There's Proof of Evolution Hiding in Your DNA 

Daddy

What's ur field of PhD.....? Specific

My teeth !

Shiv A Joshi biochemistry I believe

Being alive...

I just like science, as long as we look at it for what it is and not what we want it to be. Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Dii6Aor7nH4.html The Programming of Life ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-00vBqYDBW5s.html As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code” It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves! Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334). Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this? This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source. Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose. Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language” The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.” For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it. If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71). The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it. As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70). So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program. Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples. He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).

@@candidob8683 Please copy and paste this reply to mine! I thought i was alone in this pursuit!!! Brilliant work!

We wouldn't be catgirls anyway, we'd be monkeygirls.

Humans never had tails, this is just a tale. When has anyone discovered fossils that show it? This ridiculous notion is like assuming another vehicle that has 4 wheels must have come from the same company factory that the one you have did.

@@dannykurretto4152 Humans didn't have tails. Our ancestors did.

So how gene come to existence

@@mohdfarhan5255 hmm... I see where this is going..

If only we had evolved from Spongebobs...

I find that EVERYWHERE in life. Which probably is why those people need those messages in the first place.

@@billskinner7670 No need to hear this.

@Harry Gerry Evolution is a theory not a fact

@Angellical7 yh bro society keepd getting worse bro.

@@icegunz5872 You should look up the definition of a scientific theory and then get back to us. Gravity is a theory. Cell theory is a theory. Is gravity and our cells fake too?

@Hamster All they do is mindlessly recite creationist websites without ever having thought through them and done any proper research while putting aside their huge biases.

Do you guys really want to argue with a “religious fanatic”? Because if you guys think I’m one of those people you are wrong. Let’s talk.

I was an avid evolutionist my entire life until I went to see a wooly mammoth exhibition. That was when I realised just how poorly our science story represents reality. Unfortunately neither evolution nor creation seems to provide an adequate answer for what I'm seeing.

@@adifferentangle7064 learn about practical design, coding, entropy, finance, logistic and management. then search about intelligent design. You will see how human designed is from ground up to create civilization. Tailbone to sitting for a long time, which needed to create tools, which is one of the pillar of civilization Mouth connected to lung so human can speak, which is another pillar of civilization Special foot to support ability to throw thing, which compensate for humanity weakness caused by 70% energy focused on brain, another pillar of civilization And plenty other

@@HonISfirE So this is called evolution and adaptation to conditions.

Did you actually watch the video?

@@thegreatbehoover788 here's a tip: use commas, it's faster and easier to use than ellipsis

@@thegreatbehoover788 also relax a little

@@patobanana4909 Here's a tip..Why don't YOU RELAX a little instead of being the grammar police! I am writing for effect, not perfection of grammar. I have always placed five to eight grades ahead on all my grammar and spelling in school. I went to the regionals in spelling bees and read all my encyclopedias before entering high school. I don't need your "help". Using these tiny keyboards on mobile devices lacking functionality causes me to be creative. Arrogant atheists and materialists always love to talk on any subject other than SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE...that is what drives them nuts! They complain, curse, strawman, lie, etc. in order to hide their deficient studies on the subject matter. I'd be rich if I had a dollar for every time the silly people avoided the EVIDENCE. You've said NOTHING to add to the discussion. Try this...either agree with my statement instead of using DISTRACTION TECHNIQUES of correcting me...OR...use SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to disprove it. It's that simple . Oh that's right...you CAN'T. You see, I only write about that which I KNOW. I don't merely PRETEND like the silly materialists and atheists to understand the subject matter. You should try it! I also don't sugarcoat the EVIDENCE that makes silly atheists uncomfortable as so many apologists attempt to do. FACTS matter in SCIENCE and PHILOSOPHY, not whether someone gets butt-hurt over those facts.

@@thegreatbehoover788 we actually have evidence? and you don't?

Same. To know that I am cousins with all living things really shapes my morality to be a lot more compassionate.

@@miri8851 yeah youre related to all humans but not to all living things... check the difference

@@mateuszstan1260 what's your evidence?

@@miri8851 your mom

But dont give you respect for yourself. Who create DNA for every living in our world, plants, animals and humans ?

i n t e l l e c t u a l l y t r a n s c e n d e n t

+The Duck Knight How those things came about and where those things came from are completely irrelevant to the fact that evolution happened.

