The Story of Indian Scripts - Part 2 | The potshard inscriptions of Keeladi 

thank you :)

[7/3, 3:14 PM] purushothaman p: Interesting.. is there any reference to Indus and Sumerian.. And this Brahmi could be seen as agamei agam+mei Now having few insights into Indus and Sumerian..I thought of looking into Chinese and Japanese to have additional insights.. let me see.. In Tamil Lord Murugan and Agasthya are associated..the archetypes of both Murugan & Agasthya are just about the same, the inner mind.. say Muru+ga >> muru+agaa...agaa ...is agam inner mind like Anuman..the muruga could be seen as Child ego, the inventor.. further note Tholkappiam meipattiyal and pirappiyal, and Valluvar first poem agara..aga..ra.. these show how languages not only of human but of any being have evolved.. The above thoughts are initial thoughts.. let us see.. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Yz5OYW_8R2E.htmlsi=tfdDgOeC9-7Jrf37 [7/3, 3:14 PM] purushothaman p: Now let us presuppose clusters of population... Egypt Sumerian Anatolian Persian Elam Asia minor Indus Gangetic Dolavira Maharashtrian Magan Dilmun Kerala Kanyakumari Madurai Kaveri Poompatinam Kanchipuram Srilanka Australia Ethiopia So on all coexisting some 2000 BC...were speaking and having arts on rocks, pots, woods.. etc... Now Tamilnadu.. we have an education system teaching children how to read.. that has one element Amma, mother abstracted as A,a...another read pictures only and tell stories.. the later is akin to Indus, former is Sumerian.. Where are those Chinese people.. I suspect they knew writing development in their own country, South, Northern parts of ancient India and elsewhere.. they should have all the hidden knowledge of writing evolution world over.. Chinese had trade relations with Tamil or Dravidian speakers of Southern parts... So in essence we have to slowly build up and explain iteratively.. Sumerian spoke and wrote Tamil.. ra of Sumerian is both aram, aRam, arai... respectively sawing tool, virtues, half.. even parasu (ram) as axe could be seen in Sumerian.. Indus the Rosetta stone is Dholavira wall sign.. that wall sign reflects the city name as passed down and the fort archeological evidences... That is in Tamil or could be read even in Hindi or any Dravidian languages...dolak as pallak or kaavadi refers to carrying goods, Veera is soldiers.. our sangam poems few tell us how business people got kings support to protect their goods... Chinese were on Indian East coast both travellers and business people.. Sumerian used a river double. curved line as scripts or pictogram to represent river with phonetic value of a, A.. in Tamil.. same letter is used to indicate many other words.. The point we could welcome ideas and proposals how these things would match or not... [7/3, 3:14 PM] purushothaman p: Ofcourse this was a year ago, but didn't take into account our Keezhadi scripts dating to 600 BC...and our archeological scholars proposing that writing in Southern parts of India was wide spread as noted by common people writing on clay pots.. this scratching method in Tamil is kiiruthal and the Sumerian did use the root syllable, "ge" to scrible and write.. we have a poet by name Nak.kiiran the writer who is great.. though we interpret his name differently.. If we consider the word Brahmi came from interactions with Sumerian, we can reconstruct it with Sumerian syllables.. ra+mi where already we have shown ra as aRam and take mi or me as shining, bright, intelligent, truth etc.. now we have in present form of Tamil as aRam mei ..the truth of virtues.. Note one of my proposal tells how the word Kali Yuga itself would have been constructed from Sumerian written days as things are changing ka for mouth, saying, libi or liko or lika as written saying.. It is possible every one with vested interests started hiding Sumerian linkages.. I have also postulated that the priests of Sumerian migrated back to India as priests of our modern days... I also the poets banan banani aswell migrated from Sumeria to India..

