This AI Does Nothing In Games…And Still Wins! 

Game Maker's Toolkit This AI is my archnemesis; wins by doing nothing whereas I always lose despite all the effort.

I came here expecting a Luigi comment thank you

Damn it you beat me to it.

Hey there GMTK, nice to see you here! I watched your analysis on Celeste a few weeks and loved it. Went on a binge on your other videos right after. So good! 👌

@@TwoMinutePapers Please make the video game with the smartest AI in it. And call it a multiplayer game.

Yup. And they didn't know to try it in Terminator! Might have avoided loads of hassle.

Human playground:

@@Billy_plays2017 YES

*"I can't believe you*ve NOT done this"

@@demerion ??

@@kingzingo1784 he didn't do anything

@@demerion I don’t think they got the joke

_AI: done what? GG lmao_

I think its related to the Shaolin monks learning the drunken style of martial arts.

They sort of said this about trump in political terms.

Yeah, pull a gun

So that's why cpu players in games are hard to win against despite playing like a toddler on a screen resolution of 24x10 with input devices which don't work properly 50% of the time.

@@suedenim6590 worst swordman: *pulls out gun* best swordman: (chuckles) "im in danger"

Haha!

*neo falls down* *agent smith trips and stumbles*

epic comment!

It's a surprise seeing you here, morn, I just love your videos.

Neo: What are you trying to tell me, that I can dodge bullets? No, Neo, I'm trying to tell you that if you drop to the floor and play dead, the agents will behave like idiots

Ah, yes, I remember. That's exactly what they said on the first-aid training: "If you see that someone collapses in front of you without any apparent reason, get the hell out of there. It might be gas, or electricity."

that's what i was about to comment lol

We can see on the original paper's video examples, especially in Kick and Defend, this poor red agent undergoing bad epileptic seizures... In such disturbing context, if the blue agent still kicked the ball without blinking, he wouldn't be human! I say these AIs are much more empathetic than we thought; the singularity is nigh!

Would you?

This comment made me think of Baman Piderman Hab da Pumpkin.

Lol. Underated

That was hilarious :)))

You won my day sir

That guy doesn't even try hahaha Funniest shit I've ever seen

loool =P

Sun Tzu said that!

@@jsnam8139 And then he perfected it, so that no living man could best him in the ring of honour!

Alan Bareiro did is he also the reason why anytime we see more than one animal it’s called a zoo?

@@jdirksen Yes. Unless it's a farm.

We see similar stuff to this in nature with animals weird survival and hunting tactics. Possum playing dead. Animals that piss and shit themselves. Weasels making weird dances to hypnotize rabbits to make it easier to catch them.

I think it's also common knowledge that you can avoid a street fight by acting like you're unstable.

@@TomBielecki you just need to start coughing these days ;)

@@BlackDreaded lmaoo i love this.

@@TomBielecki There's a fairly infamous story about a Danish comedian, who got ganged up on by a group of bikers in the night club. Realizing they wouldn't leave him alone, he said: "Okay, you can beat me up, but just know that you'll have to beat a naked guy." Then he stripped all of his clothes off, and curled up into a ball. Of course, you don't have to act like you're unstable when you're actually unstable, but according to legend, this strategy has a success rate of 100% so far.

the first chess ai that tried to learn from human games had exactly this problem. It recognized that grandmasters frequently won after sacrificing their queen, because you wouldn't give up your queen unless you were sure it was worth it. But the AI was missing this important context and would just jettison its queen for no reason right out of the opening.

Leela chess blundered a queen against andrew tang

@@letsmakeit110 There is another AI that did the opposite though, it was playing I think DOTA 2 (I've never played myself so forgive any minor inaccuracies) and it came up with a novel new strategy that involved 'baiting' human players by making it look like it was sacrificing a really important hero character that normally human players were very careful with, it then had an amazing counter follow up that beat the best players of that game and I think it changed the meta abit. Pretty amazing what AI can do because it lacks human bias and attachment to things, both positively and negatively.

Deep blue was an algorithmic engine. It wasn't a deep learning AI. It really wouldn't care.

