The Rolling Stones - Brown Sugar [Live] HD Marquee Club 1971 NEW 

I don't like Ronnie Sullivan, what a jerk.

Totally agree!

@@michaelfox8200 Who even are you?

Brian Jones the most all around musican in Rock history! And please don't mention Wood, he's a reject just like Kenny Jones

I don’t think it’s because of MT I just feel Mick and Keith were writing there best songs in this period and like all songwriters they lost it a bit.

I agree...about that...Sticky Fingers was a great album..wasn't it!? Moonlight Mile always reminds me of my high school girlfriend...very sentimental dude that I am....And getting on too🌜🙂...Exiles on Main Street...loved that also...Saw them here in Australia about 4years ago...Good to see Mick Taylor touring with them..Heard "Can't You hear Me Knocking"...loved it!!

I read once that Brown Sugar was Mick's favourites to sing live.. Although I'm sure there are others😊.

​@@hilmarschacht7611hey, l just read your comment...for me the same ,Moonlight Mile and my teenage girl friend ...sooo nostalgic..still think of her 35 yrs on.😊

if you like this you might like my brothers music. His name is Stu Morris

No, Jones, baby,Jones!

@@jessewolf6806 I’m dying to hear why you think the Brian Jones era was their best. I’ll admit he played many different instruments but tell me what memorable riff or solo he’s famous for.

@@mag-nm7tw Well, I could point out the sitar on Paint It Black or the recorder on Ruby Tuesday or a dozen other unusual contributions but for me that’s not the issue. Even put aside the fact that Brian essentially created The Rolling Stones. So it’s 3 interrelated things: first, the “ancient art of weaving “as Keith puts it - 2 guitarists working in sync- was I think best with Brian. (And next best with Wood. Then with Taylor. All great interactions. Which tells you something about how adaptable Keith is). Second, for me, as Keith also says: the rock is easy, the roll is hard. That is, Rock’n’Roll is not about the lead guitar as much as the rhythm guitar and indeed the entire rhythm section. The Watts, Wyman,Jones,Richards combo was the best rhythm section in the history of the genre. (Satisfaction, Jumpin’Jack Flash). Finally, the Stones are fundamentally a live band. In fact they are the very embodiment of a live rock and roll band. The early performances with Brian - one of which I actually attended - were raucous, sloppy, out of control, punk before punk - exciting beyond belief - with the maestro a very young Mick Jagger making everyone go nuts. You really had to be there but watch the documentary Charlie is My Darling about the Stones’ tour through Ireland in ‘65 and you’ll get a feel for what I’m talking about. Or listen to the British 6 song EP Got Live if u Want it for a brief taste of the pandemonium. As Keith says in his book Life “there wasn’t a dry seat in the house “. When Jones died Rolling Stone Magazine said Mick is the body, Keith is the mind, but Brian was the soul of The Rolling Stones. RIP Brian and Charlie!

I prefer Taylor's era as well.

The Jones and Wood eras don't hold a candle.

@King of Sweden hahaha!!!! why not Joe Satriani as well?? 😂😂😎😎 Either you are joking either you just met the Rolling Stones at their best, ever!!!! And Mick Taylor was part of it Sir 😜😎

Jaggers voice is not top form sounds damaged

Solo. Só.

I agree 100% but I don't know what it was, he just never seemed to fit, yet Ronnie stepped in and he was a Rolling Stone.

@@stewartmcmanus3991 Visually. But on the records, those solos, those fills: Mick Taylor was The One.

@@stewartmcmanus3991 I say this out of love for M. Taylor, but he just doesn't have a big stage presence. He doesn't look up, dance around; but he stares at that guitar making sure he gets every note right. & By God, he does get every note right, AND THAT'S WE LOVE HIM!!

@@vinceschauf9437 here, here, he doesn’t or didn’t need stage presence. In a strange way, it worked cos their ‘69, and Exile tour in ‘72 are among some of the best live tours of all time.

AKA Mick Taylor Era

they were always great just a different audience

fuck yeah ,exile on main is my drug

They haven’t peaked yet! Haha. They still sell out anywhere in the world.

