The Shocking SCOTUS Leak and the GOP's Decades-Long Plot to Overturn Roe: A Closer Look 

You know it!

Remember that none of you will fight against Fascism to protect your "rights and freedom." Always remember that your apathy let this happen.

@@Marijuanifornia You are full of it, as usual - MILLIONS have been resisting this for DECADES. I'm one of them. Get a grip...

Conservative SCOTUS members: "but Donny Tiny Hands told me to do it".

A similar statement could be made about the DNC.

And anyone who thinks this end with abortion. They are going not just for gay marriage but all non missionary straight married sex.

I mean, if it was a conservative leaking it on hopes of cementing the decision, then they're not really risking their career. Republicans have established pretty clearly by this point that they do not have standards.

How is it ridiculous to correct an error made by the court years ago.

Keep in mind the original decision was leaked as well, sort of gone full circle here.

I want you to punish these protesters the way you do for the Jan. 6 protestors... They are hitting police officers and this is a FEDERAL BUILDING.

Yep. I am in the legal profession, but still studying. This has been a topic of discussion as you can imagine. It is mixed. I am with you. I think somethings are more important than others. There has always been great sacrifice in order to affect change. We need more people to do this.

Get it on paper. Stick it in your cellphone pocket. Walk into the WaPo office lobby. "accidentally" let it drop out of your pocket as you reach for your cell.

@@COSjultrakay I find the GOP-Issues covered by RU-vidr Some more News way more interesting and better exectued than this video here, tbh.

Totally agreed the closed door, usually means is something they don't want known, and most likely something that should be known, if they were honest

Thank you, YES. The far right's Handmaid's Tale wet dream is becoming real. Nobody with any sense at all believes this crap is about saving babies. (they damn sure don't care about saving babies in Detroit from lead poisoned water) It's about having dominion over women's bodies. I still miss George Carlin.

Bit of a problem when democrats can't even define what a woman is. Maybe it's the cognitive dissonance that makes the left behave like children with developmental issues.

They're Pro-Control

all 3 major religions ALL say women are subservient to men! probably a weird coincidence!

@vic absolutely false, that's why your rebuttal was so vague. THE BIBLE EVEN SAYS EVE CAME FROM ADAM'S RIB, you lying liar. it's weird: the ONLY ppl i've ever met who have NOTHING in common with the teachings of Christ......are RELIGIOUS PEOPLE! "the only ppl who live like Jesus would....are all ATHEISTS!" - George Carlin

Exactly. Dead people have more rights than women, as one cannot remove an organ from a corpse for transplant, if that person while alive didnt consent to it. Same with a fetus, if a woman revokes her consent of the fetus using her body, she has the right to govern her body and have the fetus removed. Dead people should not have more rights than women, it's beyond asinine

Why are white old Republicans so concerned about a woman's reproductive health? They only defend children in the womb and when they are 18 and can fight in wars, in between they could give a damn.

Freedom of religion also means freedom FROM religion.

100% I’m completely pro individual choice , abortion, weed, cocaine, vaccines, etc

Heard recently that if Men gave birth, you could get an abortion at a walmart while getting a flu shot.

Yes. They do that on purpose.

Anti-choice.

Orwellian. They are "Anti-Abortion", also being against public school, paid family leave, etc. Actually, 60% of the women getting abortions already have children, at least one.

This is a joke right? Have kids "at the right time MIGHT later want to have kids"? So being truly pro-life means you want life to prosper only when its convenient. Thats some weird ideogy.

@@lawvere Kind of like Pro-life, but refuse to wear a mask, social distance, get vaccinated and promote well these old folks should sacrifice their lives for the economy? So pro-children that they oppose free school lunches? So concerned about groomers and traffickers' but defend and promote Gaetz, Jordan, and Moore? "Being truly pro-life means you want life to prosper only when its convenient. Thats some weird ideogy." Isn't it though....

I don't vote for the GOP, but I am absolutely increasingly angry at what the demarcated party is not doing. Even if things won't pass bc of the tight majority, they don't even know how to fight for those things that are ripping apart our democracy

no one is telling the truth: ROE WAS WRITTEN BY FIVE REPUBLICAN JUDGES and 2 dems! IT'S A GOP LAW!! Both sides lied every day!