Well, that's a pretty bold claim. I expect a thorough explanation and maybe some evidence if applicable.

+The Duck Knight That's thanks to the evolution of intelligence, or specifically evolution of control mechanisms in the form of central nervous system.

Hyper Nova evolution is not a fact it’s a theory. Learn the difference. Interpretations of data and evolutionary explanations are not facts. Direct observable evidence of an organism evolving to another is evidence. And anyone cans grasp these evolutionary explanations, but that doesn’t mean they are true. You made a fallacy “if you don’t accept evolution, then it’s okay, but your inability to understand isn’t an argument against.” Which assumes “if you don’t accept evolution, then you don’t understand it, but if you understand it, then. You must accept it.” Lol which is laughable...

He still believes in fairy tales

AX System this is so sad, can we hit 500 dabs?

and you're a typical European

Well in a democracy the population of every country gets what they deserve / vote for. So depending on what you vote for, you might end up with a hard cord creationist as vice-president or one that can't even spell potato (Dan Quayle). But it can get far worse: Italy got Berlusconi (not once, but four times) and in the last election even elected a comedian (by job, not by behavior), Germans thought that Hitler would be a nice guy and elected him, Venezuelans elected Chavez and Maduro to increase their average standard of living, Turkey went several times for Erdogan (who banned evolution from the school curriculum as being far too difficult to be understood by Turkish pupoils) and in the first free democratic election for ages, the Egyptian population decided to elect fundamentalist religious nut Morsi who of course quickly shut down democracy. So it can get worse.

Frank Schneider we are a republic take civics

sweeeet

Tbh I'm glad humans don't still have tails. They wouldn't be big and fluffy like a fox's, they'd be thin and hairless like a rat's. Yuck.

@@AetherealGirl ughhhh! Now I'm thankful we lost our tails🤢🤮

Furries get a LOT of tail!

@@AetherealGirl true 🤢

@@P_Pro27 k buddy

you look like that too (no offense)

?

I did mine too, you and I differ only by 1/1000 base pairs. So a big hug for you my cousin.

But most of that 98.7% resemblence are introns. Thus, we safely said that our miniscle parts, exons, of that 98.7% resemblence are significantly different from chimpanzee. ✌️

The Chevy and Ford pickup trucks look almost the same too but they didn’t evolve they’re made.

& I came to the conclusion that Darwinians know nothing about biology. Especially, causality of genetic information in the first place!

@@Sheen023 After visiting your channel it is apparent to me that you are one of those people that only watch youtube video and become expert in the field.

The only people who deny science, including the Theory of Evolution, are those whose religious beliefs are debunked by science. There are no atheist creationists, nor essentially no educated in Biology creationists.

Confirmation bias at its finest.

@@ameerhamza4816 Mr intelligent man calm down

false content

@@Guitor972 cry about it

@@bigsmoke4345 about the fact his content is incorrect ? My view on such things has no inherent affect to my emotions . I suggest you consider before commenting next time .

@@Guitor972 explain how it's false content

@@bigsmoke4345 evolution is false therefore so is his content which supports it .

This is a solid joke

Gnomes don't have genomes. They have gnomes. Get it?

Gnome microbiologists mostly graduate from GNU; Gnome Nano University.

Bean Sprugget clever

Drew Fisher G-Gnomes

William, that sadly shows a failure of them to do their own research to back up their point of view. What they should say if they don't know the answer to your questions is that they don't know, but that they will be willing to research it and come back with an answer. Shutting down the debate by banning you from the room is no the answer and never will be.

Well that depends on what questions you're asking and how you're asking them

@@creationismistruth551 out of the nearly 8 billion people on this planet and the millions that have gone before NOT ONE PERSON knows what existed or occurred prior to the big bang or the Planck Epoch to be more specific so how do you know?

@@TheTruthKiwi simple logic. We all know the universe is not eternal and had a beginning correct? Scientists referr to this beginning as the moment of creation otherwise known as the big bang according to scientists the big bang is a massive expansion of matter well what caused this expansion? We have never seen information come from nothing so why is it that scientist assume this must have been the case for the universe? The only logicsl conclusion would be that their is a god.

@@creationismistruth551 nope. Scientists do not call it the moment of "creation", they call it the natural origin of our local universe. They don't know what existed or occurred immediately prior to the planck epoch. Nobody does. They don't know that there was "nothing" prior. For all we know the cosmos could have existed in some natural form (most likely a quantum state) for eternity. That is much more logical, probable and likely than an omnipotent entity from another dimension magically creating everything from nothing. You are making an argument from ignorance and incredulity. You don't know how or why the universe originated therefore gods. That is simply a fallacy.

