@Jesus Is King Not necessarily on weed... We talking about people with not one drop of self-respect nor critical thinking. When you believe you're a "cosmic accident", there's no other living being you could rely on but amoebas and monkeys. From that point on, there's nothing substantial to talk about but striking a conversation with one human-size parasite.
@Jesus Is King May the Lord bless you even more than He already has. It feels my heart of joy listening from a perfect stranger what I've personally experienced. The whole Universe screams His existence. Take care of yourself and loved ones, brother!
Nice logic you got there. Ok let's get one thing straight, the science that claims to know how exactly the universe unfolded can't explain how Egyptians truly built pyramids or how amazonians made infertile soil fertile using manmade fertile soil. But they can still make the internet.
This stupid, the question is simple why are human the only intelligent things to evolve into humans. It's not like monkeys were only given this ability, every species should have that chance.
My point was that either we all descended from apes, or none of us did. It was the distinction that made it an intentional insult, regardless of whether it was trure or not
Sadly, I think some of the same things. Our understanding of chemistry and health, for example, has changed so often that I believe it's quite possible that there are some things we're wrong about today.
We are still wrong about things even using science. Science is the method of testing concepts about how the world works in a measurable way so that we can move closer to a more complete view of the world by identifying what isn't true. We benefit from the scientific method daily with how it has contributed to our electronics getting more powerful and complex, from satellites that allow us to use GPS, to the basics of having electricity and sanitation.
@@itsmidtrib1569 It's so sad that so many people think you either believe in religion or science, not both; one always contradicts the other. It's simply not the case. Religion and science aren't incompatible at all; they actually complement each other quite well, and the combination can utterly amaze those willing to do the research. I'm actually on both sides. I believe God set into motion the laws of science. I believe the majority of occurrences have a scientific explanation. However, there will always be things science cannot explain, and that's proof of God. Just my personal beliefs. No need for anyone who disagrees to use bad language in the reply comments. Let's keep it mature and respectful, people.
He makes a fair point in that 600 years ago people "knew" the Earth was flat; and people at one point also "knew" the Earth was the center of existence. I wonder what we "know" now that 600 years from now a comedian will make fun of.
@@charactersmoreorthree I know it is. The civilization that built The Great Pyramids of Giza knew of it; and they are from before the Younger Dryas cataclysm. That brings another point of human destruction and renewal which beckons that there's and ebb and flow in our understanding and manipulation of our environment.
@@kakarotlifted7302 we kept that knowledge no one said the earth was flat because it was simple to disprove. you just look at ships leaving the docks and how the body of the ship disappears before the mast.
@@remainhumble6432 Science can address only the material world, so it can say nothing either way about the supernatural. Science is a process for finding the best explanation of how the material world works given the available evidence. And biological evolution is the best explanation. You can have any supernatural you want on top of that, but any faith has to be able to accommodate science or it's in trouble.
@@jockyoung4491 not if science is trying to explain how something comes out of nothing naturally. That is plain ridiculous and makes a mockery of anyone that has a working brain.
@@remainhumble6432 There is no accepted scientific theory that says something comes out of nothing. Certainly not biological evolution and not even the big bang. We can't know where the universe came from scientifically. So you are free to believe anything you want about that. I am more interested in how the universe works than where it came from.
Be prepared.. ID is emerging. Darwinism is collapsing under greater scrutiny. So? So you're "education" is going to cost you a fortune and could very well be obsolete yesterdays news and it sure would suck if you're trained in something no longer valid. Keep an open mind. Best of luck.
@@ethanswimmer1287 Nobody has disproved evolution. Not even close. I have been studying evolution for 30 years, and I can assure you that it is still universally accepted among biologists. The naysayers are few and far between, and completely ignored. (and what are "specials"?)
@@realamerican1610 Right in front of you. We have over 250,000 species of fossils, all arranged in time and space showing transitional progression of specific traits, as can only be explained by evolution. No fossil has ever been out of place in a way that would make evolution impossible. And the clincher is that comparative genetics and embryology lead us to the same conclusions that seem obvious from the fossil record. The evidence has been conclusive for 100 years and more keeps rolling in every day.
@@remainhumble6432 You are free to make up an alternative theory. But to be viable, it should explain the evidence we have found as well as the theory of evolution does. Go on, write history.
Part of an Omnipotent Being's creation...but of course, its fantastic characteristics (seed) mostly falls into the "odd-beating circumstance" category.
