Thanks to Established Titles for sponsoring this video! Go to establishedtitles.com/CAPTAIN and help support the channel. They are now running a massive Black Friday Sale, plus 10% off on any purchase with code CAPTAIN.
Please don't use Established Titles. I get that they're sponsorship money, but they're a scam company. They don't plant any tree, you cannot become a lord/lady due to general title laws and you own no piece of land because of land ownership laws. It's turning my country into a weird foreigner's theme park and all that money you send them gets sent to their offices in Hong Kong instead. The office in Edinburgh is their social media office for taking photos and film, nothing else.
I'm glad you addressed the Nintendo Switch Online subscription thing, but I honestly think you didn't go far *enough* there; why? Because it doesn't affect *just* Splatfest, it *also* affects the multiplayer as a *whole* , locking it, and by extension, all the rewards, gear and *other* stuff you have to unlock by upping your *multiplayer* level behind a *paywall* , limiting players who *already* paid the base *$60.00* to the single player story, and *nothing else* ! I *love* Splatoon because it's *much* more creative than any other team shooter game I've ever seen in the gameplay, world building *and* story departments, and to top it all off, the first game released on my *birthday* , and I got it as a *present* ; and I played Splatoon 2 on my Switch, and even bought the *Octo Expansion* (still one of the best *new* DLCs we"ve seen in at least a *decade* in my opinion), and I played the Hell outta both games until Nintendo Switch Online became *mandatory* to play the multiplayer matches, and after that, I only used the *free trial* to participate in the *last* Splatfest of Splatoon 2. But knowing that I *still* have to subscribe to Nintendo Switch Online to even access *anything* besides the singleplayer story mode, I've been *boycotting* Splatoon 3! I understand locking the online features behind the subscription when they're an *optional* thing that doesn't really add much that isn't *already* in the game (I don't *like* it, but I *understand* it), but if you *have* to play the multiplayer mode to access *80%* of the games content, it should be the *exception* to requiring a Nintendo Switch Online subscription to participate in it! *That's* why I'm boycotting Splatoon 3; we need to let Nintendo know we *won't* stand for that *greedy bullshit* !
The Tomb Kings, known as the Priest Kings in their former lives, are the undying rulers of Nehekhara, an ancient Human civilisation that formed a great and powerful empire some two thousand five hundred years before the birth of Sigmar Heldenhammer and the founding of the Empire. Out of all the unliving creatures that would claim dominion and royalty over the dead, only the Tomb Kings could truly claim such masterful and undisputed sovereignty. For they had once ruled a mighty and far-flung empire during a time when the rest of Mankind were little more than savage barbarians. Long ago, during an ancient and forgotten age, Nehekhara stood as a shining beacon of civilisation and Human achievement; a golden age when its cities shone with a majestic splendour, its buildings crafted from magnificent marble and limestone, its armies capable of conquering entire kingdoms. In this long-lost age, Nehekhara's mighty rulers reigned as living gods amongst men. But this great realm was destroyed millennia ago through acts of great treachery and powerful sorcery. The living of Nehekhara perished long ago in a single, mournful night, and in their absence, the dead stirred from their graves and claimed the land anew. Even as their ancient civilisation now lies buried beneath the sand, its once verdant plains turned to searing desert and their mighty and glorious empire fractured and in ruin, the Tomb Kings have once more awoken from their deep sleep. Rising from their decrepit sarcophagi, the mummified rulers of Nehekhara awoke with eyes of burning balefire, their thirst for power, conquest and vengeance just as strong in death as in life. They have returned to reclaim that which is rightfully theirs, their legions innumerable, rising up from the scorching sand brandishing weapons of polished bronze and priceless gold. Ancient, emotionless and spiteful to all those that have slighted them, woe betide those foolish enough to stand before their silent onslaught.
Everyone talks about the fact that turf war sucks as a competetive mode for several reasons but the one no one brings up is the fact that there is no knockout feature. In the ranked modes if it's one sided and one team is getting spawn camped it's over quickly because you just ko but if turf war is one sided and one team is getting spawn camped they are getting spawn camped for a whole 3 minutes
I feel like the problem with turf war knockouts is they'd definitely need to have a separate mode since I honestly think being able to learn and oppose a team that's overall better than you is a great thing for the casual mode to have, since it's all just preparation for the real game.