Some facts and much assumptions =theory.

@@simplicityistheultimatesop6571 congrats bud you don't know what a theory is.

@@kvazac4432 understanding what happened hundreds of million years ago is not possible to the degree to form a theory.if 2 or more scientists reach the same conclusions,does it make it a theory?

@@simplicityistheultimatesop6571 I suggest you actually find out what a theory is.

Facts

"And creationists still believe in creation" - how stupidly circular

Don’t see why you can’t believe in a creator and accept evolution but okay.

@@mattchambers4561 I agree with you. I was making a general point

Keith Durant same

Keith Durant same

If you ike that, you should read the book, Refuting Evolution. We had to analyze it in class and present the misconceptions about evolution. It was a very tiring and most especialy annoying work because there are a lot of misconception in there. Great read, if you want to tear your eyes out about how little (even educated) people know about evolution

@@danicaaustria4146 Let me guess three of them. There are no transitional fossils. Evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics (or as Creationists tend to call, the Law of Entropy). If we evolved from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys?

Sagan must have picked that from Hegel, though! Very beautiful comment, Gordon +++ :).

While evolution is obviously quite real, it did not create life. The Absolute created life and also created evolution to manage life.

@@mysticwine Proof?

But absurdly enough those genetic information came about to existence "accidentally" according to the story.

Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Dii6Aor7nH4.html The Programming of Life ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-00vBqYDBW5s.html As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code” It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves! Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334). Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this? This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source. Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose. Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language” The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.” For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it. If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71). The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it. As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70). So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program. Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples. He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).

modern chickens are fed so much crap that they taste super generic, so more seems to taste like chicken.

Nothing tastes like chicken but most meat tastes like meat, chicken included.

Gravijta or....is it that we evolved to think everything tastes like chicken?

Gravijta, you taste meat. Chicken tastes like meat, not the other way around.

Its the matrix!

It's true. There are many false creation myths around the world. But what takes greater faith-to believe that the millions of intricately coordinated parts of a cell arose by random chance or to believe that the cell is the product of an intelligent mind.

@@pacnja1332 you worded it wrong but the first not the intelligent mind

@@Mark-Wilson how would you word it right?

@@ZealousWins idk man i wrote it about 2 weeks ago I don't remember

@@Mark-Wilsonit's fine, i'm trying my best to learn more about evolution

Yes and that's a good thing.

@@ironwox regress

Which basic rule of logic does it ignore?

lol people that don't get the joke

Found the guy who has never taken any biology, chemistry, or physics class class and try to use linguistic impact, like saying magic and sprouting, to make a point to undermined logical evidence. Scientist have found basics proteins in meteorites, and even Mars, that reside in you at this every moment. Scientist have determined that life was not sudden, I dont know why you make the use of monkeys sprouting a bad thing since thats what happened in the bible, and it look nearly a billion years from a single living cell to become a simple organism like fish, and half a billion years to get there to here. To put in into perspective how long these processes happened, by the time you are 32, you are a billion seconds old. Taking biology and chemistry courses co-currently, you can understand why and how this happens.

CaseNumber00 This so called "logical evidence" undermines itself. The universe is far to young and small to produce life naturally. Abiogenisis is impossible. Just give it a million years and I guess dogs will turn into dragons. Just "give it enough time".

DSJ_ oakinW the universe is 13.7 billion years old, and earth is (I think) 5 billion years old

1. Yes. Basically, DNA is coiled around charged proteins called histones, which then further coil to form a very compact version of DNA called chromosomes. This is usually seen only during cell division. 2. Yes, DNA is, but not always in the form of chromosomes. 3. Genome is the entire sequence of base pairs that makes up an organism's DNA. :)

Agustín Auditore 1.Chromosomes store DNA 2.Chromosomes are inside every cell of our body. 3. A genome is the genetic material of a living organism.

Thanks a lot for the replies! I now understand a bit more

Thanks guys! Have a great day!

ya the other people got it, but just something to add about question 2. You have the exact same DNA stored in every cell, be it a nerve cell or an intestinal cell. However, which genes are expressed (thus what proteins are made) varies from cell type to cell type

PBS is a parasite

Post a video when you can explain #1 how everything came from nothing, and #2 how evolution could achieve and be based on the opposite of the natural law of nature that all decays, and #3 when you design a working human brain that can heal itself. It takes a billion times as much faith to believe the evolution religion of everything from nothing without God.

