The Soviet Resistance and Brewing Trouble in the Pacific | Colorized World War II 

I'm "jury out" on colorising.. Original footage is original footage.. it's stark and relevant. But peeps seem to be liking this.. so.. onwards we explore. Cheers.. Liam Dale (producer/presenter)

​@@liamdaletvtbh the original footage is colored...Is just that the cameras at the time were b&w

​@@liamdaletv00p0

P 0 Topless de parafusos maceio a ķs? 9 9wow o 9w k9j9 9..9 9999.9999 92 9 9 9 k .99 9 k k 99 99i k 9o n.kĶkk9o 9m 2ko99 .2 9 9k k 9o 9 m 2 .99k2 9o. 9w 99k 2 .9mo 29o 9 9 kc. 2 9o .9 9.9. 2 .9 2 92 9o . 9.k 9 2 o .k o bk k.k 29 k . . 99 .2 9o 92k o 2k999 99 k 2 99 o k . O 9 o 99 o 9. 9 k. 9 o .9k 9 k x k 9 w . . .9o. 99. k .k .k 2 9 9 99 kx o k k.o k o 2 .k k .k 2.o o k 9k .2 ..9 k .k9k o k .k 2 9o o .o 9 k b k.9 92 .2 k 9 o o o 2 92 k o 2o 9 k. .k .k k k k . .k k. O o ..k. k .99k. .k 9 9.9bk 9 k .k 99 o oc k o k k 99o o . .o89o .o o m 9 o o o 9 o k k k . .k o. Źf​@@liamdaletv

wut from 1918 to 1939 was pretty chill life

@@MostIntelligentMan Logical conclusion

Same thing is going on. The west is conplete utter 💩

Not everyone was sad and miserable 😖😞

@@jonathannixon8652 Thanks for letting me know 😎

I guess when you lose a war of aggression that you started you accept whatever the victors propose. In this case it was a short-sighted demand.

I found it was pretty simple to follow

Loss in human life wise, yes. The United States through lend lease provided a vast amount of resources and equipment to all allied forces though. Soviets provided human life, America materiel.

@@lukefarnham2119 for Stalin, people are just a piece of meat. Such was the whole history of Russia.

@@qorxmazveyselov5163, will you stop raving, you unfortunate victim of anti-communist and anti-Soviet propaganda? Aren't you tired of it yet? Может быть, перестанешь бредить, несчастная жертва антикоммунистической и антисоветской пропаганды? Тебе еще не надоело это?

la " ley de préstamos y arriendo" no fue gratuito para nadie. Para Rusia sólo significó el 4% de lo invertido en la guerra... Antes de ingresar a la guerra, los yanquis proporcionan gran ayuda material a los nazis... En pleno conflicto ¿ quiénes o quién quiso traicionar a los eeuu?... 2023 y la mayoría de países de Europa aún no terminó de pagar el "favor" y siguen en deuda con los eeuu por la cantidad de bases militares en sus territorios, esto sin tener en cuenta que están totalmente sometidos a sus caprichos y enajenaciones mentales... COMUNISMO : caballo de batalla para la existencia de la OTAN, genocidio y expoliación de los pueblos que no se alinean con sus intereses malévolos...

​@@qorxmazveyselov5163вам западэнцам этого не понять, у этих Героев была беззаветная любовь к Родине и сумасшедшая ярость на врага покусившегося на нашу Священную землю, начиная от Сталина и заканчивая последним солдатом и рабочим! Наше дело правое Враг будет разбит Победа будет за нами! Сталин Таких Людей было не победить никому!

Kurdistan for ever inşallah

В начале 20 века япония была шавкой сша которые ей дали всё что нужно для войны, русско японская война 1905 года тому пример, сша вскормили Японию и Германию которые начали угрожать их интересам! Политика США угроза всему человечеству!

How come then France and England only declared war on Germany, and not USSR as well ?

@@optimusprinceps3526 Russia and Germany were allies together as they took Poland, then after what they both did to Poland. Russia dropped supporting Germany when it knew Germany was about to invade Russia and only then became our allies. GB paid America to help, they refused at first until pearl harbour made them gain support and helped us and GB was paying for all this help up until recently. We went into war to help others and ended up losing money, it also put us back decades in prosperity and future prospects . Look who sliced up Germany into East & West, Poland was erased from history by Russia. Its amazing how many War documentaries don't mention the German & Russian Sided together.

