and is supposed to influence orbits of Kuiper belt objects. Brown & Batygin and their team who had run the simulation program are convinced P9 exists - we'll see what happens...

“In a way the same kind of assumption” - if you're referring to the Batygin-Brown model, it's entirely different. Minor GR correction to the orbit of Mercury vs. a dozen of very obviously perturbed orbits (perfectly Newtonian, just very much out of expected alignment) explainable by a simple, although quite unconventional prediction of a planet on an unusual orbit. We observe a lot of quite weird orbit in multi-star systems. This is not at all prompting for a radical revision of gravity. You want gravity that changes over time, for it obviously perturbed these orbits in the past, but does not perturb them any more? But then did not affect other planets at the same time, so that gravity varies not only in time but from place to place, all within the gravity well of the Sun¹? That's too far-fetched. A past encounter with a massive body is a much simpler explanation for the orbits of the transplutonian objects. Computational models match-and these are many orders of magnitude more precise, multi-body computer simulations, compared to the simplistic Vulcan model in the 19c. Sorry about killing your idea on the spot, but just no. :) _____________ ¹ There _are_ models that attempt to correct GR in the very weak gravity limit, to get rid of dark matter, that stubbornly refuses to get detected. Nothing even close to solid math yet, but this is where we need to keep our minds open. But not in the Solar System, please.

Sedna is the only one of those orbits which is thought to be influenced by Planet Nine

@@cykkm baseline is: oddities in an orbit of a planet or celestial body led to speculations of another celestial body . It worked in the case of Neptune, it did not work in the case of Vulcan, and it might work or might not work in the case of planet X.

Known as confirmation bias.

Is anything a better example than love?

“The truth does not need our fervor, it will prove itself” . That’s truth, gospel or whatever you want to call it

Every relationship I ever had be like...

Our problem is that our math is flawed and that effects every thing we try and explain. In the past we used observation more that theory. Mass and gravity are just theories that break down when trying to explain what we actually can see.

dark energy/matter are complicated because they're not easy to measure and/or observe, hence their name. both venues are currently being explored: a model that predicts dark matter/energy, but for that you have to get evidence of it existing, which is the entire problem; or other models that do away with them and propose another underlying mechanism for the laws of our universe. an example would be string theory, or M theory, which is a very elegant and concise solution, but the problem with those is also finding hard evidence of such constructs. In sum, we can't completely check the quantum world, neither the far distant deep space, at least with current technology.

@@sparking023 it’s difficult not to question our math when it comes to these theories. The whole gimmick of dark matter and dark energy is that it isn’t observable, similarly to quantum theory. I really enjoy the math and effort going into them, don’t get me wrong, but it really sounds like a physicist got drunk one night and said, “Our equation is wrong because of an unobservable force!”, and that joke was taken as the leading theory. The James Webb telescope has disproven many things we thought we knew about the early universe, and left others in question. We need better instruments and new approaches, not to write off things failing to add up on invisible problems. And hey, maybe I’m totally wrong, dark matter and quantum theory are really, really cool concepts. And I’d love for them to be true. It’s just hard to say 1+1=4 because of a 2 that if you observe doesn’t exist anymore.

@@karalyzel3177 it's funny because a lot of scientific discoveries were made precisely because something wasn't adding up and then they looked further into it. but I admit that I too feel like a lot of scientists are "making up" formulae and throwing it on the wall to see what sticks. It's not the most refined approach, but in theory, if you try everything, eventually you'll arrive at the correct answer and you're also correct in the difficulty in confirming those theories. I think that until we develop a way to get out there and check those galaxies, we'll never have a definitive answer as to why they're acting weird. That or someone lands a verifiable theory of Modified Gravity

@@sparking023 Definitely! Either way we have lots to look forward to!

It seemed fitting! And I think it worked quite well!

Maybe about Planet 9 too

There's 2 they found vertically orbiting the solar system close to Neptune, niku an another I forget

​@Jinx now I'm getting this mental image of a giant sphere of meat in our solar system

phaeton was a planet hypothesized to have torn apart, which formed the asteroid belt. it was not a moon

The Sumerians were around when woolly mammoths weren’t fully extinct yet and the Pacific Northwest was still permafrosted over- and that’s just the oldest civilization we have any surviving record of, agriculture has been around since around 10,000 years ago when we were only starting to turn wolves into dogs.

