Studied Stan's work since 2008. As much as people want to believe, Stan NEVER had a car that he could just turn the key and drive. He made some amazing discoveries and did some incredible work but he never completed it. There were many problems that even he himself could not solve and still to this day have not been solved. Many want to believe it worked perfectly and use confirmation bias to support their beliefs that it did. Reality is the circuit has at least 15 variables that all have to be aligned/tuned correctly, if even ONE of those variable is off by a fraction it will NEVER work. Getting them all right is just the first of many problems to overcome but it still won't guarantee you success if you don't setup the initial conditions. Sad that the lunatics and conspiracy theorists drive away people from really looking at Stan's work as there is much more to it than he ever led on.
@@vmgzombie Yes. It's hydrogen powered not water powered. It did work and all that was in the tank was water but he never got it to where he could just turn the key and drive.
@@solutionrecruiter7130 Yes the whole thing was fun off of the car battery. I just meant it was never completed to the point that it was as reliable as modern day vehicles.
Stating the facts! Blind acceptance leads to a recursive duplication of secondary armchair speculation and manufactured documentation, that has literally been the largest "impedance" to everyone genuinely interested in following the research.
It was documented by the coroner that Stanly had a brain aneurysm. I am a doctor and I would like to point out anyone having a brain aneurysm would immediately put his hands on his head and complain of severe pounding head pain. Stanly did not do this, instead he immediately after the first sip, suddenly gets up as if he's gone crazy, he holds his hands around his neck, loses his breath, runs out into the parking lot, collapses to the ground stating his last words “they poisoned me”. We must understand His invention would have destroyed the entire oil industry.
@@1963Jazzy Look how much the economy is collapsing with the sudden cutoff from russian blood oil. You can see why a man with a plan for the future of automobiles jeopardized the entire lifestyle for these corrupt oligarchs.
He got the patent and showed off the car in 1990, got sued in 1996 for fraud, and died in 1998. Why would "they" let him live that long and let him sell the technology to investors? Why would his patents still be easily accessible?
I don't hear of anyone in the electric or hydrogen car industries getting poisoned for undermining the petrol industry. Even though they're literally selling commercial products that do just that.
That's because they have worked out how to market it through carbon offset and installing charging points into fuel stations which have very little production cost compared to oil shear profit after you take out the cost of electricity and let's face it they also produce the fuel that the power station uses so win win for the oil company it's just taken the time to work out how to make it profitable
I'm pretty cynical when it comes to suppression of information. What gets out, what gets pushed down. This story sounds exactly like the old canard about "the carburetor that could get a car to 60 miles per gallon, in the 1960s!!"
@@TommytwotimesTightlips I can tell you're an intellectual so let me explain. Did Stanley Meyer exist? Yes. Did Stanley Meyer die? Yes. Did Stanley Meyer have a car? Yes. Could Stanley Meyer's car operate as claimed using only water? No. Did the US government kill Stanley Meyer to suppress his car technology? No.
That's not true. I can light a bonfire by striking a match releasing more energy output than the energy used to strike the match. 13.56 water electrolysis is the same way. It makes water viable as a fuel source. John Kanzius demonstrated this on his local TV news channel before he died from cancer in 2009. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4fYc_MRG2wM.html
Long story short: That car required more energy generating the hydrogen than the hydrogen it generated could provide. To "make it work" he had to keep charged batteries onboard the car to generate the hydrogen, and once those was discharged, no more hydrogen. In other words: A very inefficient electric car with extra steps.
@@dentonthomas5622 Of course. What I meant is that it requires batteries and water in order to produce the hydrogen. Hydrogen is then used to run a modified combustion engine, but the end result is that it needs electricity by feeding it externally or by charged batteries essentially making it an "electric vehicle". Hence what I said at the end: A very inefficient electric car with extra steps.
@@sysghost yes I know..... I have been studying this..... I know it can work but you need the hydrogen in a highly compressed tank. The Japanese have done this and made a race car. I think it burns more of the hydrogen than it would the gasoline to get the same power though. But in my research....something seams off. Like this technology is being suppressed. I've heard rumors that this guy's patents were changed before being released. Making it seem like it wouldn't work. Without gas and oil the economy would be dead. Same as the bob lazar story with propetual motion using element 115 as a fuel. Powering gravity amplifiers to move any where you want to go. Maintenance free. Yeah.....there would be no economy.
The first question is there even a way to generate HHO gas from water using less power than the gas produced according to Faraday electrolysis. Faraday electrolysis produce approximately 0.0105 L/min pf HHO gas using 1.23 watts of power.
it doesn't matter what you think you know. the man was screaming they poisoned me right before dying means he was reap close and big oil Corp does not want ro lose trillions.
An alternator can average just under 1500 watts. Multiple alternators would allow for more efficiency, I you wouldn’t be able to recoup losses, obviously, but we’re not trying to make a perpetual motion machine. We’re trying to make an efficient car
@@brandonmiller9155 I am dismayed at the inability of people to comprehend the simple principle of the second law of thermodynamics. What do you think powers the alternator in a car....its driven from the crankshaft of the engine. An alternator is fairly efficient but it still has losses, belt friction, inertial mass of the rotor etc. Even at 90% efficiency its losses are 150 watts, that means you are taking 1650 watts of power from the crankshaft of your engine. When you use the 1500 watts from the alternator for electrolysis that efficiency is only 60% maximum its more like 50% in the real world. That means you have produced hydrogen gas that has an energy of 900 watts. When you feed that into your car engine as fuel you now have to deal with the problem that the car engine efficiency is only 25% that means you are only adding 225 watts of power to the crankshaft. Do you see the problem, you are drawing 1650 watts of power from the crankshaft to produce hydrogen that when burnt as fuel only supplies 225 watts of power back into the crankshaft. You have a net loss of 1425 watts. This is why you can never run a car off water, its impossible. For the same reasons an under the hood electroliser powered by the alternator will never give you better fuel economy, it doesn't matter how many alternators you use. This is also the reason why commercial hydrogen is not produced by electrolysis, it requires too much electrical energy which makes it very costly.
