This is all you need to know about the Talmud: "If the girl is less than that age, younger than three years and one day, the status of intercourse with her is not that of intercourse in all halakhic senses; rather, it is like placing a finger into the eye. Just as in that case, the eye constricts, sheds tears, and then returns to its original state, so too, in a girl younger than three years and one day old, the hymen returns to its original state." There are countless other horrors in it.
ahh yes, the 2 talmuds. one written in basic arameic with the misnah parts being written in hebrew, and one that is more encrypted than the anigma code
"Then Jesus said to them, 'Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees'...Then they understood that he did not tell them to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees..." (Matthew 16:6 &12, NKJV). The Messiah clearly warned his first century disciples, and us today, to "beware of the leaven of the Pharisees," yet some still insist on quoting from the Talmud. I've read almost every Scripture known, I'm interested in Where you found (what writtings) you said "God gave the talmud with the 10 commandments"? Does the Gemara deal with Gematria? I known gematria is jewish mysticism and I see its code it almost everything. I'm studying to further my knowledge on the talmud as I feel it's the exact opposite of Christ and was written by those who loathed Him. It seems as if the 3 main jewish sects at the time were the pharisees, sadducees and escenses. I've read the escenses writtings and they seem way more grounded in YHWH then the other 2 sects.
I'm sorry to say, but you make no sense. On the one hand, you quote a Christian source that warns to stay far away from learning the Talmud, but then you're asking for help to further your knowledge of the Talmud (implying that 1. you've been learning parts of it and 2. that you want to learn MORE of it). Why don't you just forget about the Talmud altogether? It was not written for you, nor was this video meant for you. It was meant for non-affiliated Jews to take interest in. As was stated in the video, the Talmud was specifically written in a manner that it can only TRULY be understood when taught by a Scholar and only understood by those that put years of dedication into learning it (which you stated above is prohibited by your god).
The Sadducees and pharacies kicked the people out of the synagogues if they followed messiah. They wanted an earthly messiah. They did not understand he is coming back though. There is proof he is messiah but they close their eyes to it.
You should have given an example of a page or even a topic discussed in the Talmud. It's a picayune discussion of detailed topics many of which did not apply even when it was written. There are many discussions of Temple practice years after the Temple was destroyed. Agricultural discussions of crops and grasses that didn't even exist in Babylon. The bottom line seems to be: what is and what is not kosher. You'd think in all these years there would be an attempt to straighten it out and make it at least look like an intellectual discussion. Yes, many of the argument tactics might be useful but most of those had already been used by Greek philosophers. And it's interesting that Talmud is not taught in any law class, any philosophy class or even classes on arguing effectively. It's just a notion of "it's there" but no one understands it. Tradition.
@@72Yonatan I went to Yeshiva and studied Mishna and Talmud from grades 4 until grade 11 in the original dead language. When Steinsalz came out with his translation I even attempted to read parts of it again. How could I have known all those details without having been taught it? It's interesting that they avoided the term "pill-pull" when discussing the topic. Look it up. This is why throughout Jewish history there were so many attempts at codifying the law in a easy to look up way like the Shulchan Aruch. Try a chavroosah and tell me I'm wrong.
@@alg11297 This is a good and true observation on the Talmud. However, the Talmud is much more than what you or this video described. It's very structure, and the symbiotic relationship the two Talmuds have are working their magic in the background and expanding the student's consciousness. There are concealed bits of information, mysterious legends that hide keys to the Bible and more.... We should be proud, this text helped make our people successful and lively in many ways, all thanks to our sages. Today it is OUR job to organize and straighten out what has been handed down as a gift.
@@1995yuda There is no structure that anyone can see. Even within each Mesechta all kinds of topics are discussed that have nothing to do with anything else. Magical stories. Myths. Superstitious practices. Try any single page of any Talmud and you'll be lost in a minute. I hope you are talking from experience. Daf Yomi is a single page and covered in less time that it takes to read the headlines in The Times. And then you have the commentaries on the commentaries. Please talk from experience.
