@@K.Marx48 the real ariete has armor equivalent to the abrams and even more thanks to the addition of the war kit and the PSO package but alas gaijin can’t model anything correct unless it’s Russian or Chinese
@@NGC2419- It had more armor equivalent then M1? Which? M1A2 - it would really crazy composit there if you compare armored inner volume and weight of both vehicles. Armor is heavy and Ariete is simply to light have good armor.
@@lizzi4289 Japan have a two vehicle system (Type 81c) and Gaijin already has implemented the ability to control more than one vehicle (like a scout drone in ground or airplane in naval mode).
@@joeyjo-jojuniorshabadoo6827 They could even attach the radar as a trailer similar to how the churchill crocodile was added, since fake systems and setups were given to the Yak 141 this shouldnt be a problem.
Chinese MBT should have won, it scored nearly perfect on all tests, while the Abrams literally took the last place on the first test, seems a bit unfair to bump it up to first place when it completely fumbled the first part
Exactly lmfao. The Chinese tank did the overall best AND took first place in one test. American tank literally did not do any better than average in any test. And I don’t see why they said it has better armor than Chinese tank like bruh Chinese one has way better hull armor than abrams.
It's amazing how the yak 141 made all these "world records" with out a radar or gun or any weapons at all. But hey I'm sure if it was really good they would of kept making it like the mig 29 and 31 right? 🌻
@@twangybubblextr3560 there is no 120mm version of Olifant Mk.2. It was only proposed but never build. I don't know where you get that information but SA have barely money for keeping their current vehicles working, they can't afford doing any more expensive upgrades.
@@muffin_the_great ah thanks for the info, I was reading the other day on a website and it said there are two variants of the tank in service, I thought it sounded odd but I had no reason to doubt as I don’t know a huge amount about SA armour
Q: Will the Hunter F.58 be getting moved out of the German tech tree? Pretty much everybody agrees that Germany of all countries shouldn't have gotten it and instead went to the British tree or the French tree. This is especially true considering it is better than the Hunter F.6 that sits at 10.0 BR with no flares, while the F.58 sits at 9.3 with flares.
It's really glitchy, it's best to lock with radar (try to fight with the wobbly lock) then guide your missile to the target. You may have to lead quite a bit and it can appear to overcorrect, any fast and agile plane is very irritating to shoot at *cough* F16
Any chance we could get a keybind to toggle the auto reload of tank shells so you have the option to load the desired round for your target without needing to shoot first?
@@steakinbacon8593 I think you might misunderstand, not removing shells from breach to load another one but simply leaving the chamber empty without loading anything. That way when you see a target you can choose and load the appropriate ammo.
Great episode! Sure would love to get more Marauders in-game. Especially later models with the canted engines. Q1: Some aircraft in War Thunder still have the old afterburner effect (e.g. T-2, F-1, F-100, F-89, etc.). Do you plan on updating them to use the new one? Q2: What about implementing ejection systems for the appropriate helicopters?
@@shirghazaycowboys, if I remember correctly German tanks have to have horns to drive in puplic roads. Like turning signals etc. But thanks for the Info about the American versions. I also see some Horns on some tanks in war thunder. Would be cool if they added them
For the Lancaster, I see you have added the Tall Boy bomb. What about the Grand Slam bomb for it? The Grand Slam was a 22,000 lb bomb carried by the Lancaster, and it would add to the realism that you guys are trying to achieve in this game.
Question: Are you guys going to add the XF5U or the “Flying Flapjack” to the game? There were 2 made in real life carrying 6 .50 caliber machine guns and 2 1000lb bombs.
As much as I would love for these to be a game unfortunately, they would mostly be useful only in ground realistic battles. However, the B2 might stand a chance to at least bomb one base given. Radar missiles will be useless against it.
Is There any chance we will get The Lopard 2A7V one day? Since there are so many Variants of the M1 and the Challanger. And the German Puma usually have "Spike" Atgms.
Spike ATGMs would be too overpowered right now, which is why it wasn't added originally anyway. More top tier MBTs for Germany are likely coming soon, most notably the 2A5PSO which I think will be in the next event.
