Why The Shroud Of Turin Could Be The Authentic Burial Cloth Of Jesus 

On his podcast, Father Carlos Martins, exorcist, said that a priest gave him a tiny strand from the shroud. He did not know for fact if the string was authentic but he assumed so. When he had a really terrible possession case that was very difficult and nothing was progressing, he pulled out the envelope with the strand of the shroud. The demon of the possessed person immediately became quiet,subdued, and it positioned the person's body to match the image on the shroud (crossed wrists etc) and if I recall, he said it was whimpering. Father knew then the strand was authentic.

@@MW-he4cp Conferring authenticity because of only one single event wherein random chance is a viably huge factor is not only bad science but is also akin to jumping a twenty-foot chasm in two ten-foot leaps.

It’s already been proven to be impossible to replicate with any man made technology.

​@@Metanoia000 Really? Then how come it has been replicated with a very simple method over a decade ago in 2009.? If you still haven't heard of it 14 years later, I have to assume you don't want to know, but for those who do want to know the truth of it, just google the name of Luigi Garlaschelli, the professor of Organic Chemistry in Italy, who reproduced the shroud to the most minute detail. At any rate, what has been proven is that shroud is a fake first mentioned and displayed in the early 14th century. The fact the carbon dating confirmed that date should be enough for anyone even remotely rational.

​@@Metanoia000BS

Just like a photo negative, yes. 🙏🏼

That's it

God is amazing

Who knew crucifixion would stretch the arms so much?

What? How stupid !!

Indeed! That is exactly how I always felt in my heart + spirit abt The Shroud.

Fact!

I knew the first part but the second part is a really good point

I was not a believer before I saw enough evidence to convince me that Jesus really is the Son of God. There are people that can be convinced with decent evidence, but what you said is still true for a good percentage of people.

He was also a Catholic lol. The same Catholic church which has refused to declare the Shroud a miracle despite overwhelming scientific evidence in support of it. The same Catholic Church which has declared Jews and Muslims will enter the Kingdom without accepting Christ because they are "good people". That Catholic church which Aquinas declared the p;apal head of to be God's mouthpiece on Earth.... Yeah, your source exerts no influence amongst those who know.

@@realnametba2 then you don't know what a sceptic is. Just by looking at the thing you can tell it's hilariously fake. And every time someone non-biased has examined it, it has been deemed a fake. I'd say you're a religous clown disguised as a sceptic. No sale.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-cliig1vRryw.html

Exactly! Why is that so hard for some (have to be low IQ) people to understand?

Let us trust THE eyewitness. The regarding verses of John should clearly show that the Shroud of Turin is not in conformity with his gospel because there are more than one artifacts in question. Remember that Peter and John were in the tomb and it is out of discussion that it was the same John who wrote the gospel: John 20:6+7 Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb. He saw the LINEN CLOTHS [plural] lying there, and the FACE CLOTH [singular], which had been on Jesus' head, not lying WITH the LINEN CLOTHS [plural] but folded up in a place by itself. And there has to be a comparing view on how Jews were buried at that time although all steps happend after Christs' death were done in a hurry and it is therefore maybe not comparable 100 % with the standard e.g. the story of Lazarus: John 11:44 The man who had died came out, his hands and feet bound with LINEN STRIPS [plural], and his face wrapped with A CLOTH. Jesus said to them, “Unbind him, and let him go.” But if we would refer to this standard then it debunks the authenticity of the shroud even better than John 20:6+7. And please do not rely on RU-vid only. Once you are viewing something like that you are in video bubble where similar videos are proposed to keep you as long as possible watching.

