Physicists Proved the Universe Isn’t Real 

After learning about quantum entanglement, the Double Slit experiment, and Shroedinger's Cat years ago, I fully believe that the universe itself is conscious even at the quantum level. It seems consciousness is woven into the very fabric of space and I find it incredibly fascinating. We are simply the part of the universe trying to understand itself. Weird. Edit: I didn't expect my comment to be so thought provoking. I'm fascinated by the comments it has inspired.

Ever had a dream where in the moment it makes so much sense, but when you wake up it suddenly made no sense what happened...

A couple of nights ago I dreamed that my eyesight had been completely restored. It felt so real that I actually cried with joy in the dream. In this case, it was waking up that turned out to be the actual nightmare.

If we are a simulation, than the fact we are here trying to figure that out and who it was that created the program is..... astounding. Imagine playing a video game you created and then one day the characters look at the screen and say, "We know you created us. We've been spending a lot of time researching it to figure it out. We know we are just a simulation and we want to know WHY you put us here." They can't see you, of course, but the jig is up. What do you do? Do you reprogram them? Wipe the drive clean? Cntrl, Alt, Delete? It poses so many questions I can't even begin to think of them all. Truly fascinating.

If the universe isn't REAL, DID THEY REALLY WIN THE NOBEL PRIZE?

This stems back to "You create your own reality" on so many levels.

Quantum entanglement is mind blowing. It tells us how little we know about what the fundamental building blocks of our world (of us) actually are.

2 questions/observations: 1. Why/how would Anna "instantly know that Luke's coin should have landed" on the opposite of what she got? Based on what assumption or principle? She could very well suppose that his coin landed on the same side as hers, couldn't she...? 2. The boxes with colored stones inside - if a person is told that the stone inside the box in front of him is either black or white, opens the box and sees a black stone of course he/she would correctly guess what color stone is in the other box immediately. Without needing to receive any "entanglement information". Please explain if I am missing something here.

Quantum entanglement. The thing that got me, is how the particles in the Double Slit experiment KNEW they were being observed and the experiment was repeated in other labs.

How bold of us to decide we know what the definition of _real_ is.

What I'd like to know is how do you know the "entangled" 2nd particle from all the others around it? How do you know this (*) and (*) this is the pair that needs to be measured? Im struggling to explain myself but I want to know how do you differentiate the pair..

The way how latent spaces work inside an ai image generator (which are higher dimentional mathematical constructs), feels as an uncanny analogue of how higher dimentional crystals seem to work on projecting reality.

We suddenly woke up in this place and we've been wondering what the hell is going on ever since.

This might sound odd, but could we be the universe simulating itself thru our consciousness?

Tetrahedrons are strikingly similar, in this videos visualisation, to the polys used in 3d modelling. Gets the imagination going in terms of simulated reality.

This theory has never failed to send shivers down my spine

It doesn't matter if we're in a simulation or not. What if we "wake-up" from this simulation in the "real world"? We could ask again if this is a simulation as well and are left with same questions unanswered.

How the universe moves from predictable to random is in direct relationship to how the mind at any given moment perceives and interacts with its world.

Watching the scientific videos makes things more mind boggling than clear. 🤯

What makes you think that if we were in a simulation that the outside of that universe would follow the same rules?

I don't care if we're in a simulation or not, it simply does not give an answer to every question we have as there has to be something simulating us, meaning another universe where matter seemingly spawned out of nowhere just like ours? You could argue maybe in their universe, they have the answers, but then it would still be hard to imagine that their universe just "appeared" out of nowhere from matter/energy. ( Just like we can't explain what was there BEFORE the big bang )

Didn't expect the ideas on emergence theory from Klee Irwin and his team at Quantum Gravity Research to show up in the middle of this video but Im delighted it did. Im a layman fan of them and Garrett Lisi's work with the E8 Lie group.

For me so far, this is the most plausable option for an acceptable basis for meaning in the universe as we seem to know it. For me it begins to suggest a viable causation and understanding to death, suffering, good and bad, success and failure and the meaning of it all.

The statement that the "speed of light is an artifact" according to some physicists gave me mental shivers, so to speak.

Excellent vid, keep up the good work

3:53 Actually sound is an interpretation of physical/mechanical waves so in reality the tree does create mechanical waves through the air causing vibration but without an interpreter it isn't really "sound"...

If there is nothing more real than a simulation, then the simulation is as real as reality gets.

