I the last 30 minutes of this series taught me more about history then my entire time in school. But I am from Australia, so I can see why and who is in control now. Thanks mate. God bless.
My paternal grandfather was a military priest executed by the Jewish Communist Bolshevik while my father was in the Russian Navy stationed in Vladivostok serving and protecting his country. My maternal grandfather was a very intelligent hard-working wealthy man who owned many acres of land, a home, and livestock, the Jewish Communist Bolshevik confiscated everything he owned. His property was distributed to the peasants. This angered my grandfather tremendously. He became an anti-Communist leader. Grandfather was caught and sentenced five years in prison. He was released in 1934. Several years later, he took my grandmother and my youngest aunt to Frankfurt, Germany, where he became a Mayor of the town. Grandfather is buried in Frankfurt, Germany.
@@rhysnichols8608 No, grandfather did not fight for Germany. When he got out of prison, grandfather continued being an anti-Communist leader with a much better plan to avoid getting caught again and be executed. He did not get caught the second time. He moved to Frankfurt after the war was over. Besides, he was not that young anymore and the only thing on his mind was to find a safe place for his family.
Imperial Russia was moving towards a constitutional order, but not fast enough for some people. So they had a Republican government that lasted a little over half a year before Red October which brought the Russians back to serfdom.
@@eleanorkett1129 Constitutional "Monarchies" are just Republics in disguise, inherently evil and masonic controlled aka judas just like the Marxists, would have been the same outcome, the anti-russian massacres all the same, just like in any and all revolutions. Destroy all Democracies/Republics and all Marxist states from the face of the planet. Constitutional traitors deserve no mercy nor respite, Delenda Est Traditione Monarchia Imperat Maximus!
Thank you for having the courage to share the facts/truths. The murders of the Czar’s family was cruel and unjust. It hurts me still to read about it. From looking at the pictures of Russia then, I cannot help but wonder what Russia would be like today. On a different note, my father in 1972 was at the Naval War College in Rhode Island. He was a LCDR in the South Vietnamese Navy. He had a picture of his International classmates, all officers from Iran, Iraq, China and other countries. On the back of the photo, it was signed by his classmates. It wasn’t until in the 90”s when I saw a documentary (Dateline, I think), that had the story about the Shah of Iran. The Shah and his family had a hard time getting their former Allies to accept them into exiles. Very sad, because Iran was very westernized at that time. Unfortunately, I have lost the International picture during several moves when I was in the Navy. Very disappointing to see and live through so many wars and see so much turmoils. I still have hopes that the World will get better for our children’s sake.
The "Islamic Revolution" was fueled by Islamist-marxist terrorists who were often students who had been fed leftist bs in their western colleges. The west was behind the fall of Shah. Iran has been in constant struggle since he left. Tbh I cant say his wife Farah who is still alive wasn't behind it as well since she was broadly smiling in the photo of her leaving Iran forever. The Shah wasn't a flawless leader, but he loved his country. Unlike the current pedophilic leaders that took the seat after him. They are very good friends with communist countries as well, which should tell you enough about what they really are.
Sir George Severn They betrayed him. In 1918, Lenin suggested to the British royal family, that they could pay a tribute to the bolchevics and in return, they would send the Russian Royal Family unharmed to England. George the fifth refused, and by this, he betrayed his cousin and his family.
@@therussian572 Lies, King George V agreed to bring the Russian Imperial Family to England. The British PM at the time David Lloyd George denied it and said it would bring about a bloody revolution in England. The British Empire was a constitutional monarchy, the King was overpowered by the treasonous politicians.
@@therussian572 George V wanted to bring the tsar and his family to England, but the prime minister and the parliament refused to allow it. In England, the king is a figurehead. The power is with the prime minister and the parliament.
The Kaiser actually realized the threat of Russia very early on and urged a concentrated attack on Russia and that the army essentially hold the line in the West and attack in the East and knock Russia out as soon as possible. As usual , the generals ignored him and essentially told him to go home and polish his medals and let them take care of the war...They took care of it alright then sent him packing to Holland and paraded around like heroes and looked for a scapegoat for their failures...
