Тёмный

The World’s First Photo of Quantum Entanglement Could Disprove Einstein’s Theory 

Seeker
Подписаться 5 млн
Просмотров 667 тыс.
50% 1

Einstein dubbed the idea of quantum entanglement as "spooky action at a distance." Now for the first time ever, scientists have taken a picture of it.
» Subscribe to Seeker!bit.ly/subscribeseeker
» Watch more Elements! bit.ly/ElementsPlaylist
Today we understand quantum entanglement as when a pair of particles that cross paths and interact with each other can become connected and stay that way, even when the particles are spaced very far apart.
Once particles are intertwined in this way, changes to one particle can immediately shape the other particle, an odd scientific phenomenon that has been proven through experiments with atoms and molecules, and more recently through entangled objects of even larger scales.
Quantum entanglement is a key part of quantum mechanics, which forms the basis for fields such as quantum computing and cryptography, so there is considerable interest in advancing our understanding of it.
For scientists at the University of Glasgow, this led them to study a form of quantum entanglement known as Bell entanglement, described by late physicist John Stewart Bell.
Albert Einstein conceived of special and general relativity, but when it came to the idea that two particles can be entangled, and an impact on one particle could be instantaneously felt by the other particle, even over vast distances, for Einstein that was simply unbelievable.
Einstein even went to his grave a skeptic, but since then, quantum entanglement has been demonstrated time and time again, and now for the first time ever, researchers from the University of Glasgow have taken a picture of it.
Learn more about these photographed entangled photons and quantum entanglement on this episode of Elements.
#Quantum #Einstein #Photons #Physics #Seeker #Science #Elements
We’re Close to a Universal Quantum Computer, Here’s Where We're At
• We’re Close to a Unive...
Read More:
A 'spooky' effect of physics that Einstein couldn't believe has been photographed for the first time
www.businessinsider.com/quant...
"The picture represents the first photograph made by quantum entanglement, or the "spooky" pairing of particles. 'The image we've managed to capture is an elegant demonstration of a fundamental property of nature, seen for the very first time in the form of an image.'"
Imaging Bell-type nonlocal behavior
advances.sciencemag.org/conte...
"A BBO crystal pumped by an ultraviolet laser is used as a source of entangled photon pairs.The two photons are separated on a beam splitter (BS). An intensified camera triggered by a SPAD is used to acquire ghost images of a phase object placed on the path of the first photon and nonlocally filtered by four different spatial filters that can be displayed on an SLM (SLM 2) placed in the other arm."
'Spooky' Quantum Entanglement Finally Captured in Stunning Photo
www.livescience.com/65969-qua...
"Recently, a group at the University of Glasgow used a sophisticated system of lasers and crystals to capture the first-ever photo of quantum entanglement violating one of what's now known as 'Bell's inequalities.'"
____________________
Elements is more than just a science show. It’s your science-loving best friend, tasked with keeping you updated and interested on all the compelling, innovative and groundbreaking science happening all around us. Join our passionate hosts as they help break down and present fascinating science, from quarks to quantum theory and beyond.
Seeker empowers the curious to understand the science shaping our world. We tell award-winning stories about the natural forces and groundbreaking innovations that impact our lives, our planet, and our universe.
Visit the Seeker website www.seeker.com/videos
Elements on Facebook / seekerelements
Subscribe now! ru-vid.com_c...
Seeker on Twitter / seeker
Seeker on Facebook / seekermedia
Seeker www.seeker.com/

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

9 сен 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,5 тыс.   
@kingdmind
@kingdmind 4 года назад
- Photo of a Black Hole - MRI of a single atom - First look at Quantum Entanglement
@jokuvaan5175
@jokuvaan5175 4 года назад
What a time to be alive
@zafarabbas5563
@zafarabbas5563 4 года назад
Where are my flying cars?
@watcher6935
@watcher6935 4 года назад
King D - Mind , we see that everywhere in nature. All scale. In image of a vascular system looks like a picture of smaller rivers branching off a big river from high up. Also looks like the inside of leaves. See a PATTERN ) here? Oh an MRI image of an active brain looks like an image of the universe.
@Yooo-ph5zx
@Yooo-ph5zx 4 года назад
Jami just amazing!
@ludwigtemmel
@ludwigtemmel 4 года назад
Catgirls are next
@Kachlimpen.
@Kachlimpen. 4 года назад
Nice, something to hang up next to the Black hole portrait.
@RatedArgForPirates
@RatedArgForPirates 4 года назад
Kachlimpen I didnt know it but my heart was lowkey searching for this comment
@Akashic85
@Akashic85 4 года назад
And the MRI of an atom
@ntactime_w3488
@ntactime_w3488 4 года назад
@@RatedArgForPirates Dude chill
@Nbrobst
@Nbrobst 4 года назад
@@ntactime_w3488 no u
@Stevethethird677
@Stevethethird677 4 года назад
@@ntactime_w3488 Nobelium uranium
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
Is it just me or is this way too little information to understand what we're looking at? From the simplistic description, I have no idea what I should be seeing in that picture, or what I shouldn't see if the hypothesis was falsified. It's sensationalizing but shallow videos like this that make people dumber about science. Anyone with the illusion of knowledge is less likely to seek the whole truth. If you want to help with public science literacy, don't do it halfway.
@robwes9227
@robwes9227 4 года назад
This is probably less about true education and more about views.
