The Quickest Way To Write A First Class Literature Review | IN JUST 5 EASY STEPS 

Cover your hair well

@@suu-9804shut up

Ahhhh well done you!!!

Really glad - good luck with writing :)

Best of luck! If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask! 😊

Iam doing it too but iam lost can i contact you on instagram

Perfect!! Hope it helps x

You’re welcome. I appreciate the support!

Glad it was helpful!

Hope you enjoy 🥰

are you sure?

Appreciate that!

You’re welcome x

I would be glad if somebody gives me a appropriate quick reply

Glad to hear it!

Haha yess! Thanks for letting me know :)

Hope you enjoy!

OK, you did at the end.

I always do in my design :) we have to by law.

@@pamw47798 glad you made it there :)

It absolutely would. Her channel has gone from being really useful to borderline giving advice to students about how to get caught and penalized 😭

@@labhairgaelinn ​​⁠​⁠​⁠No one has been caught or penalised, have they? Society, business and technology are moving into a new dimension. Soon, universities will incorporate the use of A.I into their assessments. I say this because even with AI, there are levels to the quality of work; e.g. using chatGPT will not get anyone a distinction at Masters level. A.I is supposed to help, not do the work for you. If a student uses A.I to generate a complete essay with no personal input; it will likely be detected as there are repeatable patterns in the way A.I generates text and this can be seen in the essay structure. But a little help from A.I will definitely not be detected. This is slightly far-fetched ( or is it?), but picture a future where interviewees are asked to produce a piece of work using AI in 5 minutes and the person who produces the best piece of work gets hired because the way a person thinks, the questions they ask and how they use A.I will determine the quality of the output. The bottom line is that great minds will always outshine the rest when similar tools are used. A.I is the future and resistance to its use sounds like Blockbusters vs Netflix, and we all know what happens to Blockbusters. Have a great day

Grammarly isn't flagged.

good question

Good question - will make a short and longer video about this next!

Just uploaded a short with some examples x

@@DrAminaYonis thank you 😊

The difference between a narrative review and a systematic review lies mainly in their objectives, methodology, and application areas: Objectives: A systematic review aims to formulate a well-defined research question and uses qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze all the available evidence attempting to answer the question1. A narrative review can address one or more questions with a much broader scope and is often used to track the development of a scientific principle or a clinical concept1. Methodology: Systematic reviews follow strict guidelines such as those provided by the Cochrane Handbook, ROSES, and the PRISMA statement. They require a protocol, are reproducible, and involve a critical appraisal of all eligible literature1. Narrative reviews, on the other hand, use narrative analysis to synthesize data and do not necessarily follow a predefined protocol. They are more subjective and rely on the author’s background knowledge of the topic2. Application Areas: Systematic reviews are used to recommend best practices and inform policy development due to their high-quality, focused, and precise methods and reporting1. Narrative reviews are invaluable for providing context or background information and identifying knowledge gaps in a wider exploration that might be lost in the restrictive framework of a systematic review1. In essence, systematic reviews are more structured and objective, while narrative reviews offer a broader, more interpretive overview of a topic. If you want me to write your project for you let me know it’s 100 dollars

was wondering the same thing. ...

I've got one! resources.thepagedoctor.com/l/researchproposal

IMMEDIATELY

Because this is MY channel and I can take as LONG as I want :)