The universe is not only stranger than you imagine; but stranger than you can imagine.😂

There is a Creator who created this reality or call it simulation. A creator who programmed this reality. A creator who is outside this universe and not affected by timespace and just watching everything we do. 👌

8:23 "We would not be able to notice any glitches." I find this line extremely interesting. It actually would make quite a bit of sense if reality was a simulated one. A great example of a glitch would be the following: In 2019 I got into a really bad motorcycle accident. During the process of flying through the air, I experienced a "Slowdown" to almost a frame by frame state. Mind you, this took seconds to occur. This is a re-occurring theme across many individuals who have experienced traumatic events such as these where everything slows down. It could just be adrenaline, however, this would mean the body would have to find the threat, react accordingly, and have that reaction be basically instantaneous. The likelihood of reality rebuilding itself for the individual experiencing the simulation in a situation such as this seems pretty likely. Especially if it wasn't a "planned" event, or "destiny". This would mean reality would have to essentially in an instant rebuild an entire future for that individual path. Many who have spent years in a monk's temple meditating, or even those who have experimented with natural plants that alter consciousness have come back with the same collective messaging. 1). We, and everything that lives are connected, we are one. 2). The universe is alive, and it is experiencing itself through us. 3). The purpose of life is experience, and to learn how to love with indifference. One can even make the argument that this "Source" is what original nomadic civilizations may have called God. The very first religion ever created was the belief that everything has a soul or a spirit, and this seems to be not too far off from what we are discovering today. I believe at the end of this journey with what we call physicality, your placement and where you go will be determined on your own pre-defined belief system or lack thereof. If you believe only 144,000 people will go to heaven and the rest will burn and you subconsciously find or deem yourself unworthy, you place yourself in that punishment. Whereas if you do well, help others, and vibrate at a higher state for the majority of your time here in servitude and kindness to others, you will find a more welcoming place after this life.

2:22 -“pairs connected -entanglement” means phenomenon that should not occur due to the “laws” of physics can occur because somewhere else those laws are void. The behavior is determined regardless of the space the “object” is contained within

One of the best videos that incorporates physics and human mind.

If we’re in a simulation would the Big Bang be when the player powered on the game? 🤔 🤔

It may be a simulation but the pain is real.

Universe is strange place, lost my watch for weeks then decided to ask the universe to help me find it, really almost an experiment, without actively looking for it 2 hours later I found it, it was like it was presented to me, so eerie and strange. I wouldn’t be surprised if we are in an AI simulation ourselves and something is listening. Now I’m asking the universe to keep revealing me deeper truths about itself.

Some of the assumptions, theories, and conclusions mentioned just make me shake my head. When we ask about "real", what are we comparing it to? If there are multiple levels of simulations going on, only the top most level would be "real", but any conscious entities in that level would also wonder if they were the top level or not. Bottom line, our mind and senses can only get us so far in understanding.

Have you ever driven a long distance and hear your radio station losing signal? Sometimes you even hear another radio station coming in. You can partially hear both for a brief period of time. I’ve always wondered gleefully…Are ghosts and other paranormal phenomena simply distortions in parallel realities?

The simulation theory sounds so crazy to me like WHO runs this simulation? Are they living in a world like this or Is it completely different? Who says that a computer like theirs would even leave traces? Why would we think that our physical laws or theories apply to the observer‘s world? I feel like if this theory turns out to be true, we‘ll just have more questions than we did before 😅

hey, not sure if this is a valid question or if there's just a lot i haven't understood yet.. but does this work? what if the quantum particles exist in a higher dimension as one particle whose properties are changing when we "create" 2 particles in this dimension. I'm thinking that distance is no longer a factor because in that higher dimension, it still exists as one particle. that way, measurement of the state of one particle immediately determines the state of the other regardless of the distance.. like.. is this something? i'm not well versed in any of this.. i thought it might be worth a comment for discussion

Why is it (and I know others experience it too) sometimes I have the feeling that I have been there or have done something before?? It lasts for a few seconds or so and I know exactly what is going to happen in that time. Knowing the whole time that this is the first time I have been there or done that.

Even if we are simulated, then also there must be a reason behind the experiment ongoing.

My Sunday started off so well, pancakes and orange juice, playing board games with my daughter… I turn on RU-vid for 10 minutes and now I’m facing an existential crisis.🤔

I sometimes find it really hard to believe scientists have found so many things invented so much about the world Universe time space.

I want to know more about this theory where they used 8 dimensional crystals. Where can i study it? Who are the authors? What is the name of the theory?

If the speed of light reveals the limit of the processing speed of the larger simulating computer, then the infinite speed of entangled particle information exchange rules out the simulation theory as it requires the larger computer to be faster than infinitely.... I vote for a conscious universe

Our behaviours are like a computer programmed by different softwares, everything good or bad one has experienced since birth is recorded in the brain as if they're different softwares and many reactions stem from them

As someone who has a background in Physics, I always went along with the accepted point that the randomness within a quantum entangled system prevents FTL communications. I recently read a book 'Cracking the Cosmic Code' which actually shows that the randomness is not a restriction at all. It now opens up the distinct possibilities of FTL communications.

so if we are living in a simulation, what are we simulating? and how many simultaneous simulations are running right now?

