Тёмный

The REAL difference between CINE & STILLS lenses 

Dave McKeegan
Подписаться 123 тыс.
Просмотров 257 тыс.
50% 1

What are the true differences between Cine lenses and Stills lenses?
In this video I compare both versions of the Irix 150mm to find out
Huge thank you to Irix, both of these lenses can be found at irixlens.com/
INSTAGRAM: dpmphotographs
PATREON: / davemckeegan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Music from Epidemic sound:
Sign up for your 30 day free trial here: bit.ly/2FbWbTI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please consider supporting the channel by making purchases through my Amazon affiliates:
geni.us/Affiliate
My Gear:
Sony A7III - geni.us/A7IIIbody
Tamron 28-75 - geni.us/Tamron2875E
Irix 11mm - geni.us/Irix11
Sony 16-35 f4 - geni.us/Sony1635f4
Sony 55mm f1.8 - geni.us/zeiss55f18
Sony 85mm f1.8 - geni.us/Sony85

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

5 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 458   
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Just to clarify this is looking at cine lenses which are derived from stills lenses. The very expensive cine lenses that are designed as cine lenses have no focus breathing and are par-focal, which stills lenses generally don't have to reduce costs - but as stablemate cine lenses carry the same optics they have the same result
@federicodecuadro5672
@federicodecuadro5672 4 года назад
Easy to see the difference in design in the image at 8:55. All the other expensive cinema lenses have optical elements protruding back from the mount, since you have no mirror in a cinema camera you can do this and it opens a whole world of possibilities in optics design.
@revocolor
@revocolor 4 года назад
i was surprised that u didnt mention focus breathing in the video, thanks for pinning it here.
@orsoncart9441
@orsoncart9441 4 года назад
@@revocolor Focus breathing is relative to Zooms not fixed focal lenses.
@revocolor
@revocolor 4 года назад
@@orsoncart9441 u need to update your knowledge. It is relative to both lens types ;)
@orsoncart9441
@orsoncart9441 4 года назад
@@revocolor Never considered to be releventant until all the internet expert arrived. Only ever became relevant as Zooms moved from Par focal to varifocal. But to know that one would have years of experience in the film industry. The internet has a lot to answer for in terms of youtube experts. I despair.
@Morgy337
@Morgy337 4 года назад
7 minutes passed and I just noticed there's a dog on the couch.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
He's a ninja-dog 😉
@dakinnie
@dakinnie 4 года назад
Same, and only after reading this comment.
@tedmichaels
@tedmichaels 3 года назад
Took me 11.
@andrewparker318
@andrewparker318 3 года назад
He has mastered the ability of staying so perfectly still, that he has become invisible to the eye
@corneliusdobeneck4081
@corneliusdobeneck4081 4 года назад
You forgot two important differences: 1: Cine lenses have a much MUCH longer throw on the focusing ring which makes it way easier to pull focus especially with moving objects. And there might be a chance when doing film that things move. 2: Cine lenses usually have the same color matched coating throughout a series which is not always the case with still lenses but makes a hell of a difference on set and in post production. All in all and in summary you could say that Cina lenses are much more precise then stills lenses hence the price difference.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Very good points, although incidentally the focus throw on these 2 lenses is identical at around 270*
@MrStupidHead
@MrStupidHead 3 года назад
@@fto5935 You are a real charmer. I would guess you work by yourself.
@PNM_79
@PNM_79 4 года назад
This is the best explanation for the two types of lenses I've seen on RU-vid. Good job
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you Nick :)
@DJVARAO
@DJVARAO 4 года назад
Indeed
@marqueshaynes8780
@marqueshaynes8780 3 года назад
I concur!!!!!
@oceansidesounddesign8770
@oceansidesounddesign8770 2 года назад
+1 Brilliant. Thank you.
