@@brodieroomojo Yes, but the poor Joe in the street is ALWAYS accountable. Anarchy IS NO RULERS! The people decide, always the most sensible.. Peace be unto you.
.... What the actual hell? I am blown away that he was REPEATEDLY sent to the courts to get help and they just threw him back onto the street. They ignored ALL warnings, even the ones HE himself gave. How did they not take his threats of murder seriously? I hope some people got fired over this.
Welcome to the end of the 20th century and prior where NO ONE gave a fuck to help the mentally unstable until it was too late. System is still a joke now but back then it was even worse.
lol "Fired". No disrespect but they probably got desk duty until the coast was clear, then promotions. These assholes look after their own and tend to fail upwards.
The system failed James and his victims, of course, but most of all, his mother. Imagine loving your son so much, but knowing that he's unpredictable and dangerous, then being ignored repeatedly when you seek help. Unbelievable.
At the point when he murdered an innocent animal. He was lost. He was not her son anymore and did not deserve love or respect. I feel sorry for the poor woman and for the poor/once innocent kid who was abuse and abandoned by his so called "father" just because of a thing that was not his fault. I hope that his father got what he deserve.
@@cosmicreef5858 yes but there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
How did his mother fail him? It seemed like she tried everything she could to get him help. The blame is solely on the system in this one. When even the killer was expressing that they would do something and they still weren't given help.
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
Whom ever was in charged of his case and didn’t allow the involuntarily supervision and restraining him in a psychiatric clinic, should also be also held accountable for his killings.
he had all the red flag traits too... animal cruelty, no remorse no empathy, violent outbursts, arson, death threats... i swear what were they thinking letting him go..,. so much blood is on justice system and social services/psychiatry alike
@@kimmyfreak200 Soon as i hear that someone hurts animals at a young age(some continue into adulthood) = Abusive towards others, homicidal maniac, sociopath, they have no remorse /empathy towards others. They are not hard to spot, they could be next door, or even in your home/a fam7ly member.
I feel mostly bad for the mom in all this her husband walked out on her. Her daughter died her son who she worked hard to take care of was about to kill her and her son is a murder and she probably feels responsible since he said his mom nagged at him to much and she raised him
@@hellknightmordred7655 you got that right many people would and have given up on life just from one of these events happening but even in the end she still wanted what was best for her son
Honestly anyone would be blessed to have a mother like that who actually acknowledges your disabilities and does something about it to help. Most parents don't even bother
James: tortures animals, burns his neighbors house, institutionalized, threatens to kill his mother, smears poop on the walls. Government workers: Yea he seems fine.
@@xxscribbledragonxx9744 nah man there is only so much the state can do lol. You can’t blame the govt for all of his actions. He’s got to take at least some responsibility. Relying on the govt to be everyone’s moral compass is just lazy at the least. And there was also proof that he was aware of right and wrong as he committed the murders as explained in the video by the prosecution.
This is literally all of the system's fault. They failed him and his community on several occasions that could've been an opportunity to get him help and stop him.
No it is not. He would have done everything he did either with or without help. Weird how people think psych drs and meds can prevent murderers from murdering.
@@malcolmhughes6345 again, they still failed the community either way. They knew he had a history and they still released him. It is absolutely the system's fault.
@@malcolmhughes6345 they failed him and the community by releasing him into the community. Everyone, including the killer, would have been better off if they had locked him up and threw away the key.
Wow... his poor mum. She really did work hard to try to get him help hut the state literally failed her and him. He didn't kill her but she had to wake up to see that smile while he hovered a knife over her and would have killed her if she didn't scare him by screaming. I'm amazed that despite this repeated alarming behaviour they still thought he "wasn't dangerous enough". SERIOUSLY???
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
Not that these monsters have the rights to go in people's houses and murder innocent people, but for god's sake people ALWAYS REMEMBER to LOCK YOUR DOORS!!!!!! 🙏..... Rip to all the victims
@@xxscribbledragonxx9744 back even in the 90s i remember all my childhood friends kept doors open. Id walk in like Krahmer on Seinfeld. Idk what it was about that time that people were so open. Clearly thats changed now.