George Treepwood Hmm interesting, but I do think the schleiffen plan seemed more sensible at the time. Who knows how effective the kaisers plan would’ve been??
@@rhysnichols8608 Well the British made it very clear that they would declare war if Germany violated Belgium. France didn't even have the population to stop Germany on its own.
@@eleanorkett1129 the black check is a myth. Specifically, it's the myth that Kaiser said the Austrian than they can do whatever they want. It was his PRIME MINISTER, not Kaiser himself. Wilhelm II was NOT IN GERMANY at that time, he was on holiday trip. So stop spreading bullshit
The Tsar should really have sided with the central powers....he had far more in common in his world views and politics with the kaiser than he did with the damn French and my nation (UK) As much as I sympathise with him and don’t believe the lies about this man, I do think he was too weak minded and indecisive. He would’ve done better to join the central powers (as Russia was previously) but he came under the entente shortly before ww1. He should’ve known what the democratic governments of France, Britain and USA were planning....the kaiser also didn’t want a war. All Nikolas has to do was leave the entente and this would nullify the confidence and vice grip of the French and British governments and their provocations for war would fail. Back to the drawing board for them....The Tsar was a bit of a short sighted bitch in this instance.... a good man and decent ruler but too naive and weak. He could have prevented a massive war if only he didn’t needlessly back up and bolster the French and British. The destruction of Germany was being planned for decades and the international banks were instrumental in manipulating governments into war. It came down to the Masonic leadership VS Christian leadership of Europe, but the Tsar was the only Christian leader on the wrong team.... Central powers victory = no USSR, no ‘democratic’ domination of western people’s, end to Masonic influence over European affairs and a stronger traditional future for the continent.
The tsar felt obligated to support Serbia because they were Slavs like the Russians were. So he declared war against Austria Hungary and it's ally Germany.
If the tsar really cared about pan monarchism and his country he would have agreed to Germany's separate peace offer in 1915. The offer was extremely generous. It stated that all the borders would go back to pre war boundaries and that no indemnities would be owed. Basically it was like hitting the reset button and acting like war never occurred. But Nicholas said no and lost his throne.
+Александр П. Yes there was... During and after the gorlice-tarnow offensive. Erich Von falkenhayn had Bethmann hollweg and the German foreign office approach the Russian government in the late summer of 1915(right after the big Russian defeats and the Russian great retreat). The Russians were approached via the Danes as a neutral intermediary but the Russians wouldn't allow it, saying they would stick to the entente pledge never to make a separate peace.
+Александр П. There are tons.. I would recommend Farrar's "divide and conquer" to start (as it is a book dedicated solely to he subject of German peace proposals in ww1)... Ritter's multi volume "sword and the sceptor" is excellent as well and deals with the subject in great detail
Thank you so much for ur video about the Russian Revolution. I have always been intrigued about Russian history, from the Czars, revolution & the USSR. Mainstream narrative seems to be implying that Czar Nicholas II is a weak Czar who was out-of-touch with the poor & working class.
Muy thanks to you Sir MM, My apologies for entering a topic that is no part of this chapter, I saw your vídeo about Emperor Maximilian , and I really appreciate that you State the TRUTH. everithing you said is true. Not all mexicana are uneducated and de alzó disagree with the official líes of the goverments that followed after Juarez. That _president_ was a real traitor. I could no leave muy comment because the platform does not allow it. Thank ver y much for speaking the sad truth.
Sir I appreciate your fine work. I live history myself and I enjoy doing my own revision and conclusions. Have you ever thought about doing a revision on Germany, about the unfair Treaty of Versailles. When the allies declare war on Germany when it invaded Poland and not on the Soviet Union.
nobody talks about the Bolsheviks because they were a jewish faction and your not allowed to talk about where the origins of Communism comes from or who Marx was and who supported them. These same Jews left Russia and came to America and they created Hollywood. They made a video here and youtube explaining How bad the Czar was and how they had a revolution after which many left...and they created the Hollywood film industry where they made movies about the Gulags and all the bad stuff of the USSR..which they helped create. Very informative!