As a player who came over from Splatty 2, I do think that the “paint as you go” style of play is probably the best form to go unless your playing support or turf-painter religiously
Have you played Tableturf? Inking base first is a great way to establish a losing steak :) It basically teaches you the intuitive mechanics of how turf war works without the pressure.
The "Paint-As-You-Go" point and somehow have the "Only the last 30 seconds matter" in the same argument is somewhat counterintuitive. If only the last 30 seconds matter, why do I have to bother with getting the mid first? "Because if mid is painted by the enemy then-" yeah, but that's not true at all is it? How many times have people turned a game around even though the enemy painted mid first? Ultimately, play however you want. There is no predefined strategy. I paint base, then slaughter mid and then *R U S H B A S E*
@@Xgil2Play the main reason you wanna rush mid and not paint base is because painting charges special. if you're just sitting at spawn not using your special, you're eating up precious paint that your teammates can use for specials later in the last 30 seconds. and just because you can make last second comebacks doesn't mean you will 100% of the time, so why risk it?
@@Ataraxia0 Meh... Never been in a situation where I had to paint base to get special in the last 30 seconds. There's no point in painting base in the last 30 seconds because that time is better spent diminishing your enemy territory
I felt let down seeing how tri color turf wars don't have an exclusive or super size map designed for them. Just imagine how much better that would be.
This and the fact that Tricolor isn't a balanced free-for-all. Maybe a 3v3v3. Just imagine 3, balanced teams on a big, special map where each team has their own base. Maybe give each base a cannon to turn this map into an absolute warzone.
Why the 1st 2 minutes of Turf War's aren't a waste: a short theory You use the first 2 minutes to learn how your opponents play and how your teammates play, and prepare the best you can to do the winning thing in the last minute. Thanks for coming to my ted talk - Pikachu
If your theory held true, that would mean that an effective counter would be... not to play until the last minute of the game, thereby denying your opponents a chance to conduct reconnaisance while you splash around on the map not doing anything. Even if this was the intended design, I think it's a deeply flawed one.
It's not a theory, it's a strategy, but as it was said, people don't think. Instead of developing the ability to analyse and adapt, people are genuinely convinced "rUsH mId" is the only strategy.
FINALLY someone mentions overextending! The amount of times we've lost because one teammate decided to rush the enemy base and leave the rest of us fighting a 3v4 in spawn is TOO. FREAKING. MANY.
this splatfest i lost half my matches bc of this shit. Additionally, i ended up with lower scores myself because if stay mid to keep watch, instead of trying to hoard ink. So id end up scoring lower, AND losing bc my team would overextend. Sure, you got 1300P but we still lost.
I may have misunderstood it, but I think he meant not pushing for the enemy spawn when the match is happening close to the center. At least I think so because when we're the ones getting spawn camped, slipping past the enemy team and covering as much of the center and the enemy base as possible has been one of my most reliable ways to recover from a defeat. You pressure enemies out of your spawn and you can attack them from two opposite angles. Plus, if an ally notices you, they can superjump towards you and put even more pressure on the enemy base. Usually this ends up in a map reset or a full wipe regardless of whether you pull it off successfully or not. But then again this is only ever useful when you're pinned against your spawn and there's not much you can do.
this might have been me, but the idea has been that if we're crowded at our base, if i have weapon setup that allows for faster movement i can rush ahead & hopefully distract the opposing team enough to create an opening to push back.
I played 1 match of tri-color. Team grass had some random guy reef slide into the ultra signal twice during the first minute, and they never once lost 1st place.
Yeah I was team fire and just...I think I started more disconnected games than I played actual games. And even then most games I did play we got spawn camped.
I don’t even think it was on purpose though, the Nintendo Online servers just suck. My friend and I tried to play together on the last day and we kept getting connection errors one after the other
I just want better maps. Every map right now feels super cramped, they’re extremely narrow and offer little varieties in routes to take for a more exciting and unique match. I know it just came out and obviously we can expect new and better maps as we go, but that’s my biggest hope for now.
I don't know about this. The problem with big maps in turf war is that everyone gets so spread out that team fighting doesn't happen. A lot of the maps that are less cramped end up with people running about randomly not knowing where they should be and the chance that the randoms you are playing with don't know where they should be at any given time is really really high.