@PoetryFilms
@PoetryFilms 2 года назад
There’s nothing like seeing someone entirely in command of his subject give a quick rundown of how and why it all works, and keeping things clear and logical even for the uninitiated like myself. A masterclass in only a few minutes. Brilliant. Thanks. Subscribed
@KhoPhi
@KhoPhi 4 года назад
I appreciate the uniformity and consistency in the cine lens world. The still world could use that consistency of design.
@fto5935
@fto5935 4 года назад
Lol you never used a vintage Cook cine lens... Modern still lens series i.e. Zeiss Milvus are matched.
@MarioAtheonio
@MarioAtheonio 3 года назад
There's just a bigger incentive for it in film. If everything already costs so much, you're hauling so much gear around, and time is extremely precious, you really don't want to have to rent out and lug around a whole different mattebox kit for each individual lens. Also, you need a lot more consistency if you're constantly cutting between shots taken with different lenses.
@TechnoBabble
@TechnoBabble 2 года назад
There isn't really a reason to match everything on stills lenses. Generally during a photo shoot you're not switching between 5 different lenses and you also aren't using accessories that are attached to the lens. I think most photographers prefer having their lenses cost as little as possible for the quality and features they provide while also being as small and light as possible, all of those things go out the window when you want all the lenses in a line to match.
@SushantandAanchal
@SushantandAanchal 4 года назад
Never has the difference been so clear! The best explanation so far. Thank you!
@Hello2U4s0e4r
@Hello2U4s0e4r 4 года назад
I loved the disclaimer at the beginning. Always concerned when browsing recommend videos and other reviews and that quickly made the video trusted and fun.
@BigBadLoneWolf
@BigBadLoneWolf 4 года назад
I knew the difference between f stops and t stops, but you taught me about the rest . Excellent video
@bravo4adventure988
@bravo4adventure988 4 года назад
I had no idea, so I learned that part too.
@CockatooDude
@CockatooDude 4 года назад
Man this guy's video quality is so good it feels like he's sitting right in front of me.
@PhDuh42
@PhDuh42 4 года назад
Thanks for making this well crafted video. I have been curious about this for a long time.
@RadicalEdwardStudios
@RadicalEdwardStudios 4 года назад
Many cine lenses do work hard to be different from still, optically. They try to avoid aberrations, make things more even across the glass, fix light angles, deal with reflection. The catch is that these are the ones where you end up paying a lot more than double for the same thing. And then, of course, all of those things you mentioned are also true. Focus breathing is also important, if that's compensated.
@okebaram
@okebaram Год назад
Why don't they put the same optic quality efforts into still lenses? Is it because movie production companies are more ready to pay for expensive gear?
@RadicalEdwardStudios
@RadicalEdwardStudios Год назад
@@okebaram 1. I personally won't be buying a $40,000 lens for my camera. 2. Movie companies very commonly work by renting equipment. That's a great way to disguise real cost.
@MoonshineMetalworks
@MoonshineMetalworks 4 года назад
I've been doing a load of research on videography and photography recently, which is how I found this channel, and this is by far and away the best explanation I've seen... even as a lay person it's all understandable, interesting and relevant. Plus there's a sleeping springer spaniel. Thanks for a great video, I'll be watching many more of them from you now!
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you, glad you found it useful 😊
@user-bp8yg3ko1r
@user-bp8yg3ko1r 4 года назад
I understood everything instantaneously, very informative and well done video! Thank you! :)
@paulm8157
@paulm8157 4 года назад
Well done, Dave! Clear, concise, thorough, including “so what” factor. Does similarity of optical performance include color rendition and uniformity of optical characteristics across the cine lens line?
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
I believe they'll be similar but not identical, since the stablemates are using the same optics as the stills they've have the same differences across the lineup as the stills do. But I doubt they'll ever get an 11mm lens to have identical characteristics to a 150mm macro for example
@harkostroef
@harkostroef 4 года назад
Love the no nonsense approach. Informative and fun to watch!
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you Harold 😄
@KristophTy
@KristophTy 10 месяцев назад
That was such an amazing video. I learned soooo much more about the difference in Cine vs photo lenses. Subbed! Thank You!