I postulate that Decan Platue was origin of Indus scripts or earlier form of Indus scripts in art & pictogram forms... from here people went to Mesopotamia and Indus.. Mesopotamian wrote a+5+a as Aya as father..by a complex system that is very close to Indus aswell, except for using different scripts but same reading methodology.. I could read an Indus seal based on Kangali's inputs as a poem in Tamil on rain water harvesting... Indus is deciphered but no uniformity because very nature of the lessons taught in schools in Tamilnadu involve same method..involved students imaginations and word power to tell stories looking at pictograms.. how did such teaching methods is present in Tamilnadu if we could not trace it evolution of scripts..

😂

This comment is definitely by a Dumeelian 😂

Harappa script oldest

Yes​@@vikaskanhed6888

Intresting fact is that i am sitting in a remote village of Uttar Pradesh 2500 kms away from tamilnadu and this same tradition of engraving name on the vessel is practiced here. And not only in Uttar Pradesh but you will find this in whole north India. So the more you will search, the more will find oneness.

Yes, this is very true. It served a practical purpose when you live in a community of knowing whose dishes are whose. Even today in India it is very common to write ones initials or name on stainless steel or silver vessels.

​@@nopek1405 North Indians are ancient Tamils. Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit as proved by Nostratic studies.

@@TSR64 Please can you direct me to some English content on this subject? Does this have anything to do with the theory of Dr K Loganathan?

I believe that they have written their names in them so as to identify and differenciate them. This proves that even the commoners were literate unlike other societies of that time

no no scientifically . they say maybe . but it is not confirmed yet .

@@sohamshinde7978 ever heard of carbon dating

@@maghee83 i know but it is dated to 5th century bce not 8th century bce .

​@@sohamshinde7978 it is date from 800bc to 300 bc somewhere

@@birdsfly259 Bisnupriya Basak questioned whether the sherds actually came from the same level that was dated to the 6th century BCE. Some of the marks might have been made during the pottery-making process. Archaeologist E. Harsha Vardhan commented that “we cannot state scientifically that the Tamil-Brahmi script belongs to the sixth century BC” on the basis of this report.[17]

What will happen to North Indian Hindu nation Brahmin supremists, the RSS stooges?8

​@juniper7905Proof? I think you have deciphered Indus Valley script!

India means modern india In past even iranians are vedic people Gandhar become kandhar Uttar kuru become xingjiang Saka peple are from uttar kuru Xerxes from movie 300 Real name is Khshayarsa hindi name

​@@shirokun4742why not publish a paper abt it?

​@@shirokun4742 Kandhar always a Kandhar only.. It did not derieve from Gandhari..

@@vinodhsivaprakasam4923 kandhar infact derived from Gandhar

@@avinash801 Lord Karthikeya was also called as Kandha as the influence of Lord Shiva and Subramanya is very well spread in the middleEast till northern Africa. Hence Kandha/Skandha -> Kandhar

Its not just a story. Epigraphy is a science. Facts will emerge as part of this study.

Even North also many tamil inscriptions are found.

@@motherearth5229 oh... 👌 Interesting can you please give some details?

Exactly. Whichever the evidence is unearthed, appreciate it and be proud of it whether its north or south… politicians have agenda .. but atleast scientific community and readers should only have focus on unearthing the facts.

In North no Tamil inscriptions exist but proto-Dravidian and North Dravidian language inscriptions like Kurukh and Malto exist. Tamil only existed in Tamil Nadu and Kerala regions, Uttar Pradesh region spoke other Dravidian languages, not Tamil.

@@nilipertamaprakoso4156 I have never said Tamil was found in North. My point is by the amount of inscriptions older than 500 BC that is available in TN, it can be easily inferred that Brahmi inscriptions are derived from Tamil Inscriptions. Also only in Tamil nadu sites only you can observe the evolution of Tamili Script from Indus Script.

Both are Approx 2000 years apart

Is the report available for public to read? If yes, can you tell me where I can find it?

@@Woongiboongi Same question I have. I am deeply interested to read the report of the Archeologists.

