Thank you for thinking and sharing your thoughts as you understand them. I was always inspired by the marble rolling across a spinning disk. It comes out on the diameter. Now add magnetic fields and counter rotating litho graphic disks.. good stuff!
Gravity is a term applied to the functions of density / buoyancy in a static electrical field between 2 charge potentials. The ionospheric upper plate so to say and the ground source. Electron flow builds from the ground until it is close enough to the upper ionic + charge that the current can jump the gap and flow to ground. This is why lightning visually goes down but the path it follows is made of electrons that build upwards before the strike. Electron flow is from - to + but current flow is from + to - and 90 degrees behind in phase. The fact that there are no tides on freshwater bodies kind of blows the whole orbiting spheres with gravity idea out of the water. Along with numerous other examples.
Gravity is not the result of Density and buoyancy. That being said I am on a video where people think 1000% efficiency is a real thing so can't really expect people to understand 6shit here.
There are no tidal forces what so ever on land locked lakes either fresh or salt water. With "gravity" pulling down towards center on a rotating sphere there would be nothing to oppose the centrifugal force exerted by rotation near either pole or line of axis. Unless one can claim special relativity in this obvious contradiction then gravity as defined has been debunked using simple logic and known force behavior.@@seditt5146
I feel the OTC-X1 show the most striking resemblance with our planet and the solar system (flying through the galaxy). This craft is a gem of a free energy design.
Hi Bryan, thanks for working on the whole homopolar generator. I just got done reading Thomas vallone book on it. I have a suggestion about improving the voltage of the Dynamo. It occurred to me while thinking about kirchhoff's laws first and second. That's if you use the electrostatic electricity from the environment and added it to the amperage of the homopolar generator you would not violate kirchhoff's second law and the law conservation, since the available voltage in the environment is more than the total Watts input of the homopolar generator motor, then the voltage from the environment would rush to meet the wattage requirements of the the conservation of energy operating in the homopolar generator, yet these would be mostly voltage. By using open system thermodynamics such as as used to explain the operation of the homopolar generator, we can satisfy kirchhoff's first and second laws and the conservation of energy in an isolated system. Since the capacity of the Earth is larger then the current in the homopolar generator and since the power from the Earth's atmosphere comes from the sun, the homopolar generator would be the smaller of the two Energies.In this way we can give local amp hours 2 the high electric field in the environment around us. Please contact me if you'd like to discuss this further. Otherwise keep up the good work. Jeff VanEngineerTachyon Aerospacetachyonaerospace.earth/
The braking torques (back emfs) on each disk will align and add up on the prime shaft. They're in oposition directions at the disks but they align through the gears and add up at the prime shaft.
Absolutely Brilliant!!! You've done it Bryan!!! Your a genius! The elegance, beauty and perfection is magnificent. You've married nature with technology perfectly or close to it. I've thought of doing almost exactly what you've built, although I've only dreamed of it so far, never built it.
10:44 Did you know there are no tides on any freshwater lakes? If gravity pulls towards a center of mass and centrifugal force due to rotational velocity exerts its force linear outward at a 90* angle from the line of axis then what keeps the oceans on the top and bottom of the globe? Gravity only opposes centrifugal at the equator .
the ending of your talk, about the galaxy being self supporting and generating it's own current, and how you spoke your belief in abundance and love in a world from the reverse, it made me smile at you.
FYI - SDI means Strategic Defense Initiative. Ted Kennedy very rudely referred to it as Star Wars because he wanted to spend the money on social programs.
The analogy between the electric charged hollow sphere and a similar hollow sphere with a mass and no electric charge is that the field everywhere inside is zero in both cases. The electric charged sphere needs a force to hold it together while the mass sphere will generate a pressure that hold the sphere together.
Conductors equalize fields through the electron orbitals (a misnomer). They will trap a minimal amount of dielectric induced fields on their own, and will not advance/transfer those energies unless there is a difference in the field potential, or it connects to a load with a different capacity. Radially the speed between the outer circumference magnetic sources and the inner diameter magnetic source is significant (the squared effect in count and cubed affect in count and acceleration). So a straight wire can induce a moving current in this variable field, something that requires a loop for efficiency and a load for application in a uniform field in traditional generators. Traditional generators move the current in the direction of the induced field. As he points out, this current flows orthogonally to the induced field, adding the current induced magnetic field ( traditional back magnetic field) to the inspiring differential, increasing the induction of current, not retarding it. Cool
22:15 : i realized this fact by myself by reasoning on honopolar motor about a month ago: the force is only applied on the wire and not on the magnet... where is the Newton law of action and reaction? There isn't, here. Astonishing.
As I understand it, Nikola Tesla was the man who suggested adaptations for the Faraday Disk to use a disk shaped magnet and to also divide the copper disk into spiralled sections, for the very reasons you have stated in this video. Why have you not credited Nikola Tesla for these theories published in the 1891 article titled "Notes on a Unipolar Dynamo"?
Yes, entertaining but flawed. It went downhill very quickly when he said turning the magnet in a homopolar gen independent of the conductive plate would produce current. The magnetic field does not move in a homopolar gen stack, that's the reason why that type actually works 😂
BMan18 as I already stated, rotating a magnet on its n-s axis does not move the magnetic field. It's a basic concept of the homopolar motor/generator. If the presenter has measured any current by moving just the magnet then that magnet has some sort of flaw causing an uneven field.