@@ScoopDogg True

@@optimusprinceps3526 And fight on 2 fronts simultaneously? Neither Britain nor France had the military capability to do this. Great Britain, which had signed a bilateral defense treaty with Poland earlier that year, declared war against Germany as required by a secret protocol to the treaty. However, the protocol, as we now know, applied only to defense against Germany, not against any other country. The Polish ambassador in London, Edward Bernard Raczyński, contacted the British Foreign Office to point out that clause 1(b) of the agreement, which concerned an "aggression by a European power" on Poland, should apply to the Soviet invasion. Lord Halifax responded that the obligation of British government towards Poland that arose out of the Anglo-Polish Agreement was restricted to Germany, according to the first clause of the secret protocol. Similarly, France, which also had signed a bilateral defense treaty with Poland that expressly applied only to Germany, declared war against Germany hours after Britain did. But neither the British nor the French government declared war against the Soviet Union. In Britain, where the public did not know about the secret provision to the British-Polish defense accord, the failure to declare war on the USSR was controversial at the time, seeming to give carte blanche to the Soviet Union for its conquests. Taking on Germany by Britain was unrealistic. Taking on the Soviet Union as well as Germany was out of the question.

What are you writing? Are you crazy? Your ignorance of history is blatant! You are an unfortunate victim of anti-Soviet and anti-communist propaganda and, apparently, feed exclusively on propaganda from such channels. Extreme ignorance is not to understand the difference between a non-aggression treaty and an alliance treaty. And by the way, the USSR was the last of the significant European states to conclude a non-aggression treaty with the Third Reich. All the others - Great Britain, France, Poland and others concluded non-aggression agreements with Hitler much earlier, and also concluded cooperation agreements with Germany in various fields - industrial, maritime, etc. And the USSR constantly offered Western states to conclude an anti-Hitler coalition, but did not meet with their support for this initiative. Only when left alone and fearing to become a victim of an attack by a united Europe, the USSR concluded a non-aggression treaty with Germany. The text of the Anglo-German Declaration of 1938: We, the German Fuhrer and the Chancellor and the British Prime Minister, held another meeting today and agreed that the issue of Anglo-German relations is of paramount importance for both countries and for Europe. We view the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolizing the desire of our two peoples never to fight with each other again. We have made a firm decision that the method of consultations should become the method adopted to consider all other issues that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to eliminate possible sources of disagreement and thus contribute to ensuring peace in Europe. A. Hitler Neville Chamberlain What is this, if not a non-aggression pact? Что вы пишите? Вы спятили? Ваше невежество в истории вопиюще! Вы есть несчастная жертва антисоветской и антикоммунистической пропаганды и, видимо, питаетесь исключительно пропагандой с подобных каналов. Крайнее невежество - не понимать разницы между договором о ненападении и договором о союзничестве. И кстати, СССР был последним из значимых европейских государств, заключивших с третьим рейхом договор о ненападении. Все остальные - Великобритания, Франция, Польша и другие заключили договора о ненападении с Гитлером на много раньше, а так же заключали с Германией и договора о сотрудничестве в разных сферах - промышленной, морской и т.д. А СССР постоянно предлагал западным государствам заключить антигитлеровскую коалицию, но не встречал с их стороны поддержки этой инициативы. Только оставшись в одиночестве и опасаясь стать жертвой нападения объединившейся Европы СССР заключил договор о ненападении с Германией. Текст Англо-германской декларации 1938 года: Мы, германский фюрер и канцлер и английский премьер-министр, провели сегодня еще одну встречу и пришли к согласию о том, что вопрос англо-германских отношений имеет первостепенное значение для обеих стран и для Европы. Мы рассматриваем подписанное вчера вечером соглашение и Англо-германское морское соглашение как символизирующие желание наших двух народов никогда более не воевать друг с другом. Мы приняли твердое решение, чтобы метод консультаций стал методом, принятым для рассмотрения всех других вопросов, которые могут касаться наших двух стран, и мы полны решимости продолжать наши усилия по устранению возможных источников разногласий и таким образом содействовать обеспечению мира в Европе. А. Гитлер Невиль Чемберлен Что это, если не договор о ненападении?

Most subtitles are bad, maybe Al not so good ✌️

What about the Molotov Ribbentrop act ?

you can try to remove their credit as you want, aint gonna work on those who studied ww2 properly. also, ridiculous inflated numbers, too much bias, propaganda conquered you. but yes usa was already the biggest economy by far, the soviets were too much criminal, yet this dont remove their credit, lend-lease helped but didnt changed the war, this is just another bs cold war propaganda lie tryin to steal the size of contribuition on victory. to me it doenst matter, americans always played dirty.

Ленд Лиз 4 процента от общего, спасибо США за эту помощь президент Рузвельт был Великим Президентом, но запомни, самым весомым аргументом явилась кровь миллионов Советских солдат которые сражались за Родину и Победили!