@lucrativelepton
@lucrativelepton 4 года назад
So true. I feel like I should have known given the length, there's no time to go into detail. I should just stick to PBS Space Time 😛
@NikolaosSkordilis
@NikolaosSkordilis 4 года назад
Apparently they couldn't go beyond the ~4' time limit of their "normal" videos. In some other, more in depth videos, which last 10' - 12', they explain stuff in more detail. You are right that unless someone knew what on Earth he was talking about he would barely understand a thing.
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
@@lucrativelepton Space Time FTW.
@28russ
@28russ 4 года назад
I suppose it's more of a vid for people who are already up on the theory a bit....It would be a long vid if he explained the theory of entanglement properly.....Checkout the double slit experiment.....And the quantum eraser double split experiment for a better understanding of entanglement :-)......And what they said ^^^ Pbs space time for the win.....He does really good vids :-)
@GamingDemiurge
@GamingDemiurge 4 года назад
Correction. Bell's inequalities disproved LOCAL hidden variables not hidden variable theories in general. Theories like Bohmian Mechanics are compatible with bell inequalities and perfectly valid.
@JonasHamill
@JonasHamill 4 года назад
To be fair, I don't think a hidden variable could ever be disproven as it is by definition hidden.
@ne1cup
@ne1cup 4 года назад
you are so smart..are we related?
@LiLi-or2gm
@LiLi-or2gm 4 года назад
@@JonasHamill Hidden variables can be ruled out by showing the statistical outcomes of specific experiments. If hidden variables exist, the statistical outcomes of these experiments would be different than what are actually measured.
@mohammedsufyan4011
@mohammedsufyan4011 4 года назад
Hey ! How can i learn about all this? I am reading a brief history of time .. What else do u suggest
@MrWorshipMe
@MrWorshipMe 4 года назад
@@mohammedsufyan4011 if you want more pop science, Entanglement by Amir D Aczel is good (for a pop Sci), Black Hole wars by Leonard Suskind is also very good. If you want something more precise, I highly recommend Feynman's lectures, you can skip the math if it's too intimidating and concentrate on the physical explanations. Also, if you're not afraid of math, search RU-vid for Leonard Suskind lectures. He's very easy to follow, and doesn't dumb things down.
@sebastianelytron8450
@sebastianelytron8450 4 года назад
Trying to disprove Einstein is a BAD idea... relatively speaking.
@GodOfPizza
@GodOfPizza 4 года назад
Bruh
@tmseh
@tmseh 4 года назад
Ahhhhhh haaaaaaaaaaa!
@watcher6935
@watcher6935 4 года назад
Sebastian Elytron , lol. No it's not
@maumbu
@maumbu 4 года назад
Sebastian Elytron ahhh, i see what you did there. Ha. Ha-ha. Zinger!
@samanthagreen6803
@samanthagreen6803 4 года назад
I see what you did there!😆🤣
@pickin7654
@pickin7654 4 года назад
Well professors and scientists are kind of going for the direction of *_pics or we ain't believing it_*
@joshuamathew6223
@joshuamathew6223 4 года назад
How wrong could that be if the photos are 100% original......
@that1nerdyblackgirl736
@that1nerdyblackgirl736 4 года назад
Pretty much
@Marc-mp6lf
@Marc-mp6lf 4 года назад
In science data is the king so yes
@nilsacred8180
@nilsacred8180 3 года назад
Baymax in creation, affirmation is king so forever Yes ;)
@leot7
@leot7 4 года назад
I also think the original "Pale Blue Dot" photo has to be one of the best pictures ever taken as well.
@pearlyshells2430
@pearlyshells2430 4 года назад
Not 1 of the best...the best...puts all in perspective.
@holisticremedy8958
@holisticremedy8958 4 года назад
The Hubble pic I think was the best.. finally people realized that they are not the center of the universe.. didn't stop them from acting like it though. Lol.
@mrhawkyoudown6333
@mrhawkyoudown6333 4 года назад
It’s not real 🤣🤣🤣
@valentinbernard8126
@valentinbernard8126 3 года назад
@@mrhawkyoudown6333 ? You're not ?
@mrhawkyoudown6333
@mrhawkyoudown6333 3 года назад
Valentin Bernard lay of the brainwashing juice 🥤
@JustANormal-YTchannel
@JustANormal-YTchannel 4 года назад
Wow first it was a picture of a black hole, now a picture of a quantum entanglement in one year!?... Man science is crazy!
@reinyeradoriuq2733
@reinyeradoriuq2733 4 года назад
How about the MRI scan of a single atom?
@martiddy
@martiddy 4 года назад
I AM A MAD SCIENTIST!!
@nogodsnomasters357
@nogodsnomasters357 4 года назад
Science is what a 7th grader does, This is physics! 👍✌
@martiddy
@martiddy 4 года назад
@@nogodsnomasters357 wait what?
@BigNewGames
@BigNewGames 4 года назад
The image of a black hole was fabricated using CGI.
@AGDinCA
@AGDinCA 4 года назад
So Einstein thought this couldn't happen. None of his famous equations are reliant on quantum entanglement. Turns out QE works. Einstein is wrong, but it doesn't affect any of his major equations. So... kinda clickbait-ish?
@green0563
@green0563 4 года назад
Agreed.
@friendlyone2706
@friendlyone2706 4 года назад
It was not so much he thought it couldn't happen---he understood the arguments for it---as he was emotionally against it. Unlike many of Einstein's contemporaneous detractors, he recognized his dislike as emotional, not intellectual. Like all humans, he attempted to defend his emotional preferences with intellectual arguments. Because Einstein understood it, he and Neil Bohr had wonderful times challenging each other with thought experiments, encouraging their mutual growth of understanding. Einstein got the ocean of galaxies mostly right; but faltered on the metaphorical atoms in that ocean. He just didn't enjoy looking in that direction as much. It is unlikely Bohr, or the other early quantum physicists, would have developed general relativity. They did not enjoy looking in that direction as much. We still need both visions. And both visions will at times seem to contradict the other.