Because ancient Israelites used to worship Baal, and perform ‘child sacrifices and animal sacrifices’ to Baal. Jews then changed Baals name to Yahweh, and then later on throughout history, Jews found the name Yahweh to be offensive because of religious persecution. To bad Jews can’t figure out that the god that they are actually worshipping is Baal who has been secretly called many names
Because they keep picking and choosing which part of history they’ want! Haven’t u noticed she jumped from Moses to CE!!! Moses to Histker where was Jesus sis?
I first learned of the tslmud in an anti semitic sort of way - a post Christianity reactionary movement, that is evil and shrouded in mystery. As a shi'ite Muslim though, I realized that it was a neo orthodox revival of thought - the fact that we are human and bound by time, space, and personality effects and affects the message of the prophets, gave me peace that ultimately, Hashem will decide
@@sweet2863 This is not necesarily true. Some say that she was fourteen, others that she was seventeen, which was well within the global norm of the time. Though todays Jews follow the same age of consent laws as the society's around them, in anceint times they were considered to be women, not children, after the her Bat Mitzva at age 12. And this was normal in virtualy every place on earth. even in parts of the USA, girls as youg s 13 can marry if theire parents and a judge grant permision.
Dans mon pays, la Tunisie, j'avais des élèves dont les noms de familles sont: Yaacoubi, Yahoudi, Talmoudi, etc. Ils sont issus de familles musulmanes. A l'époque, cela ne me disait rien de spécial. Après la retraite en tant qu'inspecteur d'académie, j'ai lu l'ancien testament en français et depuis six mois j'ai étudié en solo l'hébreu. Je comprends un peu plus les liens génétiques entre les maghrébins et les israéliens. J'espère qu'un jour de mon vivant je verrai tous les pays du Maghreb et Israël vivre en bonne intelligence et en paix. Une remarque: l'exposé est excellent et très pédagogiques pour nous autres ignorants. Merci de faire l'effort de nous ouvrir sur un peuple exceptionnel: le peuple juif de la terre (haeretz).
While in Hebrew it's called the "Yerushalmi", in non-Jewish/Academic circles many do indeed call it the "Palestinian Talmud". Remember, even Jews called themselves Palestinian in the years before the formation of the State of Israel under British Rule.
@@UNPACKED Every day I learn something new. Thank you very much for your videos. But I think it would be useful to say that the name "Palestine" in this context , granted by the Roman empire to insult the Jews, and to give their land a name of their rivals- "Pleshet" , and that it was only in 130 a.c. It is important to say that it has nothing to do with the Arab population who took that name in the early 20 century. Thanks and happy New year from Israel:)
@@bogdan98ify We Palestinian Arameans are fine with either name, the ancient Egyptians and Assyrians also generally called the region Peleset/Paleshtu way before the Greeks and Romans, Samaria and Judah being regional political entities within Palestine while the name "Canaan" was still used by the Phoenicians in the north. I generally stick with Levantine to avoid useless argument over names as we (israelis and Palestinians) are mostly of Levantine origin.
@@Aj-zr8dz definitely not. Most Jews in Israel are from descendant from Eastern and Central Europe, including Russia, as well as non-Levantine Middle Eastern/African countries like Morocco, Yemen, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iraq and Turkey. A very small population are actually Palestinian, yet I am unsure if they themselves would admit to it.
Jesus was a Judean. In fact, the sign over his cross said King of Judea. I studied the Talmud for 6 years. It’s about as hard as trigonometry. It helps to have a two-door
One "minor" detail she left out is that the VAST majority of modern scholars, whether they be Conservative, Reform, Karaite, and secular (both inside Israel and out) reject the notion that the Talmud contains an additional "oral law" given to Moses at Sinai. People do add stories, just like Muslims wrote Hadiths hundreds of years after Mohammed and the Buddhists wrote the Jataka tales a thousand years after the Buddha.