Pretty sure what they mean is. "We really don't know anything for sure. Still lets throw some random math equations out there. We made it fit the solution we desired."

Giving various explanations to our reality is just a coping mechanism for us to deal with the inevitable end we all face.

Well despite my best logic, I learned to get guided by something far more intelligent and complex that seems to know better, with a new perspective consciousness, there is a certain synchronicity and something hidden or above that works, when you observe it, it's insane. One example can be the intuition and the signs, messages you get at the right time that gives you the right answers, the right experience, people you attract at the right moment and so on, the numerology path you see so often everywhere and that can give you a message to be aware of, that it's interesting and awakens your inner self. Watching also these kind of documentaries about the random luck we have to live in the Universe and be protected, the algorithms that make everything unique and precise in a beautiful order.

One of my physics professors was in radar in the navy. He showed that in a radio wave guide the wave front moves faster than the speed of light.

Such a mind boggling video. Amazing!

Really hard for a common person like me to know if it is reality or sim, I mean I grew up in a poor country and grew up poor. I saw wealth in the hands of other's it's like luck is always stacked against me, but sometimes everything I predict comes true, like a part of the brain causes perceived reality to warp to it. If it is a sim our brain holds the only key to break out and experience what is real

Not only the speed of light might be an artifact - if we found out that the Planck length is for some reason LONGER than it should be by a lot - which it cannot feasibly be - that would mean we found the pixelation of the Universe itself.

*Morpheus* : "What is _real_ ? How do you define _real_ ? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then _real_ is simply electrical signals intepreted by your brain"

I read one commentator say in regards to the simulation theory "If we live in a simulation, my player sucks at video games!" lol... still makes me chuckle today.

Newtons cradle can be used to explain quantam entanglement. Information is a compilation or single frequency. Love the video thanks, keep up the great work.

A random process is by definition unpredictable.

So, were in an 8D universe but can only understand and or interact in 4D if the tetrahedron theory is correct? Honestly as a gamer it isn't hard for me to imagine this is all a simulation. Eventually the simulation gets smart enough to make simulations and when they are smart enough to make consciousness they continue the cycle, like a God.

Keep it up Destiny~

3:56 the only reason the tree makes the sound is because the crash to the ground but the sound is suspended on the air

It means that there is conscious/observable levels which we are missing and can be seen. If we can move from observable levels we can be anything we want.

This is one of the most interesting videos I have seen on this channel. Here’s a thought: If we are living in a simulation, do we really have free will? Or is it possible we are given the illusion of free will in order to keep the chaos down? Are we just characters in a game, oblivious to our “user” like TRON, or can we determine our own fate, regardless of the simulation we may, or may not, exist in? Also, if we were to go from atom to molecule to crystal, tetrahedron, etc. to the human brain, my belief is that knowledge is exponential Al and it will not take 100 years, but 30.

What if we're trying to understand the universe and the universe is trying to understand us, but both aren't real, we are something else, beyond… Outstanding video! Thank you.

I keep saying it, the only way this occurs is if spacetime is quantised with more dimensions, in the same way a TV pixel doesnt follow any behaiviour seen on the whole screen by the observer, relative scale difference causes emergence and so different behaiviour at both scales

3:54 a tree that fell w/o no 1 around to hear would produce sound waves but if they nvr reach an ear drum then there is no sound

Could quantum entanglement be a connection through a wormhole? Is it possible to create quantum-sized wormholes? If possible, quantum entanglement doesn't violate locality.

If this is a simulation, then my question is who's running it, and what answer is this simulation supposed to produce for them? More importantly what does that make us?

Its so simple,,,, the entangled particle reacts with closest particle to it, playing whisper down the lane basically, until all particles are equal

after you understand that shocking truth, you cant feel anymore as you used to do once upon a time

Dude whenever you were describing simulation Theory it reminded me of Sunday School just with different words and yes we did get an instruction manual

How am I supposed to live now after knowing all this information?

I agree with Rosebaum I think there is a blueprint for life embedded in the fabric of the universe that kicks in whenever and wherever conditions are condusive for life to evolve

Possibilities are definitely revealed, mostly showing how easy it is to play fast and loose with language.

How does Anna know Lukes's coin is landed opposite of hers? They were two different coins. It literally says the results are random, but then goes on to say that Anna knows what side Luke's landed on.

This is clearly stated and explained in our Bhagavata purana, markhandeya purana, yoga vasishta books...... Many more are there in our upanishad books. Our olden days saints/Gurus/Rishi munis knew and they taught this to their students and the knowledge was transferred through communication and memory as they were not having equipments to document these. Later they started documenting and now many are available to read, understand and get to know. Great explanation are given in Garuda Purana as well...... Many books you can get to understand these concepts easily. (Must read only from olden days' Sanskrit converted books - ancient scholars name will be specified)

Maybe the electron spins have a definite spin change pattern when you entangle two of them

Wonderful explanation.

