Thew New "Claude 3.5 Sonnet" Actually SHOCKED The Industry! - Beats Gpt4o 

Stop 😂

Lmfao

Yeah anthropics censorship is somewhat obnoxious. It's a shame because it has the most personality and is smarter than gpt but the amount of what it won't do is absurd.

One day the headline will be The industry shocked the AI

Super duper shocked

scary isnt it, imagine in 12 months time

On a benchmark, sure. Llms aren't comparable to humans. They will be "copilots" until agi.

​@@AddyRazz73%

@@Dom-zy1qy it can do everything that is not novelty, it can do everything there is online, so let's say 90-95% of jobs? next year one talented programmer with agents at 90% accuracy can do the work of 100 or maybe 1000 programmers alone, just check the code and solve the novelty.

So basically better than me! 😂 👍🏾

pretty pretty great

That means a higher gpt4 o is ready to be deployed, or activated

We already moved on to superintellegence bro

It's actually currently pretty pretty true

to say nothing of easily manipulated.

No, they are ignoring this completely, which is fascinating to me. I am a software developer and absolutely no one around me is talking about this. 😅

@@BlakeShopSoey I would be in denial too if I spent 4 to 7 years working to become a software engineer just so some little robot takes over and takes 100 K to 200 K job

@@kevinsm2039 wont happen anytime soon. Sure by 2030 SWE will be dead but theres still a good 5 years till that happens.

They should be sweating. More than any other skill or job, this is the one that AI companies will benefit from most. It’s the holy grail of automation for a company that relies on software engineers, and it will allow them to scale orders of magnitude faster than their competitors. It should therefore be obvious that replacing software engineers is their primary target.

​@@wonmoreminutethey can't replace engineers, there will be fewer needed with more skills

Its faster and cheaper, and free!

if you want to increase the limit, you can use api instead

Cheaper than Claude Sonnet ??

What did you ask it?

What did you ask?

Yeah, ok buddy

@@Grassland-ix7mu i made a lengthy textfile that i copy/paste as prompt where i set up a toy universe with rules and properties and descriptions. and then i pose questions and tasks for the model in that universe. usually the models fail already at the first task or question. i think claude opus and gpt4o got a few more right. but eventually all failed at some point. i can make the questions and task easier or harder as i want. sonnet 3.5 aced them all. it basically got a perfect score. i had to stop at some point, cause i didnt want it to fail. i want to believe. this is just on another level. i could see that already with the first question. this is the first time i really feel that there is some true understanding and intelligence there. if this goes on like this, no one will have a job at the end of next year. why would they? brace everyone. (i have watched too much air crash investigation, sorry)

@@peterkonrad4364 Interesting!

Yeah does he just not care or what is going on there?

Yeah does he just not care or what is going on there?

Yeah does he just not care or what is going on there?

Agreed. GPT 4o zero shot math is incredible compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet. It took me 5 prompts and providing a correct proof from gpt4o to get new Sonnet to create a correct proof for my question. Here’s the prompt that gpt4o zero shot and sonnet couldn’t handle: “Try to prove the equation for all positive integers k. SUM is SUM n=0 to k. 1 = SUM(((k-n+1)^k(-1)^n)/(n!(k-n)!))” (Sonnet also lied about it’s math being correct when asked to double check 👎🏼 saying that 1-1 = 1 more than once and saying that as correct until I accused it lmao)

How so? I could acess the "Artifact" feature as a free user, even in EU. It works wonders, the only problem is I only got like 5 messages for free.

i would agree with all that. to put it short, gpt 4o is good for science related stuff and claude for humanistics and language

Is the wolfram gpt from Gpt 4o/4.0 not even better at math? Tried that?

@@blijebij its about the same as regular gpt now but a bit more reliable

wtf is artifacts

​@@DenzelCanvasSupportautonomous live diagrams, charts and document creation in a side window within the chat UI

🤣

Until next week it will be Gemini 2 then GPT-Next, then Llama 400b+, then Claude 4

Great model, but it specialised for coding and Open source model

@@TheAiGrid so is deepseek coder v2 better? I just wanna know for code because that's the only thing I like.

