The Problem with Chaos Dwarfs 

You know, i'll admit that when i clicked on this video i was in a hostile mindset, but hearing your grievances and how they closely align with my own and how you calmly explained them in good detail just earned you a sub.

I had so much fun assaulting Rome and Carthage in Hannibal at the Gates. Athens and Alexandria also had fun maps. Blasting the crap out of castles in Fall of the Samurai was also a ton of fun. Medieval 2 sieges in the late game were consistently fun. I feel as if lessons learns have been forgotten.

CA is the only thing keeping beloved Warhammer Fantasy alive these days, but they definitely have some glaring issues with the game still, I can only hope they fix it with time, I definitely feel the points made in this video, gotta love when 1 member of a unit is stuck in combat and prevents the other 119 members from using their ranged weapons, or running away at full speed or whatever, the minor graphical issues are a bother for sure, but that seems like an animation/modeling issue for sure

Nasty Skulkers' "Opportunist Murderer", Tehenhauins "Blade of the Serpents Tongue" and Ungrim Ironfists Slayers "Journey's End" are all bugged, have been bugged since day 1 of TWWH3, and look set to _never_ be resolved. These are three examples of probably near 20 issues that I can list. CA seemingly doesn't care because, after hundreds of bug reports, not one finger has been lifted to resolve them. This is before we even enter into discussions about; Cavalry chasing down units being unable to bring down the last entity in a unit for up to 5 minutes (sometimes longer), Wizards on chariots being unable to fire off targeted missile spells, Units set to _not_ fire at will still dumping all their ammo into units they are chasing in melee (eg Marauder Horsemen), Units not set to guard just ceasing pursuit for no reason, Units (duelling Lords in particular) just pushing against each other, one nudging forward, the other moonwalking back, no attacks happening, Entire missile cav units shooting a whole volley at an entity that died 10 or more seconds ago, Units that can supposedly fire on the move (such as the Iron Daemon) being unable to do so, Numerous Spell tooltips being wrong, Cavalry having half the unit charge past the sides of their target (no matter how thin your formation) so they can embed themselves at the rear with no hope of extracting them, Chariots just sitting there after a charge. I could go on but we don't have all day. It's actually pretty disgusting, and we haven't even started on Campaign map issues...

Fun to see my Assyrian Babylonian heritage displayed in a video game but we weren’t this evil😅

The bug with flying entities getting stuck because of 1 model is honestly so bad that it has mostly stopped me from using those type of units entirely XD nothing worse than sending rot flies to attack something and then essentially having to give up on trying to give them other commands if even 1 other enemy unit comes close to them and you want them to do something else hha

One of the best DLCs in awhile. Put 80 hours in it even after it crashing on me again and again.

Oh bb a new channel that is going to do well. I’m stoked to see what you achieve here. Great takes one and all.

Those little towers and barricades that ruined the sieges? That was them saying they redid sieges entirely.

Having played with the chaos dwarfs now, there's another issue: OP flavour of the monthism... They are actually busted strong

Ive been a Total war fan as long as I have gained consciousness, I have over 3000 hours in Medieval 2, over 600 hours in Shogun 2, 400 hours in the original Rome 1, 200 hours in both the first and second Warhammer and almost 200 in Napoleon. Sieges to me are a big part of these games and provide a new and intense way of playing the game (if the odds are truly the same) . Ive never really liked sieges in Warhammer i find it more of an obstacle then something to look foward to fighting, though the IP is really the only thing pushing me foward when im doing them because ill be one step closer to a Steam tank or Gyrocopters. I truly do love playing Warhammer 1 and 2, but I am skipping 3. Nothing is really that interesting to me from gameplay and mechanics for some reason despite being unique. Just listening to my friends playing and discussing it just doesnt sound fun and there as you said in the video the game still has loads of bugs and glitches that effect the game despite being out for a year. The video take is just one based out of reason and love for the franchise and there is nothing wrong with being negative if the goal is to point out the wrong things about the game so the developers can improve the game. Phenomenal video really enjoyed it, def earned my support and a sub. As a wise man once said: "We will watch your career with great interest."