@@jonbongjovi1869 true story...it's a little complicated. but everyone lied

@@COSjultrakay; We have a filthy group of sick religious seditious zealots that are trying to destroy the Democracy.

Trump 4ever 🤣

Thanks. Women will always surprise you. Don't know ant to tangle with an angry woman, and boy are we angry. THIS ain't over until the fat lady sings 😂

thank you, agree!

@@tuyenle8107 Gay Marriage will be next, just you watch. So, why do you support people who take rights away from others?

Frightening!

How far? So far Right, she Left a trail! 🙄🙄🙄

Trump 4ever 🤣

@@tuyenle8107 His prison time?

Susan Collins was so good in “On Golden Pond”.

Thank you for speaking truth!

Yep... why also are they not even asking Clarence to recuse himself from cases that could give the appearance of bias as related to his wife? This leak, as bad as it might be, is certainly not worse than Ginny Thomas' directly removing confidence from the supreme courts ability at "blind justice"

@@COSjultrakay SCOTUS has always been CRIMINAL (even the Declaration of Independence says ALL judges are inherently corrupt!).........only now are the sheep realizing it. EX: NO Obama judge could participate in ANY case connected to Obama policies. NO Trump Judge could legally participate in ANY case connected to Rump. YET THE JUDGES IGNORE THE LAW and don't recuse themselves. DUBYA BUSH was installed by judges HIS DADDY HIRED! Burn all their mansions down.

@@COSjultrakay GOP was covered by Cody Johnston.

41years!

Guns killing kids?

@vic But healthcare is ❤️

@vic - YOU are one of the ZEALOTS subverting this Republic. A fetus is NOT a person or "baby" no matter how many times you FREAKS say otherwise. You are NOT doing God's work - that's a grandiose fantasy of yours...

@vic So excuse me for saying this, but if the GOP want to be "pro-life", then explain to me where all the programs are for helping mothers who are now going to be FORCED to give birth? What about the kids? Once they're born, what about childcare? What about maternity care and leave (of which the US is one of the only countries in the WORLD to offer NOTHING in that regard)? What about funding for adoption programs and agencies that make unwanted pregnancies easier? What about psychological help for the 14 year old that got, let's say, victimized walking home from school? You wanna make abortion illegal, then do something about that too. No? Radio silence? Okay, then it's not "pro-life", it's "anti-choice".

@@MauiMauiMe Some of us do. While we're still allowed to read, that is.

@@MauiMauiMe The Patriot Act already did away with the 4th amendment. Were you asleep when that happened?

A vast majority of the cases the Supreme Court looks at are not expressly stated in the Constitution. Does that mean we should overturn all of them? Or does that argument only apply to cases Conservatives dislike? I think we all know the answer to that.

Eh Dittzy, how are your vile clones doing? You get tired of CNN?

They have no jurisdiction to charge anyone with a crime for leaking this draft. The person can be fired but that is about all that can happen, and no they cannot confiscate anyone's phone because that WOULD be against the law.

You do realize that to be pregnant takes a man and woman? You know, having sex and fertilizing the egg. You’re acting like theres a virus impregnating women going around, women can just not have sex and be abstinent before meeting the right man. Or take lots of precautions with contraceptives

And they definitely shouldn’t have lifetime appointments!!

@@richardgreen3081 We'd have to change the constitution to end lifetime appointments though. The secrecy of the SC on the other hand is something that they've made up themselves.

They do more harm than good...it's a system that's played out, and not about *justice.* It's a political entity.

Welcome to America

And should require a unanimous court.

Trump 4ever 🤣

@@tuyenle8107 Brandon won!

@@shanesischo7378 psst, the left doesn't really like Biden either. We just think he's a better choice than Trump.

not all people. Just women.

@@tuyenle8107 see, someone is actually making a point and then you come and just have Trump live "rent-free" in your heads since you love him so much.

When we live in a time where people consider killing unborn children "evil" it makes me realize how backwards our society is.

@@lawvere clump of cells my male friend who'll never be confronted with this issue anyway and thus has no say in the matter.

And a true patriot at that

Yep. Absolutely.

@@celimardejesus7857 ...and soon he/she will be in jail /prison for leakage.

@@pietrojenkins6901 it's disappointing because the first amendment should protect whistle blowers like this.

@@skillganon606 They're more likely to jail the journalist for protecting their source than the whistle blower themselves

Where I live, Supreme Court Judges retire like everyone else latest at age 67.