⁠@@dmandal.jaalcaryes it is. Go to : keezhadi.tamilheritage.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Amarnath-keezhadi-excavation-p3.pdf

⁠@@dmandal.jaalcarthere are free pdf online, just search it up. Or if you know tamil, listen to his speech about the evacuations !

It’s not just for Keezhadi. The ASI in general doesn’t get enough funds. We as Indians only like to boast about our past, but don’t really care to actually work on discovering and deciphering our history

​@@health_ness i just hate how some political party even use basic civilisation and archeological discovery to the core of there people to divide and spread hatred in peoples heart Dravidian politics just can't get lower than this this thought of our race better than yours will surely not gonna help

In Sinauli, UP, recently a chariot and multiple male and female warrior burials were found. They were from 2000-1800 BCE. ASI took some stuff, burried everything and left. People are farming there now. Rakhigarhi is one of the largest and oldest indus valley sites. The 5000 year old pots and tools and bones are scattered all over the village. You yourself can go and pick them up and take them with you. Government has not even acquired the land. Those are also very important sites. Keezhadi seems like a good professional excavation on par with other sites. If there is some real issue, bring it to light and ask ASI to fix it. The whole country does not work to kill it's own history.

No, they are chauvinist only where they want to claim invention of everything without enough evidences and but with fantastic marketing!

That is biased views. It is only because of current situation and current situation of northern India is bad is because of exploitation by british and frequent invasion of North India. You won't find temple older than 200-300 years.

​@@rajendradangi2585 who needs a temple to find the history.... We people from South don't know our history from temples... We dig deep down the rivers and find these scripts.... And are you going to say that current historical situation is bad in North because British and mughal dug up all the evidence and erased the history?

​@@rajendradangi2585 the current situation of South India because if north indian ruling united India. They require our tax money but don't want to give our share

@@parambariyam359 dont fall for propaganda…

It is called Tamil Brahmi (just like the North version is called Ashokan Brahmi) because the word 'Brahmi' means 'created by Lord Brahma'. Lord Brahma is the creator deity in Hinduism, the largest indigenous religion of pan-India. If we just say Tamili then Tamils get arrogant and start claiming whole India as theirs, so God's name is given to the script so that nobody can 'claim' it as theirs and then start showing social arrogance.

​@@nilipertamaprakoso4156 that's means hiding the facts too😂... Hinduism was not pan indian religion.... Have you ever heard about Aaseevagam. It is the ancient tamil religion, its significance is nature and ancestral worship (more like the religions still found in africa)... It disappeared when divinity concept of hinduism seeped down South... We tamils believes murugan as our ancestor and ravanah as our king... And you should learn who coined the term brahmi... When they say it is brahmi, they try to prove sanskrit is first... But they say the fact, I.e., thamizhi, it definitely means tamilians are more indigenous to this land....

@@whoops0 Aaseevagam is a word literally taken from Sanskrit word 'Aajivika' lmao. Because you old Tamils couldn't pronounce 'J' so you changed it to 'S' lmao. Anyways, Sanskrit Ajivika was part of Hinduism. Maybe when it became corrupted into Tamil as 'aseevagam' nobody took it seriously because you just copied it instead of using your own religion. It's definitely not ancient Tamil religion. Ancient Dravidian religion (of which Tamil is a part) is called Tirāviṭa nāṭṭuppuṟa camayam. Yes, that was a separate religion from Hinduism but later they accepted that their practices are similar to what Hinduism prescribes. Worship of nature and ancestral worship is integral part of Hinduism even in 2023, you are so ignorant you don't even know that. It's not unique to Tamils, even Uttar Pradeshis do it to this day. They pray to their ancestors in Haridwar where the holy Ganga flows. Murugan is the son of Lord Shiva, and we call him Karthikeya and we pray him as well (less than Shree Ganesha, but still we pray him from time to time). So no, he's not solely Tamil property AT ALL. Gods are NEVER a state's property. Murugan is mine too, he belongs to Gujarat as much as he belongs to Kerala.