@nickcifarelli8887
@nickcifarelli8887 4 года назад
Brilliant video. Very well shot and, far more importantly, very well explained. Video was concise, but crystal clear. You demonstrate a very thorough understanding of lens. I loved the video. Top effort lad.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you very much Nick 😊
@andrewxue103
@andrewxue103 4 года назад
Thank you for the video! It's by far the most objective and comprehensive one I've ever watched.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thanks Andrew, glad you enjoyed it
@Falk4J
@Falk4J Год назад
Thanks for this well done insight into lens types! It was really helpful! Keep it up!
@user-kh6od8xc4x
@user-kh6od8xc4x 4 года назад
Like for Lada 🤣🤣
@timrepairs
@timrepairs 4 года назад
Well done Mate, such a thorough review. You’ve answered many questions I had about lenses in the past . Thx for educating. Cheers
@dangoldbach6570
@dangoldbach6570 4 года назад
Thanks so much for explaining this! I haven't seen a comprehensive breakdown of the cine/still (as opposed to cine still film!) Lenses before. It actually makes a heck of a lot of sense that cine lenses standardize like that, it also makes me feel a lot better knowing that I can use my still lenses for videos and still get good results within reason! Perfect for people like me that dabble in both but don't want to lay out too much cash for something I may not really actually need at my level
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Absolutely Dan, I do a fair amount of videos but never use cine lenses as half the time I'm in front of the camera and needing autofocus, so to use cine lenses would also require a cameraman, and for the times I able operating the camera and using manual focus I fine the stills lenses still do I perfectly fine job for what I need.
@drkskwlkr
@drkskwlkr 4 года назад
Fantastic video! Extremely concise and sharp to the point, without missing anything. Sincere respect Sir!
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you Ivan 😊
@fredwilsenack8634
@fredwilsenack8634 4 года назад
Really informative video. I always wondered what the difference was between the two types.
@marqueshaynes8780
@marqueshaynes8780 3 года назад
The is the BEST explanation of stills lenses vs cinema lenses on RU-vid, to date... Thank you!!!!
@kenjihorvath6377
@kenjihorvath6377 4 года назад
Super great video explaining the differences. Thank you for sharing this. Your dog is really cute too :)
@mahfeww
@mahfeww 4 года назад
Highly educational video. Every high quality overall, thank you for the upload. Your channel is surely going to grow with content this good
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you Matthew 😊
@Ed_Scott
@Ed_Scott 3 года назад
This was crazy helpful!!!! Definitely subscribing👌🏾
@mikeege7643
@mikeege7643 3 года назад
Excellent video. You provide clear and concise explanations about the differences in the types of lenses. Thank you! Please give your dog a hug for me....
@zipp4everyone263
@zipp4everyone263 4 года назад
Good points! Just wanted to add that some 5k+ cine lenses are parfocal as well, IE they can zoom without affecting af sharpness or af at all. That is a staple of Broadcasting lenses for example. As well as an insane zoom range most often.
@patataeve
@patataeve 2 года назад
At least an easy and friendly video about this! Thank you!!!
@Valleedbrume
@Valleedbrume 4 года назад
Great video and explanation.I think this will help some people.(I think many might be confused between video and film)
@siddhunkarthik
@siddhunkarthik 4 года назад
Good video. Neat, clean explanation or narration with great contents. 👌
@nakosikasukasena3390
@nakosikasukasena3390 3 года назад
Good Job! Thank You! What do you recommend to get as my 2 or 3 first cine lenses for APS-C Fujitsu X-T3? Thanks
@EPMTUNES
@EPMTUNES Год назад
Fascinating, I love the detail the creators, and you, went in to their craft.
@indigoinarritu6096
@indigoinarritu6096 Год назад
Wonderful! Thank you for this. Just now getting into Cine lenses and this was extremely helpful!