@@PickPig only a little bit. You still have to ink map and since the map is the objective players naturally spread out more which is amplified by larger maps. On modes like rainmaker people are more likely to team fight no matter how big the map is because the objective is centralizing.
Idk about things getting better in the future. I think 'cramped' might be the devs' preferred map style, since many Splat2 maps had the same sort of problem with a lack of side routes because the devs forced a lot of small central chokepoints. (Especially in some of the Shifty Stations; I still have nightmares of the Trick v. Treat stage.) I think the intention was to encourage united team pushes to force through, but it mostly just lead to an obnoxious amount of camping.
Killing also helps paint the map, seeing as how killed inklings explode with the enemy's ink. So if you kill them on their paint you get a sub-weapon type splotch on their turf, and if they're pushed forward to your area killing them helps in reclaiming your turf.
Yeah but god damn it you still need to paint the map in TURF WAR. I have had teammates who literally never did that, if you don't care about painting go play literally anything else 💀
Agreed but also I keep getting team mates who would nEver paint like all 3 of them just stayed at mid and constantly DIED when I was stuck painting by my self
@@snl1353 Hard to do that when you're locked into turf war via splatfest. Your choices are: play Salmon Run, Play Tableturf, or wait two days for the splatfest to end.
I think an easy way to fix turf war without changing the base mechanics very much would be to have scoring take place at every minute mark. At 1:00, 2:00, and at the end, both teams gain points for the amount of the map that is currently inked in their color cumulatively. You still get the fun reveal at the very end to see how much the final results changed the scores at the very end.
The more I think about this, the more I really love the idea. I also thought that the final map state--what would normally be the only thing that is scored--could count twice as much as the states at minutes 1 and 2. I did some theoretical scores for the worst scenario: Team A is in the lead throughout the entire game, but at the last minute Team B takes the lead. Here are the results in percentages of the map inked. The last column correspond to the condition that the last minute counts for double. 𝟷 𝟸 𝟹 |𝚂𝚄𝙼| |𝟹𝚡𝟸| 𝟺0 𝟺𝟻 𝟺𝟸 = 𝟷𝟸𝟽 𝟷𝟼𝟿 𝟹𝟼 𝟺0 𝟻0 = 𝟷𝟸𝟼 𝟷𝟽𝟼 𝟹𝟾 𝟺𝟷 𝟹𝟿 = 𝟷𝟷𝟾 𝟷𝟻𝟽 𝟸𝟿 𝟹𝟺 𝟺𝟻 = 𝟷0𝟾 𝟷𝟻𝟹 𝟹𝟽 𝟺𝟺 𝟺𝟹 = 𝟷𝟸𝟺 𝟷𝟼𝟽 𝟹𝟸 𝟹𝟿 𝟺𝟽 = 𝟷𝟷𝟾 𝟷𝟼𝟻 Pretty interesting how close some of these games ended up being. The more I look at it, the more I like the idea of the final map state counting double. Helps to be a tie breaker in games that would have been close. If they did this, they could also implement a "knockout" condition: if round three counts the same as the others, it's a knockout if one team is ahead by 10 points at the end of the second minute. If round three counts double, you have to be 15 points ahead to get a knockout. In my examples, Games 2 and 3 would have been knockouts for Team A--who still won under both conditions despite the massive lead that Team B took at the very end.
Very interesting, or if rather simply. If the team conquers with high differences for 90 seconds or 2 minutes. Instantly knockout. Gotta defend that 3 minutes is too long since stages is very cramped.
Some splatfest Shifty Stations actually massively improved this by making sections of the stage unavailable as the match goes on, which has definitely made the early parts of matches more impactful.
The Chicken Vs. Egg and Hare Vs. Tortoise splatfests were especially great at this, and It really makes me wish that they did something better. Honestly, adding Ranked to splatfests would probably fix a lot of issues with the event, probably through the 'pro' matches.