You can probably never understand unless you study and believe God's Word. #1 all time most read book.

@@TruthChristians wow 😑 really?

@@TruthChristians Hello. I'm no expert but 1) The phrasing is wrong. Nothing is commonly referred to as the lack of anything. This is not the correct definition for 'nothing' in your sentence. 2) Not everything 'decays'. Sand is formed from erosion of rocks but it is still seen as 'decaying'. But stars are from from many elements in space and the are not seen as decaying, rather as being born. So the answer to this argument is all based on wording. 3) This is a strawman. Evolution is not the assertion that a human can create or build another human, it is just the result of multiple tests, experiments and observations over time. As for Evolution being called a religion, it does not fit under it's definition. Nobody expects you to take it as the only truth, but you are taught about it because it has been proven as true. Just like history because it has been recorded and proven that it actually happened (even if not 100% accurately), like math because you can calculate it and use in the real world, and writing, because almost everybodyon Earth uses some form of writing. I hope this helps clear some of the misconceptions about evolution 👍

From step 1 to step 2 we need billion of years "evolution" .... I have the desire to know why you said "How stuff really warks" when you can't know anything????

I’m still waiting for them to explain biogenesis

@@theyaduvanshiindian391 how does one go about conducting research on biogenesis? Everyone is so fixated on evolution yet it seems no scientist wants to dip their fingers into the untapped wealth of recognition that could come from making discoveries in abiogenesis. You can ignore the origin of life and only focus on the origin of species but the theory is incomplete without knowing how inorganic chemicals evolved into organic life forms. Why not also consider the origin of the first life forms?

@@Migger_29 No doubt. How could life "pop" into existence? And if it could how could that life sustain itself for more than a millisecond...or survive long enough to evolve necessary components for reproduction? All fascinating stuff!!

THINK AGAIN.... WONDER WHY ATHEIST ENDS CRAZY...... 👁👁

Thank you friend But your expertise is already needed For their is someone arguing against evolution in these comments right now *If you sort by newest the most recent comment should be one against evolution* **At time of comment**

Their name is Marifor Tese Or something along the lines of that

What unbelievable is people like Lee spinter , mit physicist, dont believe in evolution, how can he be that ignorant

🤓☺️……脊椎動物の標本を見ると、進化論が、疑う余地が無い位に正しい事が分かります。🤗……聖書を初めとした宗教は、現実をコピーして精神論的に転写して確立した新しい別の世界観ですから、進化論と同じ次元で語る事は出来ません。😊……私は、進化論賛成者で有り、聖書の世界を信仰している人間です🤗……この２つは、人間が活きる為に必要な進化活性化させる事が出来る、いわば、ミトコンドリア的な力です。☺️……私は、マトリックスを【聖母マリア様】に置き換えて活きています🤗

Why argue with them,, Just tell them there is no God there is No hell,, where you will burn for all internet. And not to worry about it, live their life as a perverted fool if they choose to.

Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?

Except that reality does not care about us, so why should we talk about it? The real world doesn't care what happens to us. We exist for no reason at all and when we die we are gone forever. So why should I care about the real world if it doesn't care about me?

@@mikeykitty1235 Because the world isn't a mean guy that doesn't care about you, but rather a fascinating place, with so many awesome things to explore. Some things on this world are just unbelievable beautiful.

HAHAHAHA! As the FANTASIES keep rolling on for silly evolutionists! They forget that their magical natural selection fairy isn't actually real! HAHAHAHA!!! If you have EVIDENCE show us the EVIDENCE where Chromosomes MAGICALLY ATTACH without deformation! HAHAHAHA!!! Go ahead show us the PROOF...what's that....crickets....OH I see your FANTASIES are okay with NO OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE. ...but someone else can't do the very same thing with a PROVEN DESIGN showing in DNA???? HYPOCRITES!!! BLIND IGNORANT FAITH has led you to your conclusions...that and you hate anything about life that is OBSERVATIONALLY AND OBVIOUSLY DESIGNED...RIGHT???