Its a bit misleading to criticize this when the whole series is about the embellished biblical accounts, but if you must... There obviously was an oral law way before it was written down, how else would you know how to celebrate shabbat or how to prepare kosher meat, those things were orally taught from generation to generation. Could have the tradition evolved? Sure, from a secular point of view it's extremely likely that the oral tradition evolved through time, but again, it was already there by the time the Tanakh was composed and codified. Written Torah on its own doesn't document everything since it didn't have to. So again, weird criticism for a series that includes the legendary parts of the Bible taught as historical events.
It's a Blessing to hear vibrant debate. Since it's one of the ways Je-ho-vah Our Elohim Communicates with us. But saying God gave an Oral Torah is an assumption that we have not the ability to prove or disprove.
As for the statements about the topic of the Shabbat, the Written Torah does indeed state a few important things. A fire may not be either kindled or extinguished on the Shabbat. One may also not carry wood for kindling. These are expressly forbidden and one is supposed to remain home, although the details are not flushed out.
It’s not “Palestine today” and the Jerusalem Talmud was not written partially in a Palestinian language, there is no such language. In fact, the Philistines are extinct. The subjects in the Talmud that you suggest Christians “might” find disconcerting were extremely vitriolic and hateful against Christians. The Talmud is not scripture, nor is it inspired by the Holy Spirit. Sola Scriptura.
Admittedly the best way of describing the most slippery subject in the easiest way to get near the truth of the Jewish Talmud story. But it does not mean anything serious except religious verbosity or a lot of other things that are not true in any way? The rigmarole of Talmud has been explained by the wonderful speaker who seems to be a great scholarly authority on the religious subject….
The literal translation of הנשיא is indeed "the president", but his English name is "the Prince". We didn't come up with this translation, that's how it's been for centuries. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/yehudah-hanasi-judah-the-prince
They didn't have "presidents" at that time or even the modern concept of one. The term president is strictly modern day and Prince is more appropriate for the time he lived.
Jewish peoples are very smart!!! I am writing a book came across this religion. I had complete my, search and purpose. I want to produce these 13 books, that I had encoded more than 40,000 questions and decision in the system. I had find that I am not alone in this quest. I am glad to see Jewish have a deeper path in this.
@@UNPACKED I summon and I want you to join me to cast all the Jewish souls and spirits to possess my soul to convert to modern Orthodox Judaism and Zionism forever period ♾️✡️🕎🇮🇱🕍💯
"The written Torah is considered the word of God and so is the Oral Torah, but the compliation of the Talmud was written by man in a specific historical period, so controversial opinions do show up. " How does that make sense? Can a bunch of arguments and competing opinions be the word of God? Isn't God One?
I am enjoying the channel. I know I am late to this party; I just discovered the channel today. In this video, I was hoping that you would talk about the Zoroastrian influence on the creation of the Babylonian Talmud, because it was a big influence according to scholars. New ideas emerged in Judaism which had parallels in Zoroastrianism. It wasn't just a coincidence.
What came out of HaShem's Mouth to Moses was the Oral Torah, then HaShem told Moses to "WRITE THESE WORDS DOWN" thus the Written Torah. Every word that comes from the Mouth of G-d is Law. The problem lies in the fact that He even says..... "My People DO NOT LISTEN TO ME." Sages and Rabbis have now become gods that are worshiped and obeyed instead of Listening to HaShem and obeying HIM in Covenant they make up their own laws and call it an Oral Torah. G-d's Words to Moses is and always will be The Orah Torah that was written down. The Oral Torah is the Written Torah there is no other Torah. One G-d, One Covenant, One Torah. It does not get much planer than this. Nowhere did HaShem tell us to write books of commentaries on His Laws, nor did He tell us to make up laws and bind them on other people... no where did He ever say to follow the teachings of men and obey them instead of listening to HIM. All Sects of our Jewish people need to Teshuvah and RETURN TO HIM.... and stop listening and worshiping men.