@THE WALKING BLUES I never thought much of lynyrd skynyrd

More into blues actually with Mick Taylor, but no complain about that,they played fabulous

Richard Lawson brilliant and so true lol

@Wesley Sandel . Yes , when the Stones do their 100th Anniversary Tour they will all be 4ft 6 tall ! : )

Yeah but too bad it’s his mom‘s wardrobe

Good one! Ha ha. Joke's on us. He's in his mid seventies, and still selling out stadiums.

Lol yes

that's how he looks here drunk and unshaven...drugs? probably. Go Keith!

After the show, a Doctor was actually called in for Keith. There is a picture of him seated on the floor with his guitar, boots off, in his sox, leaning against an amp, grinning ear to ear looking up at the Doctor who had just arrived.

Yeah, I think Keith collapsed after the show. Plays like the devil here anyway

All a part of the act to put on, a persona. Did you sniff the bottle that appears here? They swig from it without a wince while most people react in some way these guys having a taste as though it were sweet tea. A promoter would not pay any band that shows up late or drunk but the Stones had this act/facade that was an just that-an act. Heroin is one thing but when used in conjunction with alcohol the alcohol kills you. If Keith had been using heroin and alcohol he would not have lived long. Ever see Janis without a bottle? But she died from "heroin overdose" they reported but no mention of booze. She died from mixing H with booze. Would you rather be around a user of heroin or an alcoholic. And forget the stereotype heroin user I am talking a daily user who has a job (and there are many). Heroin also has no ill effects on the body or brain, alcohol kills fast and slow and makes people act retarded, of course they love that? Go figure.

I'm not disagreeing with you at all -- in fact all you say is spot on. However, perhaps it's just me and my age -59 - but I'm having a difficult time understanding your point. Seriously. What are you trying to say? That if Keith had been drinking AND shooting dope, which he was doing all during this time, by many accounts, that he would have died too? Are you saying promotors put ice tea or some other trick in the bottles of Jim Beam that sit atop the amps and Keith was in on it? I totally disagree, but that's just me. I don't think you mean that, but I just want to make sure. Kansas and Journey may have put ice tea in the Jack fifths, but I don't think it even occurred to Keith or anyone else at the time. Why would they want to do that? I 'm not looking for a big debate that goes on foreve I think you are on to something, or I wouldn't bother. Think deeper. What are you trying to say? It must have been something or you wouldn't have written it. Look forward to reply. Don't hold it against me, but I'm a musician who thinks too much. Not a hint of troll. I am intrigued by how others perceive this issue. Thank! Gary -- a lifelong stones fans until 1982 and recovery addict.

Well spotted! Most of the comments are about the playing (which are well deserved!), which means someone has done such a good job with the sound that you don't even notice it!

YES Taylor stunned me jaw dropping fluid soloing - 🌟 (The Winterland LA Forum LB Arena Palladium) '72 tour was off & running!! 💖

I too was at that concert. I was 3rd row, left of center, staring right at Mike Taylor from a distance of 15 to 20 feet. I'll never forget when the lights came up and they kicked off with Brown Sugar the entire mass of humanity on the Convention Center floor (1000's) surged forward. I thought I was going to be crushed. I was in awe of Mick Taylor. He stood there like a statue and produced some of the best guitar tones I've ever heard.

Yes, a good fortune to see/hear them at this time... ! The best for me... I can't stand fake montage/edit of original videos from cun'ts wasting treasors.

I saw them kick that tour off on June 3rd. That Stevie Wonder guy was pretty good too!

Keith Richards said it best when he called Mick Taylor a virtuoso.

Absolutely. As virtuoso as MT was there were any number of suitors that passed on MT's role. And it was exactly that; a role player not a band member. Keith's a musical genius. MT a fantastic rock guitar player at a time where 10 or more fellas coulda stepped into the role. Rory Gallagher and others said 'thanks, but no thanks.'

Yes the other band members are just decoration,Jagger a bad frontman,Charlie nothing on drums, Bill nothing on Bass, Taylor nothing on Guitar, Richard's one man Band😂😂😂😂😂

@@marcosgomes7681 That's kinda harsh.

