The Weird Reason Why US Store Captured Soviet Era Aircraft in Restricted Facility 

Well, I screened it

Constant Peg

Thank You for your service&Fort Polk is now Fort Johnson

@@kevinroark5024 yeah pretty fascinating they changed it while soon after we left! Thank you also🇺🇸

lot of pegging in that program@@jcak552

لقد سرقتها الولايات الأمريكية من بلدي العراق تبا لكم

@@user-wz3yq2iv7rLet me correct you…they were rightfully taken after “your country’s” dictator couldn’t keep his hand in his own pockets, and invaded a neighboring US ally to financially make up for his horribly conducted war against Iran by stealing Kuwait’s gold and riches. Half the Soviet jets that were taken from Iraq were abandoned out of the pilots fear of certain death by destruction or evacuated from Iraqi airfields and flown to neighboring countries where they were handed over to the US anyway. Don’t get angry with foul language, get educated on accurate historical accounts. Besides, Russian equipment has shown to be by far inferior to US and western made equivalent.

Much of the equipment sold by the USSR was called “monkey models” or stripped-down versions of the original. Some of the avionics were not as advanced, and in the case of armored vehicles, they used inferior armor. Army tank experts weighed captured Soviet-made Iraqi tanks and discovered they weighed significantly less than what we knew the originals weighed, which they attributed to lighter, weaker armor.

👹🇷🇺👹👎👎👎👎

And in Louisiana they probably already took apart a captured T-90

After seeing the Leppard 2A4, Ivan says, "Boss, this tank is 20 years old and it is 50 years ahead of our new tanks." Boss says, "Ivan, our new tanks don't work"

​@@Bestplayer-mx6ybи как он?

​@@ajc5479не нужно выдавать желаемое за действительное

the one with the propeller

these are educational videos a lot of times people will take notes etc while watching

A Labour Government in the late 40's (?) passed our new jet tech to the Soviets if I recall ☹

@@exAirMover yeah for “commercial purposes” and they didn’t think the soviets wouldn’t just, you know, reverse engineer them?

It was in the late 50's where they tried to reverse engineer the jet engines, they got plans from rolls royce but their best metals and alloys metallurgical properties were to brittle and lacked strength. They wanted to find out what metals were being used so they called rolls royce and booked them selves on a tour, they has special shoes made with soft rubber and foam inserts on their soles and walked around the machine shops picking up metal shards and then made the internals from those new alloys.

Yes in 1947 as a gesture of good will Rolls Royce sold 25 Nene engines to Russia with a caveat that the engines were used in non military applications. The Russians then copied them and put them in the Mig 15

Yep, you covered the whole industrial espionage thing…..pretty crafty.

They keep them abandoned so they can see their capabilities and form tactical analysis on how to beat them in long medium and short distance engagements. The F15 is the front line interceptor in many NATO countries with the fastest climb to altitude, data link and radar and sensor suites beyond the capabilities of other Russian aircraft.

Russia sells the SU-27 to other counties, we could have acquire it from one of them.

The USAF has been flying SU-27's in secret for years.

Older less advanced technology deemed obsolete is sold like generic branded goods

F4, F5, and possibly F14’s..

Make sure they've got documentation on all of them 🤠

@@alvarocorral1576 F-14 have been rumored for years . I'm pretty certain they had access to a few Iranian examples ,complete with pilots flying them .As for actually having any , I would say that only 1 was given ,with parts. I doubt it flies much anymore ,as they have likely run out of parts long ago. Too bad the Canadian purchase fell through. Would have been interesting.

thay have a whole arsenal 🤣

more like reverse engineering the usa did more than you think

Nope

Wouldn't say better, but good ideas.

By the look of it, Russia has just acquired much more real combat experience than the US as well 🤔

3 days to Kyiv, right comrade?

Dorogoj moj «drug» Josâ, Suhoj eto Suhoj. A ne "Ess-Juu". "Soo", but not "eS-yoU" It isn't short from «Sovêt Union». If the author is a bit more educated than you, it isn't their fault yet the fault of your monolinguistic nation's education. While you are agressively «admiring» on Greece and Latin, among with French, Spanish, and German, you tenderlessly domenisticate other languages by your vocabulary expansion. Although the latter is a norm, but only when you domesticate everything. Not when you had pronounciation changed for multiple times while keeping antique Roman spelling. It's a tad more schizophrenia than should be.