@LifeGQ
@LifeGQ 4 года назад
Extremely thorough explanation. Thank you so much for this.
@87rtlandry
@87rtlandry 3 года назад
Super informative! Much appreciated.
@joetrotsky6700
@joetrotsky6700 4 года назад
This is exactly the video I was looking for on this topic....thank you so much.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
You're welcome Joe, hopefully it answered all your queries
@pcofranc
@pcofranc 3 года назад
Great info I knew some differences but have a more complete picture now. Would be nice to do a follow-up where you show off the focus pulling advantages of the cine lens.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 3 года назад
Great suggestion, although I only had the lenses on loan from Irix and have since been returned but it's something I'll keep in mind for the future if I can get hold of some other stablemate lenses
@heinhtettunoo
@heinhtettunoo 4 года назад
Very informative video, Dave. Thank you.
@RianSpaulding
@RianSpaulding 4 года назад
Great walkthrough of the differences!
@JonS
@JonS 4 года назад
This was very informative. I learned a lot. Thank you! One tidbit. The "optical setup/design" is referred to as the "optical prescription" in world of lens design.
@PeterNolten
@PeterNolten 3 года назад
Thank you! That was a very useful and clear explanation!
@avinashrawal7928
@avinashrawal7928 4 года назад
The most viewed video in last 6 months. Don't you think there is gap of lens knowledge that you filled with this ,I think you should make more videos like this filling the gap . Your channel will grow super fast
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 3 года назад
Thanks for the view
@DethronerX
@DethronerX 2 года назад
Thanks! This helps decide right away.
@SKITZOpHISH
@SKITZOpHISH 3 года назад
you answered all my questions with one video! thanks!!
@awlonghurst
@awlonghurst 4 года назад
Fantastic video, thanks so much. I thought I knew a lot about photography, I know realise my knowledge is pretty limited (to stills). I hadn't realised how different the requirements would be for video. Great explanations.
@mitchmedmedia5386
@mitchmedmedia5386 4 года назад
I learned a ton, thanks for all of the info!
@iainsword3413
@iainsword3413 2 года назад
Phenomenal video! Great content!
@alessandromariscalco
@alessandromariscalco 4 года назад
your dog is a legend! super chilled ahahah great content as well!
@GeminiRelaxingMusic
@GeminiRelaxingMusic 4 года назад
I found this video to be clear, concise and very informative - thanks👍
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you, glad you enjoyed it 😊
@jeffreyyip9583
@jeffreyyip9583 4 года назад
This is good effort to explain the difference between cine and still lenses. It would have been better if the breathing focus effect can be explained early in the video. I hope this suggestion will help. Thanks.
@anstef1485
@anstef1485 4 года назад
Thank you so much! That is a great video and fantastic explanations!
@hellomynameisbenjaminupton
@hellomynameisbenjaminupton Год назад
6min in and this is so much clearer to me know. Thanks so much.
@TonyMellinger
@TonyMellinger 4 года назад
great video. Well put together! Keep it up!! I may end up doing a similar video between Canon 85mm cine and EF photo lenses because it's such a good concept. I'd love to see the comparison myself.
@extremelydave
@extremelydave 4 года назад
Finally someone explains this perfectly clear!! I GOT it!!! Thanks Dave!
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
You're welcome Dave, glad you found it useful 😊
@HusseinMarey
@HusseinMarey 4 года назад
That wheel is called a follow focus and the markings are on the side for the focus puller.
@jamesmonk5257
@jamesmonk5257 4 года назад
Great review, thanks for sharing👍
@jhalscott
@jhalscott 3 года назад
Absolutely the best video on this subject. Thank you. I get it now. Bonus points for pup in these videos.
@Balancinglife
@Balancinglife Год назад
Great info! Thank you!
