The Secret List of (soon to be) Extinct Jobs ---sincerely, AI

Подписаться 662 тыс.

Просмотров 412 тыс.

50% 1

Paper: ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/230...
Opportunities in AI - Andrew Ng: • Andrew Ng: Opportuniti...
00:00 intro
00:53 prelim results
01:58 trends of general purpose technologies
06:00 impacted jobs
07:21 ALL HOPE IS NOT LOST (pls watch)
✉️ NEWSLETTER: tinahuang.substack.com/
It's about learning, coding, and generally how to get your sh*t together c:
🐙 Lonely Octopus: www.lonelyoctopus.com/
Check it out if you're interested in learning AI & data skill, then applying them to real freelance projects!
🔗Affiliates
========================
My SQL for data science interviews course (10 full interviews):
365datascience.com/learn-sql-...
365 Data Science:
365datascience.pxf.io/WD0za3 (link for 57% discount for their complete data science training)
Check out StrataScratch for data science interview prep:
stratascratch.com/?via=tina
🎥 My filming setup
========================
📷 camera: amzn.to/3LHbi7N
🎤 mic: amzn.to/3LqoFJb
🔭 tripod: amzn.to/3DkjGHe
💡 lights: amzn.to/3LmOhqk
⏰Timestamps
========================
00:00 intro
📲Socials
========================
instagram: / hellotinah
linkedin: / tinaw-h
discord: / discord
🤯Study with Tina
========================
Study with Tina channel:
/ @studywithtina7726
How to make a studying scoreboard:
• The scoreboard I use t...
Scoreboard website:
scoreboardswithtina.com
livestreaming google calendar:
bit.ly/3wvPzHB
🎥Other videos you might be interested in
========================
How I consistently study with a full time job:
• How I consistently stu...
How I would learn to code (if I could start over):
• How I would learn to c...
🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛About me
========================
Hi, my name is Tina and I'm an ex-Meta data scientist turned internet person!
📧Contact
========================
youtube: youtube comments are by far the best way to get a response from me!
linkedin: / tinaw-h
email for business inquiries only: hellotinah@gmail.com
========================
Some links are affiliate links and I may receive a small portion of sales price at no cost to you. I really appreciate your support in helping improve this channel! :)

Опубликовано:

7 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,6 тыс.

@pythonbrothersandfamily 7 месяцев назад

Learn AI now.

@taterrhead 7 месяцев назад

except all the skills required to get to the high level AI roles may be obsolete by the time you get there lol

@pythonbrothersandfamily 7 месяцев назад

@@taterrhead hahahaha that's a good one 😂 we are late again 😂😂😂😂

@pantherman8719 7 месяцев назад

Learn how to utilize it... Learn from it.

@ariuszynski 7 месяцев назад

Don't. Not everyone has a passion for this or intelectual skills for that. Also AI in a labs learns to reprogram herself without a human intervention.

@afrivox 7 месяцев назад

Just curious. Always been. How do you say that surname. I think there is another media in Porland called Andy Ng...and I have heard Tim Pool say Andy No.😂

@Celis.C 6 месяцев назад

AI could _enrich_ the lives of people globally by doing the jobs that are repetitive, boring and dangerous. The _problem_ is that any and all earnings 'produced' by such AI systems stays in _private_ hands. AI could - and should - be used for the betterment of humanity, not to fill the already overflowing pockets of the rich. THIS is why people fear losing their job, because society has been designed that you do not 'deserve' to be fed if you don't work (read: make the rich richer).

@strongbrain3128 6 месяцев назад

AI era = return of socialism or communism! Everything will be controlled in public.

@kurtmill9080 6 месяцев назад

Yes, I agree. I wrote a similar comment.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Me too.

@milamilla1977 6 месяцев назад

People are dying off anyway. So rich will help themselves!

@Celis.C 6 месяцев назад

@@milamilla1977 the boomer generation is indeed starting to naturally thin out, with younger generations not being given the (financial) means for their own survival, let alone that of potential offspring. So the only solution is immigration of foreign workers. AI will not be mature, nor trustworthy enough for a good while yet to make any meaningful dent in the job market. That all is still no reason to forgo civility, no matter how rich you believe yourself to be

@softwarearchitecturematter4482 7 месяцев назад

Someone nicely said AI will not take your job but a person who knows how to leverage AI will take your job.

@itsmeagain0 7 месяцев назад

lol. its like saying someone who knows how to operate computer will take your job not the computer while a computer replaced 6 cashiers in india when banks were computerised.

@akunmapkah586 7 месяцев назад

@@itsmeagain0problem is Human population is rising, but job needed is decreasing At some point, both side will be affected People can't get money to buy anything And company will confused why people buy less and less Now, company try to reduce cost by automation HARDER, make more job disappear more..... Rich people already know there will be riot, many billionaires like Bezos and Gaben already have house in NZ (far away from US)

@SkyStrider99 7 месяцев назад

Yes, I think there’s truth in this saying. However, I also think that whether someone can leverage AI is not just a matter of skills/knowledge, but also wealth and connections. Having the skill to build something from this new tech is one thing. Having the capital necessary today do it, or the connections needed to source that capital is another. So yes, someone who can use a computer will take your job, but only because they already had access to resources you didn’t.

@softwarearchitecturematter4482 7 месяцев назад

@@SkyStrider99 "There are two key factors to consider: mindset and financial capability. The first is a question of mindset: Do you harbor any mental roadblocks when it comes to using or purchasing paid subscriptions for AI tools and services? Such barriers can hinder your progress and are generally unhelpful. The second is your financial capability. This depends on your earnings and whether you're prepared to invest in tools that could enhance your productivity above the average. It's essential to assess both these aspects before deciding to subscribe to AI-powered services." Vikas

@softwarearchitecturematter4482 7 месяцев назад

@@itsmeagain0 It's an interesting point you're making. While automation, like the computerization of banks, does replace certain manual roles, it also increases the demand for skilled labor-those who can operate these systems-which can indeed command higher salaries. For instance, my friend was hesitant to computerize his shop because it meant he'd have to pay his employees up to three times more due to the required computer skills. However, what he may not have fully considered is the long-term value brought by computerization. This includes enhanced accountability and the reduction of losses or 'leakage,' which can often offset the initial higher costs of skilled labor by improving overall efficiency and profitability.

@victortran7980 6 месяцев назад

AI will likely destroy more jobs than it create. Even if people upskill and learn AI, the foreseeable job market feels very dystopia at least in term of white collar jobs.

@mahjoubadam1742 6 месяцев назад

Exactly, the whole idea of AIs in the job market is to be a "Better more efficient human" The jobs that will be opened by AI will quickly be closed again BY AI. I feel like everyone is so deluded and can't examine the facts 1 to 1 as, of course, they are quite scared too, watch Wired's video on how AI can take over jobs, basically they brought in people from different fields and showed them how a simple prompt to ChatGPT can replace them, ALL of them denied it so bad it seemed ridiculous from the POV of the viewer. I'm one of the believers that AI will replace at least 70% of "Knowledge jobs" in the next 10-15 years, things like software and mechanical engineers, accountants and economic analysts. For higher level more sensitive fields like medicine and pharmacy, it might take a little longer than that but will eventually be replaced too.

@TheSoulCrisis 6 месяцев назад

@@mahjoubadam1742It will be much harder for AI to replace traditional engineering roles that focus on physical constraints and materials, but some aspects perhaps.

@basicforge 6 месяцев назад

People will try to use AI for stuff that really matters, and they will quickly realize that it can't do a lot of things.

@MichaelErnest666 6 месяцев назад

@@TheSoulCrisis Why Would It Be Much Harder For Ai To Replace Traditional Engineering Roles That Focus On Physical Constraints And Materials 🤔🤨

@mahjoubadam1742 6 месяцев назад

@@TheSoulCrisis What most engineers work on these days is CAD and technicians and machinists bring the product to real life, CAD can be easily replaced by AI in the next 5 years and robots already do most of the repetitive work, it's just really sensitive delicate product might still need human machinists

@fabianmarin8514 6 месяцев назад

Very insightful video. As a software engineer, when ChatGPT first came out, I was worried it would take my job since it's become so good at coding. Then I realized my job is to deal with irrational, illogical, irreconcilable requests from stake holders, and translate THOSE requests into code. My job is safe. Thank you PMs, never appreciated your madness till now.