@@JohnCena8351 There is no such thing as beauty in a Godless universe silly! Your little electrochemical reactions are just making you feel a certain way is just an accident...there is meaninglessness and purposeless existence for you silly atheistic materialists!

@@thegreatbehoover788 Haha, okay, what ever. Go pray to your stupid god. You can't take reality anyway.

The Science Biome what use will it have?

wiping your butt when you run out of TP in a public restroom.

germans have a tail lol (its a wordplay in german language)

The Science Biome you'll never live to see it happen...

buy a tail buttplug

Stated Clearly posted a really good video today on just that topic. It is called "DNA Evidence That Humans & Chimps Share A Common Ancestor: Endogenous Retroviruses"

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger That was a great video. Had no idea of the numbers, it was a great presentation.

Scroll up, boi

The Sarcastic Potato then you should start paying attention

The Sarcastic Potato Wow you must go to a shitty school or you are young.

Well did you only go to class for 10 minutes of 1 day or what lol

It's like you guys didn't read his name 😂 it wasn't over dramatic statement bashing the school system

Lol, I hear in a lot of red states they put off teaching evolution.

Justin Y. Oh its you

Everywhere!!

I have subscribed to you know. I see you on every video every day, so I figured why not.

GO AWAY

Afternoon Justin. *Tips hat

NerdSync didn’t expect to find you here.

Hey, i enjoyed your videos. Thank you.

NerdSync NERDSYNC I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!!!

So you like being lied to?

@@oriolvp4413 Look silly boy...your God Hatred has absolutely nothing to do with this silly evolutionary lie! ALL you have to do is EXACTLY what I challenged the maker of this video to do...provide ACTUAL EVIDENCE that a telomere translocation like this has EVER BEEN OBSERVED to change species or POSITIVELY increase information in an organism!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes....I LAUGH at your brainless FAITH!!! If it was about UNASSUMED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that we have EVER OBSERVED...you could provide the PROOF. The reason you CAN'T provide EVIDENCE is because that FANTASY he spoke of...well it has NEVER OCCURRED in the history of OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE...yet by BLIND IGNORANT FAITH...you BELIEVE anyways???? DESPITE the EVIDENCE!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What a moronic way to address EVIDENCE!!! Oh...and did I mention that SCIENTISTS ALREADY KNOW AND WE HAVE OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE that our genomes ARE NOT even close to 98%...or 95%...or 90% similar to a chimpanzee???? Did you know that: "About 30 percent of all human proteins are identical in sequence to the corresponding chimp protein."...according to the chimpanzee genome project on wikipedia. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 And notice how CONVENIENTLY leave out the part where MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF CODE WERE.... IGNORED!!! Did you catch that silly boy? IGNORED because....because....because.... even the brightest scientists have emotional needs and BIASES. You share an emotional neediness for a Godless universe. That's why you're here...to BOLSTER your FAITH...in a FANTASY!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 By all means...please tell us all...what the PERCENTAGE alike our genomes are similar to a Chimpanzee when we DON'T IGNORE ANY OF THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE????????????? You've been PLAYED!!! You have been a SUCKER...a BIASED CYNIC...not a "skeptic" as you parade your silly FAITH AROUND as "SCIENCE"!!!! It isn't. It is being WILLFULLY IGNORANT!!!! CONGRATULATIONS on your OBVIOUS emotional hatred of God driving you to parrot such ridiculous drivel!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Now watch folks as he CAN'T PROVIDE EVIDENCE of GENOMIC similarity without "FORGETTING"...OOPS...or ACTUALLY IGNORING the ACTUAL EVIDENCE of the DNA CODE!!! HAHAHAHA!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The maker of this video praised all his parrots....yet IGNORED my challenge of RRADILY AVAILABLE INFORMATION because he KNOWS this FANTASY never ACTUALLY happened!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You people are such idiots to accept by FAITH alone....without an ounce of skepticism!!!!! It proves how BIASED you are!!! Silly boy! Lol.

*space-time

I do not get the punch line

U never wrote the his favorite breed what's the reply

@@samrowe2889 Dig in.

@@samrowe2889 the guy is a creationist and since dog breeds come from evolution he can’t have one

​@@XParasiteOctoling What unbelievable is people like Lee spinter , mit physicist, dont believe in evolution, how can he be that ignorant

God created evolution. It's real. So is life. God created life. Evolution modifies and keeps life under control.

@@mysticwine ...and yet, no EVIDENCE is given, most often, because of a lack of what even CONSTITUTES EVIDENCE.