@@wipo3654 You could use a _lot_ Bible study as well as Shroud study. Those of us that have _actually studied_ *both* the Bible as well as the Shroud know that the face cloth is in Spain today where it has been for the last 1400 years. It is known as the Sudarium of Oviedo. And no, Jesus was *not* wrapped up like King Tut. Funny how some people are that silly to think so. . 1. 'And Joseph bought a linen *shroud,* and taking him down, wrapped him in the linen *shroud* [Mark 15:46] 2. 'And Joseph took the body and wrapped it in a clean linen *shroud'* [Matthew 27:59] 3. 'Then he took it down and wrapped it in a linen *shroud'* [Luke 23:53] Each of the synoptic Gospels mention Joseph of Arimathea making use of a single linen cloth to wrap the body of Jesus for burial. The Word 'Sindon' (singular noun ) means 'A clean sheet' and the Word 'Othonion' (plural noun) means 'bandages'. Luke uses the same plural noun (Othonion), “funeral linens,” in his account of the Resurrection (Luke 24: 12) after earlier speaking of the singular burial cloth (Sindon) or *shroud* (Luke 23 :53) . This plural noun mentioned in (Luke 24: 12) is intended to include all the funeral elements such as : 1) A long *shroud( - It's used to wrap whole body 2)A face cloth or 'Soudarion' - It's not used to wrap whole head but to wipe the perspiration from one’s face. The Greek word 'Soudarion' was derived from a Latin word for “sweat.” 3)A few stripes of linen - They help to tie a shroud around a body The Fourth Gospel never mentions such a 'Sindon'. Instead, John writes of Joseph and Nicodemus “binding the body of Jesus in strips of linen” The verb 'Binding' ( δέω) is frequently found in the context of binding a prisoner with chains. (Mark 5.3; 6.17; Acts 12.6; 21.33) John uses the same verb in Revelation for the 'binding' of the dragon (Rev 20: 2) Those "strips" were there to hold the body in place during rigor, as well as to secure the Shroud to his body. Duh! And who out there is dumb enough to believe _anything_ from Wikipedia? Wikipedia is an anti-religious, anti-Christian business with political answers based on personal bias. You should doubt almost everything they write on contentious issues. Same with Snopes kids. All intelligent people that have spend even a couple for hours studying the Bible and the Shroud _know_ that is is no fake. . It was *proven* by many dozens of doctors, scientists, archeologists, and other highly trained researchers and their _tens of thousands of hours_ of examination that the Shroud *most definitely* wrapped the body of a severely beaten, scourged and crucified man that was wearing a crown or cap of thorns before he died. *PROVEN.* Only an imbecile would be dumb enough to think that this was someone other than our Lord Jesus.

​@@wipo3654The face cloth was probably the Sudarium of Oviedo. The blood stains on the Sudarium match those on the Shroud in over 100 places, meaning that they were almost certainly used on the same person, even though the Sudarium has been in Spain since the 7th century.

​@@adamclark1972uk Thanks for statement. Tell me please your reliable sources that the sudarium matches with the shroud. I only know the controversy of the sudarium on Wikipedia and there is also mentioned that it covered a man with a squeezed nose. Apart from this occupy yourself with the burial tradition of jews 2000 years ago. Compare this info with the gospels. I am still of the opinion that the body of Jesus was wrapped with linen strips in the same way as Lazarus. And Lazarus could come out of the tomb on his own. This would be impossible beeing wrapped in one piece of textile. The gospel of John clearly mentioned that Jesus was buried according to the tradition at that time. And remember that Joseph and Nikodemus were rich people so we have to consider also this. Keep me updated when you have significant findings indicating verifiable sources. Thanks.

“Zero evidence to prove it fake “. Except for radiometric dating, and spherical excess. In any event those making the claim have the burden of proof.

Anyone who believes there is enough evidence to conclude the cloth is real but evolution is fake, is suffering bias.

Take a deeper look into the radiometric dating. I was a big skeptic before too

@@RichardTavilla I have. The argument is that the sample taken was from the repaired part of the shroud. However, professor Michael Tite, who supervised the testing process, points out that two textile experts were present to ensure that the sample was from the un-repaired part of the shroud. What is interesting is that the Catholic Church has never claimed the church is genuine. The carbon dating of the shroud places it around the time the shroud appears in history. Even if the shroud dated to the first century, there is no evidence that it was Christ’s burial shroud. Many people were crucified in the first century. There is no chain of custody for the shroud. If a body was wrapped in the shroud, when you flattened the shroud the image would be distorted because of spherical excess caused by projecting a three dimensional image onto a two dimensional surface. The evidence for the shroud would be inadmissible in a court of law. It would have problems at an auction as it lacks provenance.

@@RichardTavilla paragraph two: that should read Shroud, not church, is not genuine.

LMAO time-wise that thing is closer to Joseph Smith than Jesus. You might as well turn Mormon ....