Ariete AMV should be 10.7 at best as It's litterally the normal Ariete with a slightly better engine. It should have been the pt3 with both pso and warkit
Q:So when u gonna add finally bigger maps for ground RB too or atleast add a option for players to decise if they want to play on big maps or small maps, atleast for those with premium account??? If not reduce number of players at top tier ground RB to 10 players on small maps so theres less chaos and faster mm?
@@lexonfors I also agree with you, believe it or not but Brazil had a lot of designs but unfortunately we don't have enough for a tt, also it could be a subtt for probably Italy or the US
@@viruspter1dactl Not yet they should get the 2a7V when other nations get stuff like the T90M, Challenger 3, M1A2 SEPv2. But for now somthing like the 2a6M or 2a5PSO or Leopard 2a6E just somthing the get the number of Mbts to the same lvl as other the Uk and USA for instance have 5 Russia, japan and China have 4 Isreal, Italy, Sweden and France have 3 while germany is the only one with 2, if in the next two updates they can get 2 more they would be in a good spot again, and then when they add stuff like the T90M and the others i named they can have the 2a7v.
I would rather the bigger tech trees [mostly Russia] to not get new vehicles until the smaller trees get fleshed out more it feels like they are being led behind.
Q: Any chances for south korea tanks like K1 and K2? Would be awesome to put south korea line in Japan tree (with K1,K2, SPAAs and IFVs). To be honest theres a lot of vehicles that can be added into Japan tree, like 3-4 SPAAs which are classifying for WT requirements so they are like gepard or adats. Also some cool IFVs (k21, with K21 XC-8 as good premium idea) with that and K1/K1A1 + K2 tanks its should be really good addition to Japan tree which should help a lot, also i think its can be used for planes too. South Korea pretty nice amount of vehicles but i think still too small for additional tech tree, so "dragons alliance" would be really cool option to see.
Q: Any chances for more type 10 versions for Japanese tech tree since Japan ground tree stil have some issues and atleast additional top MBT would help players since theres like only 4 tanks for top tier? Prototype 4 should be cool idea since we got Type-90 B in game already.
To all the players of War Thunder: I believe everyone has noticed the recent changes in the in-game economy, whether it's for naval, ground, air battles, AB, RB, or SB. Gaijin is continuously pushing the boundaries and testing the limits of its players. If you are familiar with the game "Escape from Tarkov," you probably know the consequences when game developers constantly provoke their player base. As players of this game, we contribute to its activity, and in theory, Gaijin should appreciate each and every one of us who continues to support and encourage this game. However, Gaijin keeps pushing the boundaries and exploiting each and every one of us. This recent economic change is not just a simple adjustment; Gaijin is gradually making it clear that if you don't pay for this game, you don't deserve to play it. I implore every player here to bravely stand up and resist this behavior. Gaijin has now infringed upon our rights as players, and we cannot, and should not, let Gaijin continue to exploit us in the future. It is time for us players to unite and stand together. We should be a collective, a class, opposing Gaijin's exploitation and oppression towards us. We are here to enjoy this game, to find joy in it, and we should not be working for Gaijin. I hope that each player will save and spread this message. This post will undoubtedly be deleted, but we should copy it, share it, on any platform, anywhere that allows us to make our voices heard. Fellow warriors, let's fight for our future. Stay strong! Not my written by me, spread the message
And yet you put the Ariete at 11.3 when it shouldn't be higher than 10.7 with all the nerfs these tanks have received Gaijin has made italian top tier lineups a pain to play.
Do you guys have any plans on lining up the various tech trees ? At the moment top tier Naval covers ships of the 1930s (with a few exceptions), top tier Air has aircraft from the late 1970s while top tier Ground has tanks from the early 21st century !
Of the examples you gave, only the UDES XX 20 actually "exists". The UDES 19 is a paper vehicle (only a wooden mockup made) and the strv k is a WoT fabrication. So while it's possible, though not probable, that they could add some variant of the UDES XX 20, they won't add the other two.