@@brianmi40 The evidence is here. You refuse to accept it for some reason.

@@mysticwine - and YET, strangely, no EVIDENCE is given by you. In fact, not only can you NOT demonstrate that a god exists, you clowns can't even demonstrate that ANYTHING PARANORMAL EXISTS. It's EXACTLY why not a penny of this money has ever been given away: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_for_evidence_of_the_paranormal IF your god did create us, AND ON TOP OF IT, drive evolution to THIS CONCLUSION TODAY, he is even MORE OR A MORAL THUG THAN THE BIBLE SHOWS HIM TO BE. Just the simple fact that 5,000 PEOPLE DIE FROM CHOKING EACH YEAR BECAUSE OF "YOUR GOD'S AWESOME DESIGN FOR OUR BODY", PROVES THAT HE IS EITHER A COMPLETE *MORON* - OR *YOU* *ARE* FOR BELIEVING HE EXISTS. Occam's razor would then establish that YOU are the MORON.

Poor silly fool! DNA is the MOST SOPHISTICATED and COMPLEX and VOLUMINOUS CODE ever assembled. Prove that FACT wrong! Prove that a DESIGNER is not needed to create and assemble hardware and software with thousands upon thousands of DEPENDENCIES on separate MIRACULOUS mechanisms needed... we are all waiting! Just SHOW THE EVIDENCE for your silly BELIEFS and we will all be convinced! HAHAHAHA! Silly atheists don't even know you've been played! No the CHROMOSOMES could not have MIRACULOUSLY JOINED! Go find out why this fool is LYING. OR, just BELIEVE him by BLIND FAITH as you already exhibited for us! HAHAHAHA!

Blessed be its name!

The universe is the pasta, the cosmos the sauce, and we are its meatballs.

May his noodly apendages bless all of you, Ramen

No you mean Go.D Usopp

Creation and evolution co exist simultaneously.

I'm not a creationist, but all this video does is point out the very obvious and undeniable genetics we share, then applies an unbacked hypothesis that this must mean we have a common ancestor. This is done frequently and is a type of God-of-the-gaps argument. You take a bunch of well-known, indisputable data, then apply a baseless or at least extremely weak theory to fill in the gaps. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, the evidence for a common ancestor for chimps and humans is pathetic.

@@QuinnBook Where did evolution come from?

@@mysticwine the process itself? No idea, waiting for science to show me. Why do you ask?

@@QuinnBook I say evolution is a product of creation. Creation first, then evolution.

Just as gravity, so I hope they jump out of a cliff

Thanks for explicitly naming Evangelicals as orthodox and catholic Christians believe in evolution and not in creationism

The book "Finding Darwin's God" is an interesting explanation of evolution. Written by the cell biologist Ken Miller. (A devout Catholic.) He wrote a follow-up called "Only A Theory" but I haven't read that.

Watch kent hovinds channel. They all spew that.

It is a theory and God is real.

That is an entirely different field of study called abiogenesis. It's a complicated question to answer, but to summarize what we know, organic molecules formed under the primordial Earth conditions, and they polymerized into proteins and nucleic acids.

It came from Walmart...

Parz1val *_FACT_*

Khan Academy is a pretty good online learning resource.

Right so many people refuse micro evolution (intelligent design theory ) which is scientifically plausible because they don’t want to face a God who loves them

i believe in science and creation and i respect this comment

@@mrkkk8092 so, you don't believe in scientific evidence because science proves more and more that your God doesn't exist and you just can't accept that?

Science has not the vaguest idea how we got here, how the universe got here

@@benaressacred4774 100% spot on brilliant reply hes but hurt now. Big bang evolution is a masonic lie hiding intelligent design. Peace

Evolution is easy to disprove. Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?

@@END-oc4qu He did a pun what the hell is wrong with you

@@END-oc4qu you failed miserably, meanwhile fossil records, embryology and domestication are solid proof of evolution

What evidence? Did they show a video of the missing link pregnant and showing the DNA mutating into a human? Showing the fusion. I am not a creationist

@@all-lives_matter did watch the video?

that wasnt even facts

he basically said , similar , evolution

@@Guitor972

Salomon Arreguin, if you'd like to find out more about DNA and how it works, I recommend you read the book "How To Code A Human" by Kat Arney. It's pretty easy to follow (as much as a popular science book about DNA can be) with lots of colour photographs and diagrams.