@@Sockem1223 leela is an AI and is capable of making this type of mistake.

IT COLLAPSED WEEE WOOO WEEE WOOO!!!

Not standing

*Ben*

Adverserial:*gets confused*

Must be his stando powarr!

Firmly grasp them.

Good thing I bought an extra ream of papers before the lockdown

@@joakker8820 it cant be blank ream of papers tho

what does the holding thing mean?

@@ondrazposukie the joke is that in a shock revelation of someting amazing, scientists (at least in the movies) will often toss all their papers through the air in a sort of YEEEAHHH moment. so... "hold on to your papers" i.e., get ready to be amazed (and throw them in the air)

We call this rage quit, because we all live in a simulation.

To be fair, behaving randomly can work on humans, for example answering "a pineapple is a fruit" to someone asking your wallet might stall them enough for you to flee. Or if you're a contortionist, flop down and start walking upside down on all fours and hiss. Apparently that is called pattern interruption, in which you break what the other expects and then their brain needs to make sense of what is happening, so it takes the first input that makes sense without necessarily reflecting on it.

@@satibel The problem with that is that you can't predict how the other human will react to your random behavior. AIs can train for that.

@@Gonza-lh2vo yes you can. You just have to try it out on people enough times and see how they react - the trick is finding enough people to test it on, without everyone you know, knowing that you're doing weird shit like that. It's not impossible though.

@@Gonza-lh2vo you can train to predict how someone will react to that, though it won't always work. But the trick is that it's random for them, but deliberate for you, so you can fairly well predict what will happen.

Well, this may be literally true

I think both opponents "feel" each other on a physical level, I think it's "in-game" feelings, like they both have sensory inputs. So I think the red one just exploits these sensory inputs of the blue one. Should work like that

No, this has nothing to do with psychological things. It’s just maths

@@okktok Neural networks are extremely simplified models of brains. To that extent, the pursuer simply makes the other believe the pursuer is going to take a certain action, and then doesn't.

its all fun and games until someone by accident code the holy grail of AI scripts getting us all killed like all the other species in the universe who became too powerfull

Best one so far. Made me lfmao

what a time to be alive!

Collapse no jutsu 😆😆

collapse collapse no mi

Nice hypothesis.

That's a good observation!

He mentioned one pixel attack. It's also possible it is somehow forcing a particular input to the AI to be some extreme but meaningless value which is designed to break the network.

@@jamesflames6987 Without a more in-depth analysis on the actual networks themselves, it really could be either one

@VampireDuck The AI cannot recommend good content like it did a few years ago, #MLfairness Btw This describes accurately the state of all modern platforms: But normies have confirmation bias, if one word is off, they won't believe it, even though what I'm saying is factual. I hate to use the word demoralization, bezmenov style demoralization or just regular demoralization, but there are some good summaries and quotes. I can show someone who is demoralized facts and information, pictures, documents , yet they'll refuse to believe it. Someone who is demoralized cannot asses true information, #RU-vid #Twitch #Pewdiepie Even though what I'm saying about RU-vid and other platforms is 100% true , you will probably choose to not believe it anyway. All we have now on RU-vid are commercial shills, or people moralizing an issue, which subsequently benefits commercial shills , moralizing = not related to demoralization, more closely related to "moralfagging" action A = framed as immoral, socially un acceptable action B = framed as moral, righteous, and socially acceptable for the greater groupthink Choose action A and be socially ostracized Choose action B to get along If you make a decision these commercial shills do not like, they will paint you as an immoral person, someone against the groupthink, someone you can't trust. This is a very effective marketing strategy, most people don't want to be mean, don't want to be seen as "bad" by their respective chapter of groupthink. This is why things like woke capital (hard to explain) Go follow woke capital on Twitter, Idk where I can give you this part of the information, most of it is suppressed. And I'm not going to use any more trigger terms The words "normie" and others are trigger terms for AI to come into conversations and "correct divergent behavior" i.e. control groupthink, But I know the dialogue chain for words like normie, So if you are a real person, the best thing you can do is not use the same dialogue chain the AI is using, if you do use the same dialogue chain, you've been suscepted to social pressure and soft mind control There hasn't been good content on YT since 2016, I know WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE AND WHY there hasn't been good content. The gambit of deception AI uses isn't just on videogames, it's on every major platform, and it is used for soft mind control. Twitch uses it at the expense of people RU-vid uses it at the expense of people Alot of other platforms use it at the expense of people Alot of this gambit of deception, is used so regular people like me can't tell a regular person like you the real truth of what's going on. If I tell you the real truth , there will be a ton of bots in here deflecting and cope posting Deflecting and cope posting are the best ways to describe it, sorry there is not a more "clinical" normie version of this language at the moment. I know the things I'm saying are being used against me as well as anyone else who wants to tell the truth , the AI uses mimicry , That's one of the first ways people test AI, can it mimic what I say here? Or in normie language, even the shitty Porn and camwhore bots floating around YT use mimicry. Mimicry is used to it can use deflection and cope posts later on. It is not just being used for good things, Most of the things it is being used for are bad things