Having skipped Splatoon 2 since by the time I got my Switch, I figured a Splatoon 3 was on the horizons, I had no idea Shifty Stations was a thing. It looks really fun, and now I'm kinda wondering why they aren't in Splat3. It solves the issue of the last minute of Turf War being all that matters, and I'm left wondering why they weren't brought into the normal turf war stages in 3. I wouldn't mind if that was made into a standard rule for Turf War, or if at the very least, it was just incorperated into some of the Turf Stages.
Tons of content from Splatoon 2 is missing from the game and probably going to be added back gradually over time (we're already seeing this with old clothes being split between different catalogs). Kind of scummy since it just gives the illusion of them giving us new content when we could've probably had it all from the start, but I'm sure they decided the game will continue to sell better this way or something.
@@SoundToxin a similar thing happened with Animal Crossing New Horizons. I bring up another game because I notice nintendo likes to release sequels with less content and then rerelease old features later on
It still baffles me that they just completely removed shifty station as a thing and didn't give us any sort of equivalent in this game. To me one of the biggest missed opportunities of splatoon 3 is the fact that still to this day you only have the 5 handcrafted rulesets for online battles, and "the city of chaos" pulling out a new version of turf war every splatfest would've been such a cool way to introduce the custom rulesets that nearly every other shooter has. Instead all we got is tricolor turf war, and as far as I'm concerned that mode might as well not even exist for how much I've gotten to play it.
3 people on each team for tri color would even fit with their whole 3 thing they wanted to do. But, we already can get frame drops and lag when playing with 8 people, it is very dependent on what weapons everyone picks, all the particles from the weapons and specials would be nuts. Maybe if they somehow stabilize the game it'd work? I WISH it was 3 teams of 3 And having a new shifty station concept for 3 would have been extremely welcomed. Especially for tri colored. Story wise they could have just said that Deep Cut (bandits who I assume have been around the Splatlands), found cool new locations to fight. Desert fights? Abandoned towns? I don't know, something.
Last splatfest I was so confused by the Open vs. Pro modes. Felt like a freaking idiot when I figured it out after the fact. Was getting absolutely stomped in Open, like I kind of wanted to cry. I chose team Fun because I wanted to just have Fun, yet I had very little fun losing so often.
Tricolor battles would absolutely benefit from specifically-designed tricolor stages, 2-4-2 or not. I really hope that in the next splatfest with the collab with pikachu they can make a new stage
As an uncommon turf war enjoyer and strategist, I personally enjoy splatfests a lot. HOWEVER! Tricolor battles are terribly balanced. Please fix the clout system it literally gives more clout to the 2 attacking teams even when all 3 teams have an equal win rate. It's already hard enough to win as the defenders. It's even more unbalanced than smash 64 Pikachu.
What do you mean it's hard to win as a defender?In Hammerhead Bridge it felt impossible to even get to the center and in this reworked Sturgein Shipyard it feels even worse
@@kurei746 He means it generallly. Just because you lost two matches to defenders doesn't mean it is the truth, people seem to generally agree that it is MUCH harder to win as defenders, which only makes sense because they don't get access to the ultra signal + can't ink turf that easily because they constantly have to defend turf. This mode was made for the defenders to not be easy, but damn, it's actually dumb that even if you win as defenders the other teams still get around just as much Clout?
Great video - I'd also like to point out that the inaccessibility of ranked modes during a Splatfest means there's essentially no way to play anything other than Salmon Run with friends unless everyone picks the same team (or if you have enough friends to fill a full private match). I know the actual choices don't really matter that much, but it still feels kinda bad either desperately trying to convince your friends that your choice is the 'right one' or joining a team you don't really want to join just because your friends are there.
I will not lie one problem i had during turf wars was that Nintendo really decided to give some teams the brightest colors. It can be hard to see whats going especially if you have sensitive eyes.
there _is_ a mode in the settings somewhere that locks the team colors to the yellow and purple on the game icon iirc, idk if it works in splatfest but it helps a ton if the brighter colors strain ur eyes.
I’m gonna guess you’re probably right about the 3v3v3 part. Maybe they could only get 8 players in matches considering that normally it’s 4v4 which explains why they’re doing 2v4v2. Tbh if they can only manage to cap at 8 players then maybe they could do 2v2v2 instead 🤷. Would def introduce more challenges
3:25 This...explains *so* much: when i saw "open" and "pro", i thought they meant something along the lines of "standard"(for casual play) and "experienced"(for the more serious players who knew what they were doing), and didn't go anywhere *near* "pro", and stayed in "open"(as you can probably guess, it...didn't go well) >
The only time I ever really play turf war is during splatfest. These Splatoon 3 maps are getting so stale I really miss 2's, they weren't the most optimal for competitive play, but they were so much fun.