Theoretically, you could build concrete out of “air” (subatomic particles) by smashing together until you get sufficient silica and other elements. The problem is we’ll probably have enough concrete by the time of the heat death of the universe to match modern day output.
A water powered car sounds amazing and I can see why oil and car companies and the ominous "they" would want such an inventor dealt with. As someone who has studied chemistry though, I know that isn't how water works. You need to input more energy than you get out. Ripping apart H bonds takes a lot of energy.
Also one big issue with direct burning of hydrogen is the fact that an ICE is at best 30% efficient, so he would have to have produced 70% more hydrogen than the engine would have outputted in actual power. So the conversion would have to be 170% efficient at least to produce enough power to actually drive the car.... Another big problem is an ICE wouldn't just produce water vapour from the exhaust... It's releases high levels of no2 as does any modern engine burning ANY type of fossil fuel.. This can be reduced using modern exhaust systems BUT a VW engine designed in the 40's definitely didn't have..
For short: His claims were proven fraudulent by a court in 1996, his death was because of a celebral aneurysm and his supposed water fuel cell violated both the first and second law of thermodynamics
@@saramorin4792 No conspiracy theorists are people with no evidence to what they claim, often with contradictory evidence to their "theory". For example do you actually have any evidence for your claim that he was murdered? You said it was a fact.
@@katkit4281 conspiracy theorists definitely do have evidence when they prove stuff but its called conspiracy theory just to prove false the facts that they present
Back in the mid 1990's I was introduced to someone who had built the "perpetual motion machine" using magnets. It actually had a hidden battery with electromagnets. Sometime after I was observing a demonstration of a "water powered" engine It was a small engine on a square base ( hidden fuel tank" that ran on some kind of hydrocarbon fuel that smelled like liquid butane. A clear tube would be filled with water and it had a metal line connected to the carburetor but it actually went to the muffler. People thought it actually ran on water and he was careful to not let anyone examine it closely. I was able to get access as it was locked in the storage room at the college where I worked. I have been using alternative fuels for decades like wood gas, coal gas, plastic to diesel and waste vegetable oil to this day. All "water powered engines" are a scam.
A side statement is imagine how quickly water would run out. We would be in big trouble because oil is just as precious as water. We use water for everything.
1 of the issues nobody not even stan put into the mix was the emulsification of water/oil as the hydrogen turned into water vapor under extreme temp/pressure it doesnt take long before the water infused into motor oil reduces lubricity to the point of uselessness it can be somewhat mitigated but never truly resolved because the nature of hydrogen waste production i.e.water. that said it is ideal for a different configuration but nobody wants to talk about that
Interesting how the unknown is defined as impossible until it is possible. The argument it can't be done is the greatest enemy of progress and advancement. I am not saying the car did or did not run on water, what I am saying is that the largest mass of medical and technological advancement ever came in WW2. If you doubt this, ask a historian, or do the research yourself... the motivation for advancement in scientific knowledge was unshakable and because of this, many things once believed to be impossible are used on a daily basis. It can't, it won't, it's impossible, these are all excuses to avoid change and advancement.
@@allthecrazy6350 It's of course fine to ask questions in general and to dream from new technologies. But it's a different story to basically argue for a perpetuum mobile that would break the law of energy conservation.
Not saying it works but seems that would only be a problem for short drives where the engine couldn’t get up to temp and boil the water out of the engine.
Everybody loves a good conspiracy but the most mundane explanation is usually the right one which in this case is that the technology didn't work. The only question is whether he knew it from the beginning or only after he had tried hard to make it work. I would hope for the latter.
There have been no shortage of people throughout history who claimed to have discovered world changing technology, only to be exposed as frauds. Stanly just wanted to make full use of the opportunity to promote his technology by pretending that there was a conspiracy against him.
I'd really like to know what your take on Aaron Salter JR. Is now that he's dead aswell. He also told he had a water powered engine and was just killed in a shooting .
@@ChrisVSCars Someone said it used frequencies to split the water and although I doubt it worked, maybe it’s possible to tap into some great source of relatively useless energy as to not break any laws of thermodynamics? May be possible, idk
@@Cautionary_Tale_Harris I don’t actually think it would work at all, but we have done many things that seemed impossible. I highly doubt we can get around conservation of mass. But yeah the matrix power system is terribly inefficient lol
"Stanley Meyer's invention was later termed fraudulent after two investors to whom he had sold dealerships offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology sued him in 1996. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed.[2] His "water fuel cell" was later examined by three expert witnesses[who?] in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis." The court found Meyer had committed "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered him to repay the two investors their $25,000.[2]"
@@goodwinter6017there’s no actual evidence he was murdered. Why are you acting like that’s an established fact? People die from aneurysms naturally all the time
In my opinion I don’t think Stanley Meyers would have gone to the major automobile manufacturers to present his invention if he knew it didn’t really work because they would’ve figured that out pretty quickly just saying!
Many inventors will pour their soul into an invention and then present it complete enough to work or assembled enough to demonstrate the concept. It doesn't have to be so cut and dry. They want their name out there. They want people to notice what they are doing. Sometimes this results in a institute or educational agency saying "hey I like what you are doing, let me pay you to do more of this". Thomas Edison was an absolute laughingstock with all his useless junk patents and failed inventions until....he got it right and invented the lightbulb.
Actually they probably wouldnt have, at least he was hoping they wouldn't figure out it was a non starter quickly enough to block him getting some kind of payday out of it.
Unless he was bullshiting to get a payoff to keep it out of public hands. He probably thought they'd be desperate enough to get a huge payday from, and they wouldn't notice until it was too late. But I don't know lol
@@eliotjohnson8851 going back and forth you will always lose energy due to entropy and heat. Spending energy to break bonds and then getting energy back to reform those same bonds is wasteful. It also won't do anything if you can't harness/convert that energy and get it to actually move tires. That is why the water car supposedly uses hydrogen combustion which still runs in to the same problem of not being efficient if the hydrogen is gotten from electrolysis. You'd be better off skipping out the middle man entirely and having the batteries spin the wheels directly instead of consuming energy to rip apart the molecular bonds in water and then more energy to combust the hydrogen or reform the water. Because reforming the water still requires energy to do so, the activation energy, even if energy is released at the end.