@leonaldobrum
@leonaldobrum 4 года назад
Fantastic! Thanks for the detailed report.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
You're welcome Leonaldo 😊
@Jolontokhalilswork
@Jolontokhalilswork 4 года назад
thanks boss finally you switched to 4k ,what a quality bro
@willionaire360
@willionaire360 4 года назад
Best video on this topic i hv seen
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you 😊
@Merciful_Angel
@Merciful_Angel 2 года назад
I had no idea that I needed to know any of this, but I was oddly hooked from the start. And now I feel smarter...
@bakkikudva
@bakkikudva 4 года назад
Thank you! Learned something I didn't know before!
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
You're welcome Bakki, glad you found it useful
@JamesonsTravels
@JamesonsTravels 4 года назад
Good work. Recent sub and like your limited b roll, slo mo coffee pours and typical related crap. Great content.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thanks 😊
@bradhouston4734
@bradhouston4734 4 года назад
Great breakdown, one of the best that I have seen. Comprehensive and respect for making a closer apples for apples comparison! 😀🕺🏻🎥🏖🇦🇺
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you Brad 😊
@draganmikki5688
@draganmikki5688 4 года назад
Most cine lenses have additional unit inside the lens which compensate 'focus breathing', which is another major difference. Great video!
@tomastuoma
@tomastuoma Год назад
Do you have any info on this? I was wondering about exactly that after using Irix 30mm. The cine version has pretty much zero breathing, but the stills version does. Clearly something is different in the optical design, but it's not the number of elements, or what they are, but it is something.
@rickymcc9072
@rickymcc9072 4 года назад
Hi Dave Thanks for clearly explaining the key differences, as a stills only (currently) shooter I had a vague idea about some aspects but your short primer fills out my knowledge gaps nicely. I probably need to start experimenting, but I'm a tad intimidated by all the extra kit (cage - sound mikes - ext. monitor - matte box - gimbal etc) many seem to quickly evolve into using. Then there is the editing and technique. All in all seems a big step. I'm pretty competent with stills but could do with a few more pointers (as well as experimenting time) if I'm ever to feel comfortable making "good" video. Is that the sort of thing you might consider covering? A few short vids on how a stills shooter can best get acquainted with occasional video?
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Depending on what you're shooting a lot of the accessories aren't absolutely necessary, at least not to begin with. Cages for example are only really useful if you are mounting a ton of accessories on the camera. External mics are certainly a good thing to have but if mounted on the camera make no difference to your workflow than if you didn't have one. Monitors are helpful to see clearer than your camera screen allows or are useful if you are away from the camera but I personally never use them these days as I find the camera screen to be sufficient. For starters I would just use the camera with minimal accessories and just get comfortable with shooting video and then build up as and when needed. But I may do a video on it at some point in the future.
@amatijaca
@amatijaca 4 года назад
Thank you! That very clearly explained the difference.
@laika25
@laika25 3 года назад
Great great explanation. Btw, love the dog, what a cutie
@teddastych6248
@teddastych6248 4 года назад
Aside from the markings on the top vs. markings on the side, if you get a stills lens that “ de-clicks” the f-stop, is there a big difference between the two?
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
The de-clicked aperture is really aimed more for video shooters anyway so it's to make the lens more of a hybrid than a stills lens The other differences come in the geared rings and standardised front and filter sizes which the de-clicked stills lenses don't have but that's only a real benefit if you are shooting a lot with the camera on a rig
@ExaltedDuck
@ExaltedDuck 3 года назад
That's really helpful. Thanks.
@jfarleyanaheim
@jfarleyanaheim 4 года назад
Thank you! Very well explained.
@TexansForChrist
@TexansForChrist 4 года назад
I always wondered those things. Thanks so much.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
You're welcome Hopefully this cleared things up for you 😊
@imammarc
@imammarc 10 месяцев назад
Thanks. Very informative.
@semtex2987
@semtex2987 4 года назад
thanks for that dude! i'm a photographer for decades but never gave a thought about cines. now i know, thanks to you!