I’m to assume the building preventing rift from appearing in your territory was not in the early release and came later on? Good thing I waited 😊

I personally love the CD and all my friends do

While i am having a blast playing the chaos dwards, i must say you convinced me on many points. Even more important, ill have to compliment you video. It is so well made and you are so eloquent, it is but a joy to listen to. Have my sub (for what its worth).

I just want pathing to become better when giving orders. So if I draw a line for units to move through a gate, then they should be FORCED to do that, and I won't care that its gonna take them ages, just don't automaticly repath a 'faster' route when I draw the line while clicking shift. Its absolutely fine that units will pick their own path when I just right click.

What’s kinda silly is how they don’t mention the term “slave” at all in entire DLC.

The big issue of the Chaos Dwarves? The asking price. Granted we are getting some much needed updates as well but $25 is a bit steep.

I got back into the game after a break and was so excited when these guys declared war during my first dwarf IE campaign. I was then severely dissapointed when i was sieged by a thousand hobgoblins and one chaos dwarf. Thought it was kinda wierd.

On a note from the future, I have sank about 50 hours into a couple of Chaos Dwarf campaigns and I can wholeheartedly say that it is the second most well put together race right after the Tomb Kings, whose mechanics are not only unique (or at least were for some time), authentic and work seamlessly with each other, they are also a fantastic representation of how the faction is virtually digging itself out from under sand. The Chaos Dwarfs have pretty deep and layered mechanics, a roster that mostly complements itself internally, yet I feel like something sort of went missing from it. That having been said I certainly feel a bit robbed. Between getting less legendary lords for a higher price and a significantly lighter FLC companion for the paid content I cannot help but to think to myself how this might be the harbinger of something way worse. I understand that the map is already waaaaaaaay too packed with legendary characters (In no small part thanks to the insistence of people for factions with multiple lords in the same starting location to fly off someplace else) but I think the correct solution is either expanding the map, as in literally adding more provinces and space (sea lanes help a lot with travel) and the Isabella von Carstein treatment, and not overpricing a smaller package of DLC. I must say this, I think the Chaos Dwarf DLC is good. Yeah some graphics are not up to snuff, seeing them makes me weep for the Dwarfs who are not having it easy and a lot of their units are performing a wee lil' bit better than I'd want them to, but the price still gives me a pause, even retroactively, which is weird 'cause I don't think I'd do the same if it was the Tomb Kings, even if they cut out one of the four lords (as long as it's not Arkhan). So yeah, good video, I think. Try talking a bit louder next time.

Hot Take! I think you eloquently explained the general ire in the community

Great take Blake. Enjoyed the content, look forward to more.

I always wait for stuff to go on sale. It's new to me.

I mean, you say "Beloved race like the Chaos Dwarves" but the Chaos Dwarves haven't seen a model on the tabletop since before most Warhammer III players were born. They've always been kind of an inside joke told to me by players older and more veteran than myself, and I'm 45 and started playing Fantasy from 2006 until its eventual (temporary) demise when Age of Sigmar was released.

Fair enough arguement friend far better put together than the usual grievances

Strong, Brave review

Im in a similar boat they are to damn cool looking to not get but the clipping really kills the immersion

I just stumbled across this. I agree with your viewpoints, so I really have nothing to adress there. But man, I /love/ your presentation and diction. It hooked me right in. Just on the topic of sieges: While it shouldn't be up to the modding community to deal with the developer's stool, there are mods that deal with the whole tower whack-a-mole quagmire. Without it, I rather enjoy the sieges, even if I tend to cheese the hell out of them.