This was the primary mission of Yeshua, besides Him being crucified. The Pharisees and their 'tradition' is what was the problem. They took away from the true intent of the Law. The corrupted the Torah with their teachings and led the people to themselves, instead of G-d.
onejohn2.26 It's the biggest risk to our inherited Faiths. We end up deceiving ourselves as to the importance of our own opinions on G0D, rather than following Him. Our fears vs. our honesty create the edge or the rub that refines our zealous vs. jealous natures for those who seek Knowledge and consider it to be given to us because of our own worthiness. We lose perspective on ourselves and end up trying to justify ourselves by our own perceptions of righteousness, rather than the walking Evidence of It. I see it in Human Nature literally everywhere. We really are far too contentious as a species.. but we lose ourselves in Success just as easily as in our poverty of material things. We are in a spiritual sifting. It's similar to the Wild Hunt of Norse Legend, perhaps. The Angels of Heaven are aligning with us, and as we align ourselves with our Heavenly Authorities, our hearts tend to be more hungry for peaceful solutions to spiritual conflicts I suppose. Idk how much of this technically goes, but I still have faith that it does. LOVE FINDS our Way.. & our Love calls us.. Home. Much Love. Many blessings!
@יעקב ייגר Dude you are very quick to lob insults and are very cocky yourself what the heck, self projecting much? Doesn't matter what religion really, there's plenty of angry fundamentalists in all of them, particularly the Abrahamic family of faiths that fights very much like a crazy family.
Jewish scholors critiquing the Tora, God's inspired Word without the Holy Spirit to guide them. Very similar to a Bible commentary today. Just man's opinion. Any Born Again Christan can read the OT and know simply what God is saying. The Holy Spirit is our teacher. Moses was guided by the Holy Spirit when he wrote the first 5 books of the Bible, the Tora. The Bible is spiritually discerned, without the Holy Spirit it's just a book of history and makes little sense to anyone. God is the author of the Bible, its a living book. Your word O Lord, is everlasting; it is firmly fixed in the heavens. Psalm 119:89
@No one King Saint Louis IX pray for us and pray for the conversion of the jews. King Saint Louis IX thank you for your example of burning the blasphemous book that is the talmud.
yes it says she was a prostitute and jesus was a lying magician currently in hell.... that's their opinion...but don't ever get caught saying it in public...israel loves donatrions from ignorant christians...
Oh yes. But those obscenities will never be repeated by my lips (it was defilement enough even HEARING it). You'll have to research it yourself. (I practice one of the Dhammic (Indian) paths of liberation, so it is not from ''religious'' hang ups that I relay this). I'd post a link, but they would just delete it
So I would like to ask a question. I'm not Jewish, but was drawn to the Talmud because I have studied Semitic languages, and find the back and fourth between Aramaic, Rabbinic Hebrew, and Classical Hebrew kind of amusing (although not intentional, as the linguistic switches indicate layers of editing). I got tangled in it, and even took a Coursera course to work it out. I think what keeps me coming back to this confounding book is how it tends to define legal a category not by the mean, but by the exceptions - where does one legal category end and the other begin? It is analogous to Support Vector Machines in Machine Learning, that a category can be defined by a fraction of the original datapoints. Following this analogy, Plato would try to define a category by its mean, its divine form, and all the inconvenient exceptions are just simulacra to be ignored. When I find a parallel between my profession and ancient literature, that is a good day. Here is what I do not understand. People claim to have read this book and experienced sublime truths about the Torah - to "find God". I can see how this may be in terms of Jewish practice - what to do and exactly when, and so when one is practicing one has a living tradition actively working itself out in their head. What I do not see very often, reading either the Talmud or books about it, are descriptions of arrivals at these moments of sublime meaning. For example, the Coursera focussed on a passage from Makkot, which talked about exceptions to the measure for measure stricture regarding false witnesses. The exceptions seemed to focus on situations where it would harm those around the perpetrator - either their family, or their neighbors, etc. So what I took away was that justice only had meaning when it was as precise as it could be - otherwise it would just put more hurt and badness into the world. As such, thinking carefully about how to respond to malicious activity is in fact a sacred endeavour. But ... that's what I took away, not necessarily what was there ... So I guess my question is, if the Talmud leads people to these moments of profound intuition, but so rarely even indicates the existence of such moments, how do we know that the intuitions we come to are legitimate? Or is it akin to what mathematicians define as "mathematical beauty", something that cannot be communicated to a layperson, but can only be arrived at after years of study, when one day you think about an equation and just say "well, yeah, of course, duh ... oh wow ..."