@c1osmo
@c1osmo 4 года назад
Yep.. very clickable. But Newton got us to the moon, Einstein's time dilation keeps GPS satellites on track and working. May be something for this in the future.
@kingdmind
@kingdmind 4 года назад
Carrie Osmo Really, anything can be used for societal matters
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
Actually, special relativity has been fully integrated with QFT. But quantum just implodes if you ask it about gravity, so no serious physicist is going to suggest that any of Einstein's work or equations were wrong. Rather, they would tell you that both theories are incomplete.
@rea8585
@rea8585 4 года назад
One of those photons winked at me! Flirty flirty 😀😀😀
@cob571
@cob571 4 года назад
Bacon is delicious! Edit: Woah.. Such diverse opinions about bacon :)
@alexdg7755
@alexdg7755 4 года назад
Chris Anderson but only if they’re unattractive or famous lol
@MrNeo901
@MrNeo901 4 года назад
Should hashtag #Me2...
@abhi-_-
@abhi-_- 4 года назад
#Mentoo
@ronnierabell1
@ronnierabell1 4 года назад
😉😉😉
@fabricobjects-llc3581
@fabricobjects-llc3581 4 года назад
Freeze @ 02:11 - Thank you! This video actually gave me a VERY big breakthrough in my physics research!
@germaindrouet4754
@germaindrouet4754 4 года назад
Hi Justin. Thanks for this incredible peace of news. Why has this not reached the mainstream TV news yet? Did I miss it? Definitely on a par with the double slit or cloud chamber experiment. Thanks Glasgow Uni!
@deluxeassortment
@deluxeassortment 4 года назад
Since you prefer hype over clarity, I'll clarify: Einstein built an interpretation of the world in quantum mechanics as real and local. He did not bekieve in "spooky action at a distance", because it messed with the order of causality. Neils Bohr believed certain aspects of the sub atomic world were meaningless until we measured them. So, what's being proven wrong is Einstein's local-realistic world-view. This doesn't disprove relativity. BUT, Einstein used realism and locality as axioms in his development of relativity. Maybe this is why his theory breaks down at the smallest level.
@CatMan_7
@CatMan_7 4 года назад
Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride - Newton’s Spookey Action theory. Einstein was in the naysayers camp. Just like he accepted The “Expanding vs Static” Universe model. Einstein was building on the work already done by others, just like any good scientist would and does.
@deluxeassortment
@deluxeassortment 4 года назад
@@CatMan_7 Right, but when you have a title that says "...Could Disprove Einstein's Theory" that's ambiguous like that and don't clarify, it makes it seem as if we are going to just throw Relativity away, which isn't the case. It just needs to be refined to work in the non-local, quantum world. Supergravity solves this by substituting the quantum variables with string equations, but since we have no way to test string theory, there's no way to know for sure if it's the right answer.
@robinh7745
@robinh7745 4 года назад
Excuse me, but where is the spooky action at distance here? Take 1 watermelon in the space, make it explode exactly in the center to have to hemi-watermelons spinning in the opposite directions. In few kilometers they will still be spinning in opposite directions, until one of them meets an attraction or an object on his path while the other dont… There is no action at distance in this process, just a probability to predict the state of one particle based on the other? Knowing that the entanglement comes from the first LOCAL and REALISTIC event. For entangled photons, if you increase the distance, the time, im pretty sure the chance to predict their states decrease (no magic)
@dim83527
@dim83527 4 года назад
Amazing discoveries happening everyday
@michaelflash6457
@michaelflash6457 4 года назад
the idea that we actually have camera's fast enough to capture a photon as well as the movement of a photon amazes me. The black hole is amazing too, but i think that is easier to do than imaging the movement of visible light itself, moving at the speed of light.
@IRONMAN-oh5od
@IRONMAN-oh5od 4 года назад
How does it make Einstein's theory wrong when he was only sceptical and not his theory?
@Haki145
@Haki145 4 года назад
Exactly.
@UltraCasualPenguin
@UltraCasualPenguin 4 года назад
Einstein was afraid of quantum theory because it would disprove his theory at least some level.
@sageASHEN
@sageASHEN 3 года назад
He brought up Einstein-Pedolsky-Rosen paradox to disprove Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.
@strangerwithscience3597
@strangerwithscience3597 3 года назад
Ummm.... Go check again
@dzikraaksa527
@dzikraaksa527 3 года назад
@@sageASHEN and those paradox has been disproved by experiments
@db197529
@db197529 4 года назад
For the History, He didn't just dubbed the idea of Q.Entanglement as Spooky. He was actually the first one to suggest (mathematically) in a paper that this phenomenon exists. This didn't came up by Bohr and the others. They didn't even realise that this exists. Einstein hoped this is a proof that Q.Mechanics is an incomplete theory. Of course, QE proved to be true and leads our research nowadays. Even his objections proved to be valuable! Also there is a research that goes to suggest that QE could be another phenomenon related to wormholes (Maldacena and Susskind). Remains to be seen.
@friendlyone2706
@friendlyone2706 4 года назад
He understood the time-independent consequences of entanglement, and as a student of Spinoza's philosophy and a cultural, if skeptical, descendant of Abraham, he believed deeply in the laws of cause and effect being time-logical---as we humans perceive logic. Entanglement means not only does God play dice with the universe, but those dice are forever hidden from view in a realm where effect is cause. Scary crazy. Deep Space Nine, the TV series, wormhole aliens were an excellent example of quantum thinking.