@@indiana47 I understand that the process already is massively inefficient, and that electric cars are far better. My point was that no matter how efficient you make the system, you can never run an engine on water.
Same thing happened to a scientist that invented a car that could time travel, but something happened he flipped out and the flux capacitor that made time travel possible ended up being destroyed for the better of humanity…
... 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Hysterical funny... Oh he never got that damn head gear to work, I think it was the Thought Reader 🤔 ...A lot of people are saying. ....like Everybody ’s talking about it. ...They are saying that aliens who visited in the past, like the Asgards, used that device on Charles Manson and his posse 🙄 That's what I've been hearing 🤔
Ya... makes sense because a "corners report" couldn't possibly be faked or influenced by an extremely powerful industry. The corners report will say whatever the government wants it to say.
Yeah. They're so powerful they've infiltrated schools so children can discern between a corner and a coroner. You're lost in a sea of conspiracy and judging from your syntax you don't have the mental facilities even if you weren't a mind rotten fool by default. In short, try reading more.
One question: If it doesn't work, why would anyone poison the poor guy??? Why would he be poisoned, for what, (and he was definitely poisoned), will anyone ever know? If they have power to murder people with no consequences, you naively think they cannot just modify his drawings before giving to the public or just keep some material top secret?
Someone doesn't understand basic physics lol. Why would you think he was murdered other than because there are internet rumors? His autopsy showed no such thing.
This situation, including all these comments on utube, (like yours, btw) demos that a very large percentage go thru elementary schools w/o ever acquiring the basic tools with which to think rationally These days, these schools are little more than just glorified, state run, baby sitting operations Your comments here were monumentally irrational.
@@famaccount479 So what he committed suicide? or just suddenly died roght after doing somethinike this? Because it was the same type of news when someone misteriuosly falls out of the window. Cannot be a coincidence
I'm watching the movie "Chain Reaction" from 1996 with Keanu Reeves right now and looked this up just for fun, appreciated your video. Keep up the good work! Wishing you a successful future.
The car was actually re invented in Canada first, which goes with the story of it be relocated to Canada. Australia and just recently in the Middle East. His technology might have or have not been completed. But it's not impossible. Nothing is. At one point we as humans thought it was impossible to fly to the moon. Who thought we would have electric cars in the 50s? We don't fully understand everything. Once we believe we do is when we stunt our growth.
Electric cars existed before gasoline cars. People theorized going to the moon decades before rocket propulsion was practical. What you are talking about here is on a different scale. Those other things were theoretically possible, but impractical before their time. Overunity is impossible without changing the laws of physics. I don't mean changing them one time, I mean that violating the conservation of energy means the laws of physics are changing with time while you're doing it. Even if it weren't impossible,it would be a staggeringly bad idea. Read about Noethe's Theorem if you want to understand why overunity means the laws of physics are changing with time.
The problem with this conspiracy is that his claims defied the laws of psychics, and that's the reason no major corporations have resumed his work. His patent has expired, all of the information is in the public domain and if anyone wanted they can resume his work. The concept defies the first and second laws of thermodynamics. It simply would not work. Like with most conspiracy theories, people WANT it to be true. There are always people who need to believe there is always hidden motives going on. When you research anything, 9 times out of 10 you will find what you want to believe.
And before You come back hard at Me hear this. I was a 23 year old doing a Rolls-Royce Dart Engine Training Course in Derby, England in 1977 when I thought I saw a shortcut to the 30+ year old "Installation Power Declaration Procedure". Raised My hand and suggested same to the lecturer. He stared at Me in silence for about 10 seconds then went on with his lecture. Major twittering ensues ! Fast forward to a Year + later when after 4 full days of unsuccessful "Ground Running" of an installed engine I asked My Chief Engineer to try out My Idea. 2runs and 18 minutes later the job was Completed! Rolls-Royce was informed of said "alternative procedure" at a Rolls-Royce Dart Engine Operators' Conference in Manaus,Brazil late 1978. By March,1979 they'd incorporated it into their Official Maintenance Manual as an "Alternative Procedure" ALL OPERATORS Worldwide started using it and at Rolls Royce I heard the talk was "How Come none of Us ever thought of that"! So outside the box thinking CAN sometimes have Great results, despite initial rejection by ALL the "Experts"! So,My boy,My motto is "Never Say Never"! Just Sharing from personal experiences. Right Now I'm working on a 3500:1 odds 5 line Sports Betting Accumulator; missed by one goal recently (an Own goal to boot😠) Cheers,and remember, what We take for granted today was thought Impossible/ impractical a generation ago! 😀👍😎
There is no such a thing as general law of physics, we don't yet know how physics fully work, we have only set some scientific laws on what we already know and we think is right but that doesn't mean there is something else out there that we don't even realise. I mean look at the recent congress hearing on UAPs, this is proof that we don't know shit.
@@oswaldjames5332 Agreed...any 'laws' of thermodynamics were made by man - at a point in time, so surely there are potentially new 'laws' that can be made if there's evidence to suggest those laws may not be the be all and end all.
@@damped6242 You have no idea what you are talking about. We don't speak about some new quantum physics phenomenon that isn't fully understood. The law of energy conservation is an elemental part, proven countless of times and it is widely used day by day in many industries while all attempts to build a perpetuum mobile failed. Its like suggesting a new discussion if the earth is really a globe or actually flat.
One of the new things I've seen on RU-vid is the addition of a special "HH+" compound to the water, which supposedly increases the efficiency of electrolysis to the point where it requires less energy than is produced by the recombination of hydrogen and oxygen. The real funny thing is that the videos then show the gasses being recombined in slightly-modified gasoline generator -- which is not exactly the most efficient way of producing electricity. The electrolysis efficiency gains provided by that HH+ compound would have to be immense. It's ridiculous.
Doesn't matter what intermediate magical stages you insert, the binding energy is what stores the chemical potential energy and that can't release more when combining than the splitting takes.