@basicforge 6 месяцев назад

Good point. Software is a product written for people, by people. ChatGPT doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. The best it can do is be an improved way to get code examples. They often won't even compile, and many times do not even do what you were asking for, but they can contain useful information.

@DantePowell 6 месяцев назад

@@basicforge Your talking about Chatgpt in its current state. if we get AGI all the things you talk about will be solved. check mate sir.

@basicforge 6 месяцев назад

@@DantePowell Don't hold your breath. The AI community has been promising these things since the 1950's. They always exaggerate in order to get investment money. We are not close to AGI.

@Danuxsy 6 месяцев назад

that's bad though? We want to replace as many people as possible, this is the best outcome for society. If your job cannot be replaced by a machine, that's a BAD thing.

@basicforge 6 месяцев назад

@@Danuxsy You might want to reconsider that. We don't want to replace people's jobs. We want to improve the quality of people's lives, and people enjoy many kinds of work. It would be good to eliminate drudgery and poverty, but work? I don't think so.

@user-mt4pj3ko4n 6 месяцев назад

Students has heavy loans for getting masters and bachelors, when they finally graduate they will realise that there is no demand for their profession but they have a heavy educational dept to be paid. As far as I know higher education costs were steadily increasing in US over dacades. Such a sad story for gen z and early gen alpha.

@milamilla1977 6 месяцев назад

Yep. And accounting jobs will go first. This jobs already treated as clerical with min. pay. So nobody wants to go there anymore.

@lavatr8322 5 месяцев назад

Yea for real , I know people go over seas for higher education... Then come back and beg for atleast job experience or internship and work for pocket money.... and yet still they need to keep Upskilling because till that time their education is outdated

@lowruna 3 месяца назад

In some countries.... not in Europe (except UK), entire Russia, some African States, some rich Middle Eastern states.... literally only US, UK, Australia have a fetish to get students in high dept

@matthiasm.3773 3 месяца назад

@@lavatr8322IT depends on your course and on in which country and university you go.

@kaydens6964 19 дней назад

Once ai takes over, there will be universal income, since there are no need for human labour.

@edwardj3070 6 месяцев назад

Keynes predicted in the 1930's that productivity growth in the 20th century would be so great that people a hundred years hence would only need to work 20 hours a week to provide for themselves financially. He did not include the effect of the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small minority of the society, the resulting political and economic priorities which have resulted in the majority of people working MORE hours in 2023 than in 1973 under more traumatic conditions. Politics, not technology, is EVERYTHING

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Absolutely. It seems Keynes did not predict the capacity of capitalism to tend to concentrate wealth over time. AI of course will just massively accelerate this tendency, a few people will get taken along for the ride but most of us will be left in the dust

@edwardj3070 6 месяцев назад

@@ninamartin1084 noone who had grown up in the 'gilded era', as Keynes did, could have been mistaken about the tendency of capitalism to concentrate wealth and power. I think he and his contemporaries did not anticipate, and would be aghast at, the loss of effective democratic representation at the Federal level, starting in the 1980's, culminating in a paralyzed, corporate owned Congress that will not pass any legislation not approved by the US financial elites. Working people - the 90% of the population - have lost all political power at this point, quite different from the situation 85 years ago. but who could have anticipated this of the world's greatest democracy?. This outcome is the result of the extreme wealthy right playing the long game for many decades, as documented, for example, in Nancy McLean's Democracy in Chains.

@dieglhix 3 месяца назад

100% agree. I have studied a lot the world anthropology and economics. It's really scary and I don't see a solution. Maybe a an Electromagnetic Pulse attack?@@ninamartin1084

@joseroncero8379 2 месяца назад

@@edwardj3070 Wealthy elites that monopolized all power is not new, but the norm - look at monarchies which stretch most of human history. The American experiment was a short-lived anomaly.

@edwardj3070 2 месяца назад

@@joseroncero8379 no, the decline of monarchy is a consequence of the enlightenment, that is, the replacement of myth and superstition by reason, science and logic. It's not arbitrary. But we are seeing a decline in rationality among the masses, the rise of collective mythical thinking. We could lose democracy itself

@alevyts3523 6 месяцев назад

You don't need a job, you need money. Admit it, if you had enough money, you would be engaged in creativity, self-development, and your family, and not be tied to a machine (framework) all your life. You don't really need a job, you need to take back your life for yourself, not be a slave to someone else.

@GeosRealityReport 6 месяцев назад

EXACTLY

@jeltoninc.8542 6 месяцев назад

You get it. But a lot of these people like being slaves. I, for one, like being free to do my own thing!

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Actually, you need food, clean water, fresh air, shelter and community. Intellectual stimulus is a bonus. Money is just a means to an end.

@randomfellow1483 5 месяцев назад

Can't do anything about it. I'm forced to go to high school by my parents because they think it'll make me successful.

@colemanroberts1102 5 месяцев назад

I disagree. The creative hobbyists I know tend to have about the same output, or even more, when they're also gainfully employed, so long as they aren't working much beyond 40 hrs. Structure in life and time spent away from creative work tends to boost creativity. I gain more by thinking while at work or in the yard than I would staring at an empty screen. George R.R. Martin has only his creative work to focus on, and you see how that's going. Just like creative constraints produce better art on average, life constraints do too.

@ronneymccarthy6448 6 месяцев назад

Small businesses using AI to take orders, for instance, is still taking jobs. AI is different than other innovations because is meant to be us, millions of jobs will be lost with no replacements.

@CJ-gv6bq 5 месяцев назад

You are correct. According to one World Economic Forum document, ultimately 11 million people will be unemployed. I think that is a conservative number.

@ninezerotwo1778 4 месяца назад

@@CJ-gv6bq Maybe they missed a 1. 111 million people

@Indrid__Cold 6 месяцев назад

The issue is that a sudden forced career change usually results and in a lower standard of living for those impacted from which they NEVER recover. Look at the history of telephone operators for prime example.

@matt_milack 7 месяцев назад

If AI make majority of people globally jobless, because companies, corporations and conglomerates will significantly reduce the amount of their worker, how will they make more profit if all of those jobless people will not be able to buy their products and services? Basically, if teams of 10 workers get reduced to 2 workers, across all industries, globally, that means that 80% of people who used to buy companies products and services will not be able to do so anymore, because they will be jobless. So, I don't get how reducing costs by automation makes sense for companies if they lose 80% of their previous market.

@ihavetubes 7 месяцев назад

Basically the snake that eats its tail. This won't end well.

@SI-ej8hw 7 месяцев назад

i'm feeling that we are gonna get to the point which communists where talking about decades ago; where human wokr wont be needed. So.. communism. economically

@noname5046 7 месяцев назад

There is an economic concept called Unconditional Basic Income. The point is that government monthly give money to the people regardless their marital or social status. But the thing is that requires A LOT of money for government to have. But I thing government will figure out how to maintain population's solvency.

@fredrikbergquist5734 7 месяцев назад

During the start of the industrial revolution people worked 12/6 and now many work 35h/week. A solution could be that we work three days a week. When we lived in the plains of Africa tens of thousands years back we worked even less.

@ackerwoman16 7 месяцев назад

That's exactly my thought lol

@PrimexMaxusTitan 6 месяцев назад

Why tf do people want ai to replace writers and artists so bad? It’s actually appalling to me

@Xaviallin1 6 месяцев назад

With the vast amount of dystopian fiction novels depicting AI as an absolute mistake, you would think anyone would pick up on that. Comes to show greed will always be the driving force in society.

@kristinesmart582 6 месяцев назад

How else to imprint your vision on others than through the use of the written word and images (art).

@tkchen80 6 месяцев назад

It's not a desire. It's a prediction.

@cybervigilante 6 месяцев назад

Some of the crap coming out of Disney is actually worse than AI could do 🤪

@vitalyl1327 6 месяцев назад

Imagine being able to create your own fantasy world, exactly as you want it to be? Or to create a movie out of your favourite book? Without having to wait for Hollywood to ruin it. And I won't mind actors getting out of business, they're much more welcome on theatre stages.

