"These Are Fun. I Should Do One." - Quentin Tarantino On The Decision To Novelise His Latest Film 

I can't say that's a "lovable" characteristic.

@@A_M_Bobb Well for a talk show it’s perfect lol. Makes his job much easier.

@@A_M_Bobb passion is awkward most times

Lmao yup

Totally 😂😂😂😂😂

Agreed!!!!!

IMQT

Nah, his takes on movies aren’t nearly that inarticulate and annoying.

yeah wtf was that ? Seemed like he didn't want him talk about it at all for some reason ... kinda odd

It was an editing cut. There is a continuity error at the end. Quinton is not holding a cup then suddenly he has it full grasp. Ipso facto, there is a full interview somewhere without him getting cut off.

I think it was a joke that flopped. Stephen was asking why he had so much more material than could fit in the movie. Quentin was explaining time constraints. Stephen cut him off, for a time constraint. F*ing hilarious, perfect timing, straight-faced. And not even a giggle in the crowd.

@@AWINZLER ahhhh totally went over my head ... but I would honestly still rather have listened to the rest of the story

Yes, and the worst part is - even if Tarantino continued his thoughts after the interruption, the next clip wasn't uploaded. The other clip is about another part of the conversation. I was SO into Tarantinos story here. Even though I respect Colbert a lot as an interviewer, this is a bummer.

Cocaine's a hell of a drug.

Sleeps - Tarantin0 Wakes - Tarantin1

@@FlameOnTheBeat his final movie will be 2 hours , nothing but feet.

And so full of himself. Gimme the modest ones.

@@palmereldritch7777 He knew he was born to make movies. confidence & passion

@@brysonlozano7 I'm fine with that more power t him, and i absolutely admire SOME of his movies (Reservoir Dogs, Pulp fiction, Jackie Brown). His recent output a bit less - Kill Bill, Deathproof, Inglorious Basterds, DjangoUnchained, Hateful Eight, ONce Upon a Time - and not going in the right direction. Too much self indulgent dialogue scenes which aren't as crisp as in Pulp or Dogs. Hateful Eight - pfftshould have been a Broadway play - instead of a static 1 set (which they took a good half hour before reaching the one set they used) non-action action movie - even as a one set thriller movie - it just wasn't thrilling enough, cause they bored you to death with the tangents of dialogue. 2 -Too many self indulgent "hommages" to his well of inspiration (the b movies). While I love his choices of giving cameo's and roles to underused icons, actors from days past - who all well deserve it) - frequently the "homage" as for example in the endless fights of Kill Bill 1 make you nostalgic for the better and better balanced originals, who achieved a greater effect on a pittance of a Tarantino budget and a pittance of the technical means. His love is genuine for these movies, but too many homages/citations which fail to live up to the original - and he ends up with very little or too little that he brings himself to the table. The snowfight in Kill bill for example. I'd say just go watch the original Lady Snowblood and i have a sneaking suspicion Tarantino would agree with me. Thirdly self indulgent length of the movies and increasingly less smart "twists/ideas". The once upon a time idea might have been charming at 75 minutes length in a sleek, lean B-movie - but at 3hours or so it becomes an unending monster with a meagre outcome. And yeah, he's a bit full of himself (which has nothing to with his qualities as a filmmaker) - but....bit of self reflection..

what spectrum?

@@rerikm p sure he/she is referring to autism... :(

I’d bet my last dime he’s on the spectrum.

@@bernardlindeman739 Why the sad face? Autism isn’t some kind of terrible illness.

He’s a lot like Martin Scorcese

He's a movie geek who happen to make movies

@@8draco8 my point is more that other guests will tailor their stories and replies to network late night shows, but Tarantino doesn't

@@halfabeet nah, many guests just pops in talking about nothing even if they supposed to promote something, especially SNL people.

@@8draco8 I didn't mean it that way but it's fine

"W.W. and the Dixie Dance Kings" is a Drive-in / Second feature staple with Burt Reynolds, Art Carney and Jerry Reed. It was also directed by John G Alvidsen, who would direct "Rocky" the following year and "The Karate kid" after that. 2 bags of buttered popcorn are required when you watch this classic.