Jesus was not put in a tomb. He was thrown in a mass grave and his body was lost to history. The shroud had nothing to do with Jesus.

It would take a greater leap of faith to disbelieve the Shroud in light of all the evidence. For starters, a 14th century artist would have to create something we are unable to create today, with artistic means that were never again used. And they would have to create the image as a photographic negative without knowing anything of photography. There is a greater likelihood the dating analysis was incorrect, especially given that the institution that did the carbon dating no longer stands behind their conclusions. Peace be with you.

No he didn't. The shroud is not of Christ, read your bible.

​@perfectblindguy it is well documented Jesus's body was put in the Tomb of Joseph of Arimethea

You didn't read your bible. If you did you would know that this was not Christ.

​@@swathdiver489who is it?

⁠@@swathdiver489thanks for stating that without explaining anything. Like I said, if it’s not His it doesn’t impact my faith in Him. But from what I’ve learned about it, it lines up with the biblical and historical accounts. To say “you haven’t read your bible” just seems like an attempt to pick a fight with no evidence to back it up. I’ll wait….

Swathdiver will probably pull out a passage of the “strips of linen” from John 20:1-18. Thing is, the shroud has a strip of linen attached to the side of it (just google image it) other documentaries state that part was sown back to the shroud. Theory is it was really the strip that binded the body together from the outside (and also caused the image disruption close to the neck). The face cloth hasn’t been found (could be the Oviedo cloth, google it). So the passage doesn’t invalidade the shroud, people just assume that, for some reason, if we have just the shroud, then that’s the only thing used in the burial.

Nice story

There's a movie coming out in Nov. that does this with the Shroud (I don't know if the sudarium is included).

You are wrong

@@andrewholdaway813Classic anonymous moron on RU-vid saying someone is wrong without using any sources to back up his claim.

What exactly about the Shroud has anything to do with religion? Assuming it's authentically a real death burial shroud from the correct period and place we still have absolutely 0 reason to think it was specifically Jesus' shroud. And even if it were 100% confirmed to belong to Jesus who cares? It wouldn't prove anything supernatural in the slightest.

Since we're talking about details in the 'masterpiece', it's fair to point out that that's not the face of someone merely 33 years of age. Remember, Jesus died young, barely past his 20's. The image on the shroud looks like a very old man.

@@skydriver5709 I mean the life expectancy in first century Judea might not have been great. Jesus was living in the wilderness with twelve other dudes so for him 33 was the new 66 😂

Totally agree! Really great editing! Not something that I’ve really seen anyone else do, with the cutting, adding the text like you did, etc. Very well done.

@robertstephenson6806 Not sure how you conclude the truth of (1). (2) While there does seem to be tension between the idea of a face-cloth and the image on the shroud, this is not conclusive evidence. It is evidence, but I'm not confident in our ability to know precisely what the nature of the face-cloth is at this point. Perhaps there is a way to reconcile the two. I'm sure shroud scholars have looked into the question and have presented some alternatives. One would need to interact with their work before declaring the evidence was conclusive. (3) This seems the weakest of your arguments. Reconstructing the features of the man of the shroud is not nearly precise enough to tell us how attractive he was, how good his posture was, whether he had a lazy eye, if he had yellow teeth, or many other things.

Next on to addressing rampant sexual abuse in the catholic church

Say the claims are 100% proven to be real. So what? What does that do for you? What difference does that make? See you think there is some superpower to be had by holding a physical object. Do you know how God defines faith? The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things NOT SEEN. This is fleshy carnal filthy degeneracy. You keep thinking that if I can see it and touch it that brings some great power. That it somehow strengthens faith. Your foolish and understand nothing about the kingdom of God. Your flesh is stuck in the kingdom of heaven. It's a mental disorder at the least. The CAT-holics claimed to have Jesus' baby linen. Why you'd keep a dirty diaper for 2000 years idk. Claimed to have John the Baptist head and some of Mary's breast milk. Ya have to be mentally sick. What does do it? Absolutely nothing, just a perversion and distraction from the one thing undeniably that is from God. All scripture is given by inspiration of God. The superior and pure words of God found in the authorized KJV.

Just a little friendly constructive criticism, I think it would be good to eliminate using the word "like" as preface to an idea or example.

Nonsense?