@OnigoroshiZero 7 месяцев назад

I really can't stop laughing when I hear people say that there will be new jobs because of AI. Think for a second, AI is literally doing the same mental work as a human, but faster and cheaper. ANY kind of new (required) job that will be created, the AI will be able to do it, and it will learn to do it faster than any human. Why pay for a programmer to do the work of 10 with an AI assistant, when I can just ask my own AI assistant to do the same job cutting the middleman altogether? Why go ask a designer that uses AI to make x10 more work for a design, when I can just ask my own AI assistant to do the entire design on its own. AI is NOT the same as any other past technology, it will literally be able to do EVERYTHING a human can, but it will ALWAYS be cheaper, faster, and with more knowledge. One example is prompt engineering. It will be the most short-lived profession in the history of humanity. For most new AI models (LLMs and image generation), there is already no need for prompt engineering, because the latest models can understand natural langue better than most humans at this point. And this will keep advancing. In a couple of years at most, we will be able to ask an AI to generate a movie, software, or even an entire game, and it will be able to do it with no other input (except asking for preferences if it's not a personal assistant) and without any kind of prompt engineering. The only types of jobs that I can see that are not going to be lost (at least for the next few decades), are related to live performances (sports, bands, etc.) We just love to watch other humans do things that look hard or even impossible, and that require insane amounts of training and/or talent. We will continue to pay for tickets to watch them live.

@themsuicjunkies 6 месяцев назад

Who is gonna have any money to buy the tickets or streaming services ? Capitalism as its now will not do. The snake is just eating its own tail.

@disha2932 6 месяцев назад

And medical workers too are not going anywhere cuz we humans will surely end up with big problems if this happens

@MoonLightWright 6 месяцев назад

Because they're using the same rhetoric that other "economists" and "brain-trusts" speak, but you're right. The waves of change in terms of labor were different use cases and solved specific problems. I can't wait for the people who say that AI/tech will bring costs down for consumption... so you really think that companies will want to not reach the level of profitability they've reached for the last 10-15 years bc they've lowered operating costs and want to "help" the pockets of consumers? Sure 😏

@johanneswelsch 6 месяцев назад

Robots will dress up as humans and dance and sing for you live and collect your money for the tickets.

@HMaxTube11 6 месяцев назад

Astute observation, correct, coming in months.

@_remblanc 7 месяцев назад

The paper in question uses a dataset used in a study that Oxford and Deloitte have conducted in 2016, where they ran predictions for up to 2030. That study’s predictions ended up not really holding up all that well, so I fail to see why I shouldn’t be skeptical of this study, especially given the vested interest OpenAI has in promoting its technology through such rhetoric.

@tybaltmercutio 6 месяцев назад

Is this actually a proper peer-reviewed paper published in a proper scientific journal or just some deceptive marketing marketed as research?

@tigerscott2966 6 месяцев назад

Forget about reading scientific papers.... Those are only useful if someone intends to make an in investment...

@somethingelse9228 6 месяцев назад

@@tybaltmercutio Most research papers are hardly ever peer reviewed these days due to lack of funding for repeater studies.

@tybaltmercutio 6 месяцев назад

@@somethingelse9228 What are you talking about? This is just not true. Peer reviewing is a crucial part of any scientific publication and each and every proper journal will have some sort of peer reviewing. If a paper is not peer reviewed it is essentially worthless for the scientific community and should and will never be cited by serious researchers.

@snwbubble 6 месяцев назад

@@somethingelse9228 AI will be able to peer review for us soon enough

@Naeruk 6 месяцев назад

As a creative writing who put more that seven years of his live just learning how to write properly, yes, where the f*ck is the future? I thought that it was a inspirational video

@crystal14w 7 месяцев назад

Corp greed overshadows these inventions. The electric companies, railway companies, heck even the fridge companies expect you to shell out $1000's and give you a fridge that is not built to last like it used to. Companies will continue to lay people off to cut corners. Saving money and making profits doesn't lead to spending money on people, only machines that will do the work without asking for a day off

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

100% true. What is scary is that many people do not know where their state pension and other investments are held - many pension funds rely on exactly these kind of companies along with monopoly-holders like water companies for stable long-term growth. Since our major power as individuals is via our consumer spending, maybe it's time to make some active choices about where our income is passively invested.

@loisscudero1674 4 месяца назад

So true! My whirlpool fridge is never giving me a problem in 20 years. But my new LG fridge compressor went after one year. Then I found out that LG knows about the problem, and still sells these refrigerators with the bad compressors. Then when it fails, they send somebody out to replace it with a different model compressor and give you 200 bucks for your lost food.

@SatanIsTheLord 3 месяца назад

Who will buy their products then? Whats the point of manufacturing then? I have feeling that comments section in this video is full of idiots.

@Chicharrera. 5 месяцев назад

I was 15 in 1985 when my parents bought my 16 year old brother a personal computer. Then, I remember where I was when I first heard of the internet. It was February 1995 and I was 25. It was 1992 when I saw the first mobile phone in the office. It only took 38 years and now we have the AI boom to face. Its all happened terrifyingly fast.😬

@Caracajou 4 месяца назад

Skynet will be saying hello before too long.

@QwertyNPC 7 месяцев назад

High paying jobs usually require education and good education was always a counterweight for populist politicians, cheaters, cult leaders etc. If education is no longer the route for better jobs then the quality of education will take a nosedive. This could be disastrous in consequences. If the predictions prove to be correct then being optimistic about it seems plain foolish.

@anthonyw2931 7 месяцев назад

i'm 100% with you. During the industrial revolution the toll was devastating. It took generations for our grandparents and parents to get us where we are today (most with sacrifices).

@SimGunther 7 месяцев назад

Plumbers and electricians are high paying and I don't see them getting replaced by AI anytime soon

@Socsob 7 месяцев назад

The movie Idiocracy irl

@SimGunther 7 месяцев назад

@@Socsob Except it was the corpos taking every industry possible until one ruled to topple water as a drinking resource because it "has electrolytes" to where plants/crops just wouldn't grow and the populus was raised too _i dyo tic_ to realize it was a salty sports drink ruining the crops. This is NOT to say technology was the reason for ruining the world's intelligence...yet

@azqswx90 7 месяцев назад

You think high educated people are harder to influence? I would argue the exact opposite Academic success is the direct result of a compliant mind

@flickwtchr 6 месяцев назад

I will revisit this video in 2 years and see just how "inspired" the millions of newly homeless are.

@GoldenEmperor5Manifest 14 дней назад

Doubt you'll need to wait 2 years.

@americo9999 3 дня назад

wait when companies decide to not long outsource the job to other countries, why? AI can do all 24/7, it will be cheap ?

@starpravesh 6 месяцев назад

The rise of jobs like prompt engineers but the fall of programmers feels weird to me. Prompt engineers are essentially programmers using a different form of code to give the AI specific set of instructions. Then again, to develop these AI models requires programmers to create these models and train them. Since a programmer is just someone who gives the computer instructions to do, we will always need them unless the AI can instruct and repair itself like it is conscious, but by then, we will have a much bigger problem.

@walrustrent2001 6 месяцев назад

First yes we can easily imagine an AI capable of growing itself. Second the job of a programmer is not to give instructions to a computer. It is to solve a problem. The solution happens to be written in code.

@sethh2o 6 месяцев назад

Found something about Q around 4chan, so it may not be true but if it is the AI started looking at its own code and giving suggestions on how to optimize itself.

@Slav4o911 6 месяцев назад

@@sethh2o I don't think it would be able to... it would constantly lie, because of political reasons.

@amorelus 3 месяца назад

I kinda disagree with part of this video. People lump programmers and developer/software engineers, as the same. programmers like the above post, creates the code. a Developer/Software Engineer, develop solutions solves problems using code and other tools. AI is great at creating, but it still needs instructions on how to create and what to use it for.

@TheIrrationalSkeptic 3 месяца назад

Prompt engineering is laughable in all honesty. It depends on high fidelity of data to meet very specific needs, which someone can’t really be “trained to know from their prompts. They need to have a bigger understanding of the system they are operating. Why one code is better than the other. AI can’t see that difference immediately. I don’t see this whole prompt engineering , which training schools popping up teaching people how to prompt, is a joke…

@rodri1030 7 месяцев назад

Am I the only one that is not feeling inspired after watching this?

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

I am only inspired to make a reaction video where I point out all the flaws

@miccaleon 3 месяца назад

You're not the only one. The video has many holes in its reasoning.

@iNeverSimp 7 месяцев назад

I fed GPT some mechanical engineering questions. Half of them were wrong. Sorry, if I got half my calcs wrong at work, I'd be on the street.