GPT-4o is pretty recent so it's worth it this time

Yea tell me about it man! They have yet to release the dynamic voice mode nor have they released the whole live video interpretation. The are probably bullshitting us.

One way to learn is to find an open source AI project to contribute to where you can practice your prompt engineering skills

Not the person you intended, but just wanted to comment. Prompt engineering is almost an art. Having a great prompt can get great results. Prompt engineering being so new makes me think the people asking for a bachelor's degree in it doesn't understand anything about prompting and how long it has been a thing. Not long enough to develop a curriculum. What kinds of places are you trying at? Being able to showcase your ability to a prospective employer might get you in more doors than an unqualified degree.

@@jesahnorrin ive been using chat gpt to give me a comprehensive guide on how to become one. I was utilizing a site called coursera. I stopped when I saw all of the jobs requiring a bachelor's degree. I thought maybe the LLM gave me bad advice or something. It also recommended web development, but I don't find that field particularly interesting. I also predict that computer programming will be phased out almost entirely. Chat models can create tons of things without code its only a matter of time until their is no code. I could be wrong for sure though. I'm mostly trying to aquire a skill to obtain a higher paying job so I can invest the money. I have recently learned alot about investing "not day trading" and I think with enough capital I could be very successful. I understand concepts such as compounding interest. Things of this nature.

This AI race is kinda funny, almost every week a SOTA model is released and beats the previous one.

TODO

Apple ai is relatively tame

Apple is a cheat

@@TheAiGrid models, sure - access to personalized information to make it useful, no. The problem with these models if we have to communicate with them. If we don't, they're not going to be nearly as useful as Apple Intelligence. No one is getting a large file of their 20k text messages and giving it to Claude so it can understand personalized context of the user. I believe these are (2) different ways of approaching AI, and while Claude is more advanced, I'm not sure it will be perceived (to the end user) as more helpful (in most cases).

@@TheAiGrid I was trying to be funny with some of my sweet sweet sarcasm my friend. I understand a lot of folks take this topic very serious but sometimes the jokes are just to easy and I'm a weak person that can't say no to an easy layup. I'm flawed. I need Apple Intelligence to fix me. Lol... Help Tim Cook. Help!

Testing it

How long before I don't have to work anymore?

@@MyAnalyser 2030

@@MyAnalyser I'm still on the job hunt, so I'm here with you brother lol

If you code you would know how much it already changed. And you know that this is only the start. The better the models get at coding the better gets the code the better gets the model the faster it develops

GPT3.5 was near useless for me. On the other hand, I use 4o everyday, and many times a day. It did for me 2 days worth of work once, in minutes. So... it is changing, right now multiplying the overall productivity of the economy by a small factor. Years in the future, you'll see complete change.

so far

@@Sindigo-ic6xq let's see how far until we get SHOCKED.

Wow. This is from the journal, Science, Vol 307. Artificial intelligence (AI) has solved one of biology's grand challenges: predicting how proteins fold from a chain of amino acids into 3D shapes that carry out life's tasks. This week, organizers of a protein-folding competition announced the achievement by researchers at DeepMind, a U.K.-based AI company. They say the DeepMind method will have far-reaching effects, among them dramatically speeding the creation of new medications. “What the DeepMind team has managed to achieve is fantastic and will change the future of structural biology and protein research,” says Janet Thornton, director emeritus of the European Bioinformatics Institute. “This is a 50-year-old problem,” adds John Moult, a structural biologist at the University of Maryland, Shady Grove, and co-founder of the competition, Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP). “I never thought I'd see this in my lifetime.” It's literally saving lives already, but your thought process seems to stop at "AI not make Lord of the Rings yet. AI make stinky pictures. AI bad."

Funny how you refrain from mentioning its use in software development

@@EasyOCE you mean software development for which you still need software developer to write prompts?