The world's smallest brushless motor(BR0603B) on an RC airplane (V2 - It flies really well now) 

Excellent. I'm a scratch builder myself and enjoy the smaller lighter RC models over the larger ones because of the loss of outdoor suitable flying sites in California.

Good explanation with inner details in bringing it to fly well. Nice enjoyment, thankyou from Jawaharlal India

I think that I would probably cover it with either Cling film (kitchen wrap) or maybe by floating covering Dope on water - that’s what I used years ago on Indoor endurance model which had a rubber motor. Nice idea using Depron, I’ve used that myself for sub 250gm models, I built a 30” STOL fun fly which used a small brushless motor, it’s great fun to fly outdoors when there’s not much wind!

Awesome work, thanks for the video

V3 with flaps and slats like the Fisseler Storck

good job

Very nice. 👍🏻

When and where will you be releasing all the build instructions and files for the build? Also very noice plane, I will try to build it in the futur

haj :)

Tror næsten den her hobby ku' få mig til at købe en 3d printer

The tail seems to be twisted

Somebody needs to make indoor thermals, just put an electric radiator on the floor...

the main wing needs to have ONLY about sixteen degrees of dihedral; that's eight degrees per side.

Not the World's smallest brushless motor. Those are made by Faulhaber.

Is this propeller 75mm or 54mm?

ALSO NOTE the Minimization of MASS, in the stab structures.

at 9:30, the High location of the MASS of the CF main spar is the Opposite of smart.!

if the main wing is NOT going to have a Center Section, then the wing mounts NEED to be contoured, Accordingly. WHEN the model is LEVEL, the Mass of the main landing gear SHOULD BE BELOW the wing leading edge.!!!!

information. still LOTS of room for improvement. at :37, the use of polyhedral, and incorrectly located landing gear, are Still the opposite of smart.! at 2:33, the use of CF for pushrods and spars is Still the opposite of smart.! the dom is Still wonky, with an excess of mass/landing gear/servos being located right at the nose; and mass located at the 'top' of the fuselage. the tail is still FAT; as result of poor stab and rudder design.! at 3:11, the chord lengths of the rudder and elevator SHOULD BE EQUAL.! the vert-stab leading edge SHOULD BE at a slope of 75 degrees.! part of the rudder is MISSING.! it is correct to use a few degrees of sweep, at the horiz-stab leading edge(s).! the control horns are not correctly located.! there is still a significant amount of excess mass, in the 'structure' of the stabs.! at 4:07, this is called 'making a mountain out of a mole hill'.! at 5:37, this is a LESS-than ideal wing profile.! consequently, the wing is making significantly MORE-than a nominal amount of drag.! this type of (single-surface) profile should LOOK LIKE the Upper Surface of a clark-y.!!! with the leading edge being elevated (as you have done), 'in place of' the 'rise' at the leading edge of a Two-surface profile. googletranslate st11.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3692001511?profile=original