Yes he lived on rock nroll booze coke dope you just got to remember when you are voted no. One to DIE you are no joke 😳

@@marcosgomes7681 Mick Taylor made this band. Period!

totally agree Ron Wood cant even get close to Taylors talent!. Keith looks pretty strung out but his rhythm guitar is just the best. When i see clips of them today i just gotta laugh.

the Stones did'nt need Taylor on the Some Girls album or the Tatoo You album .so don't compare apples to oranges ,

@@zcam1969 HA HA they sure didn't both albums suck Some girls was their new wave/lets be relevant album LMBO

Ian Mills Most of the legendary bands from that era hit a pretty high water mark live but 1969-1973 Stones, esp. 72/73 when touring Exile is where I want to be caught in a time loop.

Hell yeah!

The Who, with only one guitar...

with Taylor they have sucked live since he left

Yeah. Too bad they’re not playing it in this clip.

Best version of this song I have heard.

@@brianengel1298 oops your right although I've heard them do this song at a concert and it didn't sound as good as this version !!!!

Poor Keith, so glad he made it out

But first, Mick WROTE the riff.

This performance is obviously dubbed. The guitar and vocals do not sync up in a lot of places.

The Artful Dodger Here we go again. This Mick Taylor vs Keith vs Brian etc. is getting so boring!

NO, Mick Jagger wrote the riff. He wrote it in Australia when filming a movie in 1969 during the off time of the Stones. Both, he and Keith have talked about it. It is basically a Mick song, I think Keith structured it a bit and helped with the phrasing of the riffs, but the composition of music and lyrics is 100% Mick Jagger.

I'm currently reading Keith's autobiography and he gives credit to Mick fully on this one. He said, "I'm the Riffmaster, but this one is all Mick's."

Sure he was the final piece, but the band would be nothing without Keith, Bill, and Charlie

Maybe you should also thank the dismay of George Harrison, Yoko Ono, the death of Brian Epstein, and so on.

​@@CarlosHenriqueXavierEndooh sod off

Taylor was genius and so clean on the riffs !!

totalmente cierto el sonido duro de los riffs de Keith y los solos de Mick Taylor.

Desde luego Sticky fingers es la obra maestra de los Stones

Si, todos lo dicen, la mejor época. Guapos, talentosos y jóvenes. Pero, con Ronnie también tienen lo suyo: "Some girls" y " Tattoyou" lo confirman.

Stones, actually

Sorry friend, it ain't any old shit. Mick knows what he's doing. He is an accomplished rock musician here, my friend.

@@howardrobinson4938 Mick Taylor is just a noodler.

@@kurtb3260Noodle

@@kurtb3260 Sometimes but not always.

alfiesgirluk for sure some of there best work was with Taylor

He was nothing but another really good guitarist without Jagger, Richards, Watts and Wyman.

alfiesgirluk that is true.

Linn Vaveon Black and Blue was a great fucking album! So was Goats Head Soup! So was It's only Rock and Roll. I can't remember when Mick Taylor left. I know Ronnie Wood was on Black and Blue. Stones got into some trouble for the Black and Blue advertising, some of which featured bruised women who were tied up.

degree7 not terrible but nowhere near as good as Sticky Fingers and Let it Bleed.

Can’t agree more. This early 70s camera flip make me want to slap the directors from back then. It was NOT clever you idiots. Too much Coke I guess.

Yeah, it has been remastered from the original stuff I used to watch, but just the image quality not the editing. I’ll have to go back to my original copy but the sync seemed out on this clip, I can’t remember it being out that much............have to love this though it is so rawww, you can see and hear every note played.....They were all loving it.

can't watch

this was a little night club performance. we are luck that there is any recording of it at all.

A fine example of the smart-ass editing diminishing the event the film records - makes it feel like a compilation at times, which in view of the uniqueness of the occasion is regrettable. Fortunately the sound is absolutely amazing (not to mention the performance).

led zeppelin had a brief reign after the beatles broke up but things started falling apart quickly, id have to agree with you other than that two-year(?)-long period

At the time of the Beatles breakup CCR was on top of their game, but too much internal band strife ruined them.