Ray V Hey, I'm still learning about this stuff, and I apologize about the denial thing. We all see what we see until we see clearer. Distinti has done a lot of work about discovery and electromagnetism. You might check him out, its OK to have multiple models and to let go the ones that fail. But to the point, the work on homopolar and unipolar generators has seen a lot of coverage on RU-vid. Several University studies are cited in the comments to augment that work. The results are in. If you have a magnetic field, it matters not if its moving or not relative to other conductors. If those conductors, even if they are within the magnet itself or in the plating of the magnet, or even if they are separated by non-conductive materials, or are rings or radial bars... if they move in the presence of a magnetic field, they will generate a voltage and/or current (if connected). The electromagnetic gyroscope is proof of this operational fact. The example of a rotating magnet has differential in speed radially as it spins. The magnet is in its own field, which has moving field parts and apparent stationary field parts which are irrelevant. The flaw is that it is a disc with an increasing circumference, altering the speed and therefore the induced voltage across the radius. Current and voltage is generated independently of the movement of the magnetic field. All that is needed is moving charges. Moving sensors relative to fixed charges won't do it. That means any motion of charge in a magnetic field (moving or stationary) will make a voltage, connect it to a relatively differently moving point that is making a different voltage and you will get current flow motivated by the voltage differential. And therefore creating its own magnetic field with that current flow. This give us two key benefits. You don't have to move charge carriers in any specific direction compared to the magnetic field, although the direction will influence the force that moves the current. So lines of force are irrelevant to induction, induction happens with any movement in a magnetic field. Voltage differential is all you need for that induction to move. So you can use an outside voltage source or vary the movement of a circuit in the same magnetic field or vary the magnetic field strength or some combination. The magnetic field does not have to motivate the induced current movement. This next benefit is: some directions of induced current movement produce reactionless current flow, others can produce amplified EMF with current flow. The jet streams from quasars are examples of amplified current flow. Practical rail gun tech can be designed using this awareness, not the super high current flame throwers demonstrated on the net. Or self-propelled, high torque electrical generators as hinted to at the end of the presentation. These of course will seem like they are over unity, when in fact they are simply more efficient use of electromechanics, similar to natural systems. The presenter here is focused on the reactionless options to enable less resistive energy induction, explaining how his design sets up the current flow to create a magnetic field that is orthogonal to the source field, not contrary to it as in a typical generator. Orthogonal magnetic fields do not resist each other ala Lenz' Law.
If you reduce the Lenz law, to 50% . Then also the induced watt would be 50% . NOT 200% . Maybe we Think the term "back emf" and "paramagnetic" and "Lenz Law" Are all synonymes . Desire a reduced Lenz Law, try another metal disk . Maybe aluminium .
Impressive, Bryan, altho much of it is above my pay grade. Your side comments re gravity are most enlightening... and show that the standard model of star formation (not to mention black holes and the big bang!) is bunk, its bedrock non-existent....
Nice work. I prefer to define induction the way Faraday did and not use Lenz's law. It clarifies the mechanics. It also appears in his closing comments that his device mimics the field structure of a permanent magnet. The tertiary fields he describe exactly match the field dynamics of a magnet. The potential for a device that is only limited by the physical wear resistance of its components for power sounds quite reasonable.
They don't actually exist they are just useful. A big deal when useful theoretical constructs are spoken of in real terms and then used as mechanisms for other theories such as magnetic reconnection. Forgetting about electricity
@@georgetubb9124 So if magnetic fields don't exist why can't we see the golden/yellowish color of electricity acting between two magnets? It seems like magic that there's nothing happening in between two magnets but we can feel the repulsion or attraction somehow.
@@AstralApple magnetic fields certainly exist. And they have a field for sure it's just that individual lines don't exist they are a useful concept on paper. It's just the mainstream make too much of the field lines and wrongly invent a mechanism here that ain't true. They are forgetting to consider the electric current that is the source of magnetic fields anyway. Magnetic field variance in turn causing more current. Electrical engineers have explained why. Look at any of Don Scott's RU-vid videos on the sun. He goes to great depth on this point near the beginningru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eHi6ib9STPg.html
@@AstralApple Magnetic fields exist, but the field lines are just a model as we use to think about it, because thinking of lines waving through space gives an intuitive understanding that usually leads to accurate conclusions. It doesn't work in certain unusual cases, like this one - you need to set aside the helpful visual language of field lines, and turn to the more accurate but less-intuitive model of a vector field. A task that involves first learning the fun topic of multivariate vector calculus. Field lines are the pictures we use to avoid doing math.
It occurred to me that the generator should turn on its own while producing Electricity . You can make with such a generator a turbine plasma jet engine. This guy could make atmosphere engines for aircraft and using the brown effect spacecraft engines. When running, you could charge batteries for Life support and other things. Like field generators and lasers.
@@Streamcatcher russian guy, how make OTC-X1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Z-M55XP3D4A.html Pol guy who explained effect ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xC9-qfsjsjo.html
