Part II of The Mad Monarchist's Politically Incorrect Truth About the Russian Revolution, focusing on life in late Tsarist Russia -it was not the stagnant backwater most people think.
Exactly! And the same exact people are responsible. We know who they are. The group’s name starts with a “J” and ends with a “W” with an “E” in the middle.
@@vladvladimirov4399 The jews aren’t responsible as you think. The Rothschilds or “red shield” are court Jews working on behalf and handling the finances of the Vatican.
@@CHX_37 I believe it’s important to never forget why these wars are forged and fought for in the first place. It’s about giving more power to the people who are well off and to create laws that only those with proper education or understanding can tap into the full benefits of it.
I think it would be very nice if you could source most of your statements with external links and citations for where you got the information. I consider you a trusted expert on the subject of all Monarchies, but others won't. It is useful to have external sources when talking to Anti-Monarchists.
+Kaiser Louis-Philip V I'd look to *Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime* by Richard Pipes for specifics on how badly the machinations, terror tactics and general mismanagement of the Bolsheviks set the Russians back. Not that the Romanovs were doing a great job, but it was a stellar performance when compared to life under Lenin. And of course, when Stalin takes over, things go from bad to monstrous (particularly during the Holodomor).
Search the book "A history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind" almost all of the things he said I had read before in there and many more he did not mention.
@@DawnReiFaun Call it anything you want, none of the slander matters when it is the absolute truth. Inconvenient? Maybe to you, and others with something to gain from continuing their history of destruction.
@@vladvladimirov4399 The Jews are just the poster child or scapegoat for the pope and the Vatican. Just look into the Jesuits and Freemasonry. Secret societies destabilize nation-states. Vladimir Lenin was initiated into a secret society Grand Orient of the Peoples of Russia. Do the research.
Any one who has done anything close to descent / fair / equal... have indeed been forcefully removed. Look into the history of any country you will see. There some people that had fair idea ; the the rest did listen to.
Someone should do an alternate history about the Tsar, and Bolshevik revolution failing. If this exists please let me know, as I think it would be interesting.
There is a lot written by author Antony Sutton. It's basically an alternate history which follows the money. We find out how wall street was a primary funder of a lot these revolutionaries and how these people even used the cover of the American red cross to travel to Russia and give more monetary support.
@@123airaz Yes I’m aware of Professor Anthony C Sutton and his trilogy on Wall Street and the rise of both fascism and communism. Do you believe this results from republics and constitutional monarchies are more favorable?
Quite interesting information is being presented here. I would like to read some primary or at least secondary sources on all of that. Maybe you could share with me the sources you used in this video? Thank you in advance!
Not only him but his entire family, why the innocent babies. They should have a VIP awaiting their arrival to their dad's 🏠. In hell for the diabolical acts this family endured
Yakov Mikhailovich Yurovsky was a Russian Old Bolshevik and a Soviet Revolutionary. He was best known as the chief executioner of Emperor Nicholas II of Russia, his family, and four retainers on the night of 17 July 1918. He was jewish.
Imperial Russia grand production increases in 1900s are they accurate? Russia on paper should be the wealthiest nation on Earth. They have Vast untapped & undiscovered resources Wood, Water, Metals, Minerals, Stones & Gems etc, Petrochemicals etc. They have enough capacity to feed Europe+... Why isn't it the wealthiest nation?
I litterly cry thinking of what that nice sweet hearted yet naive young at the Tim man and his family everytime I think of the horrors they suffered for being good so why, did why murder not only
The Mad Monarchist I think movies from Western Culture poorly judge and misportray Nicholas II while jumping to conclusions about his reign except Din Bluth’s Anastasia. If you return to posting things on your blog can you do a review on Don Bluth’s Anastasia and give it praise for doing Nicholas II’s personality and ability to govern and rule right. I think Don Bluth has done Nicholas II justice and his reign as well.
If Russia was so advanced under Nicholas II, then why did the Russian military have to contract out to France and the USA to build weapons for them? the truth is that Russian industrial capacity could not keep up with the demands of the military during WW1.
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us and guide Russia to unite the True Catholic People in order to fight against the "Liberal Republican" menace . Amen . DEVS VVLT !!!
The Pope still hasn't consecrated Russia singularly. He consecrated the world and russia in the 60's and Ukraine & Russia last year, so Russia's mistakes are still spreading.
