These NATO Submarines Can Destroy Russia in 30 Seconds 

I'm sure that's a long walk from Texas. I don't think even between all the fried cars around I could put together one. Then there's the fuel issue😳. Nope. I might as well just set back and remember the good ol' days until my number is called 😮‍💨.

Expedite things . Fart down the vents .

I agree that Putin has lost his mind and needs to lie down permanently; sooner the better.

Waarom mag de us overal invallen en samen met de idioten van de nato alles vernielen, mensen doden en als ze niet kunnen winnen gaan ze met de staart tussen de benen naar huis . (Vietnam en Afghanistan)

@@frvu6336 omdat ze geregeerd worden door het kwaad en te fucking dom zijn om het te beseffen

or maybe they dont cost that much and its a case of imbesslment? nahhhh an army would never do that.... would they? well it is all about profit

@@100canadianmaplestirup8 Perun agrees with your assessment. I do too.

They missed a few zeroes on the sub cost....2bill a sub....2 mill a missile

How deep is your ocean

Their.

dunno, a caveman club alone could be pretty lethal if used accordingly.

Russia has built quite a few new submarines and is continuing to build more. The US started late to replace their ageing though still good fleet. The Russian diesel electric subs have been nicknamed black holes because the US can’t track them. The new US subs cost 4 times what a Russian one does plus they had a problem with the acoustic tiles peeling off…..so don’t be so sure that US is best. The grift in the MIc is causing big problems.

double rainbow all the way, what does it mean

The most destructive thing in or from California, are its population of loons.

There is no such thing as California class, and the LA class subs are the oldest subs still serving. The current production sub is the Virginia class, and perhaps the most powerful in terms of firepower would be the Seawolf class, if you don't include ICBMs

I don't even get out of bed for less than 2.5M....

@@christopherhiggins8238 Thats all? You need a raise!

Majority of their subs are not that advanced, I ain't worried.

@@iamaloafofbread8926 the nukes still work

@Milwaukee Mac Repair they can't all be destroyed, what are you talking about, and do you even know how nuclear missiles work?

NATO's history is a criminal record - relevant

@@righthand7965 International politics is simply gang interactions at the highest level. In other words, cry more.

Dude just America has enough nukes on subs to destroy not just Russia but the entire world twice over We've had that same capability for over 50 years only a complete moron doesn't know that

What ?

Oozing is

Accident, sorry.

that write scumbags...lool

russia destroys Amerika in 5 sec that problem

Hitler expected to finish soviet in months and guess what happened? changing the title into China or Russian submarine still works. The comparison is BS

😆😆😆

Waiting for zelinski to stop dancing and get dressed.

What's the difference? each and every single Russian sub is already just a target no matter it's propulsion or it's lacking ability to try to hide. The US lets Russia believe they have something . . . . until the time comes, then they'll all be sunk before any of them even get a single shot off

@@timhenderson6035 You can polish a turd, it's still a turd. The russians have much better boats than the kilo class.

Kilo is so old hat .

@@jefflloyd8999 jet lethal and gives nato headache to this day due to its capabilities of evading sonar detection

@@briant5685 no they aint have you ever been in the trail of one or two of them?.

@Rex Warren well Great Britain anyway.....

it's funny you think ocean water is a heat sink when really it's more of a heat ground plane. You can't heat up the ambient ocean temp with a vessel my dude.

@@MFcitrous Actually you leave a slight trail of warmer (like 1F) water. BUT... the sea water is not homogenous or transparent. There are layers, etc. Even if you know that there is a sub inside a small area, you can lose it quickly or never find it. 2018 or so there was an exercise with an aircraft carrier battle group vs subs. The subs "sank" the carrier several times. Idk if they were stopped even once, I cannot remember that happening at all. So liberal Rationalist is wrong: In reality you cannot find a modern sub.

Not with US Submarines. Sub warfare has advanced. At least for the USA!