@@andrewholdaway813 Narc?

@@MG77740 Gibberish?

@@andrewholdaway813 I think you can ask a better question.

@@MG77740 A better question? Than what?

Ditto. I NEVER believed it was fake. I KNEW + have ALWAYS known in my spirit -- that the Shroud is REAL -- that the image IS OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST -- that the emanating rays, if u will, coming from Jesus' image on the cloth are the NRG markings left by his body RISING FROM THE DEAD. I have ALWAYS BELIEVED + WILL ALWAYS. 🙌 ✝️ 🙌

Correct, we don't have the technology to impart the 3-D image on the top linen fibers, which is a 2-D surface. We can be certain that medieval artists did not know how to do this either.

@@debrahouston2884 According to John's Gospel, a full length shroud was never found in the empty tomb. All that was seen were the linen strips to wrap and bind the body and the face cloth. THERE WAS NEVER ANY SHROUD that covered the face. A lot of Christians who accept the Turin Shroud as genuine need to reread the various gospel accounts. They will discover that the "shroud" translation/scenario is a complete misrepresentation.

@@les2997 Yes, we do. And yes, some of them did, because it was not painted but created by projecting the image of a corpse with the aid of a camera obscura (known to Leonardo da Vinci and no doubt others) onto a genuine burial cloth brought by by a pilgrim from the Holy Land and smeared with a photo-sensitive chemical.

God is a delusion. This guy will spend his whole life being deluded.

Hi Worship ONLY GOD! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over His Creation from Jerusalem forever.

lol

It's a fake.

@@dominicpardo4783 yes but to all catholics it's real lo. So gullible bunch aren't they mate lol james

It is fake and he is being dishonest. For example at around 9-10 minutes in when he is talking about Peter at the empty tomb and the author uses 3 different words. No competent writer will use repetitive words if they can avoid it. I learned this in like 3rd grade when they taught us about dictionaries and thesauruses. This catholic priest absolutely knows this too. I guarantee it... These men, all catholic priests are trained in deceptive arts, rhetoric... None of them even believe in Jesus or the Bible. If they did they would not pray to Mary and her statues. It's a big scam. Come out of her.

​@@jamesfitzpatrick9869 There's a million-dollar challenge to who can replicate the Shroud of Turin, perhaps you can gather all the artists and scientists in the world so they can get that easy money.

Yeah right

The demon knew the shroud was real because it carried out a DNA test.

Hello my friend, very interesting I’m a Catholic and enjoy very much listening to father Carlos and others do you have a link of where this pod cast can be found please

@@heyitsedz1785It is called The Excorcist Files.

Spotify. The Exorcist files.

A happy year it is! Glory be to The Risen Jesus

I did also, actually enjoyed the Pints with Aquinas better because it goes in to so much better detail.

On his podcast, Father Carlos Martins, exorcist, said that a priest gave him a tiny strand from the shroud. He did not know for fact if the string was authentic but he assumed so. When he had a really terrible possession case that was very difficult and nothing was progressing, he pulled out the envelope with the strand of the shroud. The demon of the possessed person immediately became quiet,subdued, and it positioned the person's body to match the image on the shroud (crossed wrists etc) and if I recall, he said it was whimpering. Father knew then the strand was authentic.

Would you be able to discuss this in your seminary please? And maybe there is an expert who has veryfiable sources to compare it with the burial custom mentioned in the gospel of John: John 11:44 The man [Lazarus] who had died came out, his hands and feet bound with LINEN STRIPS [plural], and his face wrapped with A CLOTH. Jesus said to them, “Unbind him, and let him go.” John 19:39+40 Nicodemus also, who earlier had come to Jesus by night, came bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds [about 32 kg] in weight. So they took the body of Jesus and bound it in LINEN CLOTHES [plural] with the spices, as is the burial custom of the Jews. John 20:6+7 Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb. He saw the LINEN CLOTHS [plural] lying there, and the FACE CLOTH [singular], which had been on Jesus' head, not lying WITH the LINEN CLOTHS [plural] but folded up in a place by itself.

@@wizardofahhhs759 LMAO it's a fake, silly buns

Nonsense!

@@adamcosper3308 The gullible that think the Shroud is a fake? More like mentally ill in my opinion.