The answer to your question is that the moments of truth, the aha moments are individual. While there are many obvious messages in thr Torah & Talmud, its the detailed studying that unleashes/releases the intricate depths, truths of the Torah with the Talmud a tool to achieve that goal. Thus, studying of the Talmud is typically done in pairs and not large classes.
Bennett, instead of typing the proper response here, I direct you to the BEST resource on this very subject/question: Rabbi Joel David Bakst! He wrote 5 incredible books that are focused exactly on this matter, and they are unparalleled in any Jewish sources. Check it out on Amazon, and I wish you a good journey through the "Rabbi(t) hole" of the Talmudic wonderland!
whats offensive about child rape or thinking christ was a magician and mary was a prostitute....Real rabbis reject the talmud, torah is the only word of god to them.
"The center for Jewish life and thought had shifted out of Jerusalem, and into Babylon". G-d, isn't this just a terrible thing prophetically speaking? The fact that we can even say this shows how forsaken we all are.
I love how too the point you are thank you for all that information. Learning my history in this detail makes me less angry. Thank you for being a bridge and a light in a dark world.
@@UNPACKED the only exile was by slave trade (mass slave trade), and the big decrease in the population actually happened in the bar kokhba revolt as a result of a genocide, not in the big revolt.
Wrong and misleading. DEUTERONOMY 32;39 Me, I am He, and there is no god with Me! (Meaning God is 1, no son, no holy spirit). I kill, and I make alive; I have wounded, and I heal; and there is none that can deliver out of My hand.
She said that in the beginning! And just to clarify; The philistines were not Arabs nor Muslim. Trying to use different terms and twist the real story to push her ideology.
I have a message that I’m sharing where I can, some may not want to hear this, but I ask that we stay polite and seek truth together. 😊 Love is an action. Feed the hungry, house the homeless, father the orphan, and protect the defenseless and vulnerable. Read the Word for yourself, not only relying on others for guidance. Pray for guidance.Yahushua/Yeshua - His Hebrew name who is usually called (Jesus) taught to keep the whole Word. Including the Law/Torah. Matthew 5:17 “Do not presume that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. 18 For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not [g]the smallest letter or stroke of a letter shall pass from the Law, until all is accomplished! 19 Therefore, whoever nullifies one of the least of these commandments, and teaches [h]others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever [i]keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven." Read 1 John. John tells us that sin is lawlessness, and that we must keep the commandments. Trust in the atonement of Yahushua/Yeshua who is usually called Jesus, and keep God (YHWH)'s whole Word/commandments. Revelation 12:17 So the dragon was enraged with the woman, and went off to make war with the rest of her children, who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus. Revelation 14:12 Here is the perseverance of the saints who keep the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus. Go to parableofthevineyard youtube channel for information about the bible and good bible studies. I'm in no way paid or sent by him for advertising. I just have learned a lot from his content. He's just a man who is trying to learn as well. :) Yeshua died so we may be resurrected to eternal life.....