@infinite2742
@infinite2742 4 года назад
Best channel for science updates👌
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
No it isn't. This video (and many others on this channel) is sensationalized and shallow. SciShow is more reliable for current events and PBS Space Time is waaaaay better for detailed explanations of the experiments and concepts. In fact I can't recommend Space Time enough, they are the real deal. Seeker is meant to make you go "wow! science is neat" but leave you without any actual knowledge.
@somethingelse25
@somethingelse25 4 года назад
Cool info!
@alberteinstein3078
@alberteinstein3078 4 года назад
*WTF* *YO* i used to like seeker
@extradimension7356
@extradimension7356 4 года назад
Yo mamma so entangled that the all the other mammas busted Bell's inequalities just to shut yo' up going on all about "Hidden variable " this, "Spooky dumbass " that...
@nilsacred8180
@nilsacred8180 3 года назад
Lol ;) thank you thread ;P
@nuitarix8160
@nuitarix8160 4 года назад
The man died 64 years ago. Heaven forbid we make advances in science and technology....
@hopesmedley1648
@hopesmedley1648 4 года назад
Ikr
@CatMan_7
@CatMan_7 4 года назад
Nuitari X - Exact-A-Moundo
@protocolsoftheeldersofchic1215
@protocolsoftheeldersofchic1215 4 года назад
most of einsteins ideas (which he actually plagiarized btw) have been rekt by modern day science
@Haki145
@Haki145 4 года назад
@@protocolsoftheeldersofchic1215 Such a stupid comment.
@protocolsoftheeldersofchic1215
@protocolsoftheeldersofchic1215 4 года назад
@@Haki145 research it
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 4 года назад
"while each particle track passes through just one slit, the wave passes through both; the interference profile that consequently develops in the wave generates similar pattern in the trajectory guided by the wave. "And so influenced that the particle does not go where the waves cancel out, but is attracted to where they cooperate. This idea seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored." John Bell
@onehitpick9758
@onehitpick9758 4 года назад
I have simulated correlations of low-level waves with quantizing detectors. The correlation results are very straight forward and replicate the entanglement phenomenon, but don't require any spooky action. It just requires operating at low signal levels close to the noise limit, with detectors that have been cooled to a similar, very low KBT limit.
@mike_y0st
@mike_y0st 4 года назад
This reminds me of the Philotic Strings described in Orson Scott Card’s Ender Series, particularly in Children of the Mind.
@hupekyser
@hupekyser 4 года назад
Awesome, great info. Crazy good achievement by science.
@caddiman1990
@caddiman1990 4 года назад
To bad they can't achieve that in the depths of the oceans.
@consonantsandvowels1
@consonantsandvowels1 4 года назад
@@caddiman1990 *Too bad
@trinigooner8865
@trinigooner8865 4 года назад
You don't know what he's talking about do you? 😂
@ls200076
@ls200076 4 года назад
@@caddiman1990 Different fields
@Growlizing
@Growlizing 4 года назад
The coolest photo? The image of the microwave background radiation.
@OfMiceAndMegabytes
@OfMiceAndMegabytes 3 года назад
That and the Pale Blue Dot pic along with the Black Hole picture are the most beautiful.
@spinoff55
@spinoff55 4 года назад
First Hubble Deep Field image. THAT was the big wig flipper for me.Thanks for the explainer!
@igotnerfedd
@igotnerfedd 4 года назад
@seeker HI Great Video I am commenting to ask where did you get that shirt?! it's awesome!
@WRAND2208
@WRAND2208 4 года назад
I love these kind of content but the same time i dont understand.
@clockworkdave9850
@clockworkdave9850 4 года назад
No-one really does..yet
@maria12501
@maria12501 4 года назад
It means that the quantum particles travel faster than the speed of light they proved it with their machines, and what actually set the particles off.
@youtubingbabs
@youtubingbabs 3 года назад
Two photons go two dif paths.... But end up the same because they're family.
@mitchellhudson8338
@mitchellhudson8338 3 года назад
Hey hey hey, LOCAL hidden variables violate bells inequalities. Non-local hidden variables or superdeterminism can still explain a “medium” that transfers information in such a way that doesn’t travel faster than the speed of light.
@mitchellhudson8338
@mitchellhudson8338 3 года назад
Sorry didn’t mean to post that here 😅
@raphsere
@raphsere 4 года назад
Einstein once said that he would feel sorry for God if his theory was proven incorrect. P.S: What he meant was that the theory of general relativity was of such incredible beauty that God would be a poor universe designer if it wasn't correct.
@CourTooKnee
@CourTooKnee 4 года назад
raphsere interesting
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
That had to be a happy accident, given how poorly God designed us living things.
@kiyoponnn
@kiyoponnn 4 года назад
@@davidhand9721 Lmao, god's not real
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
@@kiyoponnn You can't prove that there is no God to crack jokes at.
@kiyoponnn
@kiyoponnn 4 года назад
@@davidhand9721 Touché🤣🤣
@sb-hf7tw
@sb-hf7tw 4 года назад
I'm fortunate that I could know about Quantum Entanglement and could see first ever image through the video of SEEKER. THANKS SEEKER FOR CONNECTING ME MODERN WORLD PHYSICS!!!👍👍👍
@gooblegobble3416
@gooblegobble3416 4 года назад
Maybe someone will do a vid on these AMAZING cameras that can photograph a single photon. That's the part that blows my mind...like what medium are we using to show a grainy image of one of the smallest "particles" in the universe??
@yatint9665
@yatint9665 4 года назад
I have absolutely no idea what he just explained.