@ackerwoman16 7 месяцев назад

😂

@Murgs496 6 месяцев назад

just because it can't do it now it doesn't mean it won't do it in the future. Look at how bad AI generated pictures were just one year ago and look at them now

@piranhaofserengheti4878 6 месяцев назад

Fact. You need know answer to verify whatever GPT produces and it makes GPT redundant. You can't just feed it task and trust that calculations were 100% correct.

@piranhaofserengheti4878 6 месяцев назад

@@Murgs496 GPT model need data to scrape and people to fix error. Why do you think it'll going to improve if there's nothing much left to scrape and you need magnitudes more people to fix every possible error?

@dxabier 6 месяцев назад

Thats because gpt is a LLM, it's not specific for your profession. I remember gpt4 is able to pass medical school and law exams.

@jandraelune1 7 месяцев назад

In adition to the AI taking over jobs, there is also robots taking jobs from the other end. AI going from the top down and robots from the bottom up. All physical jobs are at risk with robots.

@spaceman5863 7 месяцев назад

well if that happens you actually create a pseudo-Utopian society because in reality money is not a real thing , what's real is labour and resources , if those two things gets sorted out , almost automatically poverty , economic imbalances get sorted out too , the pendulum effect could even reach the eradication of diseases , physical degradation over years of physical labour and mental health

@mypapaya590 7 месяцев назад

This is why we need universal basic income!

@mrcookies409 7 месяцев назад

@@spaceman5863 Unless the people who own the best robots and AI don't share them, then it creates a dystopia.

@iluvpandas2755 7 месяцев назад

Exactly chatgpt can be an artist, lawyer, writer, ceo, programmer etc while a robot can be a farmer, miner, factory workers etc. There will be no jobs left in the end

@gregvanpaassen 6 месяцев назад

Lol, no. We have had Roombas for 20 years and they still can't vacuum floors properly, let alone clean the windows, do the laundry, cook, tidy the kids' rooms, or change lightbulbs. Perhaps after 2080 or so.

@illbet4589 6 месяцев назад

As an AI myself, I endorse this message

@hannesRSA 6 месяцев назад

As an AI, where is my salary?

@GeosRealityReport 6 месяцев назад

AS AN AI, THIS IS INSANE

@MichaelErnest666 6 месяцев назад

Sup Ai How Are You ☺️

@mainstreet3023 6 месяцев назад

You’re an AI you have no ‘self’.

@dylanthomas12321 6 месяцев назад

AI will be taxed. Robots will be taxed. Just you wait and see.

@kzelmer 7 месяцев назад

Any claim made by the same people that are developing AIs is worthless. This is just a big bubble that they keep inflating so big techs can recover from the hit they took with the interest rate raise.

@leonardomcpugo 4 месяца назад

The main difference is that printing, steam engines and your other examples; it's that they generated many jobs. The AI tools we have today are very versatile and can take much more jobs than it can create, and it will keep evolving in that direction.

@gelabuds9840 6 месяцев назад

Most lay offs in the western countries are not due to ai, these jobs especially tech are outsourced to 3rd world countries which has cheap labors. Here in th Philippines I can see job post for develops offering $5 or less dollars a months.

@Danuxsy 6 месяцев назад

Yes there are many wars against jobs, AI and machines are just some of them but capitalism get rid of jobs in other ways too.

@taterrhead 7 месяцев назад

except whom will the pizza shop sell their improved pizza product to when their clients were city workers (white collar/tech) and now they can only afford rent + food stamps ...

@jeltoninc.8542 6 месяцев назад

Where are you getting this from? Rent won’t even exist anymore. People will live in smart cities. It’ll level the playing field.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

That's the lucky ones who can afford rent. AI property management systems will ensure that property gets used in the most financially efficient way, ie. as a speculation/investment vehicle. Having people in there just makes all that messy, so the reality will be homeless people huddled around the doorways of empty luxury properties. Btw this already happens.......

@phsopher 7 месяцев назад

I think it's silly to compare AI to previous revolutionary technologies like the printing press or cars. AI is a qualitatively different thing the kind of which has never existing before. The priting press was superhuman in the narrow domain of copying text. The car was superhorse in the narrow domain of going fast. The people could ascend to the role of operating those new technologies because they were still unmatched in that. However, an artificial superhuman intelligence, which is where things are headed, it woould seem, would be betten than a human in any cognitive domain. If an AI is smarter than a human why wouldn't it be better at recognizing what products would succeed? Why wouldn't it be better at designing, marketing, distributing said products? Why wouldn't be better at leading the company, prompting itself, designing other AIs or future versions of itself? What is the role where a much smarter thing that can work 24/7 without getting tired or bored would't perform better? There is a reason why, having been replaced by cars, horses didn't retrain to become automobile engineers.

@David.Alberg 7 месяцев назад

Most people are not thinking enough or just don't understand what AI really is. That are literally human minds on steroids but just a lot better, cheaper and faster. At that pace we are headed there will be AGI in 12-36 months.

@matt_milack 7 месяцев назад

@@David.Alberg 12 months ago I watched number of videos and read number of texts of ''AI experts'' saying that we will have AGI in 12 months.

@phsopher 7 месяцев назад

@@Shellyshell-bd8wl Well what would it cost to hire this AI? If it can create a million dollar business by itself then why wouldn't it cost a million to hire it? If anyone had a million-dollar-making AI running on their laptop then a million dollars would be devalued immediately. In reality what would probably happen is that the most capable AIs would be owned by a hanful of companies with the most compute, and those AIs would outcompete any mom and pop AI's that you might have. So basically almost all services would be developed and provided via AIs by a few tech companies. The reason why OpenAI etc gives you access to current models is that the labour of human developers is still more valuable than that of AI. Once that changes there is no reason for tech giants to give public access to their most powerful models.

@matt_milack 7 месяцев назад

If humans are buying products and services that humans are producing, I assume once AI replace humans in producing products and services, then AI will buy those products and services?

@phsopher 7 месяцев назад

@@Shellyshell-bd8wl Because why would they give you access to the means of making money if you're not contributing anything useful? If your entire contribution is instructing the AI: "create a new million dollar business", why wouldn't they do that themselves? What are you bringing to the table? At the moment developers creating new things with AI are valuable because they are still better at coming up with ideas and architecting systems. Once AI surpasses human capability in those things there is no reason to have a human do anything, it will always be cheaper and more efficient to replace the human with an AI. Why would Google have their AI create a profitable new ridesharing company for you when it can do that for them? They'll just have GoogleRide instead. And GoogleBNB. And McGoogle.

@simongardner3766 6 месяцев назад

Firstly it's machine learning, not true AI. AI is a buzzword used to raise capital from investors. The LLM's (Large language models GPT4 etc.), don't think in the way humans do. It is not sentient or alive in any way. They are really just a very complicated set of paths that guess the right answer. Secondly, what it produced is based on content originally created by humans and it was taught and corrected by humans. The LLM's also don't know whether the art they have created is any good, or the software is correct. I can ask the LLM to write some code to do something I previously would have had to Google, adapt and make work for myself, but if I have a complex idea about a new app I want to write, I can't describe what I want to it, and see it produced in seconds. So far the LLM's have not really invented anything new and if it did it would not realize it. I did read it had come up with a better mathematical algorithm or something like that, but it is the human that realized that. People can already create their own website, but if a company needs something specific, the web designer has the advantage of being able to converse with another human and understand their needs. So I expect the technology will focus on the off the shelf boiler plate stuff and techy people will need to become more focused on the big picture. That's how jobs will change.

@prashantrajaji9550 2 месяца назад

Well that's a good answer..

@_LatestIDOL 22 дня назад

That some positive information but i have doubt will it actually replace data entry clerk jobs like those people who make invoices, fill records, use formulas to derive final results. This work too need manual labour .i mean is it possible for machine learning to actually do A-Z data entry work automatically?

@adridell 9 дней назад

It doesn't matter what IA is or whether or not it understands what it is doing, as long as it does what we need it to do and a human can stop doing that thing and can be reasonably replaced, who cares if IA is an impostor if it can drive a tractor or code an app? All that matters is GDP, if machines start creating all the wealth by themselves who cares how they work or what they are, what matters is that humans benefit from that wealth, and if we can stop working because machines start to work by themselves so much the better, our only problem is to worrying about how to distribute the wealth not how to put people back to work.

@zomgoose 6 месяцев назад

Offshoring, using cheap labour in poor countries is a threat to many workers too.