I feel like splatoon 3’s maps are the equivalent of making all Smash Brothers stages Final Destination. I really only play turf mode- so I’m really feeling the grind… the first year of 2 I was constantly playing for fun- now I log on to make sure I get my catalog level up once a day.
I will never get the people complaining to complain about people playing to win and “try hands”. Getting into X ranked was hard and you don’t stop analyzing the game because it’s turf war
By all means play to win. But don't play with me. If I am a c or b rank scrub do not match me with Mr. XXX plays splatoon as a job hardcore ascension mode. Shove them in their own little pedestal with other ascended beings and let me enjoy playing with equally or closely skilled players. There is nothing fun about fighting against someone playing splatoon with only his mind as he plays 4d chess with god.
@@silverwing4153 That is a very fair point. Good match making makes a huge difference, it’s never fun to be be completely stomped on and winning isn’t enjoyable when the other team can’t fight back.
@@SingingDragons11 The issue is Splatoon 3 right now does not have good matchmaking, at all. Which is why casual players are running into Splatoon 2 X rankers so dang often that there's been a spike in complaining about tryhards and sweats. The reason people get mad is because they get put in these clearly unbalanced matches repeatedly and lose over and over because of the garbage matchmaking. Personally when I am in turf against a less skilled team I'm not going to try as hard against them because a) the matchmaking is unfair to start with and b) I don't find joy in ruining other people's ability to enjoy their matches. These X rankers and Splatoon gods can exist just fine on their own if the matchmaking kept them away from noob players, but it literally pairs them up all the time and it's just infuriating.
The 3v3v3 concept (with the way the map is split) is what I am still wishing for 😭😭😭 even with the ultra signal or whatever but everyone is able to get it, not just the attacking team.
the only stages that could that could work as tricolor with minimal adjustments are saltspray rig and skipper pavilion because theyre horseshoe shaped instead of rectangular/square like every other map. all nintendo needs to do is diversify the overall map shapes and now you have more maps that are viable in tricolor
I've never seen previous splatfest stages since Splatoon 3 is my first Splatoon game, but the idea of locking off areas of the map seems so cool and I'm already disappointed that they didn't bring back anything like that Stages specifically for Splatfests seems so cool, hopefully they eventually start adding them. It really does seem like the development team was rushed, especially considering how we didn't get a Splatoween and they even skipped a splatfest
It always annoys me that people don't understand what should be their priorities in Turf War: 1. Take and hold centre, it's the only contested part of the map (your base is easier to retake since it's designed to be harder to get to for the enemy team, and the oponent's base is too hard to hold) 2. Take and hold flanks (to either get a vantage point, or a sneak-attack route to attack centre from) 3. Ink Base (you're likely respawning there multiple times during a match, and it's harder to get into than out of which deters the enemy team from taking it anyways)
Trust me, once your base is taken, you're done for. Spawn killed immediately. You might push back towards the center but not for long. For example the stages today made it so it's easy to get to someone's base and end your team... Not a problem in Turf War because it's usually more chill but in a fest, it's terrible
Thank you for mentioning how Areospray users and rollers ink every single spot that does absolutely nothing and those who literally just paint and not contribute to the team at all. Looking through replays of the enemy team, there's a lot of people who solely paint and do absolutely nothing to help their team out.
3v3v3 sounds SICK! Maybe they could keep the ultra signal in that the two loosing teams could call it in and have a chance to place it somewhere on the map to keep that area mostly painted in. Or they could do what shifty stations do but the losers have to call in the domes to lock off the areas. OR maybe we could use maps that are designed for tri colour. Picachu
In my time during splatoon 2, I’ve learned at least 2 things. 1: securing the middle in turf war should be your first objective. A 3v4 is not gonna help you win. And 2. If someone uses tenta missiles, try not to run towards teammates as I’ve seen many die from this. Even more so if they were also targeted by the missiles.