He was clearly a danger to society but unfortunately nothing was done about it until it was much too late far too the signs were clearly there but no one did anything.
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
He even told people he was going to end up killing someone, and still nothing was done. At least his mother was trying to help him for his whole life, which seems pretty rare in these cases. Usually the parents do absolutely nothing to help too.
@@kenkaniff8428 It won't be. If he'd been locked up in advance, the same people saying he should have been locked up in advance would be arguing about how the very concept threatens their 'liberty'.
I can't get my mind around how they did not consider him dangerous after standing over his mother with a knife!? He let everyone know he was fascinated about killing! How can it not be more frightening and concerning for someone with his cognitive limitations to be free in society with these strong desires to kill!?
Speaking from personal experience in Washington State: it is extremely difficult to get help removing or rehabilitating the person posing a threat. Especially if that person seems rational or otherwise lucid. Even if they confess their desires to cause harm, unless there is photographic evidence or some other sort of physically tangible proof it is unlikely they'll receive proper care involuntarily. It sucks to know someone is a genuine threat and to know that those designated to help likely cannot.
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
This is a SOLID episode. One of your best. Stories like these are always as fascinating as they are tragic. Mostly tragic because bafflingly the courts kept saying there was no reason to lock him up EVEN when said he was going to kill someone. The people who kept him on the streets have blood on their hands too.
Really tho. I'm from Texas and i watched something about how the cops in san antonio are now required to take extra classes to teach them how to properly handle the mentally ill instead of just arresting them on little charges like a small assualt charge or criminal mischief which would put them back out pretty quickly. Idk if it's all over Texas but at least they started somewhere.
His mother sounds like a damn Saint. She didn't seem to be overly protecting him; she just loved him unconditionally and wanted him to get help. This is tragic on so many levels
This reminded me of the case of Jessica Camilleri, which I would love to see you cover. Jessica had many disabilities and a mix of those unfortunately made her very violent, she ended up taking mother's life. Just like this one, it is a tragic story that opens the question of involuntary commitment. Great video, thank you for sharing!
The Jessica Camilleri case was so gruesome, i saw Daves Lemonade post a video about it, the fact that she was capable of such brutality was so disturbing
I have said for 20+ years that I could do the same job as them!! I say that because all they do is basically pick names if medications out of a hat! You try it and when it doesn't work they TRY another medication! I've been in over 17 meds for my depressive disorder and 8 for my anxiety and 5 for my PTSD!! NONE of them worked!! The mental health profession is a farce! A joke! An absolute fallacy!!! I say this with 26 years of trying different medications and finally just a few years ago I was told that I have "classic signs of treatment resistent depression" meaning no medication will ever work for me!! I went through ALL THAT BS to eventually be told 26 YEARS LATER that "sorry dude, doesn't look like anything is gonna work for you!". WTF!?!! I have zero faith in the mental health field!!! ZERO!!!
Such a big fan of yours I love watching these sometimes I wonder how many kidnappers or killers do we walk past everyday on the street like we could go past someone and they already committed a crime
The poor mom. She really did try to do everything right; Nursed a very sick child for two years, overcame a spouse that abandoned her and the children, worked hard at a job, went to school to better herself, lost a daughter (who was not only loved no doubt in her own right but also seemed to have helped pacify her unpredictable brother), tried to support her special needs son as a child, repeatedly tried to maneuver, understand and get help for her special needs son as a violent adult. R.I.P Geneva. Also kudos to that one case worker(s), who tried against the courts on his behalf, despite being rejected. Might not be much in context but at least *some* sort if professional tried during this obvious failed system.
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
My heart, thoughts and prayers go to Geneva's family, and to the mother of this monster. It must've broke his mother's heart that he had committed this heinous crime, especially when she had begged and pleaded for her son to be committed, so he can receive the proper treatment. I hope and pray that Geneva's resting peacefully in her eternal slumber, and watching over her family and friends.