My only criticism of your video is this: Nicholas II was the wrong czar for the time. He was actually too lenient in handling Bolsheviks and other revolutionaries. If I were Czar, Lenin and Trotsky would have been executed in 1905. Russia would be better off if Nicholas II had been ousted by a moderate pro-royalist coup which installed a more competent Czar: Along the lines of England's Glorious Revolution which replaced the Stuarts with a more able Constitutional Monarchy 👎
No freedom in the soviet era? I think you should go to any of the old republics and ask anyone who lived before Gorbachov, Life in the soviet union was good despite what your american propaganda tells you. I would also like to see your sources, i have watched both your video's and not once have you mentioned a source. I would also like a explanation for regiment after regiment deserting to the red army, even the cossacks who had been the loyal army of the tsar refused to fight. You also never mentioned Khodynka. The tsar wanted to do good, but his lack of knowledge of his people and of what was happening in his country led to him failing as emperor and tsar. I can understand people thinking of the tsar as a good leader, and i don't agree with the murder of the imperial family. But he certainly wasn't what the empire needed at the time.
Agricultural output grow however transportation internally in #Russia was so bad that people in the cities never got the food destined for them, these and some others facts like some Russian politicians and businessmen were corrupt and there was no social welfare system many of the military leaders and #politicians were also incompetent and industrialists were plain greedy just like in the British Empire that almost had a revolution as well. #Poverty, mistreatment and injustice is generally what creates revolutions, the russian revolution was a city dwellers #revolution not a country persons revolution, if only the government and officals and the czar had just given the poor people more free food as they were starving the revolution would never have happened, but as is the case people had no empathy for one another, so you got anger, violence and fertile ground for revolution. Too many people have too little to lose too many people were at the bottom end of the bell curve.
In Russia, Tsar Nicholas had the nickname Bloody, the Cossacks were chopping the striking workers with sabers...The population of Russia was poor and famine often occurred in many provinces
@@rhysnichols8608 The people revolted in 1917 and set up a moderate government under Karensky. Then the Germans sent Lenin and the Bolsheviks to Russia, and they overthrew Karensky's government and set up a Communist government in it's place.
Technological progress was far from being a "good thing", as it's portrayed in this video. Rather the opposite - it made the traditional social order break apart, which ultimately brought about revolution. Think about that.
Martin Van Schalk yeah, I'd rather slave away in the fields instead of letting my machines do all the work and hang out in my air conditioned house banging my wife. Get a grip, moron.
The moral faithful traditional order is more important to society than industrialzation or purely technological progress. I would rather social cohesion, goodwill, and morality over that easily. I would rather work in MY OWN fields, growing food, animal husbandry, raising a family, on LAND I OWN under God, than being a slave who has his land usurped by greedy technocrats, corporatism, & cronyism who take away control of the means of production from the common man’s life & liberty. Efficiency is not the answer when it is dominated by the few and they pay the majority of “employees” low wages or minimum wage. Instead give back a man skills, tools, Land, and his own physical labours & health under his God given rights and he will be FAR richer in many ways, especially as each of his childrens generation grows up and nurtures it.
@@Matt-zp1jn Matt would you work in your fields with a gun to your heard working more then 12 hours a day, while me and my communist commanders seize half of your winter supply and ask that you continue to provide for the red army without any inclination of payment but tell you it’s for the collective good
Anyway Russia was then favouring the worst form of agricultural management no matter underdeveloped or overdeveloped : big plantation. The best model is middle-size family farm like the best parts of Europe.
The Tsar was however a awful General who was getting more and more paranoid as the war was getting worse the empire unstable with a backward government the empire was still a unshakable autocracy the duma had limited power
But without Russia, France would have fallen rapidly and England would have retreated to the islands. Germany would have won the war. Russia fought hard against Germany - Austria / Hungary - Turkey. The case was no one had expected the war would have continued after New Year 1914/15.
Russia fought bravely in World War I. Nicholas had some good generals during the early days of the war. Nicholas took over during the latter days of the war. He did his best but he was being undermined by his enemies in St. Petersburg who were jealous of him. The first revolution happened and Nicholas was forced to abdicate. Then the second revolution happened and Lenin took power. Then monster Lenin murdered the tsar and his family.
Read world history, then you will know Russia was in very great progress both agriculturally and industrially, that wanted countries like US and England not, therefore they financed and sent revolutionary bandits into russia to destroy the country.