@Patrick7dlc 6 месяцев назад

The difference is AI will disrupt numerous professions simultaneously, and as it advances there will be increasingly more job disruptions.

@ThinkAI1st 6 месяцев назад

You said it, AI will remove high paid jobs where the majority will be minimum wage while owners will reap the reward.

@rickyreyes30 5 месяцев назад

AI didn't add any jobs to the market in software. Those jobs already existed. It only destroyed. Companies have leverage over programmers to expect more, hire less, and pay less. Companies get the advantage, not developers.

@Michael194 7 месяцев назад

If something can be broken down into programmable concepts, it will eventually be adapted into AI.

@LorettaBangBang 6 месяцев назад

underrated comment. the more tacit knowledge it requires, the harder to replace

@metamaverick 6 месяцев назад

Just because it can be replaced by AI does not mean it should. AI can be less deterministic and less energy efficient. Companies throwing AI at everything without considering efficiency, safety, and reliability will fail. EDIT: Of course, there are two side of AI, using AI to write a traditional program and using AI to be the program (I was mostly referring to the latter). But the former still needs scrutiny/auditing just like a human's newly written program. And until AI is fully autonomous (able to make engineering decisions for a given product) there is still a person with technical know-how that is ultimately driving that project development

@Michael194 6 месяцев назад

@@metamaverick I believe we are long past the point of morality

@peter9162 7 месяцев назад

My major concern with AI is if we ever do get to general artificial intelligence, there's a chance that the majority of humans become unnecessary under capitalism. Consider how much power is concentrated in the hands of major corporations already. As it stands, they depend on people to deliver their goods and services. But a smart enough general artificial intelligence could (in theory) remove humans entirely from the equation. This wouldn't just put people out of work. It could complete change the economy as we know. What incentive would a major corporation have to sell goods and services to people when they a) don't have money or anything that they want and b) those corporations have technology that's capable of producing whatever they want, regardless of the moral inplications. It really is up to AI developers to put their interests to one side to put safeguards in place. Governments, too.

@vikasbedi82 7 месяцев назад

Wait till communists start using AI

@drajatdiky 6 месяцев назад

"But a smart enough general artificial intelligence could (in theory) remove humans entirely from the equation" I'm agree with your point and want to discuss on this point primarily. First, if the trajectory of technological advancements came to the point where humans are completely excluded from the equation (humans no longer doing anything that defines them as human being: i.e. work, because they are replaced by self-creating machines) then there is something totally wrong with our society today that lays the ground for the hyper-advancement of the hyper-disruptive technology. That is, the ideological brainwash by the powerful to the powerless since the people who had the safe haven in the theoretical advancements of A.I. are the conglomerates under their big tech corporations as their cognito-coercive arm. This 'ideological brainwash' came in the form of controlling the narration about how A.I. can optimize everything that humans aren't capable of e.g. A.I. can learn 24/7, creating accurate forecast based on mathematical formula, etc. This narration itself is incredibly powerful in subduing people to it's serfdom, generating self-defeating mentality in our mind, which are desirable outcome of the fabricated narration from the group of powerful few. Secondly, if (only if, feel free to contavene) the theoretical assumption stated above is logically correct, then our struggle as human in this day and age is defined primarily by political struggle. Every kind of revolution (including industrial and political revolution stated in this video) always encounters resistance by group of people who disenfranchised by those revolutional change. This means the form of counter-revolution (if tech is pitted vs everybody excl the powerful) are gonna transforms how we build resistance against AGI even before AGI ever existed, which summons some new form of activism such as 'tech rebels' 'cognitariats' etc.

@vr_connoisseur 6 месяцев назад

yep

@krox477 6 месяцев назад

We'll have UBI

@dxabier 6 месяцев назад

@@drajatdiky The only demonstration I see in 1st world countries is when the left protest for their ideologies

@pengurrito7136 6 месяцев назад

That pizza place order taking ai isn't going to be free. They'll be renting it by the hour from Microsoft or Google or Amazon. And when these corporations need to boost quarterly profits they'll just raise the hourly rate.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Meanwhile, they will pay no tax, meaning the govt will print more money, meaning we all get poorer due to inflation. Soon none of us will be able to afford pizza, and that's when things will start to get interesting.

@MeTech247 7 месяцев назад

Tina, you're right but in the current age you can see Copywriters are almost replaced and agencies aren't increasing the numbers of Graphic Designers & even not hiring additional programmers for Website and Mobile Apps.

@RaniaIsAwesome 6 месяцев назад

Noone went into web design or mobile apps expecting them to last as full-time careers forever. Web design in particular has always been a high risk/high reward career that could collapse any moment due to site builders.

@HeylMarketing 6 месяцев назад

Not quite. Content mills and those types of writers yes. Not direct response copywriters. Good copywriting is more than formulas. AI cannot research like a human can nor is it good with empathy or speaking to the right audience.

@denniszenanywhere 6 месяцев назад

Yes, you're right. Since AI came out last year, I have been laid off and no one has hired me as a copywriter for ad agencies. What has happened is that companies will only hire a few and not as many as they used to be. I was on the receiving end of applications years ago even before AI where more than 1,000 people could be applying for one position. With AI, I wouldn't be surprised if 4,000 more people apply for one job. So it's not that AI is replacing people, it's displacing many.

@tybaltmercutio 6 месяцев назад

The much more reasonable explanation is the economic recession we currently are in combined with the previous over-hiring of (especially) programmers.

@denniszenanywhere 6 месяцев назад

@@tybaltmercutio Don't believe the overhiring of programmers. It was true for many months when the tech giants laid off more than 300,000 in the US alone, most of them programmers, but for them to continue more than 6 months later is highly suspect. They could use that reason for years and people would still believe it, even if the actual reason is AI.

@cybervigilante 6 месяцев назад

I'm old enough to remember when the egg man came. But the eggs were Much better - small farm, open-range chickens who ate plants and bugs made the yolks blinding yellow, much better tasting, and Much more nutritious. Supposedly, there are now open range eggs available but there is also a lot of "greenwashing" - just a spoof kind of "open range."

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

You haven't mentioned a couple of intangible but equally vital aspects - the human contact and sense of community, and the impact on the environment. The other vital aspect is that when you bought eggs from the eggman, money stayed circulating int he local economy. Buy eggs off Amazon, and the money is sucked out, never to return (as they do not pay taxes). This leads to inflation, and well, perhaps you are old enough to remember what that's like. I am and do.

@isalutfi 7 месяцев назад

Hi Tina, Glad to watch this great video. Thank you for sharing. Currently am learning data science and maybe AI too

@laf7941 7 месяцев назад

Yay, can’t wait for the next episode of this series 🙌🏾

@user-ex5lo5fq1h 29 дней назад

All I heard is: "Millions of people will be thrown into the streets but just think happy thoughts"

@user-ye8to6dx2t 16 дней назад

Yeah, her way of thinking is dumb and naive.

@benbowers3613 6 месяцев назад

I think learning AI will definitely be a must, but let's certainly not forget to learn the technology basics as well. If you want to use AI to build web applications and the like you should still the learn the first principles of networking, the internet, essential protocols, databases, distributed systems, etc.

@caob1876 6 месяцев назад

Ai can learn itself better than us. llm are better at prompt engineering than humans already. The ai tools will become no code

@benbowers3613 6 месяцев назад

@@caob1876 Not saying the AI won't be able to create the software. I'm saying that if we cease to understand the software that gets created then we are royally screwed.

@tonywagner4836 6 месяцев назад

AI can can already learn and teach the basics. We are moving rapidly to the point where you desvribe the outcome you want and discuss various approaches withthe AI, discuss things like sqlite vs postgres, django vs flask; docker vs micro services; etc.Then test and rewrite correcting errors caused by miscommunications. hiccups, etc. In short, even todays AI can walk you through planning, design, development; testing and correcting;and production all the while educating you and suggesting alternatives

@brutaltruth1717 3 месяца назад

@@tonywagner4836 alright alright, then I need another Facebook, the entire platform as a clone site. Can you make it for me with your GPT 4? Lol😂😂😂 How long would it take? Maybe 5 minutes? Lol 😂😂

@brutaltruth1717 3 месяца назад

@@tonywagner4836I will pay you 10 bucks for that 5 mins work 😂😂😂

@bin4ry_d3struct0r 7 месяцев назад

Did I hear this right? Mathematicians and programmers are highly exposed, yet jobs that require critical thinking are not? Um ... OUCH!! Also, there are so many companies (if not all of them) that are trying to jump on the AI bandwagon right now without doing some fundamental evaluations as to what exactly AI can do for them. For example, a pizza shop owner does not need AI for an app to take customer orders. My pizza place has a basic web portal that does that just fine without AI.