You are largely correct. Obviously it’s a lot mor complicated and not as clear cut as you have laid out, but yeah the role of jws in Bolshevism is never talked about. They played a big role
@@rhysnichols8608 absolutely it was..not enough time or space to lay out the nuance for those who would take the time to read it. Thank you for your comment.. The Russian revolution is a fascinating topic and has many branches. I believe we are right now still feeling and dealing with the same conflict..played out over 100 years and now the very last of the people and their lineage is dying out and losing control of the dynasty have built. We are watching it crumble.
I am surprised this video series hasn't been taken down...... especially telling the truth about chosen people...they are masters of propaganda, Russian/Slavic people are good God fearing people,Judea bolshevism tried to tear that from the people,but in 1990 that was one the first thing people were eager to bring back
It should also be mentioned that during the July crisis leading to the outbreak of war, Nicholas Ii tried to avoid military leaders, but his civilian ministers were very anxious for war.
Restoration of monarchy cannot guarantee a better reputation for the Tsar. Society, not government, decides social attitudes. For example, Charles II of Great Britain was restored in 1660 but his father's reputation got no better.
MM, or anyone who may know, who holds claim to the throne of Poland? I realize some time ago, before the Kingdom was eaten by Prussia and Russia that the King was elected amongst nobles, but who could rightfully bear the crown?
One opinion is that the king should be of the Żywiec branch of the Habsburg family and another was that it should be the house of Wettin, after central powers control of Poland it was to be the Hohenzollerns, Wettins or Habsburgs, but technically the Romanov family still kinda has a claim as the tsar was the king of Poland, but the polish regency Council elected Karl Albrecht von Habsburg, but it was vetoed by the Germans
Thank you MM for producing this. I would want to mention two points which you mention briefly but did not go into detail. I think the pograms and persecution of the Jews within the Russian nation must be looked at as factor in these events. I have read other points of view that indicate that the pograms were sanctioned by the government and Tsarist police. The number of jews affected by the pograms is significant. I believe a Christian nation does not simply fall from within. There must be significant sinful actions being done either by the people or by the government that causes God's favor to be removed and to allow a revolution or overthrow to occur. This is not to minimize the hand of the Bolsheviks. I would also want to mention the foreign support for the Bolsheviks from both Germany and the US Wall Street elite who provided significant means for them to obtain power.
Russian Jews in NKWD and Russian Army,have done great job after the second War,with eliminating polish soldiers and officers,patriots fighting for kapitalizm system in Poland 🇵🇱 They always goes with the strongest
so then it is fine to murder people because you want a revolution..so the elimination of 30 million or more people because you dont like your plight..this has been happening now repeatedly by the same people now for over 100 years.. you need to read the protocols of Zion..zionism is the worlds plague and it has condemned this planet since its inception. Your people do not like monarchies ot religion. or heritage..other than your own. Ive watched those jewish apologetic films they come out with now..trying excuse Bolshevism...so now Communism is good too. I guess crimes against humanity is fine..unless it's you.
Thank you for this informative video. What I cannot understand is what actually happened to the Russian Orthodox Church during this time, because as far as I can understand, not one priest stood by Nicholas to help him.
There were a couple of priests who were executed for their association with the family, including the first who held mass for them in Tobolsk. If I'm not mistaken, he was accused of smuggling messages for the family.
you know I've watched all 3 Russian revolutionary Corrections but why don't you hit the nail at the center, you you glided over the Bolsheviks being juice, why
I also watched all three and had the same opinion. I was waiting for him to make that distinction but he kept referring to them as revolutionaries. It’s called The Politically Incorrect Truth so just say it.
God save the Russian people suffering and under the yolk of the godless authority and restore the Tsar, the true heir of Roman Byzantium and the God appointed leader of all Orthodox Christians.
The Bolsheviks did not get "lucky" {and the Allies won the war}. Germany's fate was sealed from the beginning, before the first shot was fired. The French, British, Belgian and American services had their strategy laid out in 1912: Tie up Germany in a war of attrition and bleed them dry, then send in the Americans to finish them off. In truth, the British Naval blockade did more to win the war than any land campaign, as no allied troops were even on German soil when the Armistice was signed. The German homefront was in a shambles by 1918.
