The single monitor setup for 2024. 

@@lottie-bu2jn what

@@lottie-bu2jncan you make an example of one of his horrible takes

​@@lottie-bu2jnHahaha wdym

fr fr

@@lottie-bu2jn why are you here then? xD

facts lol it’ll all be chipped into his brain by then

Pen and paper review

It’s really not he’s just a spoiled rich kid

Shalom king​@@Keeki549

​@@Keeki549lol why u say that? You can have things to just work for it

@@Keeki549 there would be atleast a million people with a million subs if being rich and spoiled was the cutoff

@@Keeki549elaborate on the spoiled part

Even that looks clean 1M

Omg i didn't even realize he has 1m

without that middle parting, he would be nothing!

Preach

@@delatroylololol

bro are you the guy i see in tryhard ffa 😂

Thats literally always been the point of peripherals tho… since the beginning of modern computing

Isn’t that what they always have been?

You're skipping out on child support payments, aren't you?

Down bad

Freudian slip

same bro 😁😁

same xd

Less is more

What did you use the three monitors for?

imo a 49" super ultrawide with a not very sharp curve (something like 1800r) is perfect. Went from triple 27" to the 49" G9 OLED and it's marvelous, although i mostly do gaming, and OLED is far from ideal for productivity. In the productivity aspect IPS is still king on monitors. If you've ever mounted multiple monitors on the wall next to each other you'll know how much nicer it is to only have to mount one haha.

​@SeXySpEcKsY if you're on the Wayland train I highly recommend checking out niri. Been using it as a daily driver for a few months now and it's almost everything I want from a wm. It's missing a few features like native xwayland support, and the underlying library doesn't support capture of single windows in obs and such, but still

@@toxicturkeyy 1800R sucks. It's way too wide and 1000R is just better.

It’s so close to perfect, the dual mode function needs some work, the 1080p mode is very blurry compared to a native 1080p monitor when scaled down to 27or 24 inches and only really usable at the full screen size, and then the full screen size is hard to get used to for a competitive game. I wish there was a remote with this monitor which made the 27 in OLED a joy to use the menus on. MLA isn’t quite there yet with these, the vertical lines are very visible in grey backgrounds still. Text at 4k is fine, but it looks like a screen door is in front of your monitor. VRR flicker is still an issue and is super distracting making adaptive sync on this monitor a no go. All of that without mentioning the price, if this monitor was perfection I wouldn’t judge the price tag, but the compromises are real here.

regarding monitors, I'd rather have a mini-led monitor. Having to baby an OLED with so many static images on a monitor is rather annoying.

@@bradnotbrad Why would you buy this monitor if you are going to scale down to 27 or 24? I play CS2 on full screen at 1280x960 stretched and this monitor is perfect fast and better than any horrible 540 hz monitor out there with a shitty TN panel.

I was having trouble getting used to the increased size of the 32in display, but after an hour everything was ok and I was able to get my head back into the game. I would call the 24 and 27 in modes a major letdown, but I’m glad they are on there for those who might be interested. The 480hz on OLED experience is good, but I think that backlight strobing would making the image clearer rather than just “smoother”. Those 540hz panels normally have some backlight strobing tech that really gives an advantage in clarity.

I tried the 540 Asus for a week and returned it. Pure garbage image quality compared to even a 240hz OLED.

been waiting for years for the masses to come round, still not there yet. In early 2007, i got a 24". Lived in remote for work and all the colleagues who saw , said stuff like" are you crazy' its huge!' I think within 18 months, 24" was commonplace. Same with TVs. 50 inch was seen as humongous. Ive always maintained that wed have our screens much larger if tech allowed, and our perceptions are warped from growing up with postage stamp sized screens. With PC screens, singlular, with gui & mouse movement, 32" is nearing that. OF course you could have one much larger , so massive desktop multiple windows / apps. But for now , with minimal neck crakning to see edge of screen etc. 32" is it. ultrawides lack height. id say 2:1 would be the prefect one size fits all ratio. Its smack bang between 21:9 & 16:9. best as can be for both worlds of portrait and panorama

then why is every pro tournament ever STILL ran on 1080 24'

@@fredfinks then why is every pro tournament ever STILL ran on 1080 24'

@@uhvoiidTV because it was a major defining defacto resolution & DPI standard. Why 2560x1440p @ 32" worked perfectly with default 100% windows, app & browser scaling (its same DPI as 1080p @ 24"). Also pro tournament is about speed, not graphics. We here talking about best monitor for your home PC. Not pro tournament. Racing cars dont have air con, that sacrifice that for speed. ITs not worht the trade off. Similarly , the extra hz you can get from the smaller 24s aint worth it for us to give up 32". Going smaller? fuk that

@@uhvoiidTV i should say, still IS the defacto standard. for apps and web browsing, etc. Scaling has matured say past 2 years. The app has to work correctly with the scaling we set. Now who has 100% default 100% normal - i.e no scaling? people with eyes of a microscope, or people with that 1080p 24" or 2560x1440p 32". If youre still using 24" these days youre either poor or a pro gamer wanting 500hz refresh. 1440p 32" is a great monitor,and that res isnt too demanding for GPUs. of course, if you have the $$ get 4k. 27" if you must because you have a shallow desk. 32" with 90cm depth is good. for desk workspace too. altenrativley wall mount / arm mount, so its close back to wall.

asking the same question, i did some research and i think he bought the tabletop and legs separately from amazon, you can find them there (i might be wrong tho)

He mentioned it in one of his older setup vudeos

@@Kai-K777 yep ive seen it, ikea idasen

Please send link to iem that isn't waste of time and on another plane. 😊

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Linsoul 7hz x Crinacle Zero:2. Find me a review that paints them in a negative light. For the price you pay they punch well above their weight; they're more than adequate for someone new to IEM's with a tight budget

@@Alby911 Have you tried them? I ended up returning them because they were so bad. Horrible seal (which is a recurring theme you’ll see throughout many of the negative reviews) so outside noise constantly leaked through, which on its own tanks sound quality beyond the already tinny sound signature. But yeah that was just my experience, and seeing as the zero red’s are just so much better for gaming specifically I just couldn’t bring myself to honestly recommend the Linsouls here. I wouldn’t even say they’re the best in their price class, just get some JBL endurance run 2’s or something lol.

@@theredcarman - I've never had any issues regarding the seal in any of the IEM's I've owned, including the Linsoul's. If there's one thing you cannot have a strong opinion on is audio gear; sound frequency is different from person to person as well ear shape; which makes it even more difficult to be 100% that your recommendation is any better.