This looks interesting! Definitely going to watch this little nugget later

I have asked myself as well if we were living in a simulation and I have watched a few videos already. I found a conclusion of one youTuber, called „The Why files“ very profound: Believing in god or the simulation, what‘s the difference? I thought that was the best answer to that question. I both cases, we are talking about a creator or multiple creators. And I had profound thoughts about those theories ( god and simulation theory ) and I come to this conclusion: The question still remains, when we were created, were do our creators come from? How does their universe look like and does it follow any laws of nature and probably yes, so which and how would they differ from ours? And still: Where does that come from and why does anything in our universe and the potential universe of its creator*s exist at all?

The way you think of the world shapes the world. New SUB! FIRST vid.

Not sure if it's a glitch, but there have been random times, when I've experienced moments of "loss of identity/ identity crisis." In those few seconds/ minutes, I actually forgot who I am and it was freaky. I had to gather myself quickly otherwise I would have got completely lost into that zone. I think there would be others who might have had similar experiences. What do you think?

If reality is a product of consciousness, then sleep might be the upkeep. Where does your consciousness go during sleep? What if I told you I think it’s to join countless others in maintaining other realities? Sometimes your consciousness may even remain there and you wake none the wiser. Might explain deja vu, or how some relatives survive near death, and seem healthy, but aren’t quite the same persona. I believe consciousness can transfer. If they can’t, what’s the point of prayers and the next life. I used to believe that when you die that’s it, there’s only the nothing waiting. Now though, I see it as turning off a game system. The character I played was just a vessel. Consciousness or the soul is the player. Time to move into the next game system, possibly with better hardware and fidelity. Positivity eh? Cheers all, Happy Holidays!

Schrodinger already said people would litterally think the cat in de box is really dead and that this ofc is absurd

Have no idea what entangled particles are, and how do you measure them.

I believe we are the product of something we are going to create. Its an infinite loop ❤

Imagine a character in a video game, given consciousness to understand it's surroundings defined by the video game... but trying to understand beyond the program itself and then the hardware beyond it. A simulation within a simulation

It's all our perception/hallucination of reality why we are unable to figure it out.

Speed of light is the limit of this particular space-time, aka this dimension. What if we understand how to move in another dimension? Then it would explain about the quantum entanglement

It is also mentioned in Advait vedanta that the real is 'mithya'(myth)

Reality could be a byproduct of consciousness? Such as devine consciousness? I don't think we have all the pieces but the universe seems to keep on pointing to something great.

We can't compare quantum entanglement with a coin, as coin has only 2 possibilities so if one person got head then we can definitely predict the other one which will be tail but in quantum mechanics there are infinite possibiliies and you only get to know when you observe so even one person finds head when he observed, he can't predict the other side untill that side also get observed by any conscious being. Tell me if i am wrong or right.

In simple words; Where the limit of Man ends, the limit of God starts..

If we are in a simulation, and the speed of light represents computational speed, I'm curious to know what other things represent...black holes and death for example.

Imagine if we are being stimulated.The only way to look beyond the surface is consciousness...and it is the most fundamental way to interact with the universe.This is where enlightenment of the monks proven to be true ...they have surpassed the stimulation thing and realised the ultimate truth.."why we are here"...

both partiles going away with c-less speed. if state of them is not decided lets say the core of entanglement is a...some link to something more basic, something close to beginning , with time already used. is not impossible to think this way if we assume fact this do not violate c limit.

I believe that if the universe is simulated, then time as we know it is simply simulated as well, as a constant to keep our experience in chronological order. In the "real world" time probably either doesn't exist or, at least, is very different then what we perceive in this simulation..... I had hoped that he would mention the guys who tested the quantum entanglement with a quantum computer, and ended up postulating that "quantum entanglement" in itself is an "Einstein Rosenberg Bridge" or a wormhole between the two particles.

I admit i became flabbergasted at the very idea of the possibilities implied by the creator of this video. If one can create an infinite number of symphonies by the permutation and repetition of a simple seven-note scale, can one possibly imagine what all the quantum particles of the Universe can represent? Like I said, this is enough to blow my mind! And yet, the contemplation of such possibility is nothing less than fascinating. What is worse for me is that I can "stop and rewind" the video as many times as I want and in the end I not closer to understanding "what is" and much less "what can be". Whatever the "ending" of this human saga may be, I still remain in the sublimest, almost religious, awe.

Interesting, i was just questioning the propose of consciousness this morning. Sometimes i feel youtube is reading my mind.