@@whoops0 Ravana is the villain in Ramayana. He's the king of Sri Lanka, not the king of Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu is not a part of Sri Lanka. And if you ever read Kamba Ramayanam, you will see that Tamil Thaaye (the ancestral goddess of Tamil people) HERSELF blessed Shree Rama, despite him coming from North, to slay Ravana because of his evil deeds. Now you want to go against your own ancestral Tamil Thaaye to justify Tamil extremism and separatism and your urge to cause civil war in India? NO NO NO we North Indians know already what you guys want and we will make sure you fail. Sanskrit's script was never first. In terms of writing Tamils may be first because they didn't have the memorizing power of Indo-Aryans ever in the history of the world. Imagine, Tamils wrote their language first, but Sanskrit STILL lived and became more popular despite not being written and just being passed from one generation to another through oral tradition. SHAME for you guys huhuhuuu. Tamils came from Elam region of South Iran, you are definitely not 'more' indigenous to this land at all. You are Iranians, just like Aryans are Central Asians. You are as foreign as we are. If you try to cause civil war to send us back to Central Asia, we will make sure every one of you flees like a herd of buffalos back to Iran and then get diminished by the Islamic population there today HAHAHAAHA.

@@whoops0 I don't think your old religion or old script exists today.

Those are chalco lithic culture warrior gods for particular area

thats a legacy of kannada kings

Can you please provide the link of the paper. I am interested.. thanks

🤣🤣🤣🤣 well said... ego is the matter here... north people never accept that tamil is oldest.

@@balajipandian2147 tamil is oldest bruh.

@@Deepak_Dhakad so sorry my dear brother.... most of the people know that. But refuse to accept that. Edicated people and the people who are accept that tamils are also indians will agree the truth like you.....!!!!!

​@@balajipandian2147 Sanskrit is a Indo European language Don't forget that Sanskrit did not attested a written script until 1st century BCE onwards

@@balajipandian2147 why will north Indians never accept? I think the hate/lies in SOME Tamils, invented by their own people against north Indians for (Dravidian) political purposes, have been believed. First, you create an enemy of your own countrymen, coz some troll says something on social media, propagates it like the whole of north India says that, and then spreads hate. I have seen nothing but hate for north Indians by SOME Tamils. and I have seen MANY north Indians being extremely accepting that Tamil could be India's oldest language. It just feels like you want to create enemies so that you can feel better about yourself. The EGO seems with Some Tamilians.

Yes people think that it was written by the pot maker, but it is ruled out. Pot maker will write on wet pot before heating it as it is easier to write on wet pot for the bulk of pot he was making, in this case it was written on the final finished pot by scratching on it. Only common man will do this, not the pot maker. In Tamil nadu even now in villages, we have the habbit of writing the names in stainless steel vessels.

@@eniyathendral2728 Brilliant connectivity. The Potter too was an ordinary or layman. He could've carved his SIGNATURE too.

I think amarnath indirectly pointing even pot makers know read write. Education was available to everyone in that society

@@balasubramanianmudisoodump2474 he was pointing all the public can read write and that is why the pot has graffiti letters in white scratched like lines, if pot maker would have made it then it will imprinted in the pot and the letters will be same color as pot color, not in white like scratch.

@@eniyathendral2728 agree

Most Abiguda languages are like that.

i am confused, isn't Hindi like that too? The devnagri script is written according to the words pronunciation. Or is Kannada more nuanced in that regard?😅

@@geisha-12 probably he didn't refer to any other Indian languages.

​more nuanced @@geisha-12

Debatable point

Just because Dravidians are descendants of Harappan doesn't mean they have any special rights to India. Even before Harappans the great Andamanese people came from Africa to India and became its first human settlement. You bloody Dravidians displaced them and sneakily removed all their culture and languages to establish yours as the dominant one. Aryans came peacefully, you tribal Dravidians didn't. Aryans didn't destroy anything, Aryans continued the civilization of Harappans with their own knowledge and humility towards the Indian culture. That's why in Hinduism, Dravidian God Shiva has same place as Aryan God Vishnu. Aryans came after Tamils but they were whole heartedly accepted both by Tamil Thaaye and Bharatha Matha because they brought natural unity and enriched culture to whole India, which Tamils couldn't bring from Zagros Mountains of South Iran (their place of origin).