While I agree, and I'm glad I was able to see them several times, Faces were a lot of fun.

Dave Thompson me big bwana me say you don't know poo poo

True, true...

Dave get it right, Brian died of an over dose in July of 69.

@@josephbuonfiglio9442 doubtful

@@josephbuonfiglio9442 Didn't he drown?

They played two shows each day at winterland, little Stevie wonder opened all 4 shows. They were amazing in this time period. 75 tour with Ronny Woods was a great show also (. 1st time I had seen speakers hanging from ceiling and the STAR stage was amazing for the period) Nicky Hopkins, Billy Preston and the horn section was mind blowing! Although not technically the guitar player that MT was Ronny makes every band he’s been with a total party onstage

What more would you give him? Playing with the Stones for 5 years was more than enough 'credit'. He was nothing but another really good guitarist without Jagger, Richards, Watts and Wyman.

Mick Taylor brought out the best in the Stones. Their decline started the day he left.

Marcusesq - lol You're close! In reality, The Rolling Stones, brought out the best in Mick Taylor. ALL of it. He quit because he was burnt out - figuratively and literally - he burned a hole thru his nasal septum with cocaine use. He was a new husband and father and his wife wanted him OUT. Musically, his decline began the day he left. Though, he sure didn't forget the way, to the All You Can Eat Buffet.

Yet he was part of their best three albums - Beggar Banquet, Sticky Fingers, and Exile On Main St. And those wouldn't have sounded anything like that without his unique guitar style. Taylor was much better than 'really good', just go back and listen to the stuff he did with Mayall to appreciate that.

The same can be said for the other musicians on your 3 favorite Stones records. Nicky Hopkins, Bobby Keys, Billy Preston, Jim Price, Rocky Dijon, Ry Cooder, Jack Nitzche, Paul Buckmaster, Ian Stewart, Jim Dickenson, Jim Price, Bill Plummer, Al Perkins, Clydie King, Kathi Mcdald, Jerry Kirkland, Tammi Lynn, Shirley Goodman, Dr John, and Richard Washington. p.s. - Mick Taylor did not play on 'BEGGAR'S BANQUET'

add a couple of strobes and you're set

Probably more so, a bit of a mess!!

Lol too many cuts

😂😂😂😂 too true!!😂😂😂😂😂

It’s all footage from other songs. The editing is meant to create the illusion that it’s real.

Yeah - absolutely.!

Mick never seemed happy w/ the stones -- fantastic player though...

Mick Taylor just weaving that lead solo in there, so natural. He's perfectly comfortable.

fuf

By the way I'm not taking any props away from Keith Richards because if you hear his intro to Can't You Hear Me Knocking... Is one of the classic guitar intros of all time!!... Also in between guitarist because Brian Jones was basically totally out of it the last year of his life... If you listen to Monkey Man off of Let it bleed... You'll get a real feel for how funky Keith can be!!

Richie B Although M. Taylor's playing greatly enhanced The Stones sound, some of his soloing should of been better constructed to fit the song. At times he played somewhat random lead guitar that although it blended in, he could of created a solo that would of made a better "fit".

Charlie loves Jazz more than Rock

He does, but I really like his drumming. Very, very simple though important that poeple don't think that means he isn;t a good drummer. He plays exactly what the song requires, isn't flashy, has great feel and is super groovy. I'd rather Charlie over, say, travis Barker x 100,000,000 times (though I'm sure Travis is a nice guy)

I think it's his way of conserving energy. In fact it looks like he got into the Alexander Technicque or something.

Yeah, I don’t remember ever seeing that expression from him except here.

He's NOT playing the intro there..it's a bad edit.

biscuit club Keith is playing something at the start, but it certainly ain’t the intro to this song. Whoever edited this video is a fucking moron. Almost none of Keith’s or Mick Taylor’s parts are synced with the proper video.

