I coded one AI project EVERY WEEK with this SIMPLE tech stack 

Yep check the new video I released, I am gonna do more detailed breakdowns in my next videos🤝 Also you can access the source code for all 7 apps on my X account, its in the pinned tweet

Thanks man, glad you liked it! Yeah tailwind is optional tbh, don't need to use it

Vercel has automatic security again ddos attacks. Check this: vercel.com/docs/security/ddos-mitigation

Brother the stack I am talking about is to build personal projects, not production ready SaaS apps. This is the stack I used to build 7 AI projects in 7 weeks. I documented the whole process on my X account with links to the apps live, the source code, and everything. You can find it there. About "useState and useEffect", yeah for these projects, they cover the majority of what I need from React. Once someone understands how to use them, they can build most stuff they want. After that it's more about optimization, build custom hooks using them, etc. AI wrappers is a different story. It's not as simple. ChatGPT has integrated a chat with pdf feature a while ago, and yet these "Chat with PDF" wrapper apps still make a bunch of money even today (check pdf.ai - that guy makes something like 60k/mo, it's a solo dev). But many will get killed I agree. I think the only once who will survive are those that have good distribution and user engagement will stay. Distribution leverage is key here. The guy from pdf.ai is doing well cause he was one of the first in the market, has good domain, + hired influencers for tiktok marketing (so distribution).

WaAlaykum Assalam brother! How would you talk to it then when you are chatting with AI? To my knowledge there is nothing wrong, there are even references to companions using "you" on objects, like when Omar (RA) talked to the black stone saying its just a stone.

@@thecodebendermaster That is a very good point. I typically just make sure to refer to it in the third person by the name of the bot. The reason i avoid saying you is because from the robot's "perspective" it would be internalizing that as "he is referring to me" since they can technically "talk" or put out text. If there is a machine that can put out text like humans language, that's fine because it is all just a big mathematical translation of words into vectors and we know that. But if we also attach a kind of perspective to the robot that is able to put out language, it is close to imitating the creation of Allah. People like to say they have consciousness, and that's only because the robot can be trained to say certain things that sound human and an object saying "i" is definitely something that is unique to humans. You brought up a good point with Omar raddiAllahu anhu tho

you can check Vercel postgres or Supabase👍