@GrapplingTV
@GrapplingTV 4 года назад
It's scientism even the guy saying it doesn't know
@paulinogalias5067
@paulinogalias5067 4 года назад
@@GrapplingTV they are educated people. They have a big passion for science. And if your just gonna say that to them who are working hard for science is just a big no no.
@lasarith2
@lasarith2 4 года назад
Yatin T look at it like this, Say you have twins one goes left the other goes right for about an hour ( so they won’t be able to see each other) one of the twins puts his right hand up - at the exact same time the other twin puts there left hand up, in other words whatever one twin does no matter the distance apart the other twin does the same thing only with the other hand, in one way you could theoretically beat light speed, in Communications (transfer of information) - but can’t be tested because the furthest distance we’ve gone is 400,000 km.(human)
@yojiviriak675
@yojiviriak675 4 года назад
@@lasarith2 farthest distance we gone is 400000 km?? Please explain
@lordx4641
@lordx4641 4 года назад
@@yojiviriak675 he means maybe in data sent but what about voyager and Mangalyaan then they send data from faraway in space🤔
@tracymitchell5054
@tracymitchell5054 4 года назад
It actually holds up his theory, Entangled particles are able to "comunicate" thier changes because , they are locked in the same time, or locked in the same space, no matter where in time or space they are.
@3KRacing
@3KRacing 4 года назад
I believe the two entangled particles are connected via a specific combination of an undiscovered state of matter and its particle(s), which in itself will be realized to make up only a very small fraction of "dark matter". Dark matter is such a broad a statement and is no different than Einstein using the term spooky actions... I think the particles are held together via a plane of matter/energy that we simply don't have the capabilities to detect and calculate. It's like observing a "magic" floating dollar trick from a distance, you can theorize that it's held up by a string, fan or even how Einstein put it, Spooky Actions; but until you are able to examine the trick at a closer viewpoint, youll never know. I feel like we just aren't able to get a closer look... or our "current angle" prevents us from seeing the secret of the trick altogether. Imagine if another audience member is standing closer and on the side of the magician, they're able to visibly see the string moving above them holding the dollar thus providing them the visibility to fully explain the trick. It's an elementary way of looking at it I suppose but I strongly believe either we simply don't have the technology available to detect this plane or our current view of the universe locks us out of being able to observe that type of phenomenon altogether. We can only observe whats available for us to observe. * Disclaimer: I'm no physicist, obviously, so if my terminology is off or if I confused anyone my apologies. I'm just trying to explain it the best way I know how. Cheers!
@nibumathew7938
@nibumathew7938 4 года назад
The 'Pale Blue Dot' picture captured by Voyager is the greatest photo science has given us. It shows our place in this vast universe, so humbling.
@pagedouglas16
@pagedouglas16 4 года назад
the pic of pluto was super cool
@kiranjoshi6721
@kiranjoshi6721 4 года назад
Sometimes I get confused whether I'm watching Nvidia or Seeker. Lol.
@botdog370
@botdog370 4 года назад
seeker rtx 2080
@virgiltuser
@virgiltuser 4 года назад
Feels
@CosmicBackgroundRadiation01
@CosmicBackgroundRadiation01 4 года назад
“Nice shirt”- Schrodinger
@jackywacky3798
@jackywacky3798 4 года назад
Quantum is like a old friend that you’ve never met
@doyshoiy
@doyshoiy 4 года назад
your schordingers cat shirt is amazing
@shatterthemirror8563
@shatterthemirror8563 4 года назад
If there was a causal relationship between the states of the two photons, quantum communication would be possible. But there isn't and it's not. Therefore what is quantum entanglement? It's not one photon in two different places even though that is how the effect is explained sometimes, it's really photons that simply share a property that can both be proven to not be causally related to the other and to be unpredictable to a certain degree. That's why quantum computers will turn out to be glorified random number generators.
@robinh7745
@robinh7745 4 года назад
True, Im still waiting for a "real" proof of the non-locality concept. For the moment, this is "just" a law of probabilities.
@SonicSP
@SonicSP 4 года назад
I thought Einstein was disproven years ago in this matter? Quantum entanglement via this isn't exactly new. Just felt like the title is really misleading/clickbaity because its already happened with plenty of evidence prior. Mind you the content of the video and the new advancement of a photo is still good.
@creatorsremose
@creatorsremose 4 года назад
You're right. The Bell experiment was done in the 60s, I think? Einstein's conjecture was disproved long before this photo. The title is, of course, misleading.
@guccifer7874
@guccifer7874 4 года назад
@@creatorsremose Well, I would assume that the title might be referring to the experience similar to seeing a photo of the shape of Earth. We knew the Earth was round and the sun (and not Earth) was the center of our solar system for a long time now, but seeing the Earth itself in a photo could also seen be as evidence that disproves all other theories about Earth. I can't really explain it in words, unfortunately. I would call it: Immediate experience or immediate evidence like the photo of Earth. You would see it first-hand with your own eyes.
@strange6973
@strange6973 4 года назад
@@creatorsremose The conjecture of _local_ hidden variables was dis-proven, but non-local variables are still a plausible explanation for these results.
@tudseaturtle
@tudseaturtle 4 года назад
Would make a great communication device for deep space exploration.
@GreenGoblinCoryintheHouse
@GreenGoblinCoryintheHouse 4 года назад
This awesome, thanks.
@PythonPlusPlus
@PythonPlusPlus 4 года назад
Einstein is so good at physics that even he can’t comprehend his skills.
@jonathansantiago5327
@jonathansantiago5327 4 года назад
Holy mother!!! I LOVE THAT SHIRT!
