The Sudarium of Oviedo w/Dr. Brian Janeway 

Death is a horrible thing. Thank you Lord Jesus for saving us from it.

Thank you Lord Jesus for you what you did in the cross !!!

Blessed are those who believe but haven't seen

Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior 🤲✨🕊 Amen

Thank you for the brilliant analysis of the facts surrounding this amazing relic. God Bless you for your time and effort to spread the message of this amazing cloth that touched our risen Lord and Savior!

Blessed be the Lord, Yeshua, forever.

Remarkable and deep analysis of the relic. Thank you so much for this!

Thank you for the great on depth analysis! God bless you!

Great program! Very informative and important!

My understanding is that the blood stains are perfectly consistent with the crucifixion

It seems quite a coincidence that there is a great you tube video about the Holy Grail in Leon Spain. Now watching Sudarium of Oviedo. Two places in Spain not too far apart. Now watching further, a part of the Holy cross is at Monasterio de Santo Toribio de Lie’bana. Near Potes in the Picos de Europa. Quite a coincidence that the holy relics are in Northern Spain.

How Brilliant Dr Brian,

Very imformative. God bless you

God Bless You

Excellent review of the sudarium...👍

Great presentation.

"Gloria in Excelsis DEO"

Very good presentation. I've read several books including Ian Wilson's on the Shroud, and Janice Bennett's on the Sudarium. I strongly recommend both. Mark Guscin's book is very rare and very costly if you can find one. May I suggest a video with Mark Guscin, where he actually 'demonstrates' how the Sudarium was used according to studies done; Search; Shroud Encounter-Mark Guscin Sudarium of Oviedo. Thank you.

Was the journey from the crucifixion site to the holy Sepulchre ,45 mitres, where Christ was carried after the crucifixion,

Has there ever been DNA analysis of the blood on the Shroud and Sudarium to see if they match?

Where can I see your shroud talk?

👏

as for the Shroud of Turn, is it possible to conduct another Carbon 14 test, taking samples from a different section of the cloth?

How far did The Dr say it was from where Christ was crucified, to the the holy Sepulchre church where Christ tomb,

Cartagena was a main trade/port and military naval base established and used from pre Roman times. During the several hundred years of Roman control Cartagena was the major arrival point by sea, a route known from all around the Mediterranean. Cartagena has one of the largest Colosseums ever discovered or rediscovered as the site here was built upon, multiple times over the intervening centuries as well as the usual scavenging of materials that has obviously been prevalent. N.B. Interestingly, (Saint) Helenas travels (First pilgrimage to Jerusalem) in order to locate the Holy Sites was accredited to and authenticated by Roman Graffiti as well as by the modern archeological excavations still currently ongoing. General Gordon’s documentation of the site of the Skull and therefore, allegedly authenticating the current Garden Tomb is less credible. A) The Alleged Tomb has had multiple occupancy over the centuries. B) The Tomb is contrived to the image of the practical operation of both Stone opening and closing too contrived and modern to be authentic. The place of the Skull 💀 at this location, is currently a local bus station, although both now and in historical photographs does appear to look like a skull. Any number of cultivated fires in the cave areas could have added to the creation of this depiction, in addition to natural erosion which has taken place over the centuries.

So I'm curious what your explanation for the 1160 date for the shroud. the different cloth thing would work but for the invisible splice. We should be able to see where it was added in. I really want to believe this but the date and honestly Helena too is hard to get around.

Two people had to carry Jesus. The tradition says it was Nicodemas and Joseph of Aramithea. Joseph had the cloth.

How could the Sudarium have been attached to Christ's head before death without obstructing His ability to breathe or speak?

The Orthodox Church has the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.

The Sudarium has been dated by carbon fourteen to the 8th century. Rucker's neutron absoption hypothesis explains that anomaly. shroudresearchxxxxxx Rucker's hypothesis has been supported by the finding that the nitrogen signature in blood taken from the Shroud is missing. A neutron flux would have converted that nitrogen into carbon.

How do they know the box is Oak if they did no other testing? Perhaps it’s shittim wood, like the Ark of the Covenant?

How long post mortem would blood from inside the body still be liquid? That would give us some idea of how long it took to take Christ down from the cross and place His body in the tomb. Also, what would the spear wound in Christ's side do to the blood flow from His head? Would the loss of blood through His side alter the pressure of the blood remaining in His head? I'd also question how any fluid from Christ's lungs could be forced out through His nose post mortem.