@@worldoftancraft”domenisticate” 🙄🤦🏼‍♂️ You have absolutely no right to criticise other’s English when you’re literally making words up! SMFH…also, it’s conjugated SCHIZOPHRENIC (even though that last bit makes no sense whatsoever given the context…🤡🙄

@@jessehachey2732 first, it's my spelling issue. I wasn't lucky to be born to speak this language of the famous absolute written consistency since my first steps in this world, was I? The first time "tenderlessly domenisticate", the second it goes "domesticate everything". It is not a word I see being actively used in figurative sense. I didn't imply those are two different words, it's just my habit of second, it can be either of those. Where -enic means talking about "having such quality", while -enia means "being of that quality". And I didn't really criticise someone's English. I said that the first guy's remark, rough quote: "It's not Sue-27 but eS-yoU-27" is bizarre, and unimaginable if it'd be some more respected language, say German. I never have heard «Broov, it's not Heckler & KoH, it's Heckler & KoC», or something resembling this example

Exactly. Just like the Em Eye Gee planes.

Actually, many Russians and Ukrainians pronounce it “Sue,” as it is an abbreviation of Sukhoi. The Ka-52 is not “Kay-ay,” but “Kah” as it’s short for Kamov; Tupolev aircraft are “Two” rather than “Tee-you.” (For the record, I used to say “Ess-you,” “Kay-ay,” and “Tee-you” myself.)

I can't speak for NATO but I can speak for the US military. Firstly to answer you question on escorts, they are escorted sometimes but you may or may not see them, when they are escorted it's a show of force. Rule of thumb to follow is if you can see us we can see you. For example Iran flew a drone over our carrier group we saw that thing before it even left the ground infact we had a HELICOPTER follow it and take pictures. The times the are no escorts for recon aircraft is because escorts are a show of force, we don't need to do that 24/7 it require more aircraft and logistic recon planes fly large distances fighter jets may have to refuel which means having ariel refueling craft, it can be done and has been done but their no need espcially when you have the the largest and second largest airforce in the world. Touch one and you are screwed as USN vessels lock on to your aircraft and engage. And we can do it look in the red sea region USN shot down curise missiles and drones

@@Heavenly_Fury Heavenly Fury , I get that and totally understand but something is not adding up if what you state is true. However take a look back , when over the Black sea a U.S. Recon aircraft was in International airspace and up Comes a SU27 , comes within 16 feet of this recon EP-3 aircraft at one point , then Jet washed it on the way out.. NO escort and there has been way more recent incidents in the same area of IAS . However if there was a NATO or USN aircraft in that area of contact , escorting , this potential for not only mid air disaster , but also a international escalation of already tense situations in the region would definitely be avoided , Period. Here , Is it better to Do an oil change or to what for the idiot light to go on , on the dash. Just saying...

That is because your army consist of different bi-, homo-trans, lesbi and other perverse sexuals person.

@@sammym.belfastchild Yes their been increase aggression by Russian fighters, but sending escorts for every reconnaissance mission would be a waste. Sometimes their escorts sometimes their not. Russian and Chinese jets have flown close but most of the time it's just that. I think it simply they don't want to risk an American jet shooting down an Russian jet in the past the US has shot down jets that they attempted to intercept for example 1989 American F-14 vs Libyan Floggers. Additionally the by flying escorts you allow your enemies to collect intel on your aircraft why let that happen not to mention the other reasons I mentioned before. Overall I don't think escorts are always worth the effort it simply depends on the mission.

The US don't want those to be shot down too

Except the fact that the raptor is over 20years old and the lightning is fielded in the thousands while the 57 allegedly has 2 squadrons that have never seen any combat.

lol maybe time to lay off the vodka, Vlad.

​@@jess2690 Stop sniffing cocaine. US bro ;)

​@jess2690 это твой друг? С которым ты водка?

Put down the "Tater-Aid"