Well, I barely have scratched the surface of Total War: Warhammer games with around 300+ hours in both TW:W2 and W3 and I am not the best player, but I consider the overall balance of the factions available in W3 to be really weird. Some factions have such steep learning curves that make me never play them. One example: The chaos factions, most of them die in the first 10-20 rounds (when the AI use them, when I play with them I have a hard time). They are not a menace, they are barely a nuisance. I love the Warhammer Fantasy universe, I want to enjoy this game vanilla, but some things just make me download some mods to actually make the faction I wish to play more playable.

Well said, bachelor 's degree ROFL

Your volume is coming through as quite considerably more quiet than everything else I am watching today. It might be worth having a look at your settings?

2:30 That is the most tantalizing way I've ever heard a human talk about fishmen.

idk if i am so affected by graphical bugs, but I do wish the starting factions of tww3 were more interesting, tww2 highlight for me was skyre and throt, loved the cool interesting mechanics that felt rewarding and semi-unique. Kislev's mechanics left me wanting, nurgle's were just outright bad, except maybe as small buff, but mostly you were required to take the self plague of increase sack income because the cycling buliding's both made your settlements undefendable and gave no income. I don't mind having a battle based economy, but they were really not geared towards that save for the one plague. the slaanesh were okay, their cults were more usefule than others, but still didn't feel as fleshed out or campaign effecting, khorne was actually kind of fun, and was really geared towards military income via ruins becoming settled, but still i wish there was more. i could go on, but the choices for faction mechanics felt less than tww2 dlc's. they felt almost kind of like the tww2 starting lords, like mors who really didn't have much special about them at all, or rictus. this is too long, and no one really cares that much, ignore me.

well thought out. subbed. i love the game, but u r right about the bugs.. like in immortal empires, throt laboratory is still bugged (the chaotit energy stick doesnt work) and a lot of other bugs.. fixing sieges should be their priority too.. still hyped for chorfs tho.

Good take, I have about enough hours in the second game for a doctorate, and 300 in the third The third game is more feature complete, has many of my favorite factions and looks better. But at least in the campaign, it PLAYS worse, the AI is cowardly and yet aggressively anti player, sacking minor settlements and running away from any conflict. I don't even mind the sieges, CA just need to fix the, just make it like it was in 2 and they'd have a far superior game.

lol im listening to this video as im playing warhammer 3 and your talking about problems im faceing right now mid campaign lol

I also strongly distaste this "centerpiece" monster approach that they have taken. The elemental bear is just stupid in my opinion.

I really hope CA wont increase the price of all their new dlc after this one, the game has been expensive enough as is. I also own all of the DLC and bought them gradually, so to me it was justifiable, but it's really hard to recommend this game to new players with DLC for a couple hundred bucks that outright lock things out of the game if you dont buy them (as the DLC stuff is still in the game just not accessible to you).

True, true, true - I couldn't agree more!

I think its goodbye to the total war sage, or feels like it. People thought a whole new game would be built around it. Even if this is unrealistic since the foundation is already there for a Expansion&DLC type

Good take Blake

Here’s a second message for more engagement

I put nearly over 14,000 hours into Warhammer II and Warhammer III is still really lacking in comparison, the new siege mechanics suck the fun from the game like an overly enthusiastic vampire. You sum it up so perfectly when you point out "there is simply no strategy". I think they should simply return to the sieges they had in Warhammer II and it's one of the great flaws in modern corporate thinking that they simply double down on any errors. The sieges on Medieval were breathtaking and so much fun, yet rather than use them as a model we were given something that feels like it belongs on a mobile phone game

Agreed, I think CA could do more

I stopped playing because of those repetitive settlement battles and the insane pacing of the TW3 campaign. After the changes and the launch of IE I picked it up again and actually looking forward to playing the Chaos Dwarfs. But still, it's baffling some buggs are like herpes.

your take is hot , as the bowells of the forge temples of Ashut

lack of voice acting is the number one problem i have. lazy.

Im actually quite excited about Chaos Dwarves though your critisisms are also shared by myself. And in almost every video with warhammer people mention the seiges. And I agree that I am in complete agreement with the towers and barricades, but I will always disagree on the maps themselves. They all remind me of Medieval Two and Rome city and castle maps and I think they would work great if there wasnt the horrible tower and point system. I say get rid of it, maybe keep the capture points for leadership bonuses, call it good.

