The Staggering Success of Trump’s Trial Delay Tactics

Подписаться 62 тыс.

Просмотров 9 тыс.

50% 1

For former President Donald J. Trump, 2024 was supposed to be dominated by criminal trials. Instead, he’s found ways to delay almost all of them.
Alan Feuer, who covers the criminal cases against Mr. Trump for The Times, explains how he did it.
Guest: Alan Feuer (www.nytimes.com/by/alan-feuer...) , who covers extremism and political violence for The New York Times.
Background reading:
• On Wednesday, Donald J. Trump lost his third try in a week to delay his upcoming Manhattan trial. (www.nytimes.com/2024/04/10/ny...)
• But stalling has worked for Mr. Trump in the past (www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/ny...) .
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily (nytimes.com/thedaily?smid=pc-t...) . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Опубликовано:

13 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 30

@imirim 2 месяца назад

A staggering demonstration of how our justice system is not up to the job of holding this obvious criminal accountable. He should have been given no deference because he is a former president or current presidential candidate

@coreyham3753 2 месяца назад

Delay, delay, delay has been Chump's legal strategy from the start.

@dimitrioskantakouzinos8590 2 месяца назад

Mr. Feuer covers 'extremism and political violence'. They chose him to cover the kangaroo court indictments against Trump, I assume because they know that a president trying to imprison his political opponent is pretty extreme.

@peanutbutter3543 2 месяца назад

Deliberate delay tactics and Frivolous claims gets a lawyer Sanctioned. Let it be so!

@themengsk176 2 месяца назад

When people talk about a two tier justice system, this is it writ large 😃😃

@felipearbustopotd 2 месяца назад

01:10 According to Stormy D - there was not much, to cover up. 😂

@larryames8831 2 месяца назад

A judge appointed to an area of MAGA country where Trump recently moved too.

@MartynCollins 2 месяца назад

I bet dollars to donuts that his lawyers are using artificial intelligence to create these motions.

@user-kl9sr4ry6s 2 месяца назад

nobody cares

@louiselincoln6557 2 месяца назад

That’s a really good point!

@ssun190 2 месяца назад

I never understood how law is anything except a bunch of words that can be twisted and turned to mean whatever suits the purpose as long as you have the money and connections.

@user-kl9sr4ry6s 2 месяца назад

no one cares

@ssun190 2 месяца назад

@@user-kl9sr4ry6s OK boomer

@MartynCollins 2 месяца назад

All the judges should make the lawyers represent under oath if they are using artificial intelligence tools to prepare submissions to the court. Then at least we know what’s going on with the rapidity of these motions.

@Beanbowl22 2 месяца назад

Tremendously arrogant guest

@bolivarrubiano5798 2 месяца назад

The presumption of innocence is not guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. However, through statutes and court decisions-such as the U.S. Supreme Court case of Taylor v. Kentucky-it has been recognized as one of the most basic requirements of a fair trial. This whole podcast is a discussion between individuals that are trying to explain one side of the argument in the worst terms possible, I wish I could hear the other side of this argument at the same time!!!! I didn't vote for Trump in 2016 because I was hearing such a negative and one sided view Trump on ABC, CBS, NBC, etc. I simply stopped watching these supposed new outlets and started listening more to a balanced discussion when I can find them. I've have wasted my time on this podcast.

@nwrob1 2 месяца назад

Just go read the Presidential Records Act yourself, and you won't be so confused. It's a spurious defence. You don't need to be a lawyer to understand it - its written in clear language. What Trump took are NOT personal records, and he admitted this on tape. From the Act: "(3) The term "personal records" means all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President." It's crystal clear what is going on here.