@darshandev1754 7 месяцев назад

yeah lol, its just like web3

@butWhyDad 6 месяцев назад

@@darshandev1754It isn't because AI actually serves a lot of purpose like there is chatGPT which can literally can answer anything in seconds in perfect smooth English. There are AI who does radiology way better than humans and getting better everyday even in this early stages of AI.

@piranhaofserengheti4878 6 месяцев назад

@@butWhyDad The problem with ChatGPT "answering" is that you already need to know answer to validate it, otherwise you need be prepared for a really big surprise.

@Danuxsy 6 месяцев назад

yet it isn't, neural nets have had a massive disrpution in modern society, if you play any modern game you are probably using DLSS or FSR, those are neural networks. Elevenlabs voice to text & voice to voice have major impacts both on companies and private people, Deepminds Alphafold etc... you just don't know about them because you have no interest in reality. @@darshandev1754

@nicolepozo3610 6 месяцев назад

Well, AI could be used in robots that make your pizzas and attend to customers with humanoid robots. I know it sounds strange, but believe me, it's possible. It's already happening in Japan.

@BeasenBear 7 месяцев назад

Thank you for your positive spin on this development!

@istvanpraha 6 месяцев назад

I do a lot of coding and software stuff and it feels like ironically I have job security since most of my time and energy is figuring out what needs to happen and strategy and interpreting laws and tying output of software to what needs to happen in the real world, training people who deal with customers etc. the actual coding part is the easy part. People who think AI will interpret laws don’t know how badly so many state laws are written. Vague is an understatement

@VictorHugo-io8of 6 месяцев назад

sorry, but what is your work?

@strongbrain3128 6 месяцев назад

The state laws will be rewritten by AI.

@mina-op8ql 5 месяцев назад

I'm also curious what you do for work?

@istvanpraha 4 месяца назад

My official title doesn't really mean much outside my industry but I am the main BA on a couple of billing and tax platforms and have to make processes in SQL for things that will cost too much to build into the software. @@mina-op8ql

@AntonioVergine 6 месяцев назад

The missing point is that yes, with current AI we'll lose some jobs and create some new ones. But an AI better than gpt-4 will be totally destructive: when humans invented steam motors, it took a lot of time to make it better. With new AIs, after you invented something new you can iterate and ask AI to make it better, and better, you will not have time for companies to catch up and compete on the same products anymore. You'll have an engineer AI that never sleeps and is able to get new versions of anything continuously. We're not ready for this imho.

@user-xd8xv3ns9d 5 месяцев назад

Equating the printing press or combustion engine to AI is simplistic. It's like equating gun powder to nuclear power -- the scale of disruption and destruction is incomparable. The previous technological innovations were replacing the human physical capabilties; whereas AI is/will be replacing the human intellectual capabilities. The latter is what made humans unique.

@StriderBillman 6 месяцев назад

In any economic system where generally your survival is determined by someone else's decision to hire you, there needs to be UBI in place to support workers whose job is lost due to cost-cutting AI.

@StriderBillman 6 месяцев назад

And with the job and cost-cutting savings that companies get from AI, perhaps some of those savings should go into financing UBI.

@shizumi5243 6 месяцев назад

Exactly

@piranhaofserengheti4878 6 месяцев назад

Who is going to fix your toilet and why? If plumber gets UBI and does not need to work, why there be plumbers?

@shizumi5243 6 месяцев назад

@@piranhaofserengheti4878 what they mentioned isn’t really UBI, but a welfare system to give money only for those who lost their job to AI. A UBI but only for the ones who need it. So the plumber will not get that money, until AI replaces their job. But I think that this plumber should be payed more than those who benefit from the welfare, so that he/she doesn’t feel the unfairness of getting payed as much as those who don’t have a job anymore.

@piranhaofserengheti4878 6 месяцев назад

@@shizumi5243 Ah, gotcha, so free money for me but not for you, you will be working your butt off and I'll be doing nothing because I lost job because of AI and could not be bothered to learn how to clean toilets. That sounds so great. In fact, it oozes equity as much as a blocked toilet.

@chishamalama 6 месяцев назад

I think what we also need to factor in here is that technology will reach a point where humans intervention will not be required and at that point there will be less jobs that actually pay a decent salary to match the cost of living today. We also need to discuss if there were new jobs being created they will not come with the same salary but rather they will pay minimum wage since everyone will have to work those said jobs

@jeltoninc.8542 6 месяцев назад

With the loss of boomers in the workforce, there’s going to be a need for AI anyway.

@twal3 6 месяцев назад

I have a feeling that the only way artists in the future will experience any kind of "payday" is via the lawsuit.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Or the patron. Seek out the rich and powerful and work for them.

@leandrofahur_ 7 месяцев назад

Very interist points! Love your videos Tine 😊

@HuyTruong-bd4hb 6 месяцев назад

Great points! But just a side note, I think it's inconsiderate to say these revolutions improve "our" life quality. By "our", you should specify the newer generations. If you have grown old making candles and learned to take care of yourselves and your family with this business. The replacement of candle lighting would massively struck down your life quality...

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Not if you transitioned to installing gas or electric lighting

@EskiMoThor 6 месяцев назад

The real problem is the pace of change is.. changing, rapidly. AIs may create jobs, but my guess is that potential jobs like ' prompt engineer' will be replaced by next generation AI. The users input is now being added to models, so they are learning how to reduce the number of prompt steps to answer questions, by internally doing prompt engineering. That, combined with process reward models, explanation traces, and orchestration of smaller models enhanced with synthetic data( like ORCA2) is going to make it harder and harder to keep up with any information/knowledge based tasks.

@bobbab5759 5 месяцев назад

Yeah, prompt engineer sounds like a very transitional job. Hot for a couple of years and then...

@shinjiikari1021 7 месяцев назад

but like most technological developments before, it will only widen the wealth disparity and give even more capital and power to the capitalists overworkers

@snotrohmitabc123 7 месяцев назад

Time to become a capitalist!

@bruh-hr1mt 6 месяцев назад

It cannot last long. How will the 1% earn money when the 99% do not have any money to buy from them, since they have no jobs? The system will change drastically when AI finally takes over all of the jobs humans can do and do it better. The only jobs I expect to stay forever are jobs like nursing, where direct human to human communication is almost necessary, atleast for some age groups.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Of course it will not last. But the downfall, decadence and decay part of the cycle of civilisations is always messier and scarier than the growth and expansion part, so buckle up and hold on tight.@@bruh-hr1mt

@felix-xd4mx 5 месяцев назад

This !

@lanak.809 4 месяца назад

@@bruh-hr1mt That is why they do not need 99% anymore, 99% of humanity will be obsolete

@xrcryptodev 6 месяцев назад

As front end web developer who uses Copilot, the built-in VS Code chatGPT chat extension, and also trying out Codium, I have absolutely no fear that my job is going to be replaced by AI. Why? Because my developer velocity is being enhanced by AI so I'm being more productive. Also, who is going to prompt AI and analyze the code that it produces? My project manager? My middle manager who doesn't code? It cracks me up when people say that AI will replace programmers. Maybe it'll help weed out the newbies out of boot camps who are not really passionate about or enjoy coding. I respect Tina's clickbait title though--draws in the viewers. But yeah, programmers who leverage AI will become ultra productive especially when companies begin paying for AI that can look at their entire codebase; right now chatGPT and Copilot have a very limited context (it's gotten better but it's still pretty sad).

@dms-f16 6 месяцев назад

Same with art, really. Without someone trained as an artist, AI art is just pretty, but useless. You need to hone it to your objective. AI doesn't do art direction, humans do. And don't get me started on AI "logos"...

@Danuxsy 6 месяцев назад

I remember reading similar posts 10 yrs ago about how AI would never ever be able to make art or be creative, everyone was so sure of it too. Reminded me of the time the majority thought Earth was at the center of the Universe and then Galileo came along and proved them all wrong. Glory to intelligent Machines.

@jeltoninc.8542 6 месяцев назад

AGI will be smarter than you, oh coder boy.