E DAÍ ❓🤷❓❓❓

😂😂😂

Doubt it the only thing that saved the soviets were the brutal winter America woulda kicked the snot outta Germany and nuked them first

Loss of food would have sealed the fate of the soviets (unless helped by foreign powers fighting for communism) The soviets got enough food from the USA to feed its soldiers for the rest of the war, 12 million boots , 60 percent aluminum and steel, a lot of tin , 90 percent of railway equipment ( the soviets would never have been able to conduct offensives so fast and transfer their main armies to critical points , 300000 trucks were given , 65 percent of aviation fuel and much more apart from 15 percent tanks ,aircrafts Soviet sympathizers say "only 15 per cent was given to USSR"

@@waynelittle646 Russians have always been ungrateful. We see it to this day.

Вас в школе научили этой лжи?

Невежа

If both Germany and USSR invaded Poland and split it, how come France and England only declared war on Germany ?

У тебя в голове тараканы. Мы скоро придём к тебе и заставим правильно думать

@@optimusprinceps3526 Before the Soviet troops entered Poland on September 17, the fate of Poland had already been decided. The secret documents of the Soviet-German agreement were not known to the West.

@@qorxmazveyselov5163 The Molotov Ribbentrop pact ? Yes it was known, and in the news at that time.

@@optimusprinceps3526 And fight on 2 fronts simultaneously? Neither Britain nor France had the military capability to do this. Great Britain, which had signed a bilateral defense treaty with Poland earlier that year, declared war against Germany as required by a secret protocol to the treaty. However, the protocol, as we now know, applied only to defense against Germany, not against any other country. The Polish ambassador in London, Edward Bernard Raczyński, contacted the British Foreign Office to point out that clause 1(b) of the agreement, which concerned an "aggression by a European power" on Poland, should apply to the Soviet invasion. Lord Halifax responded that the obligation of British government towards Poland that arose out of the Anglo-Polish Agreement was restricted to Germany, according to the first clause of the secret protocol. Similarly, France, which also had signed a bilateral defense treaty with Poland that expressly applied only to Germany, declared war against Germany hours after Britain did. But neither the British nor the French government declared war against the Soviet Union. In Britain, where the public did not know about the secret provision to the British-Polish defense accord, the failure to declare war on the USSR was controversial at the time, seeming to give carte blanche to the Soviet Union for its conquests. Taking on Germany by Britain was unrealistic. Taking on the Soviet Union as well as Germany was out of the question.

I can see clearly now

@somali_lion_84 Joe Biden's a dictator

😱

Or even what the "documentary" doesn't even come close to acknowledging: ""Deep knowledge, fantastic ability to delve into detail, quick wit, and incredibly subtle understanding of human character .... I found him better informed than Roosevelt, more realistic than Churchill and, in a sense, the most effective of military leaders. " A.HARRIMAN, US Ambassador to the USSR

Браво,молодцы, изучаете документы, мы Русские гордимся что в нашей Великой Истории был такой Великий Лидер!

🤢🤮🤢🤦🏼‍♂️👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼

1991 💔😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

NATO didn't start until 1949. Check your facts before speaking untruths.

@@susiejones3634 That's great, and Warsaw Pact folded long ago, thus NATO is actually outdated, overated, illegitimate, and troublemaking, besides pushing it's luck

​@@susiejones3634, NATO did not exist, but anti-Soviet, anti-communist propaganda existed before the creation of NATO and still exists. This channel shows worthy examples of such propaganda and thanks to it, the number of people with brains powdered with lies is growing. НАТО не существовало, но антисоветская, антикоммунистическая пропаганда существовала и до создания НАТО и сейчас существует. Этот канал показывает достойные образцы такой пропаганды и благодаря ему число людей, с запудренными ложью мозгами, растёт.

@@DmitryTihomirow История непрерывна как бухгалтерский учёт. Распад СССР в 1991-м - итоговая оценка большевизма. Для понимания причин ищем точки бифуркации до XIX в., анализируем и делаем выводы. Антисоветизм для политруков и фанатиков...

The Soviet Union was ruled not by communism but by Russian imperialism.

@@yusuftalhaaslan7665 communism failed EVERY time it was tried. EVERY time.

​@@yusuftalhaaslan7665 yes,communism is great 🤡

There's a reason why Zelensky and his National Socialist, Ukrainian Einsatzgruppen Azov Battalion Commanders are all buying places in South America, in ethnic German communities, on US Taxpayers money.

@somali_lion_84 🚫🇺🇦 I'm rootin 4 Putin 🌿🇷🇺🌿

yea man. if not for the antisemitic shi I would have cheered for germany, but I aint a mass murderer stupid neonazi as we see too many on internet.

В твоих влажных мечтах😊