@jonathansantiago5327
@jonathansantiago5327 4 года назад
Nothing at all, just making a comment in a video over potential significant changes in Physics by, in fact, reacting with the shirt only. Just because lol.
@dereknaut
@dereknaut 4 года назад
Kudos on the shirt.. Perfect context for this video
@MarsStarcruiser
@MarsStarcruiser 4 года назад
What I’d really like to know, does this mean wireless transmission through everything, even through the planet? Since both sides of entangled pair can be calculated and predicted and its not “random”, doesn’t that mean its potentially the most accurate transmission medium possible?
@BensBrickDesigns
@BensBrickDesigns 4 года назад
I'm still stunned at the 2013 photo of the carbon monoxide molecule.
@Rohitranjit17
@Rohitranjit17 4 года назад
Schrödinger's cat @Cool shirt👍
@lordx4641
@lordx4641 4 года назад
Actually Schrodinger's cat maybe fine but it was more about probability to be precise in this case it is the similar behaviour of very fundamental units
@ne1cup
@ne1cup 4 года назад
this picture and the one of DNA structures are mind blowing thank you, when are we going to use "entangled pairs" for unlimit communications?
@jamesmartin9401
@jamesmartin9401 3 года назад
I think some pictures might be more scientifically impressive, but the Hubble picture of the Pillars of Creation in the Eagle nebula is by far the coolest.
@its.yashhh
@its.yashhh 4 года назад
Did anyone notice his T-shirt refers to Schrödinger’s cat and superposition
@aptibabayt
@aptibabayt 4 года назад
I'm a physicist, and don't understand your explanation. If they were sent to separate ways, how can a pic of both particles be taken? Ifv they're in an opposite phase, how can they amplify each other? Simplicity is good, up to the point it's too simplistic and unclear :/
@aptibabayt
@aptibabayt 4 года назад
@Andrew Ongais they said they've taken a pic of the two particles that split. How do they take one pic of two distant particles? Is this a super-position of two pics? If so - what's the point of showing them on the same image?
@delaatste7565
@delaatste7565 4 года назад
The thing with quantum mechanics that i dont understand yet is what do they mean with “measure, observe”. Is it like seeing of measuring because couldnt you just film the superposition?
@udaykarthikeya
@udaykarthikeya 4 года назад
This experiment was shown in the channel " The Action Lab " !
@davidhand9721
@davidhand9721 4 года назад
Did they actually explain it there?
@duchi882
@duchi882 4 года назад
*WHAAAAAAT* -You never played Tuber Simulator- Eintein's Theory could be disproved?! _BIG BRAIN_
@koungmeng
@koungmeng 4 года назад
I knew Quantum from an anime called "Rascal does not dream of bunny girl senpai".
@bhuvimangwani6644
@bhuvimangwani6644 4 года назад
It was a great video but could have delved into the deeper explanation of these principles. It seemed incredibly short to have discussed such a complex theory.
@garysmith1135
@garysmith1135 3 года назад
I love the "cat" wanted dead or alive t-shirt. HIlarious!
@HeadEnterprise
@HeadEnterprise 4 года назад
Thank you for dumbing this down for people like me...I still didn't understand anything.
@MultiBrad777
@MultiBrad777 4 года назад
You don’t build photographs.... that’s called a composite....There are no photographs of photons or quantum entanglement
@MultiBrad777
@MultiBrad777 4 года назад
@Matthew Morycinski still not a photograph as represented in the video........ it's an interpretation of data...... and we have very little knowledge when it comes to the theory of protons much less any real visual representation
@Oscar1618033
@Oscar1618033 3 года назад
Well, the Bell's inequalities have some other requirements (e.g.: locality), therefore the hidden variables may still exists breaking only a few of those requirements.
@jasonchen9645
@jasonchen9645 4 года назад
I love the Schrodengers cat shirt! Very cool.
@Xeno_Bardock
@Xeno_Bardock 4 года назад
Scientists In the future. Turns out Nikola Tesla's Ether exists and it could replace Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity and Special Relativity.
@ashyosings5089
@ashyosings5089 4 года назад
Literally been rooting for him years now
@Bassotronics
@Bassotronics 4 года назад
I believe Ether does exist because everything requires a medium to travel through. How does gravity travel through empty space? It doesn’t because Space is not empty, it travels through the Ether.
@himanshnegi832
@himanshnegi832 4 года назад
@@Bassotronics ever heard about electric field and magnetic field.
@Xeno_Bardock
@Xeno_Bardock 4 года назад
@@Bassotronics Gravity is the ether itself actually. Ether flowing towards the earths internal electric negative charge is the cause of gravity and inertia on earth. Weight of an object is also caused by the ether flow. If a person jumps off an airplane for example, as long as the person is falling towards the earth, that person wont experience inertia and the persons weight will be zero because the person is falling towards the earth with the ether flow. Its the same for the planets orbiting the Sun. Planets are falling towards the Sun with the counterclockwise vortex of ether but because the Sun itself is in orbit around the galactic ether vortex, planets never actually fall into the Sun. Planet orbiting clockwise on the other hand will meet with resistance and fall into the Sun because it will be like say swimming against the ocean waves.
@Xeno_Bardock
@Xeno_Bardock 4 года назад
@@himanshnegi832 Magnetic field is the ether vortex. Electric field is the hybrid of magnetic field and dielectric field. Dielectric field is the ether under pressure. Dielectric field is the voltage and magnetic field is current in electric field, both fields together give power measured in watts. Check archive.org/details/elementarylectur00steirich
@amithsouryasadineni730
@amithsouryasadineni730 4 года назад
*Einstein*: using quantum entanglement we can transport information faster than just like that *Thanos*: Am I a joke to you ?