Proof of a resurrection

As is known, many theologians do not believe in the resurrection of Jesus. According to them, it would be an inner experience. However, according to the Acts of the Apostles and the letters of Saint Paul, the Resurrection of Jesus is the indispensable requirement to receive Baptism and be saved. These theologians do not have the faith that is necessary to be saved, they are in extreme danger of being damned. They have two solutions, both go through humility, which is the problem. Say to God: I want to believe in the resurrection of your Son Jesus, but I can't. Make me safe, as if I believed. The other is to turn to the Shroud and mentally see the miracle witnessed by John, Peter, Joseph of Arimathea, Mary Magdalene, and even Mary, Mother of Jesus. They were privileged, they believed in the resurrection of Jesus thanks to that visible miracle. The Holy sheet with the "photos" of Jesus and the head shroud suspended in the air. The other Christian faithful would believe because of the preaching and the action of the Holy Spirit, but all had to believe in the resurrection of Jesus as a "sine qua non" condition. Now in the 21st century, the miracle is offered to us again because the book picks up the pieces of the puzzle that Saint John left us and puts them in their place and thus the scene that they saw twenty centuries later appears drawn, since Saint John was not explicit for various reasons. His community knew how to read between the lines what he was explaining because they knew the story well enough. It is about the book SAINT JOHN THE EVANGELIST "SAW AND BELIEVED" AND WE TOO! On Amazon.

The cloth may have been used as a dressing or sponge for an injured face, but Jesus died on the cross in the ninth hour of the day (3 pm) was taken down several hours later at even time and it does not show in the image burned into the Shroud. Was a hood placed over the face of the condemned man before death?

The Gospel of John states that the disciples of Jesus found only strips of linen and a face cloth in the empty tomb (John 20: 3-7). Note that the Greek word orthonia for the former is plural. There was NO single, full-body sheet found in the tomb. In 1543, John Calvin, in his book Treatise on Relics, explained why the Shroud cannot be genuine: "In all the places where they pretend to have the graveclothes, they show a large piece of linen by which the whole body, including the head, was covered, and, accordingly, the figure exhibited is that of an entire body. But the Evangelist John relates that Christ was buried, "as is the manner of the Jews to bury." What that manner was may be learned, not only from the Jews, by whom it is still observed, but also from their books, which explain what the ancient practice was. It was this: The body was wrapped up by itself as far as the shoulders, and then the head by itself was bound round with a napkin, tied by the four corners, into a knot. And this is expressed by the Evangelist, when he says that Peter saw the linen clothes in which the body had been wrapped lying in one place, and the napkin which had been wrapped about the head lying in another. The term napkin may mean either a handkerchief employed to wipe the face, or it may mean a shawl, but never means a large piece of linen in which the whole body may be wrapped. I have, however, used the term in the sense which they improperly give to it. On the whole, either the Evangelist John must have given a false account, or every one of them must be convicted of falsehood, thus making it manifest that they have too impudently imposed on the unlearned." The very validity of Christian faith is based upon the veracity of the accounts given in the gospels concerning what was found in the tomb of Jesus. Christians HAVE to believe that these accounts are accurate. Therefore , how can they ALSO believe that the Shroud of Turin is the burial shroud of Jesus when the account of the contents of the tomb states unambiguously that there was NO such shroud found there? Either this was because Jesus was never wrapped in a full-length sheet (and certainly NOT in one that covered his head as well as his torso, for this was NOT Jewish custom) or else he left the tomb with this sheet still wrapped around his resurrected body. In this case, how on earth could Mary Magdalen fail to recognise him when she returned the morning after the Sabbath to finish anointing his body, for she had seen how he looked when his body was left in the tomb? It does not make sense unless the risen Jesus had somehow acquired other clothes to cover himself - clothes that she would not have recognised as being his. The whole point of a napkin was that it was supposed to cover the face left UNCOVERED by whatever strips of linen were used to wrap the torso. It is wrong and absurd to suppose that a sheet covered the head as well as this napkin! So how could the face of Jesus appear on a sheet of linen that - even supposing that it was used (none was found in the tomb) - only covered the torso as far as the shoulders? Once again, nothing makes sense here. Whether the Sudarium is the genuine face cloth of Jesus or a fake needs independent investigation. The fact that the image of a face appears on the Turin Shroud AS WELL is evidence that the latter is a fake, whether or not the Sudarium is genuine.

Did any of the scientist perform a DNA test? If this is the blood of Jesus, then it would be another miracle if they tried it and then find that the blood is still alive.

Dr. Brian, sorry to say this, but you are not well informed, your pronunciation in wrong in several areas and the pollens, myrrh and aloes ARE in fact proved to be from Jerusalem AND the stone dust on the shroud is indeed a very specific and rare kind of limestone ONLY from Jerusalem and specifically from the very gate area that Jesus would have walked through to the hill place of crucifixion - Golgotha.

The Shroud of Turin is a real 2000 year old artifact and what Christianity is based upon but saying he wore a helmet of thorns you have admitted he was a Parthian King whom all wore a purple robe and a helmet/crown of thorns.

Also, the shroud itself was held by the Orthodox until the sack of Constantinople by Roman Catholic crusaders. This should be given back.

I have watched better vids than this.

But Indiana Jones wasn’t even a Christian either, why he didn’t die makes no sense

On this ark... why does the Jesus character look like baphomet? Even doing the as above so below hands...