The war may have happened earlier but the Zionist and Jewish bankers in America insisted on waiting until their Federal reserve Act was passed December 23,1913. This way they could force the American people to pay for it and put them in debt at a monolithic pace that they would never recover.
@Uni BlackSister The Titanic sank in 1912, two years before the war. And it hit an iceberg and sank. You are thinking of the Lusitania, which sank in 1915 when a German submarine torpedoed it.
I agree that Marxist leninists downplay how developed Russia was prior to 1917. But this guy uses the same type of overhanded argument in reverse. And that's the problem with sticking to an ideology. You have to try to shape evidence to show that your ideology is correct. In his case, it's monarchy. The truth is the Soviets absolutely developed Russia and the other republics. Yes, they had a railroad and some development to begin with, but that doesn't mean they didn't accomplish anything. They accomplished a ton. This guy unwittingly admits it in his own words by saying 'the majority of Russians were peasants' during WW1. 20 years later that was no longer the case. That there was industrial activity, factories, electricity, railroads all over the Union by the late 1930's is stagnation?? 🤔 We're talking industrialization in 20 years. Again, this is the problem with sticking strictly to your ideology. You have to say things that are obviously false
The Tsar was stupid as fuck in 1914. “Tried his best to keep the conflict from spreading” yes that’s true, but ultimately it was Russia’s escalation of an Austrian/ Serbian conflict that created a world war. The Tsar was a good man and obviously felt obliged by honour to support fellow slavs, but many of the ministers surrounding him had ulterior motives, especially expanding Russia’s influence to the balkans. The kaiser also tried desperately to get the Tsar to demobilise but no agreement was reached. Russia really was on the wrong side in my opinion. Austria Hungary and especially Germany were good Christian monarchies, France and Britain were far more subverted by globalists. I tend to believe the central powers had the moral high ground overall, and the Tsar meant well but really shouldn’t have got involved in the triple entente!
Good Christian monarchies who'd rather turn on "fellow" Christians effectively as soon as they rid themselves of Ottoman yoke, or at any other opportune moment? They had no moral high ground, give me a break. Germany and Austria bore and continued the same crusader legacy, no better than Britain and France, trying to forcefully impose themselves under the guise of being legitimate Christendom - a lost cause ever since the Great Schism and especially after the Fourth Crusade. It wasn't just an "Austrian/Serbian conflict" - it was and still is an ongoing battle between schismatics and the orthodox.
and you don't think that lenin or Stalin created a dictatorial regime? I think that you either don't know the facts about communism and socialism.. or you like empty promises of free stuff.
This video is lacking in a lot of detail- probably because it’s mostly false. Nicholas II was an inept and ineffective ruler who lived in what we now call a “bubble”, although his bubble was far more isolated than that of today’s politicos. The Russo-Japanese was was a terrible blunder, but he refused to learn from it and entered WW1 with a military that was even less prepared, if possible. He was a short-sighted leader who lacked the vision of Europe’s more capable rulers. He had no feel for the mood of the people, the state of his military, or the problems in his government. How on earth can you possibly call someone like that a good leader?
Did you watch the first video ? It looks like you did not. In it the commentator clearly says that the decision to fight a war with Japan was Czar Nicholas' mistake. Do not make assumptions when you did not watch the first two videos. Still, Czar Nicholas was a weak and moderately capable ruler. He lacked ruthlessness. He should have wrung the necks of all Jew "revolutionaries". He was too nice to them, he let them make disorder in Russia.
Its good to finally see someone with more then one brain cell, i'm tired of people just believing anything a random american says about a country he probably learned to hate all his life
@@victorkuppens4962 See there is Russia and then there is the USSR...2 different things...lets not confuse the 2. One was headed by a monarchy..and even if he was inept..he didnt deserve to be murdered with his family...by degenerate thugs who overthrew his country with help from globalist bankers and other corrupt governments....murdering millions of millions of people. those traitors should have been hanged..instead it was all Russians who paid the price for Communism in that country..and ultimatly the rest of the world lost as well..because it is infecting the USA today. We gave Communism a haven in this country and now 100 years later we pay the penalty for our mistakes.