You're eight years old and you want to watch Alien or Friday the 13th? OK, I agree, reading the novelization conveys all the essence of these films, and allows you to use your imagination to provide the vision. But--given that you can read and are interested in reading--there are a thousand greater things for you to read than any of these novelizations. There are actual novels. Written by men and women from many different countries for the last five hundred years. At least just try some of these.

My kid is 7, I forced him to watch Texas Chainsaw Massacre

He already knows how good his coffee is because he buys it. Apparently, Bonnie doesn't buy the good stuff. Shame on you, Bonnie....

He apparently also doesn’t have to tell you how much he loves feet…

But one thing he does need to tell you is that you look like a couple of dorks.

That was Jimmie Dimmick.

Also his garage, would it be storage of some kind? Perhaps a deceased members of the African American descent?

And pretty ones too! And there is a stripe of Brad the Pitt in the mirror as well. Its all there.

He loves him so feet.

i can't with this dude and his love of feet..................

@@Movingmts111 But you can adore boobs, thighs, or asses? He's just a man of culture. We all have something that tickles our pickle.

The Star Trek Logs 1-10 by Foster, adapting and expanding the Star Trek Animated series eps as well as James Blish's original Star Trek series adaptations and of course comics, got me into reading. Later favs were Andromeda Strain, Day of the Jackel and Twains Tom Sawyer and Hunkleberry Finn continued my reading habit up to Ellison, Clarke, Bradbury, Heinlein and more.

And yet they don't mention his novelization of The Thing, a movie which they both gush over in the next segment. Maybe they did talk about it and it was cut out for time or something.

I've read a few of the RE ones. If you really want to experience something to make you scratch your head, get the Metal Gear Solid novelizations. Snake is completely different in it. The author turned him into Roger Moore-era Bond

@@gvalo lol. Yeah some of the novelizations are a bit strange.

Are the Mass Effect books not different stories set between the games though? That's not really a novelisation, that's a continuation book which is a different thing. A novelisation is a book that directly adapts a story from another medium.

@@gothamite27 True. But then again Tarantino stated that he wrote stuff into the novel that wouldn't fit into the movie. Plus he talks about the novels that Alan Dean Foster wrote - some of those are more continuations of the movies, like some of the Star Wars novels he's written. But yeah, I guess it's a matter of interpretation.

@@MsBlackdeath13 Most of the best novelisations have tons of extra supplementary material that either was deleted from the final cut of the film or was added in by the author of the novel to add more insight or to make sense of plotholes etc. Still a different thing to stuff like Splinter of the Minds Eye or the Thrawn Trilogy which are continuations.

Forget autoplay. It works better to start with the intro (the short video that isn't Tooning the News) and go on clicking the next suggested video that appears on the screen when the video is about to end. The one on top. Most of the time, that's the right order (on occasion whoever does the job messes up that order too, but at least you have a better chance that way).

A Beautiful*** manic soliloquy

yes :)

I read that Batman when the movie came out. You’re right, it was great. I’ll check out his other work

As well as the Assassin's Creed series

I totally didn’t get it, it felt like an inside Hollywood joke that passed me by with an elderly Brad Pitt that totally distracted from anything that could have been a story that i didn’t notice.

I rate it right up there. I felt the film's length was just right. Especially given the scope of the narrative.

I went with a friend and got a lot more from it than she did just from knowing some of the Manson and Sharon Tate history before hand. I'm sure I missed plenty of other references too, but that knowledge definitely gave me more appreciation for the movie. His ode to old Hollywood

Yes! He's a single dad, with five daughters aged 6-15. I'd pay to watch that.

He's talked about doing a "Bounty Law" series for Netflix since he had a good time working with them on the extended "Hateful Eight" edition.

After first seeing it I thought it was a work of genius, but when I realized it would have meant nothing to anyone unfamiliar with the story around Helter Skelter and Charlie Manson and his acolytes, the movie reappeared near the top of my list of "Movies Made By People Saluting Other Movies." Still genius, but not significant.

No the book did great, this is now the hard cover version which includes new stuff! It was always his plan to release that version later, after letting the paperback version gestate

Yes !

Too much of a challenge for Quentin.

Talking.

I disagree

Aaanndd, congratulations, two people CARE!

It's still on RU-vid for free right now. And you can still grab it, as long as you don't do it on the Sabbath! Lol ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hVcEqVcsE1s.html You're welcome

That's a great subjective opinion.

They always taunt us with this irrational behavior.