-Ray tracing

@@Andytlp Totally correct

Better learn them for real because in the future its going to be the only job that those algorithms cant do.

Math formulas

- Mixed simulation tecnique, particles and grid

They have released the power of Luigi from Nintendo franchises. How will we ever protect ourselves if he gets out into the real world?

@@logonontrily4161 -- how will we protect ourselves? Recruit Shaggy, of course.

mvmlego1212 Shaguigi

:luigiplank:

you should submit this comment to the late shows staff, it looks like you're some kind of author / comedian or something

If the criminal has a seizure, the police robot will walk away.

You know there's probably a reason why paradoxes, memetic agents and other hack-like inputs don't work on organic biological creatures

Police robots already act like this, however instead of collapsing they drown themselves in water fountains.

That reminds me of this scene from Gravity Falls ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-osm-woSAqzU.html

That's why I just play the way I like, I don't concern myself too much with whatever strategy people think is meta. I do pretty good for myself in competitive shooters, and I use a trackball too.

Well, that sounds... very believable...

k. now we know...

I've been thinking about if this kind of thing would be possible. (I don't believe the story in op's comment though)

@@SPL1NTER_SE , as in, can mentioning the height of your fence get you out of a fight?

@@ThePlacehole Maybe not exactly like that. But doing or saying something very unexpected to throw them off. I think it could work on some people.

Indeed, the blue behavior was trained in red guys normal behavior circumstances. Since there was no higher concept learned, weird things happen when the situation is outside the learned circumstances. I wouldn’t be surprised if the blue guy stumbles or walks the other way if you remove the red guy alltogether.

"Output is weirdly dependent on input" sums up neural nets pretty well 😁

yeah well, you're not gonna win a battle if you can't see and react to what your opponent is doing

Yeah, kinda reminds me of the relationship between Batman and the Joker.

Ya would be interesting if playing against a human player...

i was thinking the same thing! to test this hypothesis, the blue player should play games against no one as a baseline

while this is a cool observation, the paper mentions that when the blue figure is "masked" ,blind to the defender, it's win rate goes way back up against against the adversarial defender.

In football you can do this too, step aside as your opponent already prepared for resistance. Then falls on himself

It's funny, in some competitive games, the meta will actually oscillate back and forth because people will get so used to one strategy that everyone is playing one way. Then, someone exploits that with a strategy to counter that, but then everyone just kinda forgets the other strategy existed, and vice versa

@@OrangeC7 A human could've articulated it better , Why should I believe a loser in a lab coat who hates humanity?

@@OrangeC7 that sort of thing is a lot easier to adapt to. You can get kills in pubs by going against the meta but people catch on very quickly.

@@OrangeC7 Yep. I still follow the WC3 and SC2 communities. It's funny to watch the old strategies become the norm, fade away, and then only to become the norm again years later.

"professionals are predictable, but the world is full of amateurs"

ai go brrrr (not)

ai go

Scientis? XD

@@viporal7898 Oops, forgot that T hahaha, do you speak english from Bretain,Usa or somewhere else? (I'm spanish-catalan) How do you say it? Scientist or Scientific? I think both ways are good but in some places may be weird?