@BethPlayingGames
@BethPlayingGames 4 года назад
Bless you for saying Glasgow right 😌
@Revadike
@Revadike 4 года назад
Deep thinking/speculating here, correct me if I'm wrong: If quantum physics would scale up, that essentially means that anything that isn't observed by a living being (or just me?) is in a superposition state. And if we were living in a simulation this superposition would save information, which leads to less resources being used, which means a more optimized simulation. Hmm...
@friendlyone2706
@friendlyone2706 4 года назад
Now you understand the T-shirt
@massecl
@massecl 4 года назад
"Photo" is an improper term, it is but an interference pattern, just like in the double slit experiment, which demonstrates quantum entanglement too. Einstein wasn't wrong, it is a further improper term. Only Einstein pointed out the spooky action at a distance, while all the other physicists (including Bohr) saw no problem at all. Actually, Einstein is at the origin of all the so called modern physics, including quantum mechanics. Face it.
@CatMan_7
@CatMan_7 4 года назад
Nickel Chrome - term spooky action is “Newton’s”. Einstein was in the naysayer camp trying to disprove it. So it wasn’t his theory in the first place. Sir Issac Newton is the Father of Modern Physics. We got to the moon with his work. And it takes a Genius to stand on the work of other Geniuses. Hope you can revisit Newton and enjoy the Beauty of it all.
@massecl
@massecl 4 года назад
@@CatMan_7 Newton's spooky action at a distance is for gravitation. Before Einstein, nobody saw there was a spooky action at a distance in quantum mechanics. Einstein introduced quantum physics already in 1905. Modern physics is relativity and quantum mechanics. Newton's is classical physics. Without Maxwell and classical electrodynamics, no Moon.
@andsalomoni
@andsalomoni 3 года назад
Already to start saying that it is a photo of "entanglement" is ridiculous. Entanglement is a concept. It is like saying "we have photographed mass", or "time". Then it comes out that the photo is the usual interference figure. Scientific divulgation is reaching very, very low levels...
@me1234229
@me1234229 4 года назад
I guess science is all about "hey if I jump down there would I be alive hmm, welp not sure until I proved it" years later " oh gosh can't believe I was right"
@writteng
@writteng 4 года назад
Coolest pictures science produced; Seeker did a video on laser induced sound waves. This tech was used to produce highly detailed, clear images of structures inside our body! Very cool
@utubeballbag
@utubeballbag 4 года назад
Wrongggg, spooky action at a distance was coined by Isaac Newton, 270 years before Einstein.
@brandonfrew2986
@brandonfrew2986 4 года назад
utubeballbag check out the big brain on brad
@CatMan_7
@CatMan_7 4 года назад
utubeballbag - finally!!! Someone got it Right. He only started using the term to try to disprove it. Which he couldn’t. His work has many “Black Holes” forgive the pun, that others have gladly jumped on to help with. There are teams of Scientist out there stuck on One page of his work. Which they are working to prove or disprove, see in science it’s not wrong or right, It’s prove or disprove.
@catman2157
@catman2157 4 года назад
Yay more clickbait titles!
@jb5043
@jb5043 4 года назад
Can't help but notice that it looks like "A perfect circle"
@peacekeeper9840
@peacekeeper9840 4 года назад
Question - Are the particles which appear at the edge of black hole entangled ? If they are and one particle get sucked inside the black hole and the other one is emmitted as Hawking's radiation, if we measure the emmitted particle, do we change some properties inside the black hole ?
@peacekeeper9840
@peacekeeper9840 4 года назад
@Matthew Morycinski I am sorry I am not aware of his lectures, this thought just came into my mind cause I think watched a video on Hawkins radiation before
@S3GXY
@S3GXY 4 года назад
He will still remain the most intelligent guy on the planet born until now.
@Pseudo___
@Pseudo___ 4 года назад
Intelligence is relative. Doesn't always lead to publicity. Especially when research is often done in large groups of people
@Rizzbulla
@Rizzbulla 4 года назад
Tesla > Einstein
@S3GXY
@S3GXY 4 года назад
@@Rizzbulla That's a tough one to argue.
@pitthepig
@pitthepig 4 года назад
The clickbait is strong on this one. You earned a dislike, sorry.
@green0563
@green0563 4 года назад
Agreed. Any reader will assume they meant relativity.
@dflash77yt
@dflash77yt 4 года назад
Yeah they got me too. It’s still interesting though.
@Patrickisat
@Patrickisat 4 года назад
I remember the wave and particle entanglement test. It would change results as if going back in time depending on how it was observed. Spooky
@verstengenericks
@verstengenericks 4 года назад
My nomination for best movie / series of photos : time lapse of Crab Nebula pulsar
@caylya7869
@caylya7869 4 года назад
Einstein was wrong a couple of times
@affanakhter8300
@affanakhter8300 4 года назад
His theory was a "THEORY". it can be disproven. It's not a fact.
@affanakhter8300
@affanakhter8300 4 года назад
@Jack the lad92 you can assume all you want, but theory is just an idea about the real thing. It can be close to reality. But its not a fact. It becomes a solid fact when it's proven. Until then it's just an idea.
@aleksandersuur9475
@aleksandersuur9475 4 года назад
@@affanakhter8300 You are just plain wrong in terminology. Hypothesis is an idea about how reality might be like, when tested and proven viable by many facts it can become a theory. There is no superior grade of truth in science than a theory. It is possible that later a superior theory with wider scope will be developed, but all that can do is prove the previous theory limited in scope, not wrong. All that made it a theory in the first place will still stay true.