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
You're welcome 😊
@beaudanner
@beaudanner 4 года назад
Wow, I really learned a lot! Great breakdown. IMO I'm not sure that the build quality and physical changes for focus pulling are quite worth double. Do you feel there is any premium being paid because they're most likely for professional use and "budgets" rather than "wallets" are paying for them?
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Part of it is the economics of supply and demand, with cine lenses being a much more niche product then the R&D costs and the costs of setting up new machines can't be spread across as many units sold
@nathanryan8699
@nathanryan8699 4 года назад
Time = Money my friend. You have trained professionals expecting a certain work environment. Cine lenses cater to them. A single operator has serious diminishing returns. You can learn any kit for your own purposes. Group dynamics on a cinema shoot are a different beast. Build quality definitely plays a part in rental scenarios. Again, single operator/owner it's severe diminishing returns. Resell value may play a part, though.
@azerbouf
@azerbouf 4 года назад
Great video, thanks man!
@BryanEnsign
@BryanEnsign 4 года назад
This video was fantastically well done well explained and we'll spoken.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Thank you Bryan 😊
@pablovi77
@pablovi77 4 года назад
The reason that the have markings on both sides is, because you’ll have a focus puller(1st AC). And the cine lenses, at least the professional ones, have a much better focus ring, smoother and longer.
@JuliusGalacki
@JuliusGalacki 4 месяца назад
The best explanation of the differences I've seen.
@TheLucaaw
@TheLucaaw 4 года назад
Great video thank you! Would the focus throw of the lenses also be a consideration? Most cine lenses I have seen have long focus throws which I presume is for more control and precision. Whereas many stills lenses have quite short focus throws comparatively. I'm not sure if this is a universal truth but perhaps another consideration
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Some cine versions do receive modified focus mechanisms with longer throws, although in the case of this particular lens they both have the same 270* throw (which granted is pretty long for a still lens)
@reidschun
@reidschun Год назад
Very nice comparison. However, other than the better build quality (which I find dubious), the reasons cited for the increased cost of the cine lens and cine lenses in general - and I’m referring to fixed-focal length lenses only, not zoom lenses - really don’t make sense. After all, a slow focusing system simply requires different internal gearing; the focusing distances indicated on a stills lens can be measured and marked on the focusing ring; you can calibrate any stills lens to specific t-stops (and mark them on the aperture ring); an aperture adjustment mechanism without detents should be less expensive than one with detents, since detents are an added complication; etc. This leaves few plausible reasons why the cine lens is more expensive, such as, far fewer are sold in comparison to stills lenses, the typical customer is much better endowed than the typical stills photographer and can easily recoup the cost by renting out the lens, and there is perhaps less “focus breathing,” and less of a tendency to develop internal reflections from off-axis light sources, where the latter can always be blocked when shooting a still.
@ralphmwhite3
@ralphmwhite3 2 года назад
Very clear. Thank you.
@RSpudieD
@RSpudieD 4 года назад
Very interesting!! This also makes want to use cine lenses!
@CalzoneOP
@CalzoneOP 3 года назад
Great info!
@RaymondToms
@RaymondToms 3 года назад
Fantastic explanation of the differences between cine and stills lenses. Clear, concise, engaging. Good job. Perhaps make a companion video to explain why true cine lenses are so much more expensive than these stills lenses in Cine bodies.(if you have not already done one)
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 3 года назад
Thank you Raymond, if I'm ever fortunate enough to be able to get hold of such lenses then i'll certainly want to do such a video
@c.augustin
@c.augustin 4 года назад
Some aspects I already knew or guessed (just looking at a rig or seeing a focus-pull done by the assistant gives away many of the aspects covered). What I didn't know was the standardized front and filter diameters - makes perfect sense! I'll stay with still photography, though, not only because of the insane pricing of cine lenses … ;-)
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
The purpose made cine lenses do have a few other key differences such as no focus breathing etc and are generally much better optically which account for the much higher prices, they still really aren't much benefit to stills for the money though
@saugghos
@saugghos 4 года назад
Extremely informative
@JavierMercedes
@JavierMercedes 4 года назад
I just learned so much.