I liked your comment about love, about not committing sins , and most importantly you call for seeking the truth. BUT, you, because of being misguided by the idea of considering God is three entities or He (God or Lord) is Jesus Christ, you are committing, by this, one of the greatest sins and transgressions against God, the Creator, who created Jesus Christ and sent him as a prophet and a messenger to the Children of Israel and to all people as a mercy from God, and his followers are winners. So it is a sin if some one does not recognise Jesus Christ, but as a prophet and a messenger sent by God. If you wish to learn more about it, since you seek the truth, read Sorat Mary ( Miriam), and sorat ( Al- Omraan) in Qur'an. Then reply to me if possible and tell me what you think.
Great breakdown! But for clarity sake, true knowledgeable Christians do not consider Constantine to represent Christianity. No follower of Christ burns down anything belonging to anyone. That would be an oxymoron to the teachings of Jesus.
Constantine was a political figure. His purpose was to merge Christianity with the world. The agnostic. Pagans. He accomplished just that. Giving birth to the Catholic Church and it’s harlot churches. We are instructed to come out if her lest we will share in her plagues in The last days.
The Abrahamic Covenant was confirmed 2000 years ago through the new covenant of Messiah...see Dan 9:24-27....where in the written word is the Talmud stated. And what covenant does the Talmud confirm?.. is the Talmud outside of God's Covenants?... aren't all Covenants brought by induviduals?.... i.e. Adam,Noah,Abraham , Moses, David, Yeshua....is the Talmud founded by a divine counsel?..or a group of Rabbis ...what authority dud the Rabbis have in dismissing the authority of the Levitical Priesthood that was founded in the Mosaic Covenants..?.. the over throw by the Rabbis took place around 200 bc before the Temple was destroyed...who is the founder of this religion created by the Rabbis?.. was God involved or was this a rebellion to God's ordained plan for the Levitcal Priesthood to hold the Temple practices until Messiah would come?..if anyone could explain I would appreciate..but it looks to me like a man made religion..I'm confused...its not a cult is it?
Isaiah 9:6 for unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Well, the question becomes, what is inspired by God & authoritative? The written law found in the Torah seems clear enough. Oral traditions to me were subjective.
@@robertrecchia2642 The Torah itself speaks about circumstances that the written law is not sufficient and requires the interpretation of me and their interpretation is authoritative. see Deuteronomy 17, 11
@@moses2031 False. Go read it again and also understand the role of the priests and judges. They have to abide by the mosaic torah and teach the same laws to the people. The talmud has nothing to do with Hashem and his commandments. The talmud is just another goy invention much like the new testament and the qu'ran.
Not that we've heard. There are plenty of books - from the Shulchan Aruch, to much more recent publications that dissect halacha. There isn't much need for a "new Talmud". You can check out our video about the Shulchan Aruch here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jxrt7_d35rA.html
yea i mean i have nothing against jewish people ,im rather progressive when it comes to religions and im ok with them all with no ill will to any of them even as a Christian my . i do have a favoritism to all the Abrahamic faiths acutely and really just want to get along. that being said as someone who has read the quaran and bit of Talmud along with church fathers , i wonder how people get around the more disgusting parts of these old texts . i dont call for anyone to denoise their faith but i just need to know how u or anyone comes to defend a certain part of it. like from my understanding the oral law was given along side the written law to Moses and although i dont really believe that is possible considering the turbulent history of Israel after in the next 800 hundred years after but it doesn't seem like the Talmud can be both the words of god and a debate of topics right ? it can only really be considered completely authoritative or simply complementary right ? which means if its authoritative as the torah in some sects of Judaism then how do they deal with the more problematic text ? is it that we simply don't understand as people say or is it that it was only one rabbi ? which in that case wouldn't that bring into question the holiness of the Talmud too ? i dont ask to be rude cuz i really dont have an issue with Jewish people but in all religions even Christianity i have issues with people who defend disgusting things that hurt people or say mean things about other groups . so i just dont know how there can be disagreement or seemingly contradictions and divinity ,which id pose the same question for Christian and the NT and Islam with the hadith. obviously i have my own thoughts on it with my own sect of Christianity but this is why i ask since im delight to have the discussion