I can't help but wonder if he'd actually gotten the help that he obviously needed early on, if it would have actually kept him from murdering, or would it have just delayed the inevitable?? His poor mom... seems that she did everything humanly possible to get him some attention, only to have her efforts thwarted at every turn. What's the point of having a "system", if it's so broken it can no longer do any good?? Can't imagine how awful she must have felt when she learned of his arrest for murder. Her husband deserted her, her daughter died, & then her son loses what little grip he had on reality & kills people. Now she's left with no one. What an awful way for a mother to have to live out her golden years. Very sad. As for him, he better not ever get released... I don't think it would ever be safe to take that chance.
Another unpopular opinion: By "beating the odds" (not succumbing to childhood illness) he lived to become a cautionary tale! 1) mental health is an important concern for all 2) lock yr doors
this was entirely on the system, not on him. even he was flat out begging for help. the smearing of his feces, the actual literal verbal warnings. he knew he was in the wrong and that he was out of control and no one who COULD help him did.
It all came down to the JUDGE having the final say and the JUDGE feared his constitutional rights would be violated if he did what was recommended. That's how it was back in the day. Unfortunately the way the laws are written in many circumstances were that a violent act had to take place before actions could be taken. That's how things were back then. Things are changing and have changed these days tho. Nowadays laws are being written and have been written that allows the govt/state etc to be pre-emptive. Too many things happened in earlier years like this that helped new laws to be written and one of the biggest things that helped change this was terrorism. The govt realized they needed to go on the offensive and stop things BEFORE they happened. It trickled over into everyday crimes and there are human rights groups that STILL oppose this way of dealing with certain crimes. They say it violates constitutional rights.
there will always be great debate about this. In the EYES OF THE LAW he is GUILTY. It is VERY difficult to get a "diminished responsibility" or "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict. In this case psychiatrists were brought in and couldn't establish WITHIN THE EYES OF THE LAW that he was unaware of what he was doing at the time. That debate will continue and the battle may never be resolved. Unfortunate in some cases but the law is the LAW and it's the foundation of our democracy. Does EVERYONE agree . . ? No! And that debate will go on and on and on. Will there ever be a point where EVERYONE is content with how this is viewed and handled??? Personally I say it will NEVER be totally resolved to the point where everyone is satisfied/happy/content with a final result.
Or maybe just got the help and medical intervention he needed, deserved and practically begged for from the authorities... this could have all been avoided and no one would’ve had to be hurt 😔
It was said that he thrived in the special school, where he had supervision & structure. A place that was skilled in handling the needs of persons w disabilities, like creating individual education plans, setting goals, recognizing triggers & how to avoid those, actions to take during periods of upset and training the person to self calm/ soothe, effectively teaching the person to de- escalate their own situation. He may've done well in a group home setting. Even a day program, anything that would create structure & purpose. Living on the streets certainly didn't help keep him or anyone safe. How frustrating! This was very preventable.
@@HeyIwasaValedictorian Absolutely, I’m sure with the right care he would’ve thrived as you mentioned, and so many lives would’ve been untouched by the chaos and pain he caused - I think because his mother loved him unconditionally and refused to give up on him, the authorities thought they could just keep throwing him back out for her to pick up the pieces - one less person for the state to worry about.... except now the state has to care for him anyway considering he’s incarcerated, so surely managing his problems earlier in the correct way would’ve saved THEM in the long term, and also avoided the deaths, injuries, and court cases etc that resulted from their negligence. Wondering if anyone was actually held responsible for the monumental failure within the system.
This guy was basically a ticking time bomb. The system not only failed him, but failed every person he hurt and killed. Sad to think how often this goes on ... And who are the ones who are the eventual losers? The innocent victims. Edit : A couple more things.. - Disturban, excellent coverage as always! And this guy's father . What a POS!.
Ahhh! You did it again! You opened with an excerpt and quickly transitioned into your signature opening! It really works at instilling an initial spook that sets the tone for the remainder of the film. A very haunting technique! I LOVE IT!
I would never be one of those people that forgets to lock their doors, especially not in this day and age. And then goes for doors at my house and doors in the car too, as soon as I get in.