Where did 1+1=2 come from. And it is not a code in the same sense as communicating in code.

@@stephenolan5539 That 1 +1 example seems like a very poor analogy. Are you saying that the information in DNA is an innate, rational feature of any possible universe? I mean, you don't think there could be a universe where 1 + 1 doesn't equal 2, do you (assuming base 10 is used)? But our DNA information is supposedly random and could have been completely different, according to materialistic science, no?

@@garyshapiro5196 And your problem with that is? Other than you don't like the implications. What we want to be true has no affect on what is true.

😢

Good one

Mr Kerman Ramen

RaMeN

Mr Kerman RAMEN

RAMEN

Ramen

Banm Alralmen “if iťs true why they call it theory” a coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation: the scientific theory of evolution. - Google

Banm Alralmen “just because they’re similar doesn’t mean they’re related” It does.

Banm Alralmen “these chromosomes don’t look alike” Yes they do. That’s as if you told me that 2 + 2 = 5. There’s just nothing to explain why you’re wrong..

Evolution is easy to disprove. Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?

Sorry but this creative beauty produces lots of horrible illnesses, mutations and horrible animals ripping each other etc. I guess you got the idea.

Get a clue, Roy! Separate the science of evolution from the process. The process of evolution is stupid and often cruel. That's why we need the science: to evade, avoid and outwit the process where it would kill us. We have the process of evolution to thank for millions and millions of unnecessary deaths. The process gave us this nasty appendix and these pointless wisdom teeth. But it gets worse. Once upon a time millions of people were suffering and dying from malaria. The stupid process of evolution came up with a solution: the sickle-cell trait. Those born with that trait from one parent have a resistance to malaria. But if you get that trait from both parents, you get sickle-cell anemia, a terrible and painful disease. We also have the process to thank for the rise of antibiotic resistant disease bacteria. Again, the science of evolution is good because the process can suck so bad.

@@maxdoubt5219 : Looking at the three comments here I have to say that they're all correct to some extent. Evolution has produced much that we humans find subjectively beautiful and pleasant as well as much that we find subjectively horrifying. The world appears to have a place for everything. Could that possibly be true if it was all the work of an infinitely good, kind, just, and merciful - and omnipotent - creator god? And then how do we account for our own existence? Do we currently have an adequate theory of organic evolution? Is Darwinism sufficient? The answer must be natural and evolutionary. But what is it?

Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Dii6Aor7nH4.html The Programming of Life ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-00vBqYDBW5s.html

Candido B. Thank you for sharing.

If only there were ANY EVIDENCE PROVING that this man's silly FANTASY ever happened.... right! HAHAHAHA!!! By all means show us the EVIDENCE that this CAN HAPPEN TO PRODUCE SUPERIOR CODE!!! OH...that's right...you can't. This was just another farce that you BELIEVED! Loke the tooth fairy...the person who BELIEVES the fantasy will tell you there's EVIDENCE...but like the tooth fairy...you can't produce OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE OF IT EVER HAPPENING....FANTASY!!!

@@thegreatbehoover788 He literally shows proof and you act like it doesn't exist wow

@@yeetri1034 No silly boy! He doesn't show proof... He tells you his fantasy and you buy into it because you're a sucker! HAHAHAHA!!! By all means... Show us any... And I mean any... Robertsonian translocation event that led to a positive increase in information! HAHAHAHA!!!! What's that???? Crickets chirping................ Right! NEVER HAPPENED! WHAT AN IGNORANT FOOL to FANTASIZE such an event that has NEVER been OBSERVED in the history of SCIENCE..so FANTASY is PROOF to you???? HAHAHAHA!!! SUCKERS!!!

Shawon 305 sure, in a small way. But who cares, I could go for some right now.

You could make that argument about eating anything, even plants

In some way... That's why vegans believe that they are ethically above us meat-eaters.

Luis Aldamiz, most vegans have slightly different reasoning from each other. like health, but if that says their better then you for it... they might be right but it's still rude. also, the majority of vegans don't want to get in conversations about whos better or worse based on their diets. (not that they dont think they have good reasoning for theirs)

Not only cannibals, but incest-ibals - eating a member of your own family.

The Red Celt just informative. Commenting on my comment is way more “pedantic!”

@@MickeyHarp "Since you asked, I find this meatloaf rather shallow and pedantic"