Don't say we. Not all of us wanted them in those seats. Not all of them got in those seats morally or with integrity. The Republican, fascists, conservative, idiots of America put them there. But the right knew that grew would be stupid enough to vote for them.

Age has nothing to do with it. These are corrupt individuals. They have no honor.

it you allow a 2000 fairytale book to govern your country then things like this will always happen

It's important that Niki understands these things. Her understanding is crucial.

The events of the past 6 years made a lot of citizens at least think about moving to another country.

Same thing illegal about squealing on your fellow mobsters.

@@kylestubbs8867 ie not technichally illegal, but not done especially if you want to wake up the next day. lol.

No thug likes a snitch, and no greater thug than unaccountable, closed door 'public servants', who are above the law to the point of the government covering up their crimes...LIKE PERJURY!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let alone turning women into forced broodmares for the state, ala SLAVERY. These POS judges pretend a woman use as an incubator, outweighs their RIGHT TO BODILY AUTONOMY. See the 13th amendment, people (and scum judges).

@@gorkskoal9315 “lol”?

They can decide what's "ethical" and what's not because they are the only branch of the government that has no external oversight.

It's not illegal, but I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that the reason behind it happening is sketchy A.F...

Lol, I wouldn't be surprised

Not illegal but you dont want someone working at the highest level of government leaking documents, even if they think its ok. Whoever it is should NOT get in trouble but they shouldnt be given access to confidential information going forward.

@@TheUluxian The reason behind it happening is that a majority of our Supreme Court justices are preparing to overturn fifty years of precedent and strong public opinion to strip the right to bodily autonomy from half our population. So yeah, pretty sketchy.

@@irishkniferd9837 if there was appropriate transparency then the leaks would have no value (unless there was an effort to hide the truth at some level within the branch). The republicans talk of secrecy as a necessary component to operate the law, but they tend to be the ones in the books of the lobbyists who also enjoy the benefits of working behind closed doors (while controlling the nature of the bills passed though the government). The ability to pull quick pro quo's in silence is exponential and making this public only forces people in positions of power to avoid open corruption.

Ms. Collins should be held accountable.

She'll have to get back to you. Something about a spine she lost over three years ago.

#CluelessCollins

Collins failed all women in America.

@@mariegarside8830 That old washed-up has-been needs to call it quits.

Three? I'm sure you can find footage of all five of them claiming _Roe_ or _Casey_ is practically enshrined in law.

Clarence Thomas shattered the integrity of the Supreme Court long before this leak

I want you to punish these protesters the way you do for the Jan. 6 protestors... They are hitting police officers and this is a FEDERAL BUILDING.

@@joyphillips1821 lmao what are you on about

1. They always conduct business that way and they have for literally centuries. 2. You have no understanding of the law if you think a perjury charge would stick. 3. Clarence Thomas did nothing wrong.

They don’t love him they just love the clicks like a tik tok teen

Fox 🦊 Owner, and thrice divorced, Rupert Murdoch was awarded a knighthood by the Pope…. Join the dots

7

"SUNLIGHT IS THE BEST DISINFECTANT" - Little Debbie

we Are ARE A REPUBLIC go to Korea try this over there you will be democractly done food and water ? good luck

Agreed, transparency is the key element in providing oversight or basic accountability to any governing body that can control the freedoms of the nation. Yet like true hypocrites the Republicans are demanding secrecy for themselves but transparency for their opponents. Also the fox news/republican notion that the staff show their phones and records to be scrutinized, yet they support Trump is withholding documents in contempt of the court is beyond blatant hypocrisy.

W8 didn't you say this on the Colbert clip as well LMAO I watch both too. Keep it up.

Indeed.

Yep, that'd be a lot of my dad's side of the family, and they are not the brightest bulbs in the bunch let me tell you and I don't care if they see this.

If they could, they would have the US become a Christian theocracy. I have no doubt about it.

such ignorance

Not just the uneducated, but also the uninterested!!!

When the churches become a governmental target Christian churches to be specific then those right wing voters will wake up. It's the case of if it doesn't effect me directly It's not a threat or a problem.

Also weird that women on the left seem to be fine with their safe spaces being violated and their competitive sports being taken away.