@rbelatamas
@rbelatamas 4 года назад
Great video, thanks
@aaronkaiser
@aaronkaiser 4 года назад
Great information!!
@whogivesaflyincrap
@whogivesaflyincrap 4 года назад
Dave, just curious as to what lens you shot this with...just for purpose of the bokeh?
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
From memory I believe the talking head section was the Sigma 16mm f1.4 on the A6400
@bravo4adventure988
@bravo4adventure988 4 года назад
Hi Dave, first time viewing your channel and just want to say thanks for clearing up some confusion for me. I'm a not very experienced RU-vidr/photographer and have been learning as I go with a few GoPros, a DJI Mavic drone, and a Sony RX 100 MK4 point and shoot, bought specifically because it can shoot 4K video. I went to the Sony from a Canon for that reason as well, though I did find that the Canon user controls were much more intuitively laid out. Been saving for an A7 lll for a bit now, and wondering about lenses, so thank you for clearing some things up for me. This might sound like a dumb question, but can I shoot stills with a Cine lens? I'm going to be doing a lot of traveling in the next year, so minimizing how many I carry is important. Thanks in advance. Subbed.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
Welcome to the channel, glad you enjoyed it Yes you can shoot stills with a cine lens but there is no advantage to doing so, so unless you specifically need cine lenses for a lot of video work and just occasional photos then I would suggest sticking with still lenses and using those for your video work
@Mulnader
@Mulnader 4 года назад
Wow! So much knowledge in so little time. You should have 100x subs if rest of your videos are similar quality content.
@djsvideodiarys
@djsvideodiarys 3 года назад
Is the cinematic look just from lighting and lenses or does FPS and 1080p or 4k come in as factors too. Is there any factors I'm missing out on
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 3 года назад
Lighting, composition and editing are generally always the biggest factors when it comes to viewing things. Higher FPS is obviously useful if you wish to include slow motion elements while resolution probably plays the least important role, sure its great to have higher resolution and more detail but it doesn't really make footage look cinematic.
@djsvideodiarys
@djsvideodiarys 3 года назад
@@DaveMcKeegan which of your videos would you recommend for further education on that pro cinematic look? Not the smooth high red RU-vid look but movie quality look. Thanks for your prompt reply much appreciated. -DJ
@benharris3949
@benharris3949 4 года назад
Methodical and thorough, thank you! Also, I want one of those IRIX 150mms so bad, I’ve been drooling over them since they came out.
@DaveMcKeegan
@DaveMcKeegan 4 года назад
They are a fantastic lens in fairness, although I say that of all Irix lenses 🤣
@benharris3949
@benharris3949 4 года назад
And that is definitely part of the appeal, I’ve heard nothing but good things of Irix in general.
Далее
Why I Switched to Cine Lenses...
15:51
Просмотров 34 тыс.
Cine Lenses Vs Photography Lenses
8:23
Просмотров 35 тыс.
Guess The Drawing! ✍️✨🧐 #shortsart
00:14
Просмотров 2,9 млн
КРУТОЙ ФОКУС С ШАРАМИ
00:35
Просмотров 322 тыс.
Don't be fooled by your lenses
31:50
Просмотров 29 тыс.
Photo vs Cine Lenses: Which Is Right for You?
7:23
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50mm Shootout - Which Lens is the Best?
20:42
Просмотров 419 тыс.
ENDGAME Budget Cinema Lenses - NiSi Athena Lens Review
14:38
Cine vs Photo Lenses: Which Are More "Cinematic"?
9:24
4 Camera Moves Every Filmmaker Needs To Know
11:53
Просмотров 113 тыс.
The 7 sharpest 85mm lenses...ever made?
9:01
Просмотров 105 тыс.
OZON РАЗБИЛИ 3 КОМПЬЮТЕРА
0:57
Просмотров 39 тыс.
iPhone перегрелся, что делать?!
1:01