@Richard Hopkins right they imagine we shared a common ancestor with apes without any evidence. There’s not a shred of evidence for evolution. It’s really stupid
@@chucklesdarwinwaswrongevol9264 yes there is dawg. Evolution has alot of evidence, you just don't pay attention and live in an ecochamber. explain convergent evolution. How do new species come after a mass extinction?
@@chucklesdarwinwaswrongevol9264 dude you are really dumb, you are purposely ignoring evidence because you don't want to believe it. You're clearly very biased.
I used to have an elementary school science text that essentially made fun of African explorers who claimed to have seen gorillas. In my opinion, we don't know nearly as much as we think we do.
@@Rose-cx9iz What about all those Europeans who left to colonize North America? Didn't they evolved into Americans? Yet there are still Europeans to that day. Same thing with wolves, the ones who were domesticated reproduced and slowly evolved to be the dogs we have now while the other wolves evolved to be the wolves we know today. Drastic environment changes, like domestication or selective breeding can lead to drastic changes and quicker speciation. Every creature that can reproduce on our planet "evolve", humans are still evolving. If you have children they are not your perfect clones, those changes, that's what we call "evolution".
@@Rose-cx9iz As I explained, we all constantly evolve by reproducing. Evolving doesn't mean there's drastic changes. You had a problem with wolves still existing while some of them turned into dogs and I gave you an explanation.
do you also struggle to understand basic science and instead prefer to think that you're the center of the universe and billions of galaxies with billions of planets in each of them were created just for you, one of the million of animal species on one of the planets?
Evolution is ADMITTED to be a theory sir, do you understand the the definition of theory? Furthermore, its not even a good hypothesis. Science is awesome, supports the unlimited infinite genius of God's handiwork. Do you honestly believe the scientific impossibility that nothing created everything? Do you honestly & intellectually adhere to the fallacy that inorganic matter (that came from nothing) suddenly came alive, and THEN reproduced? I have studied real science for alot longer than you have been failing at trying to intimidate people. There is a Creator whether you like it or not. Don't be a bully, especially about subjects that only embarrass you. Oh and btw, being the highest in the order of creation, which we CLEARLY are (any 5 year old could open their front door and tell you who has dominion over this planet) that does NOT automatically imply an issue of grandiose self-importance, but rather a hierarchy of responsibility, which is the opposite of self absorbed (like I said, if the role is executed properly). Now go waste your time else where and quit being punk to people who have done nothing to you (talk about arrogant, wow). Edit: And dont even try to bait me into some long RU-vid debate, there's not enough hours in a day for me to unbrainwash you, nor do you even WANT to be unbrainwashed... bcuz you WANT to believe how you do for your own self soothing reasons... I actually studied to disprove God and then ended up realizing how pathetically stupid that notion. I have studied long enough to have the equivalent of about 3 PhD on the subject, so I'm not the least bit intimidated, this comment was more for the sake of the person who wrote the original comment. And responding with a brash tone is normally not my style but I thought it was highly distasteful for you to arrogantly bully approach the person who made a harmless positve comment that apparently threatened your world view while you desperately try to keep your God-given innate truth suffocated. Leave people alone with your attitude and go do something positive. Again, don't bait me, waste of time.
@@Blessed.2.Teach.4God Though I disagree with the harshness of your tone, it's always nice to meet another science lover who found God. I always find it funny how non believers think God and science can't exist in the same universe, when in reality all science does is prove that a creator has to exist, now who that creator really is can be up for debate to some people. Another thing I have observed non believers think, is that they believe people who believe in God were raised and brainwashed to think this way and it really boggles their mind when a person says no they studied science and found God. Now there are people who believe in God and follow Him just because they were told to, but those people can be just as hard headed as people who don't want a God to exist, and to me those are the ones who are failing to take responsibility as we as followers are supposed to.
@@HandleUnclear I have said many times on here that science and God can coexist. Believing in God is independent of science, because science can't prove it either way. But science CAN prove biological evolution, and does so continuously.
@@HandleUnclear Yeah, I wasn't rude but certainly a bit firm bcuz I am so tired of non-believers acting like arrogant bully sharks with blood in the water simply to appease their own insecurities & desires... So tired of it, and feel as though some believers might not be able to defend themselves as well, so it really bothers me... I have never liked bullies in any arena. Thank you so much for sharing, really good stuff and right on point. Be Blessed & Be A Blessing!
You know there has to be a creator. Like Mark Lowry says....You can take all the parts of a watch, put it in a bag and shake it up for billions of years, but it will never become a working watch, unless it has a creator that can put it together so it can work. Same thing with the Universe.