Makes you wonder what this Supreme Court would say if a state passed a law requiring every healthy person between 18 and 30 to donate a kidney, as needed. (There would be a lottery, of course, like for jury duty....) Constitution doesn't say they can't do it.

Is...is everything OK with you and your sister? Joking aside, it's such a weird thing in US politics. It's nowhere near as prevalent in the conservative ideologies of political parties in other countries. In fact, it turns people off.

Women in this country cannot be voluntarily sterilized until the age of 25, or until they have 2 children. A male can have a reversible vasectomy at 16.

yeah because once you're dead others shouldn't have the right to decide what happens with your empty meat sack! .....but old men deciding what happens with a female body is totally a-ok!

❤🖤💙

Yeah, unfortunately, that's exactly what Republicans are taking away: women's control over their own bodies. They have no respect for them hence this is their goal.

Fetus is Latin for 'little one.' It's always meant a living being.

@@johnbrowne3950 Nobody is arguing a fetus isn't a human, thats not the point. A person on a transplant list is a human as well, yet they cannot take an organ from you or I unless we consent. And a fetus cannot remain in a woman's uterus if she revokes her consent.

@John Again. That isn't the argument. The argument is about consent and governing one's own body.

Pipes only leak when there's something flowing through them.

No, but republicans like to say we're dramatic and not focused. Never mind their use of insurrection is just wrong based on it's definition.

There were two options. Discuss the overturning of roe v wade (and the dominionist's plan to continue rolling back twentieth century civil rights progress) or call for a witch hunt and cause a big distraction.

It sounded so close to insubordination. That was probably what they were aiming for.

Perhaps the leak is a ruse to divert attention from (Ginny Thomas? or other behind the scenes debacles like the testimony of Ivanka and Don Jr. etc at the 1/6 hearing? or ……)

whoever leaked this should be disbarred. It is insurrection and a threat to our democracy.

They should have seen it coming. The Roe v Wade decision itself was leaked to the press in 1973.

Agree

Overturning Roe v. Wade is just the start, and Republicans also want to go after our other rights to privacy, such as the right to practice birth control. In fact, it may eventually get so bad that the only form of birth control available will be that men have to look at pictures of justice Thomas's wife, at which point they will lose all desire to have sex.

@@vwgti1985 Always vote it never was as damn-crucial. Use 'Some More News' and 'Telltale Fireside' to know WHENEVER a qanon-member-or-any-such-thing Runs for Office. And please oppose the current Wave of Trans-Hate pushed by Guess-Who.

Yes they would've been confirmed all the same if they had openly preached they intended to strike down Roe v Wade. You forget republicans controlled the Senate during these confirmations.

70-87%of Americans want legal abortion. How can this court subvert the peoples will and still keep their legitimacy⁉️

All they are doing is turning this back to the states. The states can now determine if they want abortion themselves. That is the way it should be. The federal govt. should not be controlling something thew states should be doing. They should have stated this back when Roe became law.

You are talking about insurrection. A threat to our democracy

You can't impeach them unless you get a Democrat majority un the Senate.

A lot of people forget that part. 😕

@@MaryAnnNytowl Always vote it never was as damn-crucial. Use 'Some More News' and 'Telltale Fireside' to know WHENEVER a qanon-member-or-any-such-thing Runs for Office. And please oppose the current Wave of Trans-Hate pushed by Guess-Who.

Trump 4ever 🤣

@@tuyenle8107 incel.

Then you need to have Puerto Rico or DC instated as the next state(s) to get more senators. I personally prefer that Manchin and most of the Republican senators be given several kicks to the groin.

@@ferox965 Maybe Gorsuch will help Tuyen Le out.

@@tuyenle8107 👈Dumbass

Great idea

Yes. Oh, yes.

The law clerks don't have turn over jack sh!t and the FBI knows it. Unless they can come up with a warrant. That would require evidence.

I find the GOP-Issues covered by RU-vidr Some more News way more interesting and better exectued than this video here, tbh.

Totally agree. Not only that, Clarence Thomas needs to come clean about his wife's CLEAR involvement in trying to overthrow the legitimate win of Biden. He needs to step down on that one issue alone. What a pig! (Sorry pigs!).

They are the same people who have been calling education on trans issues "grooming", so......yes, that's exactly what they do.