I'm sorry, im not up to date, im an old, 2nd ed fan, but... WHAT chaos dwarfs fan base?

1300 hours enough for a bachelor's? In what country

Good take

I think everyone is just more excited for ind and the hinterlands. We all knew chaos dwarfs where coming and have a decent amount of lore.

Warhammer 2 AI with broken on the defence when ambushed wouldn't move when hit with long-range attacks only once you close bow range will they attack this was never fixed

it was indeed met with universal hype. only issue the community had was no siege giant

Never liked the Chaos Dorfs, not a big fan of any of the baddies in Warhammer. I do hope they will rework the good Dorfs later on and i will give WH3 another go :)

I think it's easy to forget sometimes that if we don't like something it's bad or unpopular. The artistic choice of wooden towers during sieges isn't something universally disliked, although they may be ramshackled it is more grounded in "reality." How well thought out is the x is y percent of z therefore it is bad or too expensive argument?

I can't really bring myself to agree with the graphical issues. Clipping when you have insane designs for armour and clothes like in a fantasy game it's basically impossible to avoid some clipping in certain animations, at least not without adding pristine physics to every single detail of every entity, of which there can be thousands on screen at a time, probably 90% of the players couldn't run that and the remaining 10% could run it at 30 FPS

Hey have you ever thought about doing a series called why you suck with and doing a video about the ogres?

Bruh this video reminded me of the fact that back then, every chaos faction you play would auto-declare war on non-chaos factions on first encounter. With the player bias, it was beyond idiotic

Your opinion is mine! CA should fix the bugs and sculpt what they have already fashioned before they release new content, but as we all know, they have to put out new content to keep funding the project and that has to take priority. What we want is not aligned to the financial reality of PC game development. The direct incentives for CA to fix what they have are lacking while their bank balance dwindles. Here's a bug not everyone knows about: Belegar Ironhammer's upkeep is 750, but his base upkeep is 300 and the Angrund penalty is +50%. What's worse, all of Angrund's lords cost 625 a turn until K8P is retaken - their base upkeep is 250.

Main issue they stated there would be a way smaller team working on warhammer 2 given warhammer 3 was in develpment. which made sense, yet they promised with the release of warhammer 3 their would be way faster content drop. which again we can see was another of the many lies of CA. The new roadmap with 2 Updates a year shows this wont change aswell. Furthermore i think things like howmutch vigor effects units, effect on hills ect SHOULD be shown ingame and should not have to look in the inner files of he game to look it up. and the new special siege bugs will make the maker of this video extra happy

In hindsight, I think it's fair to say patch 3.0, 3.1, and FOTCD turned things around quite a bit. I still am not a fan of sieges - it's still an annoying slog best avoided - but then, there's ways around that. Still, a full rework of sieges would be good. The price... well. Everything went up in cost a lot the last year. It would be strange if computer games didn't follow suit.

I agree with you on alot of this, but the part about clipping was very weak. If you are gonna make it out to be such a horrible problem that seemingly speaks for the quality of the dlc, atleast mention the fact that pretty much every unit in total war history has clipping errors. Hell, at 9:15, the dwarf warrior from game one launch clips his shield into his legs.