@@cristianriosestrada7771 scientific is an adjective and scientist is a noun.

"what the heck why do people keep quoting me in youtube comments sections i never said that" - Sun Tzu, The Art of War

@@jettaeschroff6924 你们在说什么？ -Sun Tzu

@@thechosenfundead6626 "Nani?" -Sun Tzu

I am proud I understand this reference.

@@ilovethelight777 you should be proud

Red: *collapsed to the ground* Blue: *visible confusion*

Dark type deception vs psychic type big brain.

I FINALLY GET IT

Football*

that's a fun way of calling football heh

@@alquinn8576 Americans

@@alquinn8576 more around the globe called footbal or futbol than soccer,live with it.

​@@alquinn8576 just some random internet fight. you have one sport in wich you move the ball with the "foot",and other in wich you move a cantaloupe with the hands. wich one you will use the word football for? no excuses,its wrong,with bad intentions.

stolen comment (og comment: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u5wtoH0_KuA.html&lc=UgwgypHWRbDOvD9HoNh4AaABAg)

watch the youtube fight prank where the guy starts a fight then suddenly drops his pants; the opponent suddenly wont fight and sometimes runs away.

@@johnharbinger4637 It seems we are bugged too.

@@johnharbinger4637 that might be very valuable to better understand our fight or flight programming, sounds interesting

Hol up

Task failed successfully

Phrasing

It does but only over an unbelievably long time. It also isnt best when its 1v1, its better when there is a lot of characters and variables.

Pitting ai’s against each other shows the weakness of whatever is simulating then. In the case of the hide and seek video tmw has done, it was the physics system. In this one I think it is the way the two ai’s read each other’s movements. Either way, the broken part is what the designers put in place.

This does make sense. It can sometimes be harder to win against someone who doesn't know what they're doing in a game that you're very familiar with simply because they're much less predictable.

@@henryambrose8607 I already had the "spirit" :-D Another project was to create the "Rush hour" puzzle games (where you have to slide cars so the red one can leave the parking lot). I said that I would make a solver and teacher told me it's impossible with the means we have and pointed me to an essay. I read the thing and was a bit disgusted. Then I thought something else: we can't SOLVE the problem, but we can probably SIMPLIFY an existing solution. That came from the fact that each move can be undone (you slide the car in the opposite direction) and some set of moves are also "noop". For example, forward for car1, forward for car 2, backward for car 1 and backward for car 2. So, I encoded the solution as strings like "A" for car "A" forward and "a" for car "A" backward. Then replaced some patterns like "Aa" becomes "". And the aim of the program was then to create the shortest sequence of chars by applying some replacement. On top of that, I used a library which permits to take control of the mouse (Autoit) for solution replay. Teacher created a level with the editor, solved it then played the saved solution. The program spit out a shorter solution and the teacher was mindfucked. For him, I did something proven impossible on old computers in the lab 🤣 Then I explained the "cheat". I ended up with 102% ^^ (legally 100%, but on the file 102%) I was the kind of guy like "how can I do the project and mindfuck the teacher". These were the good years!

@@programaths So your program just took the teacher's solution and simplified it using algebra?

@@henryambrose8607 It was even more stupid. If "a" means forward and "A" means backward for car "a". Then you can remove everything that looks like "aA" and "Aa" from the solution. So, if the solution is like "aAcAa", then it becomes "c". All the work was finding what can be replaced by what. Then replacing until no more replacement can be done. So, that was probably not the most optimal solution, but again, much better than what the average human would do!