@@jockyoung4491 Non sequitur argument. Chemicals cannot reproduce, yet the periodic table evolved with chemical evolution. Celestial bodies cannot reproduce, yet they are said to have evolved from other materials. Ask yourself this, since cells can only live for a couple of days, then when the first singled-celled organism allegedly spawned, where did it get the complex genetic code for asexual reproduction before it died? You need to learn the science that is against your belief system and then make an informed choice. Currently, you have made your choice without a complete knowledge of the science, evidence, and logic that debunks macro-evolution and supports the biblical record of creation and the global flood. Get the book, Origins, the origin of matter, space, time, and life. It teaches the science of the Genesis creation and global flood.
actually if you shook a bag of watch parts long enough you could get a working watch.... infinite is a real long time and infinite possibilities is a whole lot of chance.
Bubgum00 Well said 👍🏾 The issue people have with acceptance of the creator is not 'the acceptance of the creator', it is the commandments that follow and go against their little human egos, lusts and deprivation. A creator would mean the existence of the Almighty, formless eternal God - that would mean a code of life with spiritual purpose and the separation of right from evil...and that would mean far less scope for the plundering of this planet and the beings in it. Push atheism and make people miserably consumerist - there you go - catch them young, tell them they came from monkeys and sell them atheism- they'll buy the rest of the world happily to find 'happiness'. Peace
@@kaamranmohammad1584 How is that true? Why does a creator necessarily imply a moral code, purpose, or anything else? Why would the creator be formless?
Evolutions happen over millions of years when right elements coming together. Of course it's hard to understand or believe because we can't see them happening in front of our eyes.
@@de.vizion Of course, i do believe in god and his spirit in each and every creature, but at the same time i do believe that mother nature is capable of changing species to stronger and more advanced forms over long periods of time. I don't think humans were exactly apes but with bodies covered with hair, different sculptures, no language, and other factors, we could be considered as an ape family. 😄
I don't know about the Spirit of God in every creature. In an alternate universe, I would probably agree with you with the human-ape comparison except that in the Bible, we read that God created mankind in His Image and Likeness. The only One we should be seeking to draw similarities to is God. We can find our perfection (perfect reflection) in Him. God has made us to have dominion over all things on earth. I believe its time some people start to embrace this unique position The Creator has given us and the roles and responsibilities this comes with.
@@de.vizion You can't even give a coherent definition of what God is.. and calling it creation doesn't make it created, it's called reality.. Does reality need a realtor?.. Just so you know. We didn't come from monkeys... We are monkeys right now.. evolution as the only explanation for the diversity of life on earth.. cloud wizard magic, is not an explanation..it's an excuse dummies use when they are afraid to say I don't know.😋
@@de.vizion did you read the part about the hooker who climbed a building and cleared out a town with her box stink.. so full of wisdom.. that bible how else would I have learned bats are actually birds.. and we can settle disputes by having a magic contests.. oh and my kids are not unruly anymore because God told me to have my whole town kill them with rocks.. and I know exactly how to beat my slaves.. and how much it costs to rape a woman.. so much wisdom and moral authority 😂😂
I was a science teacher for 16 years. This guy is hilarious! However, I never taught evolution. But I could teach Chemistry--BOOM! Kids loved explosions--and learned a lot from them too.
@@omarsheriff51 “Mostly Christians” (Relativism, strictly reductive materialism, militant atheism or philosophical naturalism): “The belief that there was “nothing”, and nothing didn’t really mean nothing as there was no such thing as meaning, and then nothing much happened to nothing except nothing and then nothing suddenly magically exploded for no reason whatsoever, creating everything, and then a bunch of everything suddenly magically rearranged itself -- for no reason whatsoever -- into self replicating bits which then turned into something that meant everything. But ultimately it didn’t really mean everything or anything as everything is ultimately meaningless.” (Atheism) And they mock other peoples beliefs!! Yeah not dogmatic at all and perfectly “sane” and makes perfect sense!! About as much sense as your “mostly Christians” argument!!