@@badpiggies988 my question is when is the war that the dark ages destroyed in history finally gonna come to truth between the atlantians and sumarians with all the radioactive anomalies around the world 100% byproduct from a world war

For clarity special relativity is about the speed of light being the same for all observers (and physics is invariant to motion), general relativity explains gravity as a consequence of this

@@directoryerror6653 Thank you!

Yeah, Alex referenced it correctly (and even put up a graphic with the correct 1915 paper's title page) but then started saying special relativity later. A bit of a odd flub.

yes

Morbius is a 2022 American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name, produced by Columbia Pictures in association with Marvel. Distributed by Sony Pictures Releasing, it is the third film in Sony's Spider-Man Universe (SSU). Directed by Daniel Espinosa and written by Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless, it stars Jared Leto as Dr. Michael Morbius, alongside Matt Smith, Adria Arjona, Jared Harris, Al Madrigal, and Tyrese Gibson. In the film, Morbius and his surrogate brother Milo (Smith) become living vampires after curing themselves of a rare blood disease

@@pennsred4900 That's What She Said

are you a bot?

Truly, one of the planets of all time.

better question: what is Nibiru?

​​@@dull_demon4717 Nibiru is a planet that was proposed to be the homeworld of the Anunnaki of ancient Sumerian mythology. This is based purely on the mistranslations of ancient Sumerian texts by Zechariah Sitchin, in an attempt to prove that aliens had visited earth in the past. Despite his 'translations' being heavily critisised by actual Sumerian scholars, they were still accepted by ancient alien conspiracy theorists, largely because it lined up with their beliefs.

@@CHRB-nn6qp ooh gotcha

I like how you seem so sure of your intelligence

Nibiru conspiracy videos were fun to watch in early youtube days.

Could there be a Schrodinger’s Sasquatch?

nah, that's more like Planet X

And which celestial body would we name Venus instead I wonder? My vote would be Uranus. Nepture and Venus has a better ring to it.

when a planet falls into its star it causes massive issues in the star and its brightness shifts quite noticeably, so no

Very good. 🖖

Fascinating

"It's a planet, Jim, but not as we know it."

Maybe vulcan is closr to the sun than thought making is harder to find

What precisely is the nature of your orbit around youtube?

I think you're looking for the world "analysis," but yeah, I agree with you. 😊

And the souls born now in 2023 may yet see beyond the planets... :)

They look insane, very cool sponsor!! Reminds me of a recent technology connections video, so probably that is how they work 😜

It would have an effect on the orbit of Mercury which would be observable, but not explainable - even with the mass of the sun 'interfering'.

@@paulhaynes8045 The gravitational mass of the sun would mask the existence of such a planet. It would not be observable due to the inverse square law of how gravity works.

@@Novusod I'm not sure Einstein would agree with you...

No offense intended, but scrambling physical and mathematical reality to fit a desired effect is bad science. 🤔

@@paulhaynes8045 Einstein only disproved that no planet could exist at that particular distance from the sun. Newtonian physics predicted that Vulcan would have existed at 10 million km from the Sun. Einstein said nope, relativity proves no planet should exist there. However there could still be a planet at 1 - 2 million km from the sun where it's influence on Mercury would be negligible. Such a planet would be completely masked by the sun's gravity.

where’s thhe cross

​@@handledav yes. The Theosophic society was being formed near this moment and esoteric astrology, through Alice Bailey writings where claiming these esoteric realities as un collected / premanifested entity . thats all.

This made me wonder about the Star Trek planet Vulcan, is it as close to the sun as this nonexistent one?

@@CovertOperation13 No. Such a planet would be so hot that the surface would be perpetual lava. The planet Vulcan in Star Trek was habitable by humanoids despite being quite hot. It’s likely quite close, though I think Vulcan’s star might be brighter and hotter so possibly not even as close as Earth.

The Vulcan home planet is in the 40 Eridani A star system 16.3 light years away from your sun. Live long, and prosper.