The Timeline of the Universe | Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains... 

Only by looking into the past can we understand the present. I'd appreciate the present in its entirety before trying to look or extrapolate the future

I'd rather know how we got here, than where we're going.

If we look into the future, we can understand what the past caused, and make the present our future.

@@pranavnath8732 "the present in its entirety" Cool, but I think the present is gone already. Ooops! There it goes again.

Past FOR SURE. Who wouldn't want to see The Library of Alexandria? Or the Roman empire? DINOSAURS AND NEANDERTHALS?!

That we live *right* at the point where the moon & sun are the same relative size in our skies, allowing us perfect lunar and solar eclipses, is not as miraculous as us all happening to cross world lines at the same time as N dG T. :D

@@jezlawrence720 - not perfect eclipses

Nigel deCrass Byron isn’t anything that you need.

💥🌟✨🎉😘♥️💜♥️💙🧡💚♥️

THINKING OF THIS EVERY TIME I WATCH THIS SHOW!!! ❤

"Laymen" (or, preferably, "laypersons"). 🙂

What a timeline to exist in!

Yeah and the JWT proves he is wrong. ( and an idiot)

Disagree. Sounds like he’s talking to a bunch of kids

On Religion, Neil twisted facts and was not fair to Islam when he talked about the 100 yard line... The Quran corroborate with the 100 yard analogy where it says; "Has there not been over man a period of time, when he was not a thing worth mentioning?” [al-Insaan 76:1].

@@Tech.Library how can man exist without a surface in which to roam? It took time for such a planet to come into existence and a framework of atmosphere, weather, vegetation and such before man can even take a breathe on the planet.

You're not learning anything 😅🤣😂 you're continuing your indoctrination 🤤🤪🤡

Same opinion here.

@@AttilaDuka So you're also indoctrinated 🤦‍♂️

Time, space and distance are independent of each other, space-time is a fabricated construct humans invented. If the universe were expanding at 186,000 mi./s from a Big Bang the unimaginable centrifugal forces of gravity would bend, crush or flatten stars, planets and galaxies into infinite density, expanding and imploding before time existed and the earth would be flat as a pancake. If space was curved gravitational waves would throw planets out of orbit, altering time as galaxies and planets ascend and descend gravity waves, cause gravitational lensing in the Hubble and James Webb telescopes. Gravity expanding at the speed of light would make gravitational waves scientifically impossible! Einstein was either an imbecile or a fraud. Big Bang theorists bring new meaning to the term Flat Earthers :-). A Big Bang singularity would expand, implode in all directions before time existed so obviously measuring time would be scientifically impossible as time would run forwards, backwards in all directions and would have no beginning and no end. Without a universal time, past and future events would be relative to distance, so time would be relative-imaginary depending on the observers vantage point. Einstein was either an imbecile or a fraud. It is scientifically impossible for a universe to create itself from nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing since nothing has no properties. Out of nothing nothing comes. Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. The speed of light and gravity are both 186,000 miles per second, if the speed of light slows with the stretching of space-time, gravity must also slow as well. Explain how the planets in our solar system can maintain orbits if the gravity from the Sun slows down. If the Suns light, gravity and images are in a past dimension of space-time using the same frame of reference, all the stars, planets and galaxies in the universe would have different coordinates than Earth and would thereby violate the law of conservation of energy also making celestial mechanics of solar systems impossible. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of space-time and an expanding universe would not be possible. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring :-). Time, space and distance are independent of each other, space-time is a fabricated construct humans invented. If the universe were expanding at 186,000 mi./s from a Big Bang the unimaginable centrifugal forces of gravity would bend, crush or flatten stars, planets and galaxies into infinite density, expanding and imploding before time existed and the earth would be flat as a pancake. If space was curved gravitational waves would throw planets out of orbit, altering time as galaxies and planets ascend and descend gravity waves, cause gravitational lensing in the Hubble and James Webb telescopes. Gravity expanding at the speed of light would make gravitational waves scientifically impossible! Einstein was either an imbecile or a fraud. Big Bang theorists bring new meaning to the term Flat Earthers :-). A Big Bang singularity would expand, implode in all directions before time existed so obviously measuring time would be scientifically impossible as time would run forwards, backwards in all directions and would have no beginning and no end. Without a universal time, past and future events would be relative to distance, so time would be relative-imaginary depending on the observers vantage point. Einstein was either an imbecile or a fraud. It is scientifically impossible for a universe to create itself from nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing since nothing has no properties. Out of nothing nothing comes. Magnetron Time is an abstract thought process of a conscious mind, where physical and nonphysical realities exist in a physical and nonphysical system called the universe. Is God Electromagnetic? sciforums.com/threads/is-god-electromagnetic.76891/?msclkid=536745d7b1bf11ec9e6fbe125fbe9860. Geniuses notice patterns or discrepancies that are not obvious to average minded people, they do not accept or take for granted things that other people do, they question why things are the way they are instead of following like sheep. "Intelligence sees the reality of what ignorance cannot, knowledge can be both painful and hilarious. While a fool follows others in the path of stupidity, a genius walks alone and laughs. Einstein Relativity 1=2 Fantasy Physics, Wave-Particle Duality, Photon, ... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0cjBdTwF6v8.html via @RU-vid (Part 2) Einstein Relativity 1=2 Fantasy Physics of Relative Simultaneit... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RVyjCQVvBRs.html via @RU-vid Special Relativity is Einstein's Biggest Blunder! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CcnyiLFqL-Q.html+via+%40RU-vid&feature=youtu.be The Scientific Evidence Against the Big Bang lppfusion.com/science/cosmic-connection/plasma-cosmology/the-growing-case-against-the-big-bang/ The Theory Of Everything According To Humans That Believe Their Intellect Evolved From A Monkey Brain www.academia.edu/79900784/The_Theory_Of_Everything_According_To_Humans_That_Believe_Their_Intellect_Evolved_From_A_Monkey_Brain?source=swp_share The first cells were simple so the nonintelligent process of evolution evolved life by adding millions more nonintelligent cells :-) This is like thinkin a TV will evolve if you bury a bunch of electronic parts in your backyard adding water, topsoil and Stardust. Explain how a nonintelligent unguided process with no eyes to see can evolve eyes without first having the concept of sight. Can you guess the reason why there are no blind brain surgeons :-) Once people been conditioned to believe an ideology all evidence to the contrary is rejected. Scientific evidence against evolution - the clash between theory and reality www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html B