Here is the point. There is no point in being adversely skeptical. if someone makes a claim you don't need to say it is possible or impossible. You just need to stand in a superposition. If new evidence comes about then you might go one way or the other. No need to say: THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE even if you are an expert in the field!
He was murdered OK second of all if they come up with that is because they sold his invention and then murdered him … they took his idea, murdered him and used it for the future. It’s plain anybody can see the truth.
Except for anyone that understands basic physics his invention didn't work hence why he was sued by his investors and lost. Sorry but what you claim should be plain to anyone just shows who the science illiterate people are.
How refreshing! A person who actually has faith in the fact that MOST human beings just want to survive, live in peace, keep the planet livable, and get on with living their lives. The amount of conspiracy theory in the world today is deeply concerning. It's time for the sensible moderates to take back the reins and get on with thinking rationally.
The oil companies are getting their karma soon. Inflation for cars are on the rise and no one can afford to own maintain and especially repair a car on minimum wage let alone $18 an hour. It’s not an affordable transportation. People are starting to get sick of maintaining and paying for car repairs that take out all of their savings and more people such as myself are leaving the suburbs and going to places that are more walkable as cars are not an affordable source of transportation anymore.
Just because someone says something does not make it true, how many times have we heard lies to cover the real truth. People need to wake up and start thinking for themselves
This my opinion in which I use logic to explain my theory. JP Morgan was behind a lot of the early pioneers in the early electricity era. Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse were providing electricity to mansions in NYC for the wealthy like JP Morgan. The problem was that DC or direct current electricity was not practical as DC current couldn’t travel but very short distances and both Edison and Westinghouse thought AC or alternating current wasn’t possible! Now comes the earlier version of Stanley Meyer who is Nikola Tesla was a bigger electrical genius than both Edison and Westinghouse. Tesla had a contract if he could create AC electric for Westinghouse he would get paid a fee for every kilowatt of electricity that Westinghouse sold and Tesla invented the transformer and now electricity was capable of traveling long distances and everyone in the developed world would have electricity if they wanted it. Westinghouse screwed over Tesla and basically paid Tesla nothing for his transformer invention. What else was Tesla working on was wireless electricity which sounds completely crazy but not more crazy than Stanley Meyer splitting the 2 hydrogen atoms and the single oxygen atom to create a water fuel cell to use hydrogen to power a vehicle. Now back to JP Morgan and how JP Morgan and the military industrial complex are basically the villains of this theory I have. Tesla created wireless electricity and proved it works. JP Morgan said he can’t put a meter on something that it wouldn’t be sold. Stanley Meyer’s water fuel cell can’t be metered either. JP Morgan’s wealth and power basically did whatever he wanted to do to make Tesla out to be a crazy lunatic and everyone knows there’s a little truth to that as the worlds smartest people think completely different and we look at geniuses as being a bit nutty! Thomas Edison didn’t comb his hair because he thought it wasn’t something that he thought was necessary to live a normal life. The military industrial complex is a bunch of JP Morgan’s and they are making trillions because everything they do is based some sort of fossil fuels. The other thing is the wealthiest companies have purchased many patents that would hurt their bottom line. The electric car has been around before the gasoline powered cars. The early electric cars were used in the city as ambulances and police vehicles. The problem was the battery was the biggest issue. I believe Stanley Meyer’s water fuel cell would have made him public enemy number 1 to big oil! Just like Nikola Tesla was public enemy number 1 to Edison, Westinghouse, and JP Morgan. The US government has stolen many people’s patents in the name of national security. Technically they take the patents because the money they are given by the corrupt is more important to them. Watch Dr. Stephen Greer and how he explains the UFO phenomenon and why it’s such a big secret and you will understand why people are killed or bankrupted over world changing technology. The US Constitution first and foremost covers the right to greedy capitalism over the rights to improve our world and make it a safer more equitable place! Even politicians that claim they want equity and inclusion are lying to us. They want the money to blow it on equity and inclusion rather than just implementing the policies that would create a much better world.
He wasn’t the first one murdered. In the 1930s a guy showed dropping a little white ball into the gas tank of his model a Ford and filling it with water and drove away it was the only video ever known to exist which it in his self disappeared 20 years ago. This man disappeared without a trace without trying to sell his invention just gone. Stanley had been approached many times about his invention by the oil companies and he refused their offers and then he died. His last words were,”they poisoned me. There have been a few people since then that have been able to build cars that would run on water using fuel cells and other means, inventions devices and they all have disappeared. Only recently have hydrogen powered cars started to hit the market, but if you check it out you will see where the United States government has been stalling And making it very difficult for hydrogen cars to be marketed.
He got the patent and showed off the car in 1990, got sued in 1996 for fraud, and died in 1998. Why would "they" let him live that long and let him sell the technology to investors? Why would his patents still be easily accessible? Just looking a the chemistry side of things, when you are burning something, you are oxidizing it. Water is hydrogen that has already been oxidized just like carbon dioxide is already oxidized carbon. The standard chemical equation for fire is Fuel + Oxygen = CO2 + H20. We know that hydrogen and oxygen are the two most flammable gasses but water is not flammable. Water is already "burnt"
Stanley Meyer was a good man trying to accomplish something good for humanity and came far with that. Brilliant man who passed away to early. Rip Stanley
It’s simple. The government will always take care of the large corporations and this could have closed down those businesses if he had been able to finish. Also, water is not an easily taxed commodity. That would take control away from the government. I mean, imagine filling your car with rainwater or rivers.