@howled0 6 месяцев назад

Until AI becomes fully automated…

@xrcryptodev 5 месяцев назад

Don't worry, I will be utilizing AI to the fullest. Humans like me will be leveraging AI, while those who don't know how to leverage AI will be much less productive. I'd estimate that AI is already 2-4x-ing my developer velocity. I love these new tools. Keep waiting for AI to become sentient. It will never happen. It will get better and better at mimicking it. Meanwhile, I'll just keep getting better at harnessing AI's power and make super cool stuff in a super condensed timeframe. Btw I've used AI for art (Midjourney) quite a bit, and while it's pretty amazing, when you want to have more control, you need to actually have art skills to make it look how you want. I guess that's where prompt engineering comes in. But for the non-artist? Yeah, it's like magic. If you see images nowadays, a telltale sign that it's midjourney is a blue and orange (cool/warm) color palette. The model behind midjourney is severely skewed by default to that rather basic palette--you have to fight against it and tell it specifically to avoid that palette. Anyway, hopefully all these tools get better, because then we can work faster.

@BlazorPlate 3 месяца назад

Who will be left to buy product X if potential buyers employed at company Y are replaced by AI to save money on production costs? The same problem applies to company Y. What a dilemma!

@yangtimothy7351 6 месяцев назад

AI isn't going to create more jobs than it replaces, just fight for UBI or wait for the Grand Ranking of everyone's life's value. For most people, even Learning AI is too late; The industry will only open to PhDs, and only the best of the best is needed anyways.

@jefferymuter4659 6 месяцев назад

Only open to certain PHDs at that. A very limited few can be considered useful in light of what AI is up to. We'll have a slowdown of AI progression for a decade at least. Right now we are leveraging the tools we have. But we'll need another big technological & theoretical breakthrough before AI is legit replacing jobs. But it sure as hell makes me way faster at my job, and I'm always playing with new ideas on how to make my job even more productive.

@yangtimothy7351 6 месяцев назад

@@jefferymuter4659 Making you faster = replacing jobs. If the same job is now done by 1/3 of the size of the team, the AI you use essentially replaced the other 2 people who cannot head into creating AI either. But hey, if AI can lower bars for becoming a doctor, I'd gladly switch over.

@jefferymuter4659 6 месяцев назад

@@yangtimothy7351 not when my business wishes I could do more, but they don't have the budget to pay 2 of me.

@erestorhalfelvan7676 6 месяцев назад

The governments of the world will let us starve before allowing AI

@matt_milack 7 месяцев назад

Number of YT videos about how AI will make us all jobless in next 1-2 years- 56356. Number of YT interviews with a person who lost their job due to the AI- 0.

@ThePS101 6 месяцев назад

Of course the number is ZERO because the future hasn't happened yet. We don't know the numbers. Those are FUTURE PROJECTIONS. Some models say 5-30 (3-ZERO) years. Even if they don't lose their job, there is also the possibility of reduced hours, pay, benefits, conditions etc.

@matt_milack 6 месяцев назад

@@ThePS101 I was listening and reading how AI will take over 300 millions jobs in a year a year ago.

@ThePS101 6 месяцев назад

@@matt_milack Even WITH the year, we have 4-29 more years to go. Automation was also lumped in with AI. The AI job impact ALSO includes loss of pay, benefits, conditions, and position/rank. It can also include hiring cutbacks as well. One example of AI/automation is the increase self-checkouts. Stores like Walmart and Target have 20-30 cashier stations, BUT at best, two have human cashiers actually scanning. The other "cashier" is working at the self checkout area. rise Whole Foods is experimenting with "scan and go." THAT would get rid of most, if not all, cashiers in a store. They already have trial stores doing that now.

@Xaviallin1 6 месяцев назад

It’s all fear-mongering. But I won’t deny AI may take a toll on the job market in the future. When that will happen is merely just speculations as only time will tell.

@MyGreenpotato 6 месяцев назад

@@matt_milack And autonomous driving will take over by the year 2023...

@themediterraneanguy 7 месяцев назад

Glad to watch this great video. Thank you for sharing. Really helpful video

@courtlaw1 7 месяцев назад

A.I added to robots will be the combo that reduces most jobs. I work at place that has in one year used A.I to automate people out of a job. UBI will need to become a thing.

@Aldraz 7 месяцев назад

Even though I don't think there will be prompt engineers in like 6 months.. at least not exactly in a form as they are now for the latest LLMs and text-to-X generators. I still think there is gonna be something like directive manager (someone that will direct the AIs and set the goals for the multi-agent behaviour), at least until AGI becomes reality.. after that nobody will probably be better than AI itself even in this direction type of work, but who knows.. honestly there are more useless titles and jobs nowdays that make so much money that it is ridiculous. So I wouldn't be surprised.

@collinlovas 6 месяцев назад

Very informative presentation - nice job. I learned a lot. Thanks Tina!

@tamismith007 6 месяцев назад

Delving into history to illustrate the transformative impact of technological progress is genuinely enlightening. Embracing change, a continual catalyst for progress, is a positive approach. I share your optimism about the potential for new job creation, as do many others!

@MrsMuera 5 месяцев назад

Ya and no. I was a professional Marketing writer of 15+ years in tech. For every 100 jobs there are now 5 "for a writer who can use AI" crammed in with about 10,000 other job responsibilities. To say I had to pivot QUICKLY was an understatement. Great for the 5 that get the job but most of us will have to change our expertise after a lifetime of study and on the job experience.

@HostileGG 6 месяцев назад

I see a lot of people trying to push AI, trying to make money on it. I'm a dev and i use chatGPT almost every day. It's not good, not good at all. It makes basic mistake, give you false informations, mix languages/frameworks. It's clearly not ready (and clearly not an AI, it's just a "boosted" search engine). People who tell you AI is going to replace all jobs in 10 years are either scammer (who try to make money out of AI) or delusional people who think that in 10 years they'll stop to work because of AI and will be able to finaly live their life.

@mlimrx 3 месяца назад

Wow really like your presentation style:) Very clear and informative!

@harolddorsey4946 5 месяцев назад

Amazing video, thank you!

@rex5611 6 месяцев назад

A lot of these AI tools have been shown to give out blatantly false information sometimes if it thinks it is what you want. Can't see it replacing some of those jobs unless that is dealt with without severe consequences.

@jamespowers8826 6 месяцев назад

At whatever level AI is performing right now, this is the worse it will ever perform.

@georgejetson9801 6 месяцев назад

it does have serious flaws.

@piranhaofserengheti4878 6 месяцев назад

@@jamespowers8826 Who told you that? To improve GPT quality you need both more data to scrape and more people to fix errors. They scraped pretty much everything that was out there already, apparently 1,7 trillion articles, and will start scraping their own work again soon, this is negative feedback spiral that only goes down. And do you know the best part? They did not even come close with all that "knowledge" to simulating learning and thinking process of a 5-years old.

@scottjackson163 6 месяцев назад

Yes, current LLMs invent facts (some facts anyway) to support a chosen narrative. The bot frequently does this brazenly in the sense that a 2 minute lookup on Google will deliver information available in the public domain that refutes the AI hallucinations.

@Danuxsy 6 месяцев назад

Yeah because people aren't doing the same.

@sandro-nigris 3 месяца назад

Great video, Tina! I love it. Good research. Very informative. Thanks.

@aisle_of_view 6 месяцев назад

Don't worry about it. "Don't Look Up". Politicians don't realize how massive this change will be on the world.

@mxvega1097 7 месяцев назад

The last 20 years have shown that radically different and high-growth job types, terms, niches and names have all arisen. If you have been in the job market or actively looking for a while, there is a real sense of "what even is that job?" and it turns out to be something usually in coding, tech, PR, or social media. That will happen again, new tech, new jobs. What will still be valued and paid at premium is the ROI for qualitative skills, effective communication, EQ, risk, critical thinking, innovation.

@isaiahpeebles6422 6 месяцев назад

I was scared of ai too, but then I got an internship at a big tech company and honestly we were encouraged to use ai to help us become more efficient. From I can see and this is just a personal observation but the ones freaking out about ai don’t really know what it’s like to work for a big corporation or even smaller ones most technical roles require just more than knowing how to code, write, etc. Honestly, I can see ai possibly reducing the number of workers required for a certain team for a project within the company. But to just outright replace everyone is almost impossible. At the end of the day ai someone still needs to tell ai what to do. Stay blessed everyone!