I actually really like Tricolor turf war, and that's coming from somebody who's been both a defender and an attacker, sometimes I wish that it was a part of the regular mode rotation as well, I know that might diminish how "Special" it is and all, but I feel like one of the reasons it feels frustrating for some people is because their winning team is at stake, and winning in tricolor isn't as straightforward as regular turf war. The reason that I like it is mostly because it's the first Asymmetrical game mode we've gotten for Splatoon at all, and playing a rampant esc tower defense to stop the enemy players from getting to mid is really thrilling.
I see u using the Sword a bit nice. I like turf war because its a great beginner mode, an shooters need that but yeah its not great in competition. I love the faucet anology perfect explanation, its so important that the entire meta of turf war is survivability specials. In S2 it was quad baller l3, and rn its machines and splash. I think turf war could be made competitive by having sections of the map close off at certain periods like that one shifty station. Realistically tho Splatfests are also supposed to be accesible, I think having Pro mode with the actual rankings be accesible to teams is the main thing, good players who want to play with at least 1 friend just does open. Ranked modes would be a dream. Funny enough tricolor hammerhead is a better layout then actual hammerhead, but yeah even if tricolor is horribly unbalanced, just leave it accessible its new and its fun. They are willing to adjust stages as sturgon got a much better defending layout so thats cool.
Finally someone acknowledges that kills matter in turf. They matter a LOT now with these small and cramped maps that constantly lead to head on confrontation. You literally need to get kills to maintain whatever turf you've already inked or YOU will be the one getting killed/splatted and then the enemy has an opportunity to paint more. Many times I have won turf games with less skilled teammates by splatting the enemy team often enough to create openings for my babysquid teammates to ink without frequent confrontation leading to them dying. Also turf war teaches map control as it is much harder to make a comeback if the enemy has inked a majority of the map. Not only does that mean they have a movement advantage and will have an easier time hunting you down as you cover up their ink, but it also means you have to fight an uphill battle to turn the tables and come out with the most inked. Your movement will be more limited than theirs as you try to cover up their ink making it a lot more important to pick your battles at that point. Inking grants you map control and movement which is crucial. That's just how I interpret turf war, I spend way too much time in that mode.
the thing about learning weapons in terf war is the fact that now you can play ranked modes casually with the open anarchy battle, the mode just has no reason to be played
Honestly as someone heavily addicted to salmon run to the point that it's basically all i play, im desperate for the big run event. I feel like it could be similar to splatfests but with gameplay thats a completely different & nice change of pace. Or give us another map already im begging
I dont mind lossing the majority of the turf war matches I play because when I finally do win nothing can come close to the feeling of pure joy. But I also understand why others disagree
Honestly, i don't think Turf War is a big problem. To me parts of the problem are: 1: People just suck at Turf war. We all know that player that pics Aerospray or Sploosh, runs to the enemy base to paint everything just to die right after, basically just feeding their brains out. 2: Splatfest Open has the worst matchmaking i've ever seen. nothing prevents you from playing with a new set of randoms as your team and getting put up against a 4-stack with a 7 win streak. This happens way too often.
If anything, only make splatzones the available ranked mode, so if they really wanted you to be inking turf, that’s the closest thing to turf war. And yea, unique tri-color maps would rock (they could be called Splatland Stadiums or something), and 3 v 3 v 3 would be cooler!
Another problem is that in order to play the event exclusive gamemode (tricolor turf war) you have to queue up for the open matchmaking, at least if playing defense, and then it still isnt even guaranteed.
Turf war should be Splatzones, but with multiple zones on the map. This means you still need to paint the map, but there are important points of interest to control. Overall Splatzones is my fave of the ranked modes, along with Tower Control. Clam Bliz sucks because it uses an extra button to toss the clams, taking your hands off of otherwise important buttons. Raimmaker just sucks for the sheer fact it can be a 20sec match, and the weapon takes away your gun for a fairly bad weapon, strong to kill, horrible to shoot.
I don't think turfwar is terrible, but when I heard what you told about splat 2 turfwars I was like "Omg this does sound way better, why is it not in the game? :d" Also we need the 3 vs 3 vs 3 mode for splatfest.