@@programaths That's actually equivalent to a subset of algebra. If a string of letters is viewed as a multiplication expression where multiplication is associative but not commutative (such as if each letter is a matrix), and if each lowercase letter is the inverse of the corresponding uppercase letter (so a = A^-1 and, equivalently, aA = Aa = 1), then simplifying the multiplication is exactly the same as repeatedly removing "aA", "Aa", "bB", etc. from the string because those particular multiplications are all equal to 1. The same kind of notation and simplification are used in braid theory to represent strings winding around each other. You can also do the same thing with addition, but it's more common to view things like this as multiplication. Probably because addition is commutative in pretty much all contexts. So, congratulations, you did math without realizing it. :)

Nah, the mountain would have to constantly be regulated, preferably with some sort of high-density invisible robotic mesh Also self-driving cars likely have two eyes or a sort of sense of depth unlike the low-quality images in the video

That indeed is why car AIs are trained with tons of input of weird situations. The more noise and random edge cases (from real life!) you got, the better the Ai will be able to cope with unexpected situations. Training against a very limited or very clean input set will produce an AI that cannot cope with any deviation at all. Like the Pong AI in the video---it never had any random pixels in training, so a single white pixel cantrip it. If it had been trained against a grainy analog video stream of a CRT monitor, it would have learned how to ignore extra while pixels...

Wouldn't this be a problem for human drivers as well? A sufficiently advanced self driving vehicle would be _safer_ because it would react faster and have access to more data.

Well...it could be hacked

Someone’s done this before i think, by adding a sticker onto a stop sign, they somehow made a self driving car accelerate uncontrollably instead of stop.

Chicken will never find an answer.

Sun Tzu AI

Luigi-AI Reminds me of that greentext of the Halo server, good stuff

Came looking for this, good job.

WarGack: The only winnong move is hacking

GOD IS BETTER

yes

they are using the old jedi mind trick

im the 69th like lol

That is the most cost efficient solution, i guess

It is more likely to propose ways on how to not get cancer in the first place.

@fuurin engawa Depends on the type of AI / objective. If the objective is just to make you content with the situation. Eg. Want to cure cancer because unhappy with it. Then the most effective way is just to trick people into thinking it is fine.

This tactic is exported to all major platforms and is used on the populace, You think it's only for games lmao. That's why people in the government and others with big money coined the term LARP. Look deep into the word LARP, LARP in the form of political disclosure , not D&D stuff, the obfuscation of the term adds more plausible deniability. Plausible deniability = even when you have evidence of their wrong doing , they can just deflect "LARPer" is synonymous with "influencer" The influencers who've made more money all know this, but refuse to disclose it. AI is also a perfect tool for brownstoning, getting dirt on someone so they'll never speak of their organizations crimes (Google, twitch, smaller factions) This is happening on a daily basis, blackmail is happening on a daily basis, Almost every big RU-vidr you will watch has had this happen. AI knows how to make different outcomes so they will never have a corroborating story , despite them all going through the same blackmail situation. So they can bring this level of deception into real life situations, For example, all the view counts you've ever seen are fake , They do this because you still weigh it's worth in the human mind, you refuse to look at it and see "this is fake," to do so would be socially unacceptable (the thing humans fear most) Because the shills running these systems intend to use them to harm us, If you know anything about gen Z watching habits, You can tell that the AI/ML people have Gen Z under soft mind control, It's creepy af how they parrot back what streamers say, It is real people parroting streamers, but they were conditioned to do It by an AI, and they don't even realize it was mean to pacify them. Anyone under 14 who watches tiktok = under soft mind control Ages 16 - 30 who watch twitch = under soft mind control This bracket is the weirdest one, because the older end are all the same AI/ML nerds who made these systems. 20-30 who watch twitch, the losers of society, nerds. They all have to conform to the same ideology , an ideology involving the gay leftist religion Women ages 10 - 35 = under soft mind control Women are by far the easiest to control because of their groupthink like nature Ages 5 - 25 , twitch , normie gaming content = under soft mind control These people aren't going to address the negative part, because they're already using it to control us This is used as a form of deception as well, but it's subtle so alot of people will miss it, plausible deniability. Is that fair? ML fairness was a lie sold to the people , probably to grant more plausible deniability. The most I've seen out of ML fairness = algorithms boosting women because they need attention and they have zero original thoughts. You will probably not see how this is used already on every major platform, for soft mind control, or whatever other ends. I hope you do see it though. The negatives are far worse , Ever notice the content on RU-vid has gotten really bad in the last 4 years ? That is also by design.