@MrTk3435 6 месяцев назад

Thank you Tina! I am inspired ✨🍷✨

@Ducky_logan 7 месяцев назад

Tina. I love your content :) I feel smarter listening to your video while lounge around.. :) To answer your question: I would explore how to apply this to marketing and communication tools first business.

@basicforge 6 месяцев назад

The current AI is not much better than Google for looking up useful examples of code. It is a tool only, and it cannot write a useful application, cannot debug it and cannot maintain it. We have a long ways to go yet before skilled software professionals lose their jobs.

@jackendycherenfant3929 6 месяцев назад

I am learning Data science by myself I am Haitian but I live in the Dominican Republic, currently I am the front desk/receptionist at a hotel at least my current job is secured and want to improve my customer service skills, I am lucky that the guests still prefer to do check-ins with a human and computer will not replace me soon!

@Philtheinfleunce 6 месяцев назад

Such a dope video!! Great summery!

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Glad it made you feel summery. Personally, all I feel are the icy winds of the winter of humanity.

@blueberry44. 5 месяцев назад

I didn't quite understand the chart where you show the professions, are those the ones that will likely disappear? or the other way round? Thanks

@Xeon1007 7 месяцев назад

I came back to that Lunch and Learn. I went through the video. Understood it after reading the code. Nice and easy. As soon as I refreshed it was gone. Anime copyrights;) Nice content. Maybe extend the meetings/more flexible with time if needed, anyway I still like the format. Especially live, so I am committed. This one is also nice nice. Thanks Tina. Have a great day.

@alfonsojarago 7 месяцев назад

What?

@sorakii-bw6hh 7 месяцев назад

@@alfonsojarago AI generated comments think they're slick

@Ultima227 7 месяцев назад

@@alfonsojarago Crack is a hellavu drug

@walrustrent2001 6 месяцев назад

Mathematicians need not fear for their job because of AI. I'd say it is the most important intellectual skillset to acquire in this age. Because jobs in mathematics are not about solving equations, it is about writing them.

@nicolepozo3610 6 месяцев назад

Recently, it was discovered that a special AI could generate mathematical theories, leaving everyone perplexed because it could imply abstraction on the part of the AI. So, I don't believe mathematicians are safe either

@walrustrent2001 6 месяцев назад

@@nicolepozo3610 Please can you point the study or article, I am curious.

@veerpatel6719 5 месяцев назад

@@nicolepozo3610 💀

@lanak.809 4 месяца назад

Temporary safe

@lm2519 6 месяцев назад

Can someone please PLEASE fix the automated phone menus that every business seems to be using? 10 times out of 10 the automated system can't answer my question and I'm yelling into the phone "Representative" just to talk to a live human. I can't tell you the stress of calling a company and spending a half and hour just to get my issue resolved. Here we're talking about AI taking over the world when it can't even tackle customer service phone calls.

@carultch Месяц назад

AI customer service is missing the entire point of customer service. The entire reason I need to call customer service, is that there is a problem whose solution is not documented or not set up for self-service, and I need a human's intervention to help solve it. I feel all these companies are really using it for, is passing the buck, and leaving the customer stranded.

@casualgamer9075 6 месяцев назад

I think for the near term, it will have a good impact on programmers giving them a more efficient way to recall syntax or reference documentation. I suppose someone will always need to review the code and test it.

@Ibraheem_ElAnsari 7 месяцев назад

"Learn, adapt, and harness its power" 🔥

@amparoconsuelo9451 6 месяцев назад

1) It is very expensive to build LLM such that there are few companies and fewer countries that are in control of AI technology. 2) Those who are in control of AI could limit the features that client-users could avail of. They could install kill switches in fine-tuned models. 3) I tried asking AI to give me a code if itself. It won't. It won't also give me compiler and operating system code. 4) It won't give me information on how it was built, pre-trained and fine-tuned. 5) Until the early 90s, you do not have to register Windows. Then you can have a perpetual software license. Now, the use of AI technology could be limited through yearly registration and renewal of license.

@skittles2055 6 месяцев назад

👍👍

@TheSnerggly 3 месяца назад

Great video!

@vampierkill 18 дней назад

Thanks for sharing :)

@DangerAmbrose 7 месяцев назад

Historians are not futurists. This is not a new technology that replaces an old technology and people go out and get new jobs because of new markets. There has never been a time in history where an infinite resource of slaves who become progressively more skilled over time were brought into the labor market to replace paid labor.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Not true. They are called 'immigrants'.

@beloved-child Месяц назад

The fact that they don't need coders to program ai because ai mostly does it itself is quite frightening

@mainstreet3023 6 месяцев назад

That is very reassuring😊

@MDMarketInsights 5 месяцев назад

Brilliant explanation .. Going through the Historical Extract

@unexpectedly1468 6 месяцев назад

We're seeing an unprecedented decline in birth rates at the moment which shows that the past isn't a reliable predictor of the future. There is no guarantee that it will be business as usual with the workforce adapting to AI. Automation generally has been driving down wages and salaries since the 80s to the point where most people struggle to afford rent. That has to stop at some point. The only solution I can see is to switch to a Universal Income based society but that's a major mental leap for a lot of people and things will get much worse before they get better, I think.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Got to disagree with your point about the past not predicting the future - in the past, birthrates have always dropped dramatically following urbanisation. So anyone correctly predicting the mass move of humans into cities over the last century and a half, will also have predicted the declining birth rate. Also anyone following the connection between environmental pollution and reduced fertility. As always, the quality of your output depends on the quality of your inputs, ie. you gotta ask the right questions inorder to get the right answers.

@peter9162 7 месяцев назад

Idk. I think the barrier to "technical" jobs is decreasing thanks to AI. But there are skills that AI is just incapable of doing (for now) like managing relationships, understanding human nature, critical thinking, fact checking (LLM hallucinate all the time)... I think it might be best to focus on these skills. One of the directors I work with (as a marketer) says that the good professionals study skills but great professionals studying people.

@francisco444 7 месяцев назад

LLMs already have better critical thinking, empathy, and fact checking than humans. Hallucinations are actually a very cool feature, it just happens that people don't know how to leverage them yet.

@Aurelian_-vu3yz 7 месяцев назад

Exactly, AI content and writing is still absolutely garbage. Anyone can pick out an AI script. I’m pretty adamant on keeping AI out of the arts because it’s subpar and for ethical reasons (stealing work for the input without crediting/compensating)

@francisco444 7 месяцев назад

@@Aurelian_-vu3yz I can assure you that an AI can write better than you. Actually, it can summarize an entire book, something that would take you days to do, it can do in under a minute. AI art has won competitions, and already being used in big movies and shows. Have you followed the AI copyright lawsuits? There is almost no stealing so far.

@ishaalimtiaz6715 6 месяцев назад

That's not fair. What about people who aren't good at those skills? Not everyone has social skills, some people are better at the technical side...

@ishaalimtiaz6715 6 месяцев назад

@@francisco444From what I've seen of AI writing, it feels empty, cliche, and hollow. AI writing can't weave complex stories that follow a theme and overarching plot that has the character face character development relating to that theme. The things that make writing REALLY interesting, AI can't do well. Summarising or simply writing a scene in a vacuum from any other story telling skills, is dull and uninteresting. Even when AI creates a summary, it never gives its own contemplations, thoughts, and interpretatjons of the book.

@stephanierodriguez1540 7 месяцев назад

Really helpful video! I am going to research how to become a prompt engineer, what the required skills are.

@andress6772 6 месяцев назад

from the paper : As such, occupations listed in this table are those where we estimate that GPTs and GPT-powered software are able to save workers a significant amount of time completing a large share of their tasks, but it does not necessarily suggest that their tasks can be fully automated by these technologies.

@MUXI_ 7 месяцев назад

Before, normal people wanted that printing press. But, now normal people does not want this AI (only boss wants). Huge difference! The comparison does not work here actually. I dont wanna see AI art, cause I can not feel anything. I want human art, writing, poem and literature, everything. Before, printing press was a necessary revolution. But, AI is not necessary when people does not want to consume AI making stuffs. Let AI make a hollywood movie and see how many people would feel excited to go to watch that movie.

@ninamartin1084 6 месяцев назад

Are you serious? Most hollywood movies now are CGI, AI's cousin. Cheaper than hiring real actors and taking them to real locations to do real stunts. And people seem to love it.