The information below is derived from the work of genius twin brothers Stanley and Stephen Meyer.Many years of study,reading 42 patents and endless hours of Meyer lectures, documentaries and radio shows gives me the chance to show the heart of their research. If you want to run your car on water then this is a viable and realistic set of stages to go through to achieve such a goal.. First you must ask yourself why has it not been done in this day and age..A car combustion system that can access the large amount of energy available in electrolysis gas from water. It is commonly known as Faraday electrolysis. It has high mass conversion losses. Mainly heat.This process alone is a poor option as an engine will not produce enough electricity output to power an electrolysis unit to supply enough gas from the water to realistically cover the car engine's energy requirements.. Many have tried electrolysis gas production methods with very limited success. So what are the steps to rethink this problem?.. Step 1 Striving for a highly efficient electrolysis cell is the first step. Your electrolysis cell will not make enough gas to keep the engine running from the car's electrical output.But this is the first step.And the more efficient you make your cell. Be it through the physical construction or efficient driving circuit,or both Step number 2. As in step number one you can make gas from your electrolysis cell. This gas fuel starts as water and is converted to gas. The gas is fed into the combustion zone where the second conversion takes place..In the second conversion the gas is converted back to water,with a given amount of energy release.This is the water to gas and gas to water conversions or energy states. Step three. We know by now that the first conversion.Water to gas is energy intensive and has a large amount of losses.This is where many hundreds of hours have been spent by people trying endless ways to improve the efficiency of electrolysis. Without taking into account they are dealing with not one mass convention in making the gas. But two mass conventions. Water to gas and gas back to water. This second energy conversion has been mainly overlooked by the majority of people studying in this area. So we must take a closer look at this second conversion to see if there are any ways of improving the reaction efficiency at the point of combustion.. Step 3 Conversion factors for gas to water. It is not well known that the conversion factors for gas to water with an amount of energy released through combustion.This only releases one millionth of the available energy that is in the gases. That is having their mass converted back to water. This is a chain reaction and is quickly shut down and reaches a stable state. The chemicals involved hydrogen and oxygen reach a stable state achieving mass conversion gas to water H2O. At this point the available mass to energy window is closed. By converting the gas back to water..This water should be then looked on as a waste product of the combustion event.. Step 4 What could be done to reduce this waste byproduct (water). In theory if you had a 100 percent conversion gas to explosive energy during the second conversion. You would not have any waste. All the gases would be burnt and there would be no byproduct water post combustion.. Step 5 How can this be done? How can we access this chain reaction event and improve its efficiency. If we could improve this mass conversion, just a fraction of a percent. This would vastly reduce the gas input needed. To attain the amount of energy required to run the engine..Less gas is what you will require as opposed to, insufficient gas is the problem. Note! Yes, correct Faraday electrolysis makes a gas that you can only access one millionth of its energy through combustion.… Step 6 How do we look at this inefficient combustion process and make improvements?.. (Chemical reactions!) Improving combustion to burn more of the available gases. This step is key! What is going on during the combustion moment? Ignition occurs.This sets off a chain reaction that will convert the gas mass back to a liquid mass.(Water). In turn with an amount of explosive energy. As we already know the explosive energy only accounts for one millionth of the possible available energy in the gas fuel. So how do we come up with a system to access more energy from the given amount of fuel? Step 7...Controlling the combustion event to access larger amounts of energy that are available.. This is done by controlling the combustion moment and extending the chemical reaction in a way to prolong energy release from the gas as it turns to water. One must note. Is a combustion engine not a pump. It creates a vacuum at the input manifold and creates a positive pressure at the exhaust manifold. Hydrogen and oxygen from water is the perfect fuel.Two parts Hydrogen to one part Oxygen.This is the perfect fuel to oxidiser ratio needing no other elements for combustion just fuel with oxidizer. To achieve control of the combustion event you have to control and minimise contamination from other elements. As said above hydrogen and oxygen is the perfect fuel to oxidiser mix. Something that is mostly unknown about is.The combustion engine can be fueled with hydrogen and oxygen and have the intake manifold completely sealed off. This creates a permanent vacuum in the intake manifold. With the hydrogen and oxygen being delivered into the engine manifold vacuum. An engine like this can be seen in demonstrations online videos.. So now we have hydrogen and oxygen and no other gases at the combustion event.This makes control of the event less complex. Step 8 How do we make a tool to act upon this simple chain reaction? Now we get into atoms and molecules. Is it not true an oxygen atom is 16 times the size of a hydrogen atom. In turn having 16 times the attraction force over an electron than the hydrogen atom. This my friends is your tool to affect the combustion event. Question is ? Can we prepare and add oxygen atoms in such a way to the combustion event to improve energy release by way of extending the chain reaction. Yes this can be done. First you have to have a way to remove electrons from the Oxygen Atom. Oxygen can be held in a stable state with up to 4 missing electrons by adding the correct light wavelength energy. Removing the electrons can be achieved with the use of a low pressure plasma reactor. A low pressure plasma reactor will act upon ambient air gases,oxygen,nitrogen,etc. In such a way to bring the constituents of air to what is called chemical resonance.Chemical resonance is a highly charged state whereby elements stop holding on to their electrons and electron sharing occurs. If you can take ambient air gases to chemical resonance. You are halfway to removing electrons from the oxygen atom. Step 9.Removing electrons from oxygen during chemical resonance. A plasma reactor consists of two stainless steel electrodes and quartz glass tube. The anode is positioned on the outside of the quartz. And the cathode is inside with a 1mm gap from the quartz. This gap is where the gases are worked upon. In the low pressure plasma zone. When in use this reactor has an amount of capacitance this is including the charged gases being held at chemical resonance.The gases become part of the reactor circuit capacitance.This capacitance could be considered to be like a single cell of a battery. It takes on capacitance and in turn can be discharged when the power input has stopped. When discharging the reactor's capacitance it is possible to reduce the mass of the plasma excited gases by way of discharging the reactor to a resistive load.. When reactor discharge is engaged the mass of the gases are reduced through a loss of electrons. Oxygen with up to four missing electrons is produced. These gases can be held in a stable state by way of red 660nM light. The low pressure is maintained in the reactor by the engine intake manifold vacuum. It is connected directly to the sealed off intake manifold. Step 10 How does mass reduced Oxygen atoms extend the opening of the chain reaction window during combustion. Well remember that the big oxygen atom has 16 times the attraction force compared to the Hydrogen Atom. This is where the Oxygen does work for you. When these processed Oxygen Atoms are added to electrolysis gases Hydrogen and Oxygen during the combustion window. They have such a large attraction force they will overcome the Hydrogens ability to hold on to its electron. And in so forces the Hydrogen to give up its mass to energy. This interaction during the combustion chain reaction causes more mass to be converted and opens the chain reaction window giving access to more than one millionth of the available gas energy. This in turn reduces the amount of byproduct,water in the exhaust.. By adjusting the mixture of fuel and processed gases. Mass reduced Oxygen. You can now vary not just the gas fuel input. But you can vary the amount of explosive energy per unit of gas fuel. Stanley Meyer used this method and perfected this fuel gas mix. He reduced the amount of electrolysis gas needed to very small amounts.The water fuel injector was the pinnacle of his achievement regarding using water as fuel. -Copypaste from a person from other video, I also personally want to say that Meyer's car is gone, it hasn't been since he was transported to ER, can somebody say something about this?