It does feel uncontrollable having 2v2v4 in tricolor turf war because I have only been on the attacking team and every time I get in a match, (which I basically never) I feel like I have to rely on my teammate so I have a chance of winning! Cant wait for this pikachu splatfest though!
The new tricolor Sturgeon actually was reworked to be a lot better. There's grates that allow the defending team to go into the attacking team's base. There's a lot more cover in the center and the changed defending team bases were improved by a lot. I think one major problem with turf war is with judgement. A lot of times when my team was winning, there were times where only one person was holding mid because everyone else or majority of the team died. Upon respawning people would end up inking chunks of base that were untouched because I think they thought we were still winning, and then it results in the person defending mid dying and a loss for the team if they can't win skirmishes. You have to know when it's okay to ink base and when it isn't. I think overreaching isn't necessarily a bad thing especially if you are good at killing others, as if you can win your skirmishes with the enemy then it allows an early advantage for your team. Don't think early advantages are useless. Such as rushing to mid and or invading enemy spawn. Sometimes you end up winning the entire match from the first thirty seconds because if you rush to spawn and are able to kill off majority of the enemies your team will catch up fast and you can start holding them in. Or the same with mid because instead of sharing the same turf with team-mates at base you'll build your special faster at all the untouched turf at mid. Sometimes dying is okay too as it allows your team-mates to know that there are enemies there and that mid is priority now. There are times when having to hail Mary and run into enemy base is useful especially when you're being spawn camped. If you aren't immediately killed and manage to get away you can lure away others and make it easier for your team to kill them. Being at enemy base is also helpful when being spawn camped because your teammates can jump to you. A lot of people dislike turf war which is fair, but I enjoy it a lot. I hope that those who want to improve in turf war or have some tips for the next splatfest find my information useful.
I’m also really sad they removed splatfest unique stages. They weren’t huge but they were a fun detail. They also removed the special-splatfest special news updates and now they just sit casually in their normal colors and then magically teleport to their podiums. It was a really small detail it is noticeable in splatoon 3 and makes it feel less special.
The funniest part of tricolor, to me, is that defense cant initiate a tricolor battle, but even when an offender selects a tricolor battle, they aren’t guaranteed to get a battle anyway. So what’s the point of having separate options for open battles and tricolor battles if you aren’t gonna get a tricolor battle anyway?
Thank you bringing up these issues with turf war, I have seen people say that Splatoon is not a very competitive game and can’t ever be as good as Halo because it’s just “shoot the floor to win.” Completely ignoring all the ranked modes, and the fact that Splatoon has become a haven for old Halo players because the new ones suck, Pikachu.
I think that turf war could be fixed with one feature: TIME BASED CHECKPOINTS. Basically, every minute, paint coverage would be calculated and if one side got the checkpoint, the opposing team could have a chance to come back. If one side gets 2 checkpoints, they win instantly. This applies to any point in time during the match, meaning turf wars COULD last for only 2 minutes. This is better because: 1. If a team is winning, the other team isn’t forced to endure the suffering of people who have poured thousands of hours into the game for an extra minute 2. It keeps the bullshit of winning for the first 2 minutes and losing to the 3rd out, which has happened to me way too many times. also I never knew that pro is better for solo queue. Good vid!
Hawt take: turf and ranked are equally fun. That said, Shifty Stations needs to return, and Tricolor battles are perfect for introducing creative and unique stages.
Yes, I absolutely hate the naming sense for the two matchmakng modes. Its literally backwards. Open matches should be solo players only, with the outcome giving you Clout regardless due to how random the compositions can be just like in a normal Turf War, and Pro should be for solo or pre-made groups where losing means no Clout gain because the whole point is to play like your life depends on it.
It's even more misleading when you realize that pro matches are only worth 10 points to the results while open matches are worth 15 pts. If it were the other way around then team fun would have won last splatfest
As a splatling main, way to many people just rush me for no reason completely oblivious to the fact that I can… ya know, charge quickly and kill them with my fast kill time. They are really stupid.
Defending this time around was a lot of fun with my splatana stamper. Anyone who got to center got chainsaw murdered cuz I was lurking around the corner
Finally bro Ive seen so many sus feet drawings of inklings and it confuses me SO MUCH on why 1, people liked it and 2 why they thought to draw that to begin with.