The system pissed me off in this more than the actual killer. *James standing over his mother with a knife and a twisted smile* The System: he's not that dangerous, let this man go at once inspector!
God...this story is kinda sad. How hard this mother fought for her son..how the system refused to take any of this serious enough..this could all be preventable asf...
Thank you for bringing us new, different and interesting stories. Your hard work to dig up cases that aren't as well known, and still do a deep dive, is certainly appreciated🙌
After the medical community and the court systems failed on NUMEROUS times to prevent this from happening I thought that they would continue with releasing him like they did on NUMEROUS occasions.
Hey, I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoy your Podcasts, they are definitely my favourite and one of the most fascinating true crime channels on RU-vid. I respect and admire the wonderful way you tell the stories on behalf of the victims.. please continue with your channels, I’m your number one Superfan from Australia💛💛💛
In southern California there's been numerous murders committed by homeless people with mental issues and drug problems. One happened in a restaurant in front of the man's daughter. There isn't enough done to make these people get help because it's "violating" their civil rights.
@@jr2904 I knew a schizophrenic man who was often in trouble w law due to his erratic behavior & skewed thinking (didn't take his meds regularly). Finally, a judge ordered that he get a shot 1x/ month called "Invega" (sound similar to 'invasive', right?). This took away his right of refusal, essentially violating his civil rights. I was concerned about this as it sets precedent. But he did much better after. Fewer incidents of screaming & fighting the voices all night long, much less delusional, was never again picked up by the cops for the remainder of his lifetime. This was in New York state. It helped that man, but in wrong, corrupt hands it could be a terrible thing. I have no answers, only this anecdote
So many of these stories consist of the parents turning their heads away from their childrens' mental issues. But sadly, this mother knew the danger, tried several times to get him the proper help and was sadly let down. Everyone touts that if you "see something, say something" While this is very true and should be done. The frustrating part, is that sometimes people try and try to say something and the system completely lets them down laying the groundwork for tragedies.
I've heard so many cases where the parent(s) tried to get their kid/adult child help over and over again, only to hit dead ends, and then one day that person becomes a murderer. There is a serious problem here that this happens. I can't imagine the anguish these parents go through when their child finally does kill someone.
These videos are depressing AF (especially as a Seattle resident) but I am glad to be able to appreciate just how good a person his mother was. In spite of it all she still loved her son and wanted the best for him.
😢😢 sleep peacefully Geneva Another stellar production from @Disturban, thank you so much for this one, I hadn't heard it at all before this. You always manage to find some pretty awesome cases that aren't talked about in the general True Crime circles/groups. Keep up the awesome work @Disturban, keep sharing with us these cases that need to be shared, but no one's talking about 👌🏻🥰💕💕💕
Nothing angers me more when the "courts" fail to make arrests or sen someone get help. So bcuz of that he & others became brutal killers. Absolutely unacceptable & maddening. 🤦♀️💔🥵🤷♀️ Smh. RIP Angel's 🕊🕊🌹🌹 I hope he's rotting away!! So sad & could've/should've been stopped. I'm glad his mother cared for him though. Another great job telling this horrific story. God bless 👑🙏🏻🕊🌹💗
Cases like this convince me that the mental health issue america is facing is by design and not because the system is lacking. The power that be want people like this on the street. They want unrest, they want people to kill each other. Theres no other reason why they would keep claiming he didn't need their help when even his caseworker was convinced he needed serious help.
Can't help but have a lot of sympathy for James regardless; people with cognitive impairment deserve help from professionals and specialists, Rainier sounds like the place he belonged, he thrived there and he deserved to be where he felt safest and showed the most progress :/ I know that violent individuals need to be restrained to some degree or at least heavy supervision, but this is such a terribly sad story for both the victim and the perpetrator if you ask me.
I think it’s easy to blame james when in actuality despite being a perpetrator he’s just as much as a victim when you really think about it had the courts stepped in and do their jobs right we wouldn’t be here watching this video
It's telling that he actually had a bit of success in that first supportive group home instead of complete rebellion and then when he was uprooted again it went downhill again. It seems like he actually had a chance to quell the violence he had brewing if he had stability and structure during those formative years. Accommodated with psychiatric visits and medication it might have been a very different James as an adult. What he did was absolutely horrific and the person who committed that crime may very well never be able to cross back into society. But it honestly seems like he didn't necessarily have to become that person.