You have to understand. His car would of been on demand, not storage. There is no residual income after the fact! Look at the outrageous cost of replacing lithium batteries! Case in point, look how fast they cured Polio in the 50's. In 60/70 years! What have we cured since? Only treatments, not cures. Treatments the money pipeline keeps coming. Sadly, but this how it works on everything..
I can't help but giggle everytime you said "meeeCHael" like that in that ultra petty way. Love it hahaha And I agree with you 100% on everything said in the video! This whole story and the car is still fun to wonder about though.
Everyone knows that conventional water electrolyis is real, but unviable as a fuel source because you need to put more energy in in electricy than you get out burning the hydrogen. Stan Meyer's version was not conventional electrolysis. It used 13.56 Mhz radio waves to break the hydrogen and oxygen molecules apart much more efficiently making it viable. Trying to say that the energy input can't be less than the energy output from combustion is like trying to say that burning wood with a match is impossible. John Kanzius proved that 13.56 Mhz could ignite water with the research that he did before he died in 2009. There was also a company in Japan called Genepax that had a water powered prototype car in 2014 before the company was shut down. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4fYc_MRG2wM.html
That analogy makes absolutely no sense. Regardless of what form of energy you use to break the chemical bonds, you still have to put at least as much energy into breaking the bonds as was released when the bonds were formed, that’s one of the fundamental principles of chemistry called bond enthalpy. To claim the ability to break bonds using less energy than is released when those bonds are formed is to claim the ability to create energy from nothing.
@@SG-ds8pr I would really like to give you several thumbs up! The bonding enthalpy is, as you said, only the minimum! You need some activation energy on top of that to start the whole process. This is the only part you could potentially make more efficient (with a catalyst for example).
@@ChrisVSCars he was offered $1 billion dollars by the Saudi Arabians and he turned it down. Once he filed a patent he became a Target. This would have put oil industry out of business and they're not going to let that happen.
@@ChrisVSCars Clearly Strachan318 and False Gods are talking about the very important Top Secret documentation posted by the CIA proving this engine was completed through the help of E.T.'s We still don't possess the technology they passed on to Stanley and once they realized the smartest people at that time couldn't understand, they killed Stanley. Knowing the internet (which is built solely off facts and truths) would quickly prove all this, they made a hasty retreat to their home solar system. Also pig farmers control 90% of the country's oil supply.
Their has been multiple cars built that use water electrolysis to increase mileage but the government will not allow it to be released for lots of reasons all related to funding
Seeing and hearsay is the sheeple's opium-smoking beLIEvism. In the late 1970's, BMW had a 6 cylinder hydogen engine on display at Toronto's International car show. The display was very inclusive, not just engine, but the electroalysis mechanisms as well. No written details; just the hardware and simple signing explaining briefly the tech. It wasn't running inside the building and everyone mostly assumed it worked. Turned out it was only for show and display on what types of tech BMW was into. That perfectly explains the Meyer debacle.
There is one way it can work. His car. If somehow hes causing nuclear fusion to happen in the water and that's reducing the energy needed to electrolysis the water. When tiny bubbles in water burst they create temperatures hotter than the sun and in theory that could cause nuclear fusion to happen.
@@mikeycrackson Well, humans still can't fly like birds without help so I'm not sure what you're talking about. As for the moon thing, it's more fun to believe I'm smarter than all those NASA scientists who say the moon landing was real so I'm going with moon landing was faked.
@@JB-lp9xr That sounds AMAZING! Could change everything. We have to think of a name for it. I think 'Microlina' is already taken. What about 'Drop Over' because of the way you describe how it works? 'Clunker' might be good too because of the sound of the mic landing. Let me know when I can order one. I will start doing push ups because range will come down to the strength of your arm. Don't worry about the black van. That will just be aliens with a galactic innovation award. I know because I already have one myself.
I am open minded by nature,and have looked at this from every possible angle with (of course) my limited knowledge of the facts as I am not a scientist by trade. Just a layman with common sense and one who is not a follower per se. Not the bovine espousing popular opinion, and of course what folks want to hear. With this and lastly,I tend to agree with this gentleman and for the reasons he mentioned which I would not endeavor to repeat as this would be redundant. It takes courage to be unpopular when all one has to is go with the grain, and fall in line with popular thought. Good job here and nice cat👍🏾.
Like you'd think out of all the engineers and scientists out here they would have already figured it out if it was possible but the sad truth is life is limited.
@@brandonmiller9155 yes but is it even efficient as electric right now it's even harder and more expensive to produce look at Toyota's hydrogen car not too many produced and they are giving away free hydrogen fill ups for an incentive
@@buffalosoulja3666 yes, there’s already a schematic of a yacht with a hydrogen power supply. During the day it relies on solar energy to power motors and desalination and hydrolysis machines, which take surrounding salt water and convert it into usable hydrogen which is then used to power the ship in low sunlight and night time environments, if I remember right they also clean the “waste” water generated from the fuel cells to use for some potable water, such as flushing toilets and cleaning dishes and such. Maybe even drinking water and showering. If there’s any place that a hydrogen vehicle would work it’s the ocean
No they wouldn't. You can only make a lot of money by selling something with a scarce supply like oil. Water costs practically nothing because it's so abundant (it falls from the sky as rain) so their profits would fall to zero if cars all of a sudden started using ordinary water as fuel. The oil industry doesn't make cars, its the auto maker is who would profit big from this. But it would completely destroy the oil industry if it existed.