@@stevechan6244 But it was a joke about the Ohios - "They are so silent, you need to look for the spot with less sound" Active sonar is a thing though, and even with the modern absorbing coating, there always is a little bit of sound. Idk about the latest generation of US subs, maybe they got hydrophones and can playback whale sounds to pretend that they are something else besides a sub ;-)

@@donaldduck830 supposedly US subs can use active sonar that sounds like whales or shrimp, so they can actively check their surroundings without anyone else knowing they are there

Slava🇺🇦🇺🇦

Russian gov.andvusa gov.got u fucked evil world we All live in hope everyone is ready Russia u suck.Godbless all Russia kids and baby's Jesus loves them

Sneak don't be silly use people are as bad as America war mongers

Sweden is not a player with Russia, china or US, its millitary is way too small

Sweden and Findland both trying to join NATO. I am half Fin. Even my mother from Tempere would agree that Findland should have worked into NATO decades ago. I do give Sweden credit. I had previously seen their sub's capabilities, which would be advantageous to us. Also, while a nuke on the nuke cruiser USS Texas (CGN-39) we stopped in Oslo, but would not go to "Communist--influenced" countries such as Finland...which borders Russia.

diesel boats have short range, eventually they have to surface and run the diesel to re-charge and then everybody knows where they are...

Those submarines would get sweden into a war that it would not be able to manage.

Sea Hunter type drones? Satellites will spot them and direct countermeasures. It will be interesting to see.

@@skwalka6372 Can satellites find submarines?

@@pjhgerlach The US ones can. The US satellites can focus in crystal clarity so well that they can see a man on tank, like you standing in front of the tank, taking a picture of the man

@@pjhgerlach China is working on a new visualization technology that will, so they claim, allow satellites to detect submerged submarines. The Sea Hunter US drone project is an unmanned ship to detect and track submarines.

@@skwalka6372 the only way to do that is radar.

Its called a mullet hook. Much like what happens in Congress. We are all just mullets to them.

The thumbnail was silly. Sometimes people present silly thumbnails to get attention. Now you know.

That's been developed along with the jet driven aircraft carrier. Don't forget that you're watching RU-vid, most of the clips are announced with tremendous headlines and impressive fotos. In the end it's all about getting the clicks.

Then the subs stay at sea because they've no home to go to .

cope

Russia will destroy NATO and the world will be peace

And the Dutch, operating from the North Sea to the eastern Mediterranean.

Thery might as well be,

@@anthonysaponaro6318 no, their nuclear weapons work. NATO inspects them regularly and they have test fired their equivalent of Trident several times.

Eh ?

at the bottom of the black sea

The kilo class is not modern. Its a joke. This video is a waste of time.

@im a loaf of bread (yes you are, brainless) do you really think Russia doesn’t have land based nuclear missiles aimed at every major city in the U.S. and every major military site in Europe and pacific? I doubt Russia with 5,000 nuclear missiles is concerned with taking out 1 or 2 vessels, they’ll be looking at the U.S. to destroy it.

@@billpeterson178 look up the Belgorod. And what NATO calls the "black hole" diesel-electric submarines Russia has. The only joke is the brainwashed average American that thinks they're still the most powerful nation and untouchable. You guys are still using minuteman nukes from the 1960's. You just had two castostophic failures in recent hypersonic tests. You're OVER a decade behind Russia in missle and torpedo technology. And the most pathetic thing about that fact is Russia is operating on less than 10% of your budget!

Ignorance is bliss... you know the saying right?

How many hypersonic missiles had any NATO country got in service? None, you will sleep tight because you wouldn't have time to react if Russia launched a nuclear attack. Your ignorance defies belief.

but there could be Russian nuclear submarines dotted all around the coast of the USA---what then?

@@rabsmiff especially when the ones aimed at Russia left to do so

Ukrajinský vojaci sa môžu účastniť na čom len chcú. Ukrainian soldiers can participate in whatever they want.