No, they want to water the meaning of the word down as much as possible in preparation for the January 6 Hearings. They know they're going to hear that word a bunch & are trying to remove as much meaning from it before it's ascribed to all the biggest names in MAGA.

Projection is their MO.

"No, *you're* a bigoted nationalistic authoritarian goon!" -Tucker Carlson, probably

Trying to make the word meaningless. For.... reasons

Very clever, ma'am.

Y'all got southern accents, n'est pas?

... did Wally wash his hands 🤔

Alotta poopies on this court…

Deepity noun an idea or statement that seems to be profound but actually isn't; coined by the philosopher Daniel Dennett

And, as usual with lyin Яepublicans, privacy for them is highly important, but privacy for their opponents is the devil's work.

Yep, I agree!

I agree to an extent, though I would say that it's more like this topic has brought out the skills of the writer's room to an extent that was more common in the past but has recently been lacking.

So we should allow public opinion to potentially change votes instead of having judges only take into account the law itself? That is fine for representatives as they represent our voice. On judges however, their votes should not be swayed by public opinion. Can you imagine the death threats on the SCOTUS if a draft of Brown vs Board of education decision was released before the vote was final?

I Agree with You American, God Bless You American.

CIA and DOD might have different opinion.

@@gscurd75 so we should let the vast majority of Americans be drowned out by a handful of people? More then 70% of the American populace wants the right to abortions. The fact that this is literally the removal of a right it doesnt fall into the standard operation of the supreme court. Throwing out roe v wade is the first step to stripping all Americans of any right.

That's why we need to prosecute the entire Trump-Kushner crime family. Ivanka was a frequent flyer to China, buying up patents and God knows what else...it was done on our dime, we need to know what that witch was up to...

There is literally video evidence of an instigator encouraging people to enter the capitol and people realising he was a fed The FBI clammed up when asked about this.

Not to mention that there are 4500 tips that the FBI received about Justice Kavanaugh during his hearings that the FBI never investigated, including a couple of credible witnesses from college saying he exposed himself to women, etc.

Do you honestly expect anyone at that network to be internally logically consistent?

the US is such a divided country........

Cognitive dissonance is a prerequisite to work there...

And all those Republicans refusing the Covid vaccine holding signs that read my body my choice, pretty ironic isn't it.

Because according to the GOP, women aren't really real. We're just boxes around the really real people.

@@marybellefleur Yeah we used to be labelled as not persons according to the law and that is exactly where Republicans would like us to stay.

@@t.dmytryshyn2615 Bingo 🎯

Do you think it's OK to abort children at any age.

Unfortunately it's not going to stop abortions. Just like if they outlaw sodomy it will still occur.

Exactly. Take one right from women, is just the start of the rest of women's being taken away. Welcome to the coming Theoracu

God Bless You American.

The only right that's a problem is to have guns. The ability for a couple, or single mother to try to make a informed medical choice? how is that a question. We don't know what changed., health or finances or a zombie invasion are all just as valid. A couple finds out the baby is DOA, someone was laidoff and now they can't in good consousness try to feed 3 mouths while 1 paycheck from being fucked. Any of those things shouldn't a BFD to opt-out.

@@gorkskoal9315 If being below a certain financial standard is reason to kill a baby are you OK with dispatching everyone that is below that standard?

@@thatswhattheyis literally no one is talking about “killing babies.” A fetus is is a parasite, not a child (implies viable life outside of womb). The host can choose whether it’s the right time to bring a child into the world or not. Either way, it’s none of your business. People with uteruses aren’t incubators.

crazy idea to give these judges lifetime appointments

Right and wrong are different from fairness and equity. Whether or not someone is allowed to commit murder isn’t about fairness. Also, entitlements and rights are not the same thing. Rights are the ability to perform certain activities. Entitlements is I believe I deserve that. There is not an entire entitlement in the bill of rights for a reason. This country was built on the idea to allow people to live, rather than giving them things to live. They are allowing the unborn child to be born, not granting them the privilege to and then giving them things. I went to college for law and finished, but left the field after a year to get into business. Trust me tho, I’m not just full of it. Pls read actual Supreme Court justices decisions and reasonings and not just reduce it to republicans bad.

You clearly have no idea what actually happened.

@@blankface5052 nobody is being allowed to commit murder, because abortions aren't murder.