Bruh we need to Pay more for less, thats why the hype train is so weak. Simple as

i wasnt happy with the chaos dwarfs because the game still runs like dogsh*t compared to WH 2 and its Antialiasing is still broken as f*ck but instead of fixing that they'd rather release DLC packs.

really dont understand how new bugs even come up in terms of ai and how units behave in battle i mean why not just copy paste that from warhammer 2? crazy how many bugs this game still has almost to the point where fighting battles is more annoying than fun sometimes

Bro the release of wh3 was a disaster.

to me it' the fun creep, campaings get more and more fun while old races stay boring and uninteressting in comparison... i waited to get a cheap steam key, and the one thing i was scared of actually happened. turns out the chaos dwarves go so many mechanics and faction traits that they are simply way more fun than almost any other race. playing boring lizzardmen or unifying the empire despite the ugly and slow elector count mechanic seems like a waste of time if you instead can just play another chaos dwarve campaing with lots of mechanics and stuff to look out for. normaly my campaings go to turn 30-50 and then become stale because my cities are all tier 5 and my armies steamroll, but with the unit cap and 3 different currencies of the chorfs you actually still got stuff to do past turn 100 except for auto resolving with OP full doom stacks.

3.0 made the game unplayable for me my pc crashes to blues screen and crashes in blue screen again... my pc is worth like 5k this is unaccaptable

Simple Truth: I spend over 800 hours in Warhammer 2 but only 40 hours in Warhammer 3. And it don't looks like it will become more in the last one.

Honestly, Chaos Dwarves campaign mechanics have too much stuff to keep track of. Units should cost gold, MAYBE supply as an initial cost. But having to make sure you have armaments to manage the upkeep of units is just over the top. Oh well....time to play my 100th orc campaign

So. . . While writing I guess I got a bit carried away. I put my comment into 3 (4 if you want to be funny and count those two sentences too) major sections. The first one being a callback to the launch of the game, followed by the somewhat underwhelming release of IE and lastly the mid but at least not terrible release of the Chaos Dwarfs with the huge exploit I found myself on day one in detail (no, I don't mean the free cast one everyone knows by now). Well. . . When Warhammer 3 released I was utterly disappointed. The campaign was alright for the first few times, until I got used to the new factions and it became an absolute snooze fest. The sieges and EVERY minor settlement without walls being a minor settlement battle with the auto-resolve LOATHING the player. It was a horrific moment. I thought "Right. . . Okay. . . Once they release the Mortal Empires version of the game it will all be good in the sandbox mode, right?" So immortal empires came, I was hyped. I was in glee playing Clan Skryre again but. . . Something felt off. Turns out the gunpowder units and every missile infantery unit (aside from any slinger unit) of the Skaven was borderline unusable. Dropped the attack order, engaged in melee, just let the foe approach and smack them in the head. . . Gunpowder units being incapable of shooting flyers without shooting the lines in front of them. . . Well, it was an absolute hell! Now with the dwarfs, they FINALLY fixed gunpowder units and I have not once had issues with my weapons teams. It only took them well over a few. . . Moments to fix major issues to the core gameplay. And the free bug fixes came out along side the most costly DLC yet. I feel like the game itself right now is in a. . . Passable state, albeit a somewhat disappointing one. The AI is whacky and auto resolve is a joke. The new dwarfs have glaring issues and exploits, such as raiding sentinel factions like Clan Carrion with multiple gobbo armies which cost you ~600 Gold per turn considering the raid and bring you an income of 1500 each since you can sell 200 slaves for that much. They get you 260. Clan Carrion is programmed to literally never ever declare war on you and lets you raid it all you want. Just like the Dawi-Zharr in Zharr-Naggrund (wouldn't go there since you'll eventually confederate them). The next advantage of having countless armies raiding for free slaves as if they were the Amazon Recruitment Center is that your strength rank stays extremely high up and you never run low on slaves during your campaign. Negative income of 20k gold? Sell some slaves in different provinces. Want to rush the confederation? Sacrifice slaves to hashut for 10 influence each and you get all the seats in no time. Want factions to stay passive for longer and delay wars? Spam more Amazon Recruiters at Clan Garrison's door and keep your Rank so high up that the AI barely dares to approach you. The only ones willing to declare war on you are Tretch, Imrik, Grimgor and Ghorst. Since your capitol has a tier 2 garrison, you can easily assault most convoys passing it, if they are in the zone of the settlement (usually they are, sometimes they aren't), giving your future Jeff Bezos a little head's up in exp before he joins his Overseer buddies in the raiding shenanigans. Well, with the raiding strategie you can easily justify rushing tons of outposts and fully upgrading your settlements with the rush mechanic without running dry on workers, while allowing you to gather raw materials that you can use to build factories and snowball effortlessly, as long as you let enough armies raid. Seriously, I do believe that this is the most busted mechanic and most easiest to exploit one in Warhammer 3. No savescumming necessary and unlike the Darkelves, you spawn quite literally next to your raid target (just do make sure to actually inspect the ruin and discover it to get your ~300 gold while raiding to make the upkeep easier). The only "downside" is that too many slaves can cause public order problems - is what I would say if you couldn't commit tax fraud by sending them to other provinces and sell them there for much more than you spend! TL;DR Chorfs pretty alright albeit completely busted, cheesable IE campaign and overpriced, bug fix update saves the game from total disaster. If you got that far, thanks for reading and your time! Enjoy the cheese until it CA may taketh away the fun.