More like this leads to a series of cascading butterfly effects that lead to the person asking finding out how to cure cancer.

yes, and no, thing is people a so against "self-driving cars" but do you ever walk out on a train track and blame the train for hitting you? the real solution is to make out transport systems antonyms, educate people on the risk and flaws, and make enough safety to at least avoid the worst case disasters. but we will need to be prepared for accidents still, hopefully ideally less than what we have... else yeah then it's a shitty idea.

@@MouseGoat cars are integrated part of our urban environment. You can't realistically expect people to behave like they would near a train crossing area (a somewhat rare thing to come by) all the time when they are outside. This is akin to stealing (even more) the urban space from people and not a great solution

Why?

Nobody tell him

@@Ivan_1791 search Luigi wins by doing nothing

@@Tomas81623 You shouldn't have told him, Player-87 will set a curse upon your computer as punishment for your crimes

@@Tomas81623 Bruh

De art of fighding, widout fighding.

Epstein killed himself by not killing himself

The best win for a fight is to not fight and still win.

Well yeah it does, when you train a artificial brian to do a task, all it knows is that task and wil get super great at that one task. but if you manage to do something that it was never trained on the same force that makes it brillant wil drive it to do stupid moves leading to disastrous result. In the end its just how all traps work, make you opponent confused

Reset_ yes because essentially the 2 AIs have adapted too well to each other’s behaviour

It’s also somewhat unrealistic because while they show multiple matches between the adversarial and normal AI, the normal AI isn’t being retrained. It would be equivalent to showing 10 pro players against the same useless player in separate matches, as opposed to the same pro player going agains the useless player 10 times - in the second scenario the pro player might be tripped up the first time but will quickly adapt (unless the useless player adjusts their tactics). I like your example though, and it’s interesting to think that con artists, magicians etc. are essentially the human equivalent to these adversarial agents. Falling and screaming would work well against a pro player as well, at least once.

It is similar to a phenomenon that happens when people play a game too much and know it too well. They know that by doing a series of inputs they can make the AI behave in a certain way, so what we are seeing is AI learning to manipulate AI. That is fascinating!

@@noahmccann4438 That is absolutely true! Also the manipulation of input for the human brain (via con artists or magicians as proposed by you) is a way more interesting analogy than mine! You can essentially think of the brain as the AI that has been trained to handle sensible inputs, but using a combination of seemingly unimportant or unexpected moves can lead to the brain not processing the info correctly. Great stuff!

Nothing you see it in poker too. Top players get comfortable and assume every choice someone makes is logical. But a new player can make an illogical move and throw off more experienced players.

This tactic is exported to all major platforms and is used on the populace, You think it's only for games lmao. That's why people in the government and others with big money coined the term LARP. Look deep into the word LARP, LARP in the form of political disclosure , not D&D stuff, the obfuscation of the term adds more plausible deniability. Plausible deniability = even when you have evidence of their wrong doing , they can just deflect "LARPer" is synonymous with "influencer" The influencers who've made more money all know this, but refuse to disclose it. AI is also a perfect tool for brownstoning, getting dirt on someone so they'll never speak of their organizations crimes (Google, twitch, smaller factions) This is happening on a daily basis, blackmail is happening on a daily basis, Almost every big RU-vidr you will watch has had this happen. AI knows how to make different outcomes so they will never have a corroborating story , despite them all going through the same blackmail situation. So they can bring this level of deception into real life situations, For example, all the view counts you've ever seen are fake , They do this because you still weigh it's worth in the human mind, you refuse to look at it and see "this is fake," to do so would be socially unacceptable (the thing humans fear most) Because the shills running these systems intend to use them to harm us, If you know anything about gen Z watching habits, You can tell that the AI/ML people have Gen Z under soft mind control, It's creepy af how they parrot back what streamers say, It is real people parroting streamers, but they were conditioned to do It by an AI, and they don't even realize it was mean to pacify them. Anyone under 14 who watches tiktok = under soft mind control Ages 16 - 30 who watch twitch = under soft mind control This bracket is the weirdest one, because the older end are all the same AI/ML nerds who made these systems. 20-30 who watch twitch, the losers of society, nerds. They all have to conform to the same ideology , an ideology involving the gay leftist religion Women ages 10 - 35 = under soft mind control Women are by far the easiest to control because of their groupthink like nature Ages 5 - 25 , twitch , normie gaming content = under soft mind control These people aren't going to address the negative part, because they're already using it to control us This is used as a form of deception as well, but it's subtle so alot of people will miss it, plausible deniability. Is that fair? ML fairness was a lie sold to the people , probably to grant more plausible deniability. The most I've seen out of ML fairness = algorithms boosting women because they need attention and they have zero original thoughts. You will probably not see how this is used already on every major platform, for soft mind control, or whatever other ends. I hope you do see it though. The negatives are far worse , Ever notice the content on RU-vid has gotten really bad in the last 4 years ? That is also by design.