@@michaelbariso3192 Lovely regurgitation of NASA

Thanks, Matt!

So essentially, mercury being in retrograde did actually affect their lives lmao

How to approach a question. I don't know how to say it like he does.

Thanks for watching!

Hear*

Rogan is polarizing and appeals more to the less educated. I’m just calling it like it is…

@@mattorr2256 Huh. I thought I did that. Thanks? 👍

I disagree. I love NDT, but there's too much inter- joking which wastes time. signed, Fido.

@@la-gl4uh i feel ya. With respect to your opinion, may i ask who you would rather tune in to for this type of info? 👀

@@IceMontgomery just watch them all like me! Joe Scott + PBS space time + Isaac Arthur

@@chrisgorgol9442 thanks Chris! Will do 😎

From an external viewer's perspective, yes. From our own, no we are just 'stationary'... But them you have to add our solar system's motion through the galaxy, and our galaxy's motion through the universe. I did see all that done recently. Damned if I can remember where! Maybe Veritasium? EDIT: It's Vsauce, here's the link. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IJhgZBn-LHg.html

Nobody asked

When the teacher’s seriously into it and you get the giggles during class…

And you want to tell them you love them one last time, but you can't.

Sunlight is 7 mins old. You probably can’t get current events using a telescope. Probably need quantum speed. For example, what you see on the computer screen is already behind what the CPU had already calculated and going to change it to in the next second. There could be advance SciFi aliens flying right in front of us but the light reflected back to won’t get to us for 100s of years.

You're the only one who thinks we haven't found microbial life yet

@@HopDavid ahan, got a example to quote?

@@HopDavid That's a tad harsh. Its usually topics outside astrophysics when, sometimes understandably, he typically displays his ignorance.

It’s more important for him to be entertaining and 80-90% correct than to be 100% correct. He’s not the guy building this stuff but he has to motivate someone to get into the field. I left the engineering field because it was too boring. Why not become an actor? But if someone had made it more exciting and fun for me, perhaps I would have stayed. That was the mistake for movies to give kids the impression that school is not fun, because then it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy where the kids don’t like school and the country declines like we have now. We could be a lot further ahead.

@@HopDavid have you not worked on a technical project? They get it wrong all the time which is why they test and redo. The whole scientific process is about constant failure to success. Yes , I’m glad you pointing it out that he is human and makes mistakes. And I’m just point that he is human and will make mistakes. So we are saying the same thing in a way. Just remember, don’t build your billion dollar company entirely based upon free RU-vid videos. Trust but verify.

@@HopDavid What do you have personally against him? You are everywhere obsessively badmouthing him. Your criticism doesn't even have anything to do with science either. I have read his paper as well as his books and they are exceptional to say the least. He worked with Brian Schmidt (noble prize winner). I have also attended seminar of people who work with him in Hayden planetarium. I'm a PhD student of spectroscopy and astronomy myself. I haven't seen a single evidence of him knowing any less than an average astrophysicist. Actually, the reverse is true. You don't go to Princeton and Harvard to do science simply by being an entertainer. There are plenty of those in all forms. Please resolve your issues for your own sake. You have an obsession.

Just put another JWT in front of the current JWT and it will magnify just fine ;) I suppose this is not "how much more of" than how / what can we measure when light is so "low" in energy if almost absent.

You can't see before the Dark Age, no matter the size of the telescope you're using. Because the Universe was so dense light couldn't go through.

@@RottenMuLoT that makes sense. I was thinking more of the cosmic microwave background, which I thought might also be visible in the infrared, but now that I think of it, I don’t even really understand what the CMB represents. I pictured it as something like a pressure wave from the big bang itself.