Can't comprehend how people play ranked in splatoon and brush it off. I can't even play turf war without having thoughts to murder everything then myself.
Never been this early to a Spaceman video. Content is always good and you've inspired me to make my channel better thank you Mr. Spaceman. The vibes stay charged up like a Pikachu keep up the good work.
I think they designed tri-color as a comeback mechanic for the losing teams in splatfest, as in the defending team has an inherent disadvantage. The asymmetry is intentional. I do agree there should be special stages tho
Honestly advertising turf war makes the most sense. The majority of the player base likes to play turf war because they don't want to take the game too seriously, and from a casual viewpoint, turf war is actually great at its job. I feel like you are asking way too much from Nintendo, because lets be honest, who really wants to advertise the part of the game that makes them the LEAST money?
I had written a long comment about the changes, but then I asked myself why bother? Nintendo won't change it and honestly they shouldn't. What they should do is bring the unique maps back with different mechanics. Not because I care about what new ideas they have, but because they have a backlog of stages they refuse to use. Other than that I genuinely don't have a problem with Splatfests. It's like they're telling us to stop getting serious and have fun for once. I don't mind that.
I definitely would like to see some minimal amount of matchmaking for splatfests. It honestly feels like the best way I can contribute to my team is to join the opposing team because I'm just getting absolutely dumpstered all game...Turns out being a brand new player to a franchise that is 3 games in the making is a pretty miserable experience...
wait, THAT'S the difference between open and pro????? by god ive been playing splatoon for almost 4 years now and i never knew. so THAT'S why i always get curbstomped when playing solo in splatfests. huh. also, god you're so right about the shifty stations. i miss them so much, they were a lot of fun. they made each splatfest fun and unique, and i really prefer splatoon 2 splatfests over splatoon 3 ones (the fact that i rly love off the hook's splatfest music probably factors into this, but). while i do enjoy tricolour, especially on defense, it doesnt feel as special as the shifty stations. i really wish it was 3v3v3 on bigger maps, would amp up the chaos i love so much even more
Imagine exclusively playing the literal afterthought mode and then calling the mode which is the entire premise of the game the training mode. Pikachu.
The problem with "paint as you go" is that you have teammates painting base in the middle and end of the match when the fights in mid are much more important. Better to ink more in the beginning when fighting and positioning aren't that important. It means you can forget about it later in the match and it gives you solid positions to retreat to when the other team pushes forward.
The issue there is that if you get killed in mid, you have nothing to ink to try to get some special back. Given how important specials are for maintaining control of mid, wasting any of that potential charge is a bad play.
Bunker Games was the most fun turf war has ever been. A friend of mine suggested thunderdome turf war as its own gamemode, and frankly I think that’s brilliant
Man, hearing Turf War - the game mode that is unique to Splatoon - referred to as the "Tutorial Mode" hurts. I like that Splatfests are one game mode, it feels more communal, bringing comp into the equation also could potentially skew the results if they give points for wins and competitive wins.
i decided to do a funny little thing to make splatfest more fun to myself. i'll grab a weapon i don't get to use often or smth competely new to me and just...try to learn it. it was so fun being bad at that weapon but then getting used to it as i got clout for my team. also i want big run, that'll add some spice...and i just love salmon run
How I would balance turf war: Score is Ending Points on the map plus half of the Total Points the team gained throughout the round. How I would balance tricolor: Sprinklers have 3000 HP. -Pikachu
I didn't get the part where you said painting enemies ink decreases their score... I believe the score does not decrease, however splatting an opponent causes to stain the ground with you own ink for additional points, making the opponent inactive during the re-spawning period of time, and there is a big advantage to continue painting. It has happen to me that even if the whole team is wiped in the last 12 seconds (not even the last minute), this turn the tables completely. I agree with your comments, probably Nintendo will improve the next Splatfest, adding Tower Control at least. Regards.
THANK YOU. I played team fire, and in hindsight im not surprised that the entirety of team fire was FILLED with overly aggressive players. AKA, we would rush mid, make great kills, constant wipeouts, etc but then still lose because my team would push over that 60% and start getting greedy into their base. ALMOST every loss i could credit to overly aggressive and greedy teammates. STICK TO YOUR WIN, DONT AIM FOR 80%.