@@omarsheriff51 “Mostly Christians” If evolution explains our ultimate origins and is the fundamental ground of reality and existence then how do you make the enormous leap from linear evolutionary adaptations and linear time constrained speciation to the fact that science has demonstrated that space/time is not primary or fundamental? Ouch!! According to the prominent philosopher and humanist Thomas Nagel… “In thinking about these questions I have been stimulated by criticisms of the prevailing scientific world picture... by the defenders of intelligent design. Even though writers like Michael Behe and Stephen C. Meyer are motivated at least in part by their religious beliefs, the empirical arguments they offer against the likelihood that the origin of life and its evolutionary history can be fully explained by physics and chemistry are of great interest in themselves. Another skeptic, David Berlinski, has brought out these problems vividly without reference to the design inference. Even if one is not drawn to the alternative of an explanation by the actions of a designer, the problems that these iconoclasts pose for the orthodox scientific consensus should be taken seriously. They do not deserve the scorn with which they are commonly met. It is manifestly unfair” (Thomas Nagel)
Guy harnesses the power of the Internet to explain that science is wrong because we're constantly learning from past mistakes and adding more knowledge to what we learned in school.
I believe in the Stoned Ape theory, the problem is most of the planet has stopped consuming mushrooms. We need to get back to that to keep searching for God.
Absolutely psychedelics when used properly can lead to different areas of enlightenment in life, but go back further and evolution gets much more ridiculous to believe in, because stardust evolving into single-celled organisms, and then those into fish, and then fish that could breathe air with legs to walk, those all were not getting high, and even if they were that only explains mental evolution and not physical evolution. Consciousness itself is the fundamental building block of reality which creates what we perceive as matter, not the other way around of unexplained atoms exploding out nothing to eventually randomly cause consciousness. It is more along the lines with the Alan Watts and Hindu philosophies of, we are all god playing a game of hide and seek with ourselves, just because hanging out by ourselves got boring or lonely. Even some scientists talk about simulation theory, the problem with that though is at some point there has to be a root core to existence and can't just keep passing the buck that the next layer of dimension over is the real one worth caring about. Dreams at night shows how the human mind can create an entire universe that we perceive as being real, so a more powerful god-mind could be creating this dream that lasts a lifetime, with more vivid sensations, and structured organization designed to keep ourselves from waking up, or wake up at a slow pace that is less of a shock to ourselves when we return to our true form to imagine a new reality to experience.
@@jackclimb3529 Sure reality is a simulation, it just isn't built on computer programming like the matrix movies, as the scientific version of simulation theory suggests, because then what are those computers made of, it can't just be infinite computer programs all the way down, was my point about that. Some quantum mechanics experiments show how conscious perception itself is linked to how other atoms behave.
I think when students ask their science teachers(or any teachers in general) they should not be penalized for it. As for the students they should also try to ask questions that actually contribute to the discussion and not be disrespectful(although as a student this one is quite hard if your teacher is a buffonish tyrant that doesn't want to be questioned smh). Being a smartass maybe funny but it robs you of the things and lessons you could learn in depth. Being a tyrannical and egotistical teacher may seem fun(or may you just have a problem and you're taking it out on the kids, who knows?) but you're wasting the opportunity of fulfilling your purpose: teaching the next generation. The best classes I had in college are the ones where the teacher answers question from the students and vice versa. I could only dream of such things when i was in high school.
Having a bigger brain means higher energy demand for an uncertain payoff. Plus you must be able to sustain that demand for the future of the species. Plus you need other element to fully leverage that such as prehensile appendage.
@@kingpopaul Wish there were more comments like yours in this theistic cesspool circle jerk about "IF we came from monkeys, how come still monkeys 'round?"... My sincere thanks for your knowledge's presence here.
You know, I came to the Dry Bar Comedy for humor, but didn't expect the comment section to more hilarious than the comedian. The vast amounts of sheer scientific ignorance in these comment threads is sickening to the point of hilarity. I like occasionally finding these gold mines of stupidity and lack of concern for understanding what has *ACTUALLY BEEN OBSERVED, TESTED, DEMONSTRATED, AND CONFIRMED* ... because I sometimes forget that pockets of this incredibly dense concentration of "I didn't learn it so it must be false, and I can't be bothered to learn now" still exists in some places...
Science is Stupid?...While talking into a Microphone!...With Lighting!....While being recorded on Video!...That is put on the Internet!.....I Love Comedy......
@@jockyoung4491 The comedian didn't require any qualifiers when the context obviously implies what he meant. But the original comment here is absolutely trying to imply that just because some science is legit that all science is legit, which is a false equivalency strawman argument.
We have a common ancestor with modern monkeys and apes. So long ago some primate ancestor group split likely due to the environment ( like some on South America and the other group on Africa) and over time the animals changed because the environment was different. It's like beetles that can be brown or green and the green ones live long enough to make green babies in leafy areas and brown ones get eaten, but brown beetles in the dirt survive to make babies and the green ones get eaten. So green ones and brown ones get so specialized to their area that they become different species.