​@@nilipertamaprakoso4156 bro doesn't know history, neither he knows science.... Bro only knows ideology and religion... So u r saying the andhamanese and dravidians are different? But dna results says the other way... 😅... Andhamanese and deaviduans, especially thamizhilians are same people. They just developed in differently because of the division of the land mass... Ams we dravidians have more genetic resemblance with the africans.... So bad that u ignored this fct 😂

@@whoops0 Sis doesn't know history, nor science nor ideology nor religion and nor how to spell names and speak with people haha. I respect you though, you are just a tribal with no civil sense...I can't blame you. Andamanese are 100% different from Tamils. Andamanese have totally different genetics from the South Iranian Dravidians lmao. Just because you are black skinned like them doesn't mean you and them are same. Otherwise we have black skinned people in UP and Bihar also, does this mean they are Dravidians? ahhaha please don't make us laugh. Andamanese are original inhabitants of India who came from Africa. Dravidians came from South Iran (Elam region nearby Zagros Mountains) and brought farming and bloodshed to India by displacing the Andamanese-type people from mainland India. Then Indo-Aryans came and peacefully settled with Dravidians, mixed their language and culture with them and brought the glory of Sanskrit and Hinduism to whole India all the way to Tamil Nadu and even Sri Lanka.

@@whoops0 also; what is this 'AnDHamanese'? The 'h' rule doesn't apply to English words silly. Andaman is an English word. Will you say 'Englandh' or 'Unitedh States'? Stop behaving like illiterate and learn to spell names first, then talk to me about history lol.

@@whoops0 well look at odisha people from odisha are a mixture or Aryans Dravidian and tribal people they share all the blood same with Aryans they didn't force other they grew together.

thats how its sounds. foreigners will read swati as swa-T. actually spelling should be Swaathi

Why should we care how foreigners pronounce our names? And anyways, Tamils write their language name as 'Tamizh', why don't you use your logic there that 'omg, foreigners might read this wrong'. Why only use this logic for Sanskrit names like Swati (Swathi), Saraswati (Saraswathi) etc. and not for pure Tamil names like Vetrimaran, Kolagatti etc.? You guys just unnecessarily want to 'otherize' North Indians and everything associated with them that's why you make such unnecessary changes

​@@nilipertamaprakoso4156 its Vetrimaaran 🤣 not only foreigners we want every one to pronounce our name correctly. and thats not logic thats how sound of a letter is properly used😂 and we write Tamil as Tamizh coz we have ழ ள ல 3 "la" in which ழ sounds different and other 2 similar for which "l" can be used but for ழ there's no letter available in English alphabet. "zh" is officially a letter for ழ declared by us. so theres no any logic to be implemented here.

@@user-qxpkwl Don't cry for one 'a'. We write 'Tamil Nadu' but we pronounce 'Tamil NAAdu' only.....same can apply for Vetrimaaran And okay, if you have three L's, make a new style of 'L' letter instead of putting two random letters (z and h) which have nothing to do with 'L'' lmao. For example, L̅ (It's 'L' but with a special symbol on top to distinguish it from the normal 'L', it's way more logical to use something like this instead of random 'zh')

@@user-qxpkwl Also, my original comment was for the fact that you guys only change 't' to 'th' and 'd' to 'dh' in Sanskrit/North Indian names. Why don't you say 'Kezhaadhi' instead of 'Keezhadi'? Why don't you say 'Thirunelveli' instead of 'Tirunelveli'? Or why don't you say 'Madhurai' instead of 'Madurai'? C'mon, stop lying now. This extra 'h' rule is only for Sanskrit/non-Tamil names like Ranjith, Swathi, Saraswathi, Hindhi etc. You guys made this rule so you can differentiate North Indian culture from Tamil culture and promote discrimination against non-Tamil culture and non-Tamil languages. Tell me ONE pure Tamil name where you put 'h' in front of 't' or 'd'.