😂

​@@adamcosper3308 "At that time Jesus answered and said: I confess to thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them to the little ones." God loves the simple of heart, not those who have complex ways of justifying their being in resistance to God. "God resists the proud." He allows them to believe that they 'evolved' from literal mud, yet deny evidence like the shroud, for example.

I think these days the more scientific evidence the better for those raised without faith.

@@themobbit9061 Science has _proven_ that the Shroud once contained the body of a man that was horribly beaten, savagely scourged, and then crucified wearing a cap of thorns. And it has been dated to the 1st century. What kind of moron does it take to think that this was _not_ the burial shroud of our Lord Jesus?

Yeah the fishbone weave can only be done during 1st century Israel which rich people only can posses. And Joseph of aramithea is a rich Pharisee who donated it to wrap Jesus.

John 20: 29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed. Romans 20: 17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

There is NO biblical evidence that the body of Jesus was covered with a linen sheet. The gospel of John states explicitly that several lines strips (used for binding the hands and legs) and a face cloth were found lying separately in the empty tomb. NO SHROUD. This is convincing evidence that the Turin Shroud was hoaxed.

Wow! I didn’t know that. That’s amazing

Interesting thank you!

Scientific experiments won't be "theorised" until the hypothesis has been proven. At the moment, they're only making hypothetical questions and trying to answer them using science. Even if the shroud is authentic. There are contradictions in the Bible. With the Gospels of John. Then they would have to prove that the shrouds were indeed from a man in the Middle East around the time of Jesus

It's said that the event horizon or light coming out the body at the intensity of several billion watts of light energy without the heat was at 1/40 billionth of a second. Instantaneous pretty much.

It was medieval paint on linen, dude, not "bilirubin", or billion-watt light. Scientists tested the materials years ago.

On his podcast, Father Carlos Martins, exorcist, said that a priest gave him a tiny strand from the shroud. He did not know for fact if the string was authentic but he assumed so. When he had a really terrible possession case that was very difficult and nothing was progressing, he pulled out the envelope with the strand of the shroud. The demon of the possessed person immediately became quiet,subdued, and it positioned the person's body to match the image on the shroud (crossed wrists etc) and if I recall, he said it was whimpering. Father knew then the strand was authentic.

The blood matches (at least, that’s my understanding)

@@mkl2237 Not just the blood! There are _at least_ 120 points of congruity between the Shroud and the Sudarium. 100% proof that they both once were on the body of the same man. And this same man, of course, is Jesus.

@@beverlyhurd8556 love it. Thank you! So while I do know a lot about the shroud… I don’t know a fraction as much abkut the Sudarium. You have me very interested to go deeper. If it’s not too much trouble: so you have any particular resources (book, person/researcher/author, or video) that younreally like ??? I can always do my own homework but if it’s not too much trouble: you seem to know way more than I do so I’d value your guidance to learn more….

@@mkl2237 Nope. While I have read a couple of books on the Shroud, what I have learned about the Sudarium is what I have learned here on RU-vid. While not quite as fascinating as the Shroud itself, the very fact that it too once wrapped the body (or at least his head) of our Lord Jesus makes it incredibly priceless in so many ways.

@@beverlyhurd8556 thank you. Knowing there’s that many points of connection… I’m now eager to learn more about it. Huge favor and blessing you shared. Thank you!

The absence of evidence is not evidence of the absence of knowledge about photography. Leonardo da Vinci did experiments with a camera obscura, and his alchemical knowledge might have included that of photo-sensitive chemicals. You don't need a bright flash of light to create the image on the Turin Shroud, just a camera obscura working on a well-lit corpse, projecting its image onto a genuine burial cloth brought back from the Holy Land by a pilgrim and covered in a solution of some photo-sensitive chemical that might have been known to alchemists of the day. You cannot rule out a possibility simply for want of any evidence.

Right you are there! So wonderful to listen to a Shroud expert like Father Andrew. Three hours just flew by.

Yes, I agree. He was able to go in to so much more detail.

The best "counter experts" are members of the gay communtiy and have an agenda against the Shroud because they do not like the Catholic Church (for obvious reasons.) See Hugh Farey, Andrea Nicolotti, Andrew Casper, and the RU-vid VLOGS of "Reason to Doubt." They are all pretty much off the wall and in denial of the scientific, historical, and forensic evidence. So, Andrew, what is your agenda?