+ it's not like they care oh-so-much about babies because once the child is born they don't offer any support to the child or mother, they both could die in a ditch and they won't give a damn.

Exactly! The same people who are instantly up in arms at any suggestion that they contribute some of their taxes to funding universal healthcare “because I don’t want to pay for other people’s healthcare” or any other welfare measure, somehow want to fight to the death to force women to bring a child they aren’t physically, emotionally, psychologically or financially equipped to bring into the world?

LOL good luck with that.

The Rethuglikkkan party is anti-American and evil...the kkkult should be illegal.

@@chunk47524 Yeah! If anything will motivate them out of an understandable apathy this is it. The Conservatives have revealed themselves and have crossed the line. They have overplayed their hand. All of the young people should realize that now it is their lifestyle that is being threatened. It will not be short termed.vThis court will sit and make many more similar rulings unless the court is expanded and rebalanced. We have a lot of work to do. It is time for Biden to give up his dream of bipartisanship. That's how he lost the historical opportunity of his presidency. But he has to counterattack like Seth and Colbert are doing.

Millenials aren't exactly young anymore. We need the Zoomers

@@rvoight92 college-educated zoomer here, I didn’t vote in the last election, but next time I’m going big time Republican. Democrats cause insane inflation and blame anyone under the sun. They also care about woke politics at a time when there are far more important things at stake.

It takes a pretty substantial lack of self awareness to use your own irresponsibility as a justification for allowing other people to be irresponsible... Not only that but you don't even seem to understand what you are arguing about. No rights have been "stolen" as you so foolishly put it, the bill has not yet passed and if it does it still doesn't ban abortion. Why is this so hard for leftists to understand...oh right, you aren't able to work out how to use birth control, I should adjust my expectations.

All they are doing is turning this back to the states. The states can now determine if they want abortion themselves. That is the way it should be. The federal govt. should not be controlling something thew states should be doing. They should have stated this back when Roe became law.

They won't have the blood of unborn children on their hands.

@@lawvere Which ones, the women or SC justices?

Sounds like your personal issue. Be more careful

Don't worry, sacrificing unborn children on Moloch's altar will not end until Jesus returns. Until then, those who shed innocent blood will be honoured.

WRONG. Abortion is godly, abortion is promoted in the Bible.

You misunderstand what "Separation of Church and State" is all about.

Democracy cannot be based on religion, race, ethnicity or any other such divide. A democracy needs to cater for the welfare of *all* its citizens, and only a secular state can manage that.

@@captainfear2172 I guess I misunderstand it too why don't you educate us

Trump 4ever 🤣

We have checks and balances. The leak was probably intentional so they can gage public reaction to such a decision. Also, the people are over 50% in favor of a woman's right to choose. Don't underestimate congresses ability to set precedent by checking the power of the court. Congress can amend the constitution thereby overriding a supreme court decision.

There are checks and balances. The president nominates and the congress can impeach.

@@tuyenle8107 incel

Rock Paper Scissors: executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.

Imma need more than that. You ever heard about context?

And…?🤨

Thank you Auntie!🌹

@@rorychivers8769 Court...what don't you understand?

Daily reminder: You get that quote wrong every single time, Auntie Pha

F is for Federalism.

Even with biden, weak as he is, AMERICA IS BACK BABY!

God isn’t for murdering unborn babies, so…

Tell me you don't understand the difference between federal and state law without telling me. If you live in a toxic leftist state chances are you will be free to continue satisfying your blood lust on unborn children.

@@dontransue9843 to repeat: do you have any idea how many other freedoms aren't codified in specific terms in the Constitution that would be at risk, after this happens? It wouldn't be pretty. Take travel, for instance. "Show your papers" at every state or even county border, since you don't have the right to travel without reporting it to authorities specifically named in the Constitution. 😄 That could be just the beginning. You aren't specifically allowed to choose where your child(ren) attends school in the Constitution. You aren't specifically allowed to purchase items in privacy that the government might be interested in knowing you own, like alcohol. There's the choice of who you marry that the authorities may not agree with, either. Don't like it? Tough, it's not in the Constitution. 😄 Want those states' rights strengthened so some can outlaw bodily autonomy? That means a state would have the right to control how much ammunition you're allowed to purchase, and forget about crossing state lines with it, as well. It doesn't affect your guns, after all, just the ammo. 😄 You may even need to sign papers to be able to even attempt a pregnancy in a state - and if that state wants to be like states that have draconian abortion bans, they can also make it illegal to cross state lines for an "accidental" pregnancy to be "initiated." Or you may not be allowed to access contraception of any kind, even if married. You may have certain... bedroom activities curtailed and made illegal, even if you are straight, as many things can be considered "sodomy or other unnatural sexual activity." You may even see blatant bigotry and racism used - legally - to keep people out of living in some areas, going to school at some schools, working in some jobs, or even enjoying recreation in some areas. Think it's impossible for any of these things to happen? Think again. They are _all_ based on the same _nonspecific_ human rights used to make the original Roe vs Wade decision.