Funny thing is.... Keef is not actually playing anything like the intro in that visual. The dummass editor probably liked the faces Keef was pulling and cut that visual over the intro audio.

Edited badly

I liked Brian Jones also.

No,im choice brian jones

The solo at 1:42 is just beautiful guitar playing.

True that!

mick is good, but ronnie is better

No. Stock standard rendition of the song, absolutely identical to the studio classic. More likely the best version you came across on RU-vid that hour, that day. So tired of these comments. Every good song or rendition is the "best ever" and the song is 'genius' of course and every great song is 'underrated' blah blah blah.

@@truefunksoul8638 Mick Taylor guitar is more obvious hear . I have heard the studio version and it doesn't sound as great

Noticed that!

if you like this you might like my brothers music. His name is Stu Morris

Jagger is an absolute joke of a man. I'm shocked that you actually take him seriously???

@@pmcfarlane7660Mick is 🥵

Sick of hearing it so what

I think so!

luxx_interior the Beatles didn’t even consider the stones as rivals

Ritchie B . Look what you did, you,ve only gone & provoked some Beatles fans , take cover !! I grew up liking them both, but when I was old enough ( about 8yrs old ) I was turned on by the sheer energy & sexual drive of The Stones. The Beatles were not capable of competing on that level . I still like their amazing creativity in the Studio of course ! But live , post screaming girls 20 mins shows they could'nt compete with the Stones & I think Lennon knew it ! Macca would have been up for it though , he's a natural live performer unlike John with all his insecurities I think . Mick Jagger was born to be a performer & The Stones hit grooves The Fab Four could only dream about !!

Mick is the prototype of R&R lead singers. The End! I think the Stones & Beatles had sort of a friendly competition. I believe they even inspired each other on occasion.The R&R Circus footage is all good, especialy the gritty Yer Blues with Eric, Keith, John Lennon and Mitch Mitchell. It's all good in it's own way. Beatles and Stones...Apples and Oranges.

Ugh this comment section is ridiculous, imagine comparing two different sounding bands that are good in their own right. In the early days of the stones Paul wrote some songs for them if I’m not mistaken, and in the late 60s the stones were pulling in way more money than the Beatles anyways so it’s trivial at the end of the day

@@Magnetron33 All the top bands competed, influenced each other, stole (or borrowed?) from each other. When a new Cream record came out, the Beatles and the Stones were the first guys down at the record store on Saturday morning. No big deal at all. Certainly fun to talk about. The list of great Stones songs the Beatles couldn't have pulled off, and vice versa, is a long one. We're all just fortunate to have listened to them at all.

Really have to blame the director and/or film editor for all those stupidly quick cuts. It must be very difficult to establish ideal shot positions in a hot, crowded club, using the bulkier gear way back then.

Worst editor more like it.

All they needed were two cameras at 30o positions. At least we could enjoy the band. The music is what brought me here.

The cameraman is good the video editor sucks

Or the human riff,ellicantly wasted,next to die.. survivor. .

@@roybennett9284 This gig he was on a 3day sleepless binge he's looking a bit haggered here but his playing is driving definitely cut from a different cloth 😉 🌟🌟🌟🌟

If you saw a junkie on the street looking like that you wouldn't piss on him.

Greasy coke/smack complexion. He's in a bad way here. Fuck knows why he's still alive.

@@bjorno2080 It's Keith's personality and musical/songwriting ability why I think he's cool. Not cause he was a junkie for a period of time. Addicts are a dime a dozen.

@christopher weise sounds about right, and funnily enough he was only ever caught with amphetamines and outed as smoking heroin so if anything he generally tried to avoid cocaine but when you do happen to use it you certainly cant hide it, i know i cant

John Muha - They did this gig one week after the 1971 tour ended

@@tonteriaslasprecisas6897 yeah, that was the farewell Britain tour before hightailing to south of france. Clubs and theaters

And mounds of cocaine will affect your voice

That was a great gift. My Mom for my 13th birthday got me "Zappa in New York".

@@dirtydave2691 Sounds like you both had good parents, at least as far as musical taste is involved.