Watch the shroud debate at duke

@@Rocky-ur9mn Not very helpful. Who what why when is 'duke'

@@andrewholdaway813 just type the same in the RU-vid search bar geez

Type O is very rare

Its universal and hes the damn devil by the way

😂

STURP (Shroud of Turin Research Program 1978-1981) report confirms very good that the Shroud CANNOT BE the authentic burial cloth of Jesus: I. SPICES According to the Gospel of John the body was CERTAINLY wrapped/bound in linen cloths WITH the spices: John 19,39+40 Nicodemus, who had previously come to Jesus at night, also brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds. So they took the body of Jesus and wrapped it in linen cloths WITH the spices, according to the Jewish burial custom. So, there must be at least non biodegradable particles and stains like it is claimed for blood. But there was/is EMPHASISED NOTHING. Already that is enough to disprove the Shroud, comparing it with the biblical account. II. IMAGE And the image itself is a contradiction. There is no shading of the bodys' sides and the top of the head? Also the contact-distance pattern of the backside doesn't correspond the forensic pattern of a dead body lying e.g. on a plate. Folds, overlappings and wavy areas are inevitable as shown in a Shroud wrapping simulation video to explain "scientifically" (why without spices?!) the blood stain pattern: III. FAZIT Both, wrapping together with spices never would have resulted in such an undistorted 2D projection image. And other "scientific" discussions are irrelevant as long there is no BIBLICAL evidence that Jesus was wrapped in something like the Shroud. The regarding biblical account is shown in a video presentation on my channel. Click icon W to the left-top of this comment. Watch and refute me where I am biblically-logically wrong. IV. SOURCES (a) Excerpt of STURPs 1981 final report: "Microchemical evaluation has indicated NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SPICES, OILS, or any biochemicals known to be produced by the body in life or in death. It is clear that there has been a DIRECT CONTACT OF THE SHROUD WITH A BODY, which explains certain features such as scourge marks, as well as the blood." (b) Channel: David Rolfe Shroud of Turin - How the Shroud wrapped the body (two parts - the links you can find on my channels' Playlist)

😂

Wow! "Light" I never thought of it that way.

& pray for the scientists who did not stay true … did not recant … 🙏🏼 🕎📖✝️

He has other, longer interviews on RU-vid.

Yes! They given permission to re-test the carbon dating after a discovery by two professors. The section originally tested was repaired by nuns 4-500 years ago. It surprises that he isn't aware of this fact as someone who studies the shroud professionally. Instead they're trying to make sense of misinformation.

see fr dalton on pints w aquinas, they go for 3 hours

The face cloth of Jesus is in Spain where it has been for the last 1400 years. It is known as the Sudarium of Oviedo.

You're not missing anything. The fact that this cloth exists in a single piece completely contradicts John's account. The pro-shroud ppl know this, so now they're making up stories about how there is another cloth that's supposedly out there somewhere. The "Shroud" is just a fake relic.

Blood can pasd through the face linen and mark the shroud.

One man's ceiling is another man's floor.

@@wet-read Just because a gold coin is worth nothing to someone, doesn't mean it's not gold and worth its weight in gold. If you don't care about the burial cloth of the literal Creator of heaven and earth become flesh, that's very much a case of a 'you' problem, since it is objectively something a creature of said should care about.

2000 year old toe rag ! 😂

@@michaelharris5370 The epitome of the fool - using the precious for the profane. Congratulations on being epitomically foolish.

That is so true and should be so easy for anyone with an IQ of higher than 50 or so to be able to understand.

@@beverlyhurd8556 I have great friends that are non-believers, Great people. They believe in science, but they will always find an explanation to debunk scientists when it comes to the shroud. Science is telling us the shroud is real.

@@duppyduppy01 Exactly! Thank God for science and scientist because over the last several decades around 100 or so scientists and other researchers and their _tens of thousands of hours_ of examination have PROVEN that the Shroud of Turin once wrapped the body of a beaten, scourged, and crucified man that died wearing a crown of thorns. Who else could this have been other than Jesus??

Interesting! Thanks for sharing. Peace friend. Maranatha

@mikewagner1614 I thought the same...peace to you my friend!