It is fun to think about things in new ways. The problem with this guy is he makes fun of something he doesn't understand without actually trying to figure it out. That is why he doesn't like science. In science you have to actually follow through and ANSWER the questions, not just make jokes about them. Think of it this way. If some Americans are descended from English people, why are there still English people? Because they didn't ALL go to America.
I was waiting for a punchline about how he's just kidding about evolution, and recognizes science is how we improved humanity exponentially. It never came.
@David Canelas "...some [science] is just lies...to divert Human attention from higher powers...to maintain Human faith in the government which you know who controls." Evidence?
@David Canelas " the active cover-up of extra terrestrials, representatives of higher powers - in the name of 'national security" Please provide this evidence, so our leaders and armed forces can stop the coverup of these extra terrestrials and higher powers.
Jesus came so that we could join the creator of this magnificent planet we now live on. Although undeserving, He loves us that much to be apart of His Kingdom and continue to live in peace and Love after we leave our bodies. We must choose Him, Trust Him and reach out and grab what He has already offered. If we don't choose Him and reject His Love before we die, we will not receive His Love and will therefore perish. For in the absence of His Love and light there is only fear and darkness or worse. Don't test the fate of your future, come to know Him for He IS the Love that fills your heart. ❤
@@sharonsees5035 Think again. He was and is our only saving grace in this broken world. Ask Him to show you His peace love and grace. He is waiting and loves you more than you can even imagine. God bless. 💗
There was a moment in our 8th grade biology class when a student asked if some girl swallowed sperm..would she have to vomit a child in 9 months. Teacher was a bit shocked...and laughed a bit. The class broke out in laughter. Some science is good...some is bad. I believe God backed science is reliable. I believe that when we think we don't need to rely on God...bad things can happen. Reality.😇😎
@John D Arundel Jr High. 1986. I'm class of 1990. I got kicked out for pulling a fire alarm. Graduated in 1990 from Meade Sr. High school...but ..hey. Don't take my word for it. Jimmy Wagner and Mike Hill were in that class with Mrs. Lee.(teacher)... For those that truly care. (This was before Fakebook and Youboob) 😇😎
The lighting on the stage is from science . The fact that we could watch his act , on whatever device you are watching it from is from science .everything around us came from science .our cars , microwaves , planes , . So science iity s real
I don't get it..... Is he being a character or what is the joke? It's all of the good old Creationist talking points but they are at least 25 years old???
The education system failed everyone. It wasnt designed to make brilliant minds it was designed to make easily governed, taxable, unquestioning people.
@@kingbenjamin22 a good PE teacher needs to impart body mechanics, cardiovascular health, etc. All based on science. As such if you're a PE teacher and say science is rubbish, then you're a piss poor PE teacher. Seeing that you can't grasp such a fundamental component of education, you're a sad example of those left behind.
@@markc6714 Is that what P.E. teachers teach? Maybe you're unaware of a class called Human Biology or Anatomy- but I guess being left behind means I took those classes but you learned everything from your P.E. teacher- congrats on an incredible gym class!
I don't really know which comments you mean or which point you're talking about, but I'm sure everyone who's against "evolutionists" will leave you a like, even without specifying, so.. that's smart from your part.
@@timothydonohue "if you believe in evolution you're a moron"......... As compared to believing in sky fairies & all powerful beings....... Now that IS smart!
There are so many comments here with people who are actually taking him seriously. It's a bit, don't delude yourself about it. His goal is to make it funny, not to make it convincing or rational. The alternative explanation to evolution? An invisible wizard in the sky came down, built a perfect man, made a woman out of his spare rib, and then kicked them both out of a sacred garden for doing something he didn't like instead of, just, y'know, creating them without that desire? Yeah, I don't even need to write a bit to make it hilarious and stupid. If you have questions about evolution, you better have even bigger questions about your church. I'm fine with you being skeptical about evolution if you're twice as skeptical about your religion.
You know, that's exactly why a lot of people actually do believe in God. We've asked all of those questions both about evolution and God, and found out that ridiculing something we don't understand doesn't make it false. And embracing something that we've been told is true, despite a world of evidence against it, doesn't make it correct.
Wrong, evolution implies the change of species. Wolf and a dog are of the same species. Now, evolution would be true if a bird changed into a fish or vice versa.
@@canadianhotbod1 No, a bird turning into a fish would not be evolution. It would be silly. The theory of evolution does not propose anything silly, or it would not be so universally accepted.