This one isn’t about profits, it’s about not letting people get access to cheap and clean energy. Someone else just recently got killed in a mass shooting who had a water powered F-150. But you know, this isn’t possible anyways and we should just stop trying.
@@spektred ‘you can only make s lot of money by selling something with a scarce supply”. Tell that to software developers genius, what a joke. You also didn’t think about making a lot of money by selling something with HIGH DEMAND LIKE THIS WOULD BE. Tell Henry Fords descendants that Fords were hard to come by. For christs sake he got rich by figuring out how to make as many of them as possible as quickly and affordably as possible. Don’t people like you ever even think before you make an ass out of yourself publicly. The oil companies may hurt, but whoever had this thing would instantly be the wealthiest entity on the planet.
well, ask Alan Alda, he took a ride on that vehicle.. oh and Jay Leno bought one of those BMW hydrogen 7's before big oil had them crunched.. yeah, the H7 ran on gas or hydrogen with the flick od a switch...although that was liquid h2 stored in 4 tanks in the back.. still it worked.
@@harleyme3163 You don't understand the difference, do you? The cars you've mentioned here are hydrogen cars where the hydrogen gets stored in the tank. NOT water powered cars, where water is in the tank!
I know that Iron Man isn’t real, but I would say is something similar to that. “Tony stark built this in a cave with scraps” scientist-“I’m not Tony Stark” If you knew every piece of a iPhone would you say that you can build one from scratch? And hell the Coca-Cola recipe is supposed to be so secret that is kept in a safe or vault, and people know the basic ingredients of the cola but can’t replicate that either. All I’m saying is that it is possible that he figured out a revolutionary way to produce hydrogen from water that was ahead of its time and didn’t leave the plans/instructions behind and unless you had the car itself, you wouldn’t be able to reverse engineer it either!? it is also possible that he was killed because of it. I mean we don’t know the full story and details could be missing. I can’t imagine that he was sitting for lunch and then his first glass of cranberry juice, he took a sip ran out the place and then die?! They were probably mid meal, and he started to feel weird so he drank a bit more of his drink, maybe thinking it would help and it didn’t and he ran out and collapsed and died. We are talking about powerful people and I don’t think it will be that difficult to slide something in his drink or pay someone to do it or even put something in his food. We can only speculate
Studied Stan's work since March of 2006. It isn't easy to duplicate Meyer's technology correctly as it's taken me several long years to get at the science behind this technology and a whole lot of money buying all the equipment I needed and having somethings made by others which is very costly. I have run so many test that I have truthfully lost count but I never gave up and learned from my many failures. It's a false assumption to believe that if one had a set of plans of this technology in their hands they would be able to build it correctly let alone implement the technology into a vehicle as it's on the complicated side. The transformer alone must be vacuum resin sealed with the correct type of resin to get all the air out and prevent the wires from moving around. Movement of the wires cause the wire's protective coating to be rubbed off and thus cause the transformer to short out, and if it has air in it that air will get ionized and again cause the transformer to short out. If you can't make the water fuel capacitor on your own you will find out that having just one made will cost you big bucks at a machine shop. Then you have to source the wire, and all the other materials need to get this technology up and running and you are going to run into a lot of minimum order quantities and minimum buy amounts. For this technology to reach the masses someone has to take this technology into mass production and I have been working on doing just that as I slowly built up my little shop with all the things I needed to make this technology on my own for the sole purpose of one day going into a limited form of production with this technology. Once I get started this technology will create a lot of jobs as I can't do this alone. I will need circuit makers, assembly people, inspection personnel, quality control personnel, installers, troubleshooters, and the list goes on as this is going to be a major undertaking as it starts to phase out the use of fossil fuels world wide. If you wish to see the science behind this technology and/or give a donation to help the cause please go to OverUnity dot com and look for the subject, "Stanley Meyer Explained," under the board "Capital and Funding." I am known as h20power on that site.
Yeah I was waiting for the donation part. Apparently the biggest obstacles you face are easily solvable things that are regularly done in manufacturing already. Vacuum sealing a transformer in resin isn’t rocket science and the resin and tools needed are readily available on Amazon. Having a rigid attachment after leaving the resin stops boring. What is this magical wire you speak of that’s so hard to source? Surely you have at least aquired enough to make a single working model? How many hours of machining do these capacitors require that make it so expensive that you haven’t been able to make one in 16 years?
@@tee4222 Since your not building anything you have no idea what it takes to build one of these devices correctly for as it turns out the resin for high voltage applications is now one of the most expensive things to get as they have a minimum order amount of 30 gallons plus the hardener and for the resin I use it's a one to one mix ratio making the minimum buy 60 gallons at a cost of over $7k. And on top of that you have just 12 months to use it or it goes bad and you have to toss it out. When I went to have the WFC's made the minimum make amount was 8 cells at a cost of $13k, but again since you aren't building anything you have no idea of the cost involved in making this technology. Note I haven't talked about building anything else but one item and a resin to be use in building the transformers correctly.
@@h2opower resin that can handle high current and temperature is readily available in small quantities. It’s used in boosting transformers regularly. A quick google search found some at accuglassproducts. Besides, temperature resistance is what you actually need for the application. Plenty of resins can insulate that amount of current, easily.
I have a qn ik its stupid but isnt it still better to make a hydro powered car even tho it needs more enegery to run/ work compared to using a non renewable eventually running out gas, petrol, diesel or whatever
Imagine if blockchain technology existed back when he was alive. He could store all of his patents on the blockchain and his all work would be public and can never be seized. All new revolutionary inventions as such should be published on blockchain.
