THE SHOOTING RANGE 327: Potty Assault 

Certified War Thunder classic

me too!!! brother...me too

WT: "it always has been..."

Whoever is ddosing needs to grow up and leave us alone

same

Nah it's more like : the missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviation to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position that it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and if follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it isn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information that the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it know where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error. You get the difference ?

@@Riskh_Mk7 yeah I get it much more now! But wait how does the missel know where its not?

@@stin428 because it knows where it is

@@chumbucket4539 by knowing where it’s not. It all make sense indeed

@@Riskh_Mk7 ----- War Thunder ? TOXIC game and TOXIC community, stay away protect your mental health

Still miss Bruce’s voice

@@killagamez4619 He is sadly a Pro-Russian guy that approves of Russian Terror attack.

i listen to old vehicles just to hear it as it is a wholesome sound of an old man

@@spitfireflyer2205 not very wholesome considering he's a racist physcho who agrees with genocide.

Did they ever say why he’s not in the videos anymore, I could guess what happen but I’ve never heard a true explanation?

Thats a good one

@@ghost_ilamas9615 ------------ War Thunder ? TOXIC game and TOXIC community, stay away protect your mental health

@@mtunit o.0

@@mtunit ok cool people have their own opinions

@@mtunit as a user of warthunder i agree with your statement *STAY AWAY FROM WARTHUNDER BEFORE ITS DEVOUR YOU*

They had the time to ruin ground smoke, they should be able to.

@@snazzydazzy for real, the old smoke was much better for some reason

@@andrejaleksa2956 the new smoke looks like PNGs layered on each other.

@@snazzydazzy atleast it does look similar to real world counterparts

@@snazzydazzy --- War Thunder ? TOXIC game and TOXIC community, stay away protect your mental health

yes

This would only work if the two helis were the exact same model, as othervise one player would be at a disadvantage. So it would be impossible to get into a mach with a rarely used heli.

Germany would always win the ground unless the player is mentally retarded Germany has probably the best rank 2 line up The Pak 40 (Kwk 40) is easily the best gun out of any country at rank 2

You dumb the sidam and buy the BMP2M or PVO. As of now they are better AA only a small BR higher.

@@vizender ah yes, get a whole new vehicle in a diff nation, good idea 🥴

@@CatsAreAmazing8187 that’s the whole point of Gaijing strategy: putting a whole lot of stupidly good vehicles in one nation with only money on the way of using them. I’m maining France, and the new Santal AA is 9.3. It has barely no armor (penned by 7.2mm), a whopping 12 missiles that can only be use against aircraft, but god forbid it’s not a plane that’s slowly banking or the missiles while miss, and nothing else, and you can only lock hells from 2.5km at most .4 br higher you have BMP2M with better armor, a 30mm gun penning 110mm, better mobility on rough terrains, 8 missiles with 10 (TEN, that’s more than the 10.0 Roland 3 missiles !) km range, can lock planes and heli (and it’s lock is more precise than a radar lock on the Santal), better thermals, smoke, scout and scout drone, artillery. Heck, even the stupidly useless grenade launcher is better than the nothing of the Santal. And it’s the same with the PVO, except that it one shot tanks. So, quite literally, there’s no point playing the Sidam25, Ozelot, Santal… and what not. Just go spend your money and get better AA than other 10.0 AA only vehicles, while also being able to shot down tanks.

@@vizender The IRST is extremely finicky. The only one that seems to be pretty consistent with it’s lock ons is the 2S38, but that makes sense because it has a full on IRST sight because it’s actually supposed to be a multi-role SPAA. The IRST especially struggles to lock helicopters and drones, which makes using it to help guide the proxy-missiles (which can really only hit those targets because they can’t maneuver much) is not ideal. It’s also finicky on all of the other light tanks that have it.

@@vizender dawg I’m not reading all of that

It’s super sick, hopefully it clears out all the teams that become air forces halfway through the match

@@an000n i like how thay put a Russian Sam systime in the chineas tech tree

@Kashgari i dont cear about my spelling lol

If i would go some day to a foriegn country.... idont think i Will do much righting nor thay Will cear for my miss spelling

@Kashgari who is she ?

@Christy Li the Tor-M1 is Russian and, though the Chinese used them, it makes no sense to have it as the top SAM system when the HQ-17, a locally upgraded derivative, exists!

My thoughts exactly. I died a little when he said the TOR-M1 was chinese lol haha. maybe it was a Freudian slip lol hopefully

@@kylelawrence3145 It gets so much worse. The T-26 is the wrong variant (1938 vs 1936; conical vs cylindrical turret), the T-34/76 was never used by the Chinese at all, the "Object 122" has the wrong name (should be WZ-122-2). While we're at it, the ZLT-11 isn't technically wrong, but most sources have it named ZTL-11, and the WZ303 is a peculiar oddball in a Tech Tree where every other vehicle follows the "Type" or Chinese alphanumeric designation schemes. As a result, it would be better if it was renamed the Type 80 just to have it fall in line with the other vehicles in the tree. The WZ-122-2 has to use the technical designation since it was only a prototype.

Hi Jake ...The (Ground) vehicles are: ...There is the Light Tank (Stuart VI (5th CAD)) USA premium , Medium Tank (M4A5) USA, premium , Anti-Aircraft, 20mm, Quad, Tank (Skink) GB, tech tree , MBT Leopard C2A1 MEXAS (C2A1) Germany, event vehicle only know all ground vehicles who are in the game You have to look for air vehicles yourself... hope I could do you a favor... ;-)

@@_swissking24_47 I wanted to know as well and now I do. Thank you for your time and effort :)

teamwork? in warthunder? ... hahaha.. good joke..

True i just got the maus and i cant use it

I used to play on IOS, sometimes with old games the game does not work with current phone versions. This can be solved if the developers update the game for compatibility, but with old games that is little more than a dream.

@@bmac7643 THANKS❤❤❤

Yes having less ammo makes you lighter and accelerate faster.

@@steakinbacon8593 Thank you! My buddies were trying to make their Ikv 103s go faster XD

No

Well this is where it is important to have better higher crew skills. To answer your question, yes you still can if your tank allows that.

Probably the cobra from the US