Because £20 DLC.

I've grown pretty jaded with CA, I expect them to support the game until they can justify selling DLCs for it then it'll get 3Kingdom'd, leaving the modders to put together an unofficial patch to fix their mess. I also find it indefensible how they created a lose-lose dilemma for the fans: if you signal your discontent by not buying DLCs then you're increasing the odds of the game getting abruptly and unceremoniously canceled; if you do buy it then CA thinks everything is fine, since to them public image means nothing, their bottom line is making the game just barely good enough for you to buy but never invest enough in it to make it great.

I can so imagine blake and spliff sitting around an antique table puffing cigars and wearing tophats haha

Give me 40k total war

I couldn’t have said it better myself!

Rome 2 is good now btw the release was indeed bad tho

Is Blake hot or not?

im really sorry, but... *dwarfs

On that point of aesthetics, there’s always been something really, really off to me about Warhammer Total War’s aesthetics with the settlements. I’ve never felt it with other Warhammer games like Vermintide. It’s a strange mix of over the top and really subdued that doesn’t mesh. Every fortress, town or city is stupidly huge and ridiculous expensive, whose crude layout and construction makes them something of an eyesore. What made Minas Tirith, Barad Dur or Minas Morgul so impressive and threatening is that they were out of the ordinary. We see more humble settlements and natural environment like Bree, The Shire, Edoras and Rivendell, and the desiccated ruins of Osgiliath. But if every we see is Minas Tirith then the effect is eliminated. Now, the Dwarfs, Elves (probably High Elves more), Lizardmen and Skaven should have larger settlements, because they’ve simply been there for far, far, far longer, or in the case of Skaven there’s simply so friggin many of them that any settlement they build is gonna be huge. But humans? These fortresses should be the exception to the rule. Now, probably the reason they do this is because the incomprehensible eldritch technology to making large cities as seen in Med 2 or Three Kingdoms would cause WTW to explode in a Hiroshima scale atomic detonation of Lovecraftian warp power. So we can forgive them for their lazi-I MEAN oversight… or get a mod… And then you have the *army sizes.* Imagine if Sauron, instead of bringing everything and the kitchen sink to even hope to scale the walls of Minas Tirith,brought around 3000 to *possibly* 4000 Orcs and Evil Men, and assaulted Minas Tirith, also every settlement was Minas Tirith. I have other aesthetic problems with Warhammer Total War, like how cannons and guns felt leagues more powerful in Med 2, but that’s one of the biggest ones.

the fact is, you simply cant sell people Dlc for a game which has a fundament that is rotting without fixing the fundament first, all the bugs, glitches, ai issues, all work should be used to fix it all before you dare to create even more content which is inevitably going to introduce even more issues, the list of issues must be thousands of points long by this point and you cant just ignore that and keep focusing on dlc, you need to fix your base and soon or you will have more work on your hand than you will ever be able to fix.

They kinda suck... Turn 130 and still using orcs as chaos dwarfs lol

7 minutes of this 10 minute video you talk about everything escrpt chaos dwarves.