F*ckin infuriating how preventable this was; There are cases where people WANT to be vicious, murderous and vile, but no one in this case wanted that, it seemed everyone was just begging for help. How many incidents, indicators or attempted murders did authorities need to see before taking this man’s mental health issues seriously? He was clearly incapable of controlling his demons without intervention, yet he was continually kept from the help and support he desperately needed. “What took you so long” says it all - if police and medical professionals had listened to his mothers pleas, acknowledged the red flags and noted the dangerous nature of James’s actions from the start, so many people could have been saved in this unbelievably tragic case.
Social worker “ your honor , James has said he wants to commit murder, and I walked in on him smearing feces on walls” Judge “ don’t care , didn’t ask”
This guy should not be in prison, even if i was a calculated murderer i wouldnt like to be anywhere near this guy. He has been, and still is being, failed by the system
@Liam Mystery You're right. He shouldn't be in the prison. He should actually be under the prison. If ever there was an argument that was in favor of eugenics and genetic engineering to prevent mental retardation, criminal psychopathy and physical deformities and various other genetic weaknesses in human beings during their biological development, it was this guy's example. He is that shit right there.
Its so funny or ironic that some nursery rhymes and kids jump rope/skipping rope games and other childhood past times etc originated from a dark part of history. The one that comes to mind right away is "rimg around the roses". Very dark origins to that one and there are night time stories and other things that originate from a dark part of our history also. A bit ironic dont you think🤔
These judges and psychiatrists need to start being held accountable for their failure to do the right thing. This repeated refusal to take the threats and actual actions of such distured people is really criminal, and for too long these people have been getting away from abdicating their responsibility to society. Families of victims need to start banding together and suing the legal and psychiatric institutions. As for people like Jim.....They know what they're doing. They're very cunning and know exactly how to act in order to convince idiot judges and psychiatrists that they're "no threat."But also, why do people sleep in their homes with UNLOCKED windows and doors????? How can you "forget" to lock a window or a door????
Same, I'm from Alaska & it wasn't til I got back into YT last summer, that I see how Alaska has its share of serial & spree killers, the lone wolves that slowly pick off people 1 at a time....I live here & finally seeing the bigger picture, yikes!!
Deadbug Says has some brutal cases w/ archive pics/videos, he does independently research & coverage. He's blunt, old style in a way....hard to explain but he takes on complex stories, sticks to facts, doesn't embellish nor alters the story-straight forward. His choice of music is incredible, he puts each & every episode together by himself. And yes, Disturban is fantastic, I stop & drop almost everything to watch his latest upload.... great coverage!!!
As a mum of two special needs little boys with mild cp(due to dv in utero)This is to close to home💔My almost 7 yr old exhibits some of these behaviours😞 He goes absolutely nuts and throws his toys and bangs his head but the things he has said about killing me and hurting me worried me the most! I've expressed my concern to the school, therapists and drs for almost a year now and Nothing! Nothing!! Watching this just makes me more determined to get the help he definitely needs & NOT TAKING NO FOR AN ANSWER!! This could be our family if I let it go. Thamkyou for this video Disturban, more than you know.
@@vincentkennedymcmahon50 and the putrid human award goes to this flop!! im soooo super glad making fun of a situation regarding disabled special needs children gets you off the way you needed🙄 Now I'm Hoping you have exactly the day you deserve big man
Face the reality it is actually very hard to keep someone involuntarily held- and you can thank everyone who thinks “they shouldn’t be told to have to do anything regarding their health or someone else’s.” Add to this the total lack of money put into the system for in house treatment for mental health and addiction problems. See above to see who to thank! And add in those who have made socialism a dirty word.
Why do voices always tell people to kill? Are there any that tell people to take a dump on the salad bar at Wendy's? There are people who do that but it's usually their own ideas. -George Carlin
