The Sig M400 Tread 

Hey everyone! If you don't know, this guy REALLY knows what he's talking about. I trust him completely when it comes to honest firearm reviews.

All my rifles are semiauto plactic hightec stuff like my LWRC IC enchanced,I was telling my wife months before Christmas. I could not believe it,after telling me for years that I had too many firearms,she surprised me this Christmas with a Henry bigboy in 44 mag,what a wonderful wife I have,love her so much! ps I got her pots and pans for Christmas.

I love how sig puts that plunger in the lower to keep the upper and lower tight!

Thanks for your excellent review! Love my Tread!!

Excellent and informative video covering many perspectives of the Tread I wanted to know. Perhaps my favorite review of the Tread. Thanks very much!

Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Bartocci. Happy New year.

This, this is the Review i was searching for.

Finally something they probably won't have to recall

Most informational video on this firearm. Thank you

Thanks for best reviews on INTERNET

This is a great review. Thanks!

Tread? Is that Sig's version of "no step on snake"? Look at the logo

I guess I'm glad I got my SIG AR before this reported QC issue. Mine is flawless. I absolutely went over it with a magnifier. It was one of the first M400 sold in the USA. My only complaint was the phosphate finished BCG. I love the ENHANCED aspects. The receiver tightener and enhancement to the extension that helps with extraction.

Is the Springfield Saint Victor or the Sig M400 a better rifle???! Opinions please......

M-Lok rail comes with the optional front sight.

I have the pistol version and I was very impressed.

You say it’s a complete Sigg package yet I see you’re using a Magpul magazine and a Magpul stock gotcha. all in good spirit

Thanks for detailed report. Best Regards Girish

Well done. Earned my sub.

Things that concern me about Sig these days and past several years: 1. Quality control 2. They try to make EVERYTHING. I mean, they are the Amazon of guns. How can you truly be excellent at one thing if you are making EVERYTHING? 3. Way, way, way too many products/guns. Especially guns. Did I mention they make too many models of guns? 4. Turnover of products is HIGH. I bought a MCX back in the day and now there is no product support for it. I wouldn't be surprised if the same thing happens to the Virtus in a couple of years. 5. As far as their rifles go, whatever format they make, there are far better options. DI? Go BCM, DD, KAC, LWRC. Piston AR? Go HK, LWRC, FN SCAR. 7.62 NATO? Go with KAC SR-25, LMT, HK. I do like the P320 FS and SC pistols and I own a P226 Legion and M11-A1. I have no issues with any of these pistols. But for rifles, I look to companies that specialize in them for the most part (HK and FN are obvious exceptions, but they have a much more sensible and streamlined product line not plagued with QC issues)

Thanks for the outstanding review as usual! I'd really like to hear what you think about the FN15 Tactical FDE.

Very educational

1:8 is definitely fine for 77 grain, I have one rifle with that and it shoots better than my 1:7’s. Wasn’t the 1:7 originally for heavy tracers or something?

Chris, did you ever do a review of the SIG 556 Classic Swat? There is a used one at local gun shop I was interested in. Thank you

Sig of North America's QC has become a real concern in recent years, the furniture on their previous rifles was throw away garbage to the point you wonder why they even sold it with furniture since the end user is going to throw it away and replace it anyway. I'll just wait on the rifle version of CZ's BREN 2

Good review as always. Happy new year

review larue tactical rifles next

This or the Ruger MPR or the Savage MSR Recon 2.0? Which do you prefer and why?

Mr. Bartocci, have you heard of the round 8.6 creedmore/blackout? If so, I'd love to know your thoughts on it. Also, I'd love to know your thoughts on it's little brother, 300 blackout.

Would like to pick this up.

It looks like you have the the original hand guard. How did you get the Tread yellow and and black logo emblems off and how are they attached?

I think Sig is missing the mark on there lower not being full ambi. It is a bit disappointing with all the competion in the AR market this needs to become standard on any AR that wants to be taken seriously.I am just not seeing the value in this rifle. Looks like a milspec, with a fancy hand guard. In my comsumer opinion! But i want to add that I am so impressed with your reviews when I want to know a technical spec on a rifle your videos are where i look first. You break down each rifle by part and in detail better then any other youtube channel. Thank you for that!!!

Could I switch out the hand guard with a Midwest industries t series’s 15 inch hand guard or no?

I must admit I am skeptical, if only because Sig’s QC hasn’t been top notch lately. Plus, I will also admit the AR15 market is almost too flooded with options at this moment

I'm debating between this and the Savage msr recon.

Not a fan of there quality over the last few years..

His scope is hundreds more expensive than the gun itself.

Subbed

Whats about RDS/HOLO vs LVP vs ACOG style scope + little RDS on top?

Is this gun worth buying?

Who manufactures Sig Optics?

Do you have the link to the sig back up sights 😯

A year late but do u prefer the vtac or tread?

Chris, after hearing you specify your preference for pinned gas blocks it got me wondering if any company has produced a barrel with an integral gas block?

Is the BCG semi auto profile?

What length is the gas system?

Stay firsty my friends....

I have lost faith in sig... the mcx was the last good gun they released... I hate all of their pistols...

Is anyone really a Sig fan ? I mean, they release different guns every month, Ar’s have fell behind the rest cause they didn’t update them for years. I don’t understand their direction

I'm a Sig Sauer fanboy but this rifle suck. I like the Sig M400 elite more

pfft, you can build your own flavor for less.

Your obviously bought by sig

1st

The US Military selected the Nightforce Optic not the Sig Optic. I don't know where he got that idea from.

Great review, thank you!