What a relief. I thought you were going to say people were getting offended by chaos dwarf slavery. That is how thin-skinned some kids are now days.

Warhammer 3 e um jogo interessante mais a CA só pensa em dinheiro e lucro fácil enganando os fãs.

As much as the word 'eloquent' is being used in abundance here, I will have to give my honest take and say that you just speak rather slowly while also dragging out the lines (my take, don't stake me here). I can get behind you on a few points, but a lot of the issues I hear brought up are not experienced in 99% of my playing time - not all of them, but a lot. I have a lot of fun with sieges. CA is not perfect and not necessary great either. But you have a company that actually tells us "We will not fix, X, Y, and Z". You make a fair video, you points that mostly reach home - but price is subjective. If it's too pricey for you, you should not get it until it is feasible or sensible for you. The patch you get for free. The truth about what they are working on and not is out there. I feel no hostility towards you or your channel, because most 'negative feelings about a video'-comments equal to rage and hate in the eyes of fans of channels around here, but this is honestly my sincere, sober and respectful view of your video. I am not your editor nor am I the sole voice to whom you must listen, but I honestly believe a little more wit and a bit more impact on the account of sound and use of what is a good score or sound effects from the game would go a long way. I'll be looking out for your content and I am interested in seeing what you dish out.

Chaos Dwarfs are excellent, but they should have been out for WH2 when their land was added, then for WH3 and with 4 LLs. I don't mind the slightly higher cost, but do not like them withholding content

Sieges are so buggy and broken, i stopped playing them.

Love Warhammer 2. Bored by Warhammer 3, it just chucks more broken crap into the game. Not buying the DLC.

Now, now, the warhammer experiance wouldn't have been complete without a pain-in-the-arse publisher.

There is not much that can beat the tomb kings DLC and this ain't it for me. The campaign is overly complicated with all the resources. Their game play is boring, you set up the formation, press start and then you can leave to make coffee.

City, siege and settlement maps are ass.

What's the problem with Community and what's the problem with CA you should ask. CA is greedy mindless drone and doesn't give a shit. And we the community - are tired of it. So I gave my nice negative review of that DLC in half positive words and half negative, especially towards sales and decision making parts of CA. They are rubbish. There is no other words to say this. This game has such potential that will be squandered without a doubt. I only bought the game with big % sale. Same with Chaos Dwarfs. Sound and animations were great, but again - main problems with the game are still not resolved. Siege battles especially. CA prefers to work on HYENAS instead.

Humbug

i havent even bought wh3 yet lol. it is not a better game than wh2

i never play siege battles, i just hate them so much.

Why? Because a bunch of entitled children didn't notice the inflation that was happening and got really surprised that game more expensive.

Yeah 1300h is a Bachelors Degree sure... that isnt even 1 Year of Studiyng xD Thats a few hours each night of gameplay for a few months xD A Bachelors Degrees takes Years thats why they are called "For Years Degree" comonly. Aside from that, interessting click Bait.... 70% of the Video isnt about the thing the Title is claiming, and the rest is "Oh there is minor unintressting crap everyone else already shit about, let me in" xDD

Really not a take on the chaos dwarfs at all just a summary about the state of the game and how it seems unfair to push hard on a grand dlc, at such a cost, while the game still has issues. I dont know... I dont dissagree but I certainly dont see the same perspective, on launch the game and the only campaign was comple trash and since then while there are issues so many have been fixed... so many, we got immortal empires and later immportal empires for ppl who buy the one game. Fixing a myriad of issues with a massive game like this is daunting and people are spoiled rotten these days with choice so they probably understand that promising new and shiny things and soon is a better overall way to retain an audience with a legendarily short attention span on average. Its not ideal but I certainly condemn them a lot less than you and I also seldom find time to zoom in so close as to notice or be bothered by some of the minor visual stuff you mentioned.

Sieges have never been good in CA games. AI is always terrible at it, and the formula has been broken since inception