Well not necessarily you experience gravity all the time and you don’t bend 😑it’s the strange Nature of black holes ware gravity is being bent 😑

This needs to be pinned

@@jettmthebluedragon it definitely bends with other gravitational forces than just a black hole. Einstein' theory was completely tested and confirmed by a solar eclipse which he predicted correctly that light behind a star would bend around it.

@@The_SCPFoundation yea but did he say it was a shadow? 😐it’s not a soylar eclipse that’s not being bent that’s the thing he did not understand 😑their were no telescopes 😑but he did not realize everything we see looks 2d but in Reality it’s 3d 😑so NO it’s not gravity thats being bent from a soylar eclipse he did not Calculate the rotation of this planet he did not Calculate the moons orbit as well 😑 Solar eclipses happen when the moon is completely in line with the earth 😑also he did not understand how this planet can change its axis 😑and orbit witch is also factors 😑its like this you have this a sheet of papper make a circle in orange to say that’s the sun now in black draw the moon 😑that’s how Solar eclipses work it’s not gravity 😑it’s just shadows 😑

@@jettmthebluedragon what are you talking about? The solar eclipse is not the point. Smh the observation was done during a solar eclipse to confirm that light of other stars behind the sun will bend around the sun because of the gravitational force. Are you not aware of this historical experiment that helped change the scientific community? And yes they DEFINITELY HAD TELESCOPES during the 20th century. Even Galileo had telescopes!? Are you just randomly talking or you have no astronomy schooling to base your thoughts on

I agree lol Humans will blame anything but themselves when it comes to their mistakes or bad luck.

Right! A wink could be a million years when sentient beings are in the mix. Just have to stop thinking in linear time.

@@bonibroco1076 linear thinking is yhe very bane of pur existence though... life is going.. so time follows. Though it is time thats the master. Lol

I'm addicted to pigger nussy 😻

Alternatively, instead a false vacuum a perfect vacuum could have existed pre bang and always had , which might be an explanation for the acceleration of the expansion we now see as the vacuum tries to reach perfection again

True. I think consciousness spawned from generations of communications and our social ties to one and other, plus family ties really make a huge difference in our lifes. So i think after it became the norm for us to be around eachother. We begin to understand that we need parents to nurture us until we can do it on our own. We understand that we're connected once you notice someone needs help or you helped another. Just as chaos is the underlining fact of the universe, all it took was time and countless other variables for something to eventually happen. So i believe just as must time passed and generations of minds coming and going, where one mind began to think that its alive and began to share this probably very enthusiasticly to its other fellow humans. It couldnt of been an homogeneous experience, it had to be shared, explained, experienced, throughout humanity from 1 mind. Just as it probably took 1 spark to start the on-going chain reaction of our universe.

Try looking into metaphysics, you might find answers if you looked genuinely

Maybe by experiencing a non-physical dimension only then we can know

Time doesn't care about time.

Its the same with year 2020. A lot of people will tell you “it just flew by” or I don’t remember much...And the few things they remember is “foggy”. Something happened.

@@Cnupoc 😂

You know how they have an heat index, it's 80 degrees but it feels like 94 degrees. Maybe it's something like that but we haven't scienced it yet.

Working at a Cafe, I noticed a similar phenomena. There would be days where almost everyone ordered the same thing, or everyone would be impatient, or everyone would be withdrawn. It made me think, not that we have secret psychic connections, but rather we're all an extension of one thing, and it's overall mood effects us in our illusion of individuality. What are we if not matter that is self aware? Was that matter not all together in a single form originally?

Excellent question, wish the answer was available.

I imagine that would break a lot of physics we have today. So yes?

That’s what I mean 😑it’s only the (observable) universe NOT the whole universe 😑but I do know this for a fact space and time are infinite 😑and our dna is super determined so no matter how many times your atoms are created and destroyed what you are is who you will be forever 😑if the universe as a whole had a beginning it will end if the universe as a whole had no beginning it won’t ever end 😑 plain and simple

Same here, i will praise mr Rick Wayne over and over again because he has great skills, i started with $2000 and after 2week i received a returns of $6,000 then i continue with him ever since he has been delivering.

I heard a lot of investing with Mr Rick Wayne and how good he is, please how safe are the profit?

After watching so many RU-vid tutorial videos about trading was still making losses untill Mr Rick started managing my investment now, I make $6,800 weekly. God bless Mr Wayne. His been a blessing to my family.

He's on Telegram 👇

@Rickwayne0

Or Prof Chaos

@@HopDavid I think it's calculated using all dogs average age, like some humans can live 100 years or longer, but our average life expectancy is around 75-85 years old while dogs average around 7-12

Based on the earliest organisms on Earth appearing ~3.7bn years ago, or ~2.3bn years after the formation of the Sun (a 2nd/3rd generation star ~6bn years old) & 800mn years after that of the Earth (~4.5bn years old), presumably the same could have happened after the first stars were formed ~100mn years after the BB...

The big bang didn't happen, it was proven recently.

Actually kinda destroyed religion, 🤣🤣🤣