First it's not Tamil Brahmi it's called Tamizhli, then you want to get convinced about sangam literature get inside sea 5kms away from poompuhar port , you can dive and see huge walls constructed, already you have evidence as written in sangam literature, which talks about sea taken places, but government yet doesn't want to get it proved , if found out civilization moved from this side towards Indus, so further evidence can be found in seabeds throughout mamallapuram, korkai, poompuhar, Musuri, Thondi ports, but if you are expecting anything related to Brahmin or Aryan theory sorry you will get embarassed

@@mscreationworks5787 that is up for debate. There are enough doubts and it is not decided that Sanskrit was a foreign language…

@@Whatsinaname423 If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them . That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist did not existed in Indian subcontinent during that Time Period Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent

@@mscreationworks5787 wow u just love to copy-paste the same thing over and over.

@@incubusk8r 2500 BC Rakhigarhi skeletons have no traces of 'Aryan gene', finds DNA study by . Dr. Niraj Rai who is the Head of the Ancient DNA Lab at Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow Even International genetic David Reich who is Head of Harvard School of Medicals said that Indus Valley people did not has genetic contribution from the steppes The study - titled ‘An ancient Harappan genome lacks ancestry from Steppe pastoralists or Iranian farmers’

@@mscreationworks5787 I don't doubt that one bit Bro. In fact, I agree that indo-Europeans did migrate from outside. Just like AASI (ancestors of Dravidian speakers) migrated into India earlier. We are all migrants unless we choose to stay in Africa. But the same "International genetic David Reich who is Head of Harvard School of Medicals" has written "both ANI and ASI ancestry are found all over the subcontinent (in both northern and southern India) in varying proportions, and that "ANI ancestry ranges from 39-71% in India." So you have at the very least 39 per cent of that ANI gene. The same gene is in you that is in the people you seem to hate. The point is to have pride in Tamil. But don't hate others. Don't get sucked into the Dravidian politics. Not every north Indian is an evil monster out to obliterate your language. what you forget as Indians we consider Tamil as our own language as well. In fact proud that it is the oldest in India. If I started believing every Tamil is a chauvinist like you, I won't be able to make friends. I am happy to say I have several here in Mumbai.

Thank you!

NO. The title is fully fine as it is. Tamil is not separate from India. Tamizh Thaaye is a beautiful manifestation of Bharatha Thaaye. तमिल नाडु की धरती, उसकी संस्कृति और उसकी प्राकृतिक धरोहर, सब भारत माता का अभिमान है. तमिल माता भी भारत माता का एक स्वरूप है. आदर और सम्मान करो इसका और अलगाव की भावना मत पैदा करो.

Names like Aathan, Kuviran, Saathan, Uthiran have been found. Possibly owners name

Names on the pots could have been written by pot maker , seller or a buyer. Even now shops in tamilnadu, they ask us if you want to write name on silver vessel. It’s not necessarily women to write on it. In tamil nadu we have a culture of writing names on vessels . When newly married girl goes to husbands home, she takes the vessels on her name as belongings to the new home. Its still followed. Some how, literate people will try to write their names everywhere they good. During my childhood I use to write my names everywhere in my home even common books , doors and walls. If you are unbiasedly then you will agree that these potsherds are created by normal people who use it for day today activities and wanted their names to be written for their identity(way of saying its mine). Its really impossible to wake a person who pretends to sleep. Even after the watching the video you reject a possibility discarding the facts.