@@gabrielakopuncova1581 ❤️❤️👍

learn English that may help

Like the Armada tanks? Where have those been in Ukraine??

Yes, there is certain peculiar tribe that would destroy everything their greedy, dirty, little and frightened minds can think of. They hate life of any kind.

OMG thats soooooo funny.

That, s submarine frequencies kill The dolphins, lol. Almost 100 on The turkish beach. Shut. Y support dolphins lol. And peace for everyone.

They can, t defend against our stupidity.

I see you understand nothing about submarine warfare. Submarines are silent for the majority of time.

Shh ;)

not yet but we have Gotland submarine upgrade, but soon we will get A25. At a war game 2005 a Gotland submarine sunk the Aircraft Carrier US Ronald Reagan.

Yes. I'm glad we learned that we were vulnerable to that kind of an attack in a war game and not in actual reality. Our navy is more geared towards blue water and not the confines of coastal waters. We've taken measures to protect ourselves in that situation. They'd better work.

@@joshschneider9766 You used the wrong winky face to be taken seriously. Reroll and try again.

Sweden has nothing to hold against as they are a small military don't make me laugh 😂 😂 😂 😂

because there are still evil leaders that dont care about peace , like putin

That's because US submariners say it the "wrong" way on purpose, the other way of saying it refers to a watch. By US standards he is saying it wrong

Yes, but that were the "good duys". They were "liberating".

If the USA Dared to make an OFFENSIVE FIRST STRIKE, It Would Most likely Be The Beginning Of The End. I dont Pretend to be a MILITARY TACTICIAN, But Just As We have Them TARGETED, THEY ALSO HAVE US TARGETED. The DEATH And DESTRUCTION ON Both SIDES Would be HORRIFIC. THERE Would Be NO WINNERS. LORD DELIVER US FROM WAR MONGERING DEMONS AND LUNATICS, AMEN. 😥🙏

@@anthonyrios8566 you're assuming nuclear weapons would be used in which case I would agree with you but in reality I don't thing any leader would be crazy enough to push the button 1st, not even Kim Jong Un.

@@lusiscus I'm Not taking Sides. But The Soviets have Already Mentioned that there Could be Consequences, If The USA or NATO Would continue to Meddle in this Pitiful War , The U.S. Should Spend its Money on Taking Care of Its Own Citizens and it's own Problems, Instead of getting involved in Foreign Wars, and Lost Causes. 🙏

@@anthonyrios8566 One thing you don't do is back down from a threat because if you do it's game over.

@@anthonyrios8566 I don't think you realise how much farm land and other interests the US has bought in Ukraine, they aren't just going to give it all away. And as for consequences, sure, there are always consequences in war, it goes with the territory.

The "Switchblade" is a small electric airplane, that can be equipped with a small gernade, that will take out a few troops. I am sure there is a larger version, that can take out a tank, by first exploding next to the tank, then exploding again in the hole it just created! A easy way to defeat active armor.

Those drones that don't move an inch when they drop the munition ? lol You can fool some of the people all of the time proves the adage .

@@laurencesmith2199 Hello , high tech weapons are very expensive, when Ukraine needs a boost who do you think is paying for these new toys ?

@@kellybartok50 I don't see how that's a reply to my comment .

@@laurencesmith2199 I wasn’t very good in school

yeah Go away United Snakes bloody pirates and criminals!!!!!!! What trouble makers!!!!!

LMFAO @ SARMAT

Lol to bad it’s liquid fueled and is still in testing!

Nukes are a lie that is too big to back out of.

No game; only a sick twisted mind in Russia.

Because the "mystery sub's" origin/location would be a smoking crater within minutes.

@@RogerThat1945 I think you're over estimating Russian hardware.

Is a diesel power plant smoking while surfaced a surprise?