I'm all for it! Now that known biased idiots sit on the S.C. we have to change their insane level of control!!

The number of Supreme Court justices has fluctuated through the history of the US so changing their number is really no problem. Term limits I think would require a constitutional amendment. While they’re at it impose term limits to members of Congress.

@@joeb4142 why do think Rosevelt meant it when he told the senate he'll just start appointing his friends? If biden had balls or brains he'd do the same. lacking both we're fucked.

The constitution says NOTHING about the number of judges to serve on the bench. NOTHING.

@@joeb4142 don't forget we want term limits in the Senate as well; no more career politicians on the court or off the court 😎

It was.

Imagine if the investigation was as swift as the, Republicans are demanding for this.

The Capitol had the same security as the Oscars.

@@thetruth-hl7ct If the security was the same as the Capitol then the public would have been encouraged into the Senate by security to read the bill themselves.

@@ferrumignis Your comment makes no sense.

Yep, gettin' to the dark times we are. This show is the best and they're doing an excellent job as always, but much like the pandemic it's just a constant stream of bad news they have to remix and frame comedicly.

Meemaw and Lindsey are probably my favorite of his impressions, along with Mike Lindell. What a depressing day, though.

Exactly, I don't think a person needs to be an attorney or studying law to understand the fundamental issues to issues behind this insanity. The Ro settled precedent has always been held up by the (and built upon) the 14th amendment of the constitution. The wording in the draft as of now, while based on flawed arguments, render Ro unconstitutional through wording meant to take down other rights we have assumed ours. Already, those in these many "religious" groups have stated they will go towards marriage equality next, I am pretty sure birth control will also be on the chopping block. Already a child raped by a uncle or father has no choice. Taking down Ro is a slippery slope which can take up back to making school segregation law and passing laws against interracial marriage.

These morons can’t define what a woman is but want us to believe they know when a person becomes a person.

Exactly! Anyone who cannot separate their religion from their work has absolutely no place in government where separation of church & state is codified into the Constitution.

Well you can’t keep religious people out of governing, but we can keep them honest to the governed. They took an oath to be unbiased, they’d betray their own values if they took the position in the first place.

@@spicysmooth2 Actually we can and should expect this of those making decisions. If we know the basics of our constitution, decision makers can not are only speak to Christianity or any one religion. the constitution of the country for which they serve, is founded separation of church and state. Religious people In general have the right to believe whatever they like, but those entrusted to the bench anywhere, must leave their religious beliefs at the door where they put on their robe. The avoidance of a legal slippery slope is taught in the first year of any law profession, surely we expect the Supreme Court to govern by the foundations of our evolving laws. If not, we might as well expect to get back to the point where only white men who owned property are considered legal. Any opinion based on religion may set us back to burning suspected witches. The courts are there to decide matters of law based on precedent in conjunction with valid legal arguments of as related to such law. A private religious organization or company has a lot of rights pertaining to religious beliefs. But our government can not (according to our constitution and 250 year system ) decide cases in a multicultural diverse non religious based democracy on any aspect of religion. So the argument about expectations on those making decisions is entirely invalid.

If you don’t want a baby inside of you then don’t put one in there. Nobody is forcing anyone to be pregnant.

@@thatswhattheyis rape? Would you be open to abortion if it was from rape? Just speaking from experience.

@@RooftopRecipes Should more people have to die because someone was raped? Two wrongs don’t make a right.

@@thatswhattheyis Have you heard about rape? Incest? Pregnancies that risk the mother’s life?

@@thatswhattheyis Should a person’s mental and physical health suffer for the duration of pregnancy and add to a raped woman’s sense of powerlessness and sense of being violated?