@@Rocky_Rocks It's not only Tamil Nadu where people get their name inscribed on brass or aluminium vessels (not just silver). My experience tells me it was also done in Travancore and Ceylon, and goes on still in Leicester (UK) where the Asian population are mostly Gujarati speakers. That suggests it may have been a general South Indian custom. I don't know about the North. Or was it world-wide? In the days when earthenware pots went directly onto the flames, cookware had a limited life and was expected to be thrown away and replaced. Brass and bronze vessels would have been more valuable, but I suppose they would have been melted down once damaged and so won't be common in the archaeological record.

@@faithlesshound5621 dont know about worldwide but engraving name on vessels is very common in north India just like any other part of Bharat. I am from central region of Uttar Pradesh and this tradition is pretty common here. The more we will search, the more we will find oneness between so called north and south.

It says, "Handle with care. If u break the pot, I will break your hand" - Hari Potter.

So what about indus valley civilization

Egypt is older. Don't let ideology get into the way of science

Why start in South India? You could say it started in Ceylon, or even in some mythical continent (Eelam) in the Indian Ocean which has disappeared from sight.

Lol, I love how shamelessly anti-Indian and racist Tamils immediately start hijacking the name 'India' the moment they show that Tamil is older/more ancient than anything from North. But otherwise they will keep crying for separate country and stuff. Even if it is proven that Tamil is older than Sanskrit, Sanskrit would continue to be respected as is and we'll continue to pray in it and consider it out civilizational gem. Tamil will also get respect, but at the same level it gets today. Just because Tamils is proven to be older doesn't mean it gets any special treatment over other Indian languages. Now keep crying for separate country...we are not even gonna give you that even if you make an Indian LTTE.

Deccan plateau is called older because of the Indo - Eurasian plate Collison event.. read books dude.

Hasn’t that been debunked multiple times?

Forget the Aryan Theory. Try Aryan Practical, just take a DNA Ancestry, results will tell you how much 'R' haplogroup(Aryan/Steppe) presence in admixture.

This video is actually confirming what the dmk claimed

@@spsspssps DMK claimed Kumari Kandam and IVC as Tamil Civilization. This video just says that the Tamizhi script could be little older than Brahmi script. There is some difference.

The language u speaking is imposed by invaders Mr Singh

@@cskcmp5009 yes please tell him in English language of other invaders.

​@@ranapratapsingh3416 Sanskrit is a Indo European language Don't forget that Sanskrit did not attested a written script until 1st century BCE onwards

No

It is not Brahminisation of Tamil culture. Tamil culture itself has contributed to Brahmin culture. Lord Shiva (Sivan) is one of the holiest Gods of Brahmins who gives Brahmins power to spread their knowledge, that Lord Shiva came from Tamil culture only. Tamil Thaaye opened her gates for Sanskrit Matha to come and for the two to get together to make one of the most glorious cultures in the whole world, Hindu culture. Unfortunately, Tamil Thaaye's sons and daughters today have become influenced by rakshasa mentality. But don't worry, we will still ensure that nothing happens to Bharatha Matha nor Tamil Thaaye's unity with Bharatha Matha.

Exactly i dont know why southies and northies arguing over this silly things. But this hatred started by northies and other southies who claimed tamils as sudras so now they are giving back

They were illiterate then

And your source?

@@varoonnone7159 it's common sense

Tamil literature were written in palm leaves. They were able to identify a material which lasts for 800 years.

@@mudrarakshasa That's quite a lazy answer. Not saying you are wrong but again just an unsubstantiated affirmation

Ikr?We have everything here - Vedic stuff, pre Vedic stuff, everything.

@@eshwarprasad524 yes & better than north culture 👍🏽

@@shubh1754 we dont hate you. You are a part of us how can we hate you

@@shubh1754 isme hate kya hai....sach hai ye.

@@shubh1754 ASI didnt give TN gov permission to do the excavation ,plus ASI transferred amarnath sir to north east ..... no ncert history books cover us, union gives more funds to dig illusion river saraswathi , but for keeladi civilians share their money .... etc etc so its natural for common tamilian to be little harsh bro