@@defresurrection LOL! "No Comrades!" "Aircraft carrier Kuznetsov is NOT ON FIRE!" "It is diesel engine and this is perfectly normal and sign of superior engine design." "USA have secret program for invisible smoke to deceive world that they are the most evil polluters in entire world." "And Glorious Russian ship Moskva was NOT SUNK! "It was clever ruse to disguise our flagship as Missle Cruiser, when in fact it is highly advanced submarine!" "I go now to eat barbed wire for breakfast, piss napalm, drink vodka and maybe have some romance with Siberian bear!" "She is female bear!" "I name her Ivanna......Ivanna Zukukokoff!"

@@jackwalker9492 I ask a question and get an incoherent rant. Typical.

@@defresurrection Aww! Do you need a crying room?

The Moscov is now the flagship of the Black sea submarine fleet.

Actually most of the world (about 3.5 billion) are either neutral or actively supporting Russia while the collective West (about 1+ billion) are against Russia. So no, I don't think Russia has pissed off the world, just the collective West which seems to hate Russia no matter what.

He can take you all any day. 1 Russian for 9 Nato people. Pretty good deal for mutual destruction.

ukrain and Russia are run by the same people putin and vlad are spokes people, puppets, actors, if you really think putin runs shit your a child. its all the NWO

@@ipsprez8672 well 141 countries voted to condemn the invasion. 4 countries voted against condemning, the rest (35) abstained from voting, sure you can talk population if you want but neither China or India voted against condemning Russia.

@@fnyqvist3 yes and you can bet the US bribed, bullied, threatened or would cut off aid if they didn’t do as told by the US. The reality is 2/3s of the world are rooting for Russia but just because the US/West control most of the media the narrative is the propaganda they want to spew. This US contrived proxy war and the one they want to start with China will be the end of the US unipolar world and the global dumping of the dollar. You tube people like Col Douglas MacGregor, Col Richard Black, Scott Ritter, Richard Medhurst, Alfred McCoy, Jeffery Sachs, Brian Berletic, Chris Hedges, Alexander Mercousis, John Meansheimer and many others that aren’t spewing the US/EU propaganda narrative of disinformation.

Ohh no the Poseidon torpedo... Is there even one final version built yet? I guess it will be as fearsome as the T-14...

@@Azotrac it was deployed to an research vessel, not the same thing, never been tested with an actual payload, no confirmations that it works at all.

@@Azotrac i know that the first sub that can carry Poseidon was delivered some weeks ago, Belgorod. But I can't find any information that Russia has been able to finish Poseidon years earlier then estimated. Also if Russia followed it's usual doctrine they would want to show it of to the world as soon as possible, they haven't. There is still to much rumors about the weapon system that hasn't been confirmed that I highly doubt they are ready for use.

@@Azotrac like the Russian news program i watch that screams about nuking UK etc all the time, or the ones claiming one Russian nuke can take out France in 5 minutes, or the ones claiming Poseidon can create a 400m high tsunami (ridiculous but hilarious).

@@Azotrac strong arguments 😂😂 why does everyone without a clue about anything always refere to media, both sides fools does it. If they ever did some digging by themselves they would find out how much public data governments (including Russia) publishes, but I guess the "media" argument is valid if you're a lazy fk, their biggest problems is that they usually argues against the country they are trying to defend/justify. One have to wonder what sources is most valid tho, the ones in countries that blocks inconvenient websites or the ones that doesn't block anything. VPN for the win.

And that would be amazing

Lmao you westerners are pathetic. Go ahead, give it a go, I dare you

Russia has the most powerful army Russia can destroy the whole NATO in 20 mins but NATO can't destroy the whole Russia in a nuclear war Russia will win.I hope you to see one day Russia-NATO war.

no

Amen

@@karenzitkus9926 yes*

So true I believe

God does not help those who do not help themselves.

Foh Russia is garbage gotta ask Iran and China for help🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡

🙌🇷🇸🇷🇺😎🙏

😂😂😂