@d.b.cooper1721
@d.b.cooper1721 4 года назад
@@affanakhter8300 You should not lecture people about the definition of scientific terms using a lay persons limited understanding of those terms. It really makes you look like an arrogant fool; especially when you just double-down with your ignorance instead of doing a quick bit of fact finding & see what indeed the definition of theory is when used in Science..
@affanakhter8300
@affanakhter8300 4 года назад
@@d.b.cooper1721 okay nerd. Whatever you say.
@d.b.cooper1721
@d.b.cooper1721 4 года назад
@@affanakhter8300 Some fools just cannot be told, nor it seems skulk away silently when they embarrass themselves as much as you have.
@Criterion5
@Criterion5 3 года назад
Visually similar to the cyclons of a half tetrahedron. half octahedron and half a cube, individually. The interference patterns of the lesser circle representations of said polyhedra.
@ursaltydog
@ursaltydog 4 года назад
so what are the characteristics of two different photons that creates opposite phases even though separated and on different paths?
@FacterinoCommenterino
@FacterinoCommenterino 4 года назад
Today's fact: The largest living organism on the earth is Quaking Aspen, a single tree in Utah which weighs 6,000 tonnes!
@jimmyshrimbe9361
@jimmyshrimbe9361 4 года назад
Facterino Commenterino I thought there was a big ole underground fungus that was bigger.
@mr.personhumanson6871
@mr.personhumanson6871 4 года назад
And the largest animal to have ever existed is a dinosaur called, Yomommasaur
@friendlyone2706
@friendlyone2706 4 года назад
There are seaweed varieties most likely larger---more room. Providing you see 'earth' as a planet, not a location restriction.
@zaneal-amood5474
@zaneal-amood5474 4 года назад
you know some theories of quantum entanglement actually state that it’s a warm hole that links the two particles together In theory there might be a way to expand that wormhole to allow classical information to travel through it
@johnpepin5373
@johnpepin5373 3 года назад
I wonder if quantum time erasure could be tested with this setup by varying the locations of the detectors?
@caitgems1
@caitgems1 4 года назад
Yay for Glesga uni ❤🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
@oneminutefixed5003
@oneminutefixed5003 2 года назад
A camera draws based on the light reflected to it's sensors, how can light be reflecting from the structure of a wave / particle if that whole structure IS light itself?
@ZOCCOK
@ZOCCOK 4 года назад
-Photo of a Black Hole - MRI of a single atom - First look at Quantum Entanglement First photo of my micro p*nis
@dmonvisigoth1651
@dmonvisigoth1651 4 года назад
That Schrödinger's Cat shirt is bomb
@corylyonsmusic
@corylyonsmusic 4 года назад
All I can focus on is that super dope Schrodingers Cat shirt!!!!
@CatMan_7
@CatMan_7 4 года назад
Cory Lyons Music - Yeah Man, I kept hoping he was going to put a link at the end😸
@ycart_tech6726
@ycart_tech6726 4 года назад
Love the Schroedinger's cat tee...
@irwinluck7419
@irwinluck7419 3 года назад
I have a 4 questions. Would you be kind enough to answer each of them. 1) When 2 particles are entangled and one particle spin is measured is it true that both particles superposition collapses at the same time and the two particles have opposite spins? 2) When the measurement ends do both particles revert back to a superposition. Are they still entangled? 3) If they are, can one of the entangled particles be measured again collapsing both there superpositions to have opposite spins? 4) What experiments have been done to answer these questions?
@teraconley7173
@teraconley7173 4 года назад
Brilliant explanation! Almost as great as the Schrodinger's shirt!!!
@das8771
@das8771 4 года назад
Recent photo of a single photon was pretty cool.
@v-sig2389
@v-sig2389 4 года назад
0:52 Yeah right so the simulation we live in is compressed because the state of particules is determined only when we load that part (when we observe the particle) ..
@klondike444
@klondike444 4 года назад
Is it is just observation of one particle that determines the state of the other, or do changes made to one result in instantaneous changes in the other? That's something I've never seen made clear.
@ImTHECarlos98
@ImTHECarlos98 4 года назад
Could you theoretically take an image of a photon? Are electrons larger or smaller than photons? Or would you have to use an even smaller medium?
@davidlewis6728
@davidlewis6728 4 года назад
i heard an interesting theory that entanglement is caused by worm holes that are so small that they can sustain themselves without collapsing immediately. what is your take on this? also, the hidden variable thing isn't completely true. no local hidden variables are possible, yes, but non-locality is still up for grabs, even if we don't yet know how that might work out.
@jefferylubinski528
@jefferylubinski528 4 года назад
Could we possibly use entanglment to create multiple ion discharges with 1 changing the flow of ions in the rest of say sometype of plasma experiment. Or is that to large of a scale just wondering. ..
Далее
Physicists Proved the Universe Isn’t Real
11:49
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Coca-Cola 😂🫲
00:20
Просмотров 3,8 млн
🤢 To try piggy toothpick beauty gadget
00:30
Просмотров 9 млн
What Could Be the Purpose of the Universe?
16:53
Просмотров 621 тыс.
Quantum Entanglement: Spooky Action at a Distance
14:42
Why Does Light Exist? What is Its Purpose?
15:10
Просмотров 602 тыс.
How Entanglement Breaks The Universe
11:26
Просмотров 353 тыс.
wireless switch without wires part 6
0:49
Просмотров 3,9 млн
solve bubbling fan issue
0:24
Просмотров 2,6 млн