@@AdrianAzian everything public just go look at it lmao there hundred of data base where you can go see them its just that complotist are to lazy to actually go see them and prefer saying aboslut dumb take on a man that go royalty screw be Thomas Edison
I made a hydrogen "booster" for my car. Never hooked it up. But I managed to blow myself up in the garage by trying to light the bubbles with my lighter. It was just 12v with two stainless rods (+ and -), going to stainless steel plates with heaps of holes so the hydrogen forms on the edges, with salt flakes in water over the plates. I read something about using a square pulse regulator (19 pulses per second or something?) To stop the insulations between the plate getting hot and melting, and maybe produce more hydrogen. I'm no expert, but it could fill balloons and plastic bottles, Chuck them on the fire and get a mad bang haha.
The only question I have is did an Army Colonel actually inspect the car (the Army would obviously send an engineer). What was his name, and what was his findings?
So... if this is true, why stop at cars powered with water? Why not for generating electricity and everything else that needs to be powered?🤨 If it were that simple, I'm sure even classmates would've picked up where he left it
I'm not sure where my comment I just made went but I was going over the actual science behind this technology as I solved the great mystery by making use of the scientific method and much help from our creator with the dreams that lead me to the science behind this technology. The way it works is by mimicking the earth's global electric circuit. Here the bonds of the water molecules are broken down just like a thunderstorm does it by way of ionization where it's the atoms that are being targeted to release their electrons. With the water molecules it is the electrons that are responsible for holding the molecules together and if the atoms eject those electrons there is nothing left to hold the water molecules together and it simply falls apart into hydrogen, oxygen, and those ejected electrons which stay in the water bath. Right now I am attempting to pick up where Stanley Meyer left off and could really use the support of the people as our leaders have been brought and paid for by those that sell energy so it's up to us to be the change we want to see in this world.
So you will replicate what clouds do? Clouds make ions by building up static energy via convection which causes the water to bump into other water molecules. This seems like a lot of fake mumbo jumbo to me, you are neglecting to explain how you generate that charge needed to disassociate the molecules and where you get the energy from, because water is already stable enough that you can't just rip electrons off without effort (which is why electrolysis doesn't give more energy than it uses)
Years ago I saw a video of a couple of retired automotive engineers in there 70s had a Ford truck V8 with 4sets of batteries 2 alternators on it a large stainless Steel tank under cover of course the tank had a 64 plate cell full of water bubbling away producing hydrogen feeding straight back into the engine. Now it still needed fuel to start the engine but once started after a few minutes the fuel pump was electronic switched of and it ran on the hydrogen gas from that big tank . And it accelerated nicely and drove around town without trouble. The old gentleman mentioned it got 400miles of a 25 litre tank of water but they had to watch out for suspicious MIB . I don't know what happened to the 2old boys but it was fantastic video
He still was better prepared with these discoveries... the oil industry did infact get rid of him through poisoning. Other examples include the light bulb, generators on cars, the list is very interesting
Stan Meyer's deadly "brain aneurysm" occured at a meeting at a Cracker Barrel restaurant with Belgian investors after he ran out of the restaurant claiming he was poisoned and collapsed on the ground. Must be a concidence, right?
@@SwagMush a yes they try so hard thats its one of the most talked topic on his life and not the fraud or the fact that no one exact him saw the actual engine but yeah nah that the fact the most hiden
You might like to investigate 'Joe's Cell' - Something that seems more impossible than Stan's work. If you are a curious person I recommend Equinox Documentary 'It runs on water' which has a number of examples that suggest 'overunity' then there is the documentary 'The race to zero point energy' Stan Meyer put into his patents misdirection so people copying his work could not reproduce the actual success. The water powered is supposed to use a spark plug that converted the water to HHO and injected it into the compression chamber which has a large number of timing issues. So without the electronics almost impossible to reproduce. Sadly we must assume that this is another inventor going for mega-rich status.
I don't doubt that there was possibly foul play here with regards to his death. But... A car that runs solely on water by splitting the atoms either takes too much energy from another source (battery), which makes it inefficient... or it defies established scientific principles around the laws of conservation of energy.
Go research Daniel Dingle from the Philippines He’s design is much simpler. The secret to electrolysis is high voltage, low amperage (so keeping the wires cool is important) and stupid high frequency. Stan disclosed his electronics used in his patent , but I truly believe he left something out. Daniel Dingle was able to accomplish the same thing, totally different design, and I figured it out!!! It’s brilliant!!! On a different note, when you talk into the camera don’t say: “ l feel that , this and that that that...!” Nobody cares how you feel...!!!!!!! Say : “ l THINK that this and that that that...!” Ppl wanna know what you think not what you feel. ... unless you’re a woman, and addressing to women...🤷♂️ Just saying... be a man!!!
As soon as you brought up women and told him to be a man, you made yourself sound like a barbarian. Which is funny BECAUSE YOU'RE TELLING HIM HOW YOU FEEL AND NEITHER OF YOU ARE WOMEN. Be a fucking man and stop talking about your feelings.
The Rogue Genius that Big Gov & Big Oil are trying to stop is such an appealing storyline......There was a great old movie called "The Water Engine" that used this age old plot.
The car doesn't work... No matter how efficiently you managed to do the electrolysis the moment you react the hydrogen and oxygen back to water and have energy left over you just created energy violating the conservation of energy. This can't work and never will.
His plans say he has an inhibitor that prevents the reversion back to water..and allow for control of hydrogen thru resonant frequencies and cobtrolling m7xture of non combustible gasses at proper intake juncture
@@jimberlygridder183 So we put energy into splitting bonds and don't ever get it back?? Stoping the H and O from reacting back to water leaves us with no reaction at all. So no energy to run anything. All the frequency stuff is straightup technobabel btw. You can't save energy by finding some magic frequency. Even if you found a way to break the bonds using some sort of oscillation you'd still need to put in the same amount of energy to break them. Just instead of hooking your power source up to electrodes you use some sort of (piezoelectric disk?) oscillator. This seems like it would be a huge amount less efficient tho, even if it worked, as you loose a large portion of the energy you put in to the surrounding container and whatever it is attached to. Compared to that electrolysis is really efficient.
If you look at the Italian company Hydromoving srl, they have retrofitted cars to become hydrogen hybrids with hydrogen produced on demand in the car. These cars run on water and fuel.