@@tyrrelldavis9919 Are you alright?

@@henryambrose8607 It's copypasta. He put the same thing earlier in the comments too. Also, look at his channel. Those are some strange playlists.

@@tyrrelldavis9919 Less write thread, more take med.

In strategy games do I do sometimes stupid or unimportant things to stay uncalculatable. For exampe in The Settlers I formed a formation, send it to the enemie and let it die. He then thought I wasnt as far developed as him and that I wasted my troops leading him to an attack. He ran into my towers, got ambushed by cavelery and I freely worked my ways trough the weaker protected parts of his area leading him to build an army to send it there. When my second army was finished I couls attack from another angle preventing my enemie to use his money to buy material or use the time to build up his kingdom. I kept doing it until I was so far that he had no chance anymore to win and he gave up. I won without conquer, just attacking outa regions and forcing him to attack my troops which otherwise would have conquered him, while I fooled him to waste his troops in the beginning. One of my best plays agains a less experienced player. (Im no pro by the way, we were both realy new to the game back then). I use something simmilar in Polytopia now. I send weak troops to enemies so that they think I didnt develop a good army yet. If they attack, theyll run into a trap and I abuse their open areas with my marine without caring much about his army. Normaly he takes his army away from the borders, back to his kingdom to protect his citys, but the time is not always enaugh. Specially when I have enaugh money to abuse the other side too when hes back in his land. I keep my enemies running, so that I can always attack an weak spot. Doesnt work always tho

Right, it may be a case of AI ignoring highly relevant outlier datapoints during its training and therefore continuing to suck for "unsual" inputs. Backprop suffers from this problem where it won't radically change the weights to accommodate a small amount of surprising data because it doesn't contribute much to the aggregate loss function.

Right. It's actually kind of worrying. This video demonstrates perfectly how drastically bad overfitting can be for neural nets with very good performance. A neural net like this could reach production, for example on a self-driving car, and be faced with such exceptional data that it completely fails. Proper testing should catch this, but this highlights how a quite unlikely possibility - even the opponent doing nothing at all - is important to include in the training data. For example, if one of the sensors glitches or stops working completely on the car.

Still, humans are reasonably good at dealing with trolls. Sure, they'll get upset, and if it happens often enough, they'll stop playing whatever game they're getting trolled in, but the AIs have exactly one goal, and that's to win, whereas the human player generally prioritizes having fun over winning at any cost.

@@mvmlego1212 The blue guy was overtrained on reasonably capable opponents. It's like wasting time getting in an argument with some idiot online without realizing that the other person can't be educated because they're playing dumb on purpose

@@mvmlego1212 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, try playing ranked in any competitive game, you're gonna have a rain of insult on you quickly.

As a self confessed part time troll, I dont necessarily "know" what is going to break someone's brain. Its more of a cold read - i get a vibe off their tone and diction and go from there. Beyond that its about faking it until you make it, really. But that's very rare, usually it's one of those funny things whereby people tend to get offended more because they were _expecting_ to be offended/insulted. Sometimes I've been making jokes with people, or asking genuine questions, and they're already so prepared to get trolled instead that they warp my words in all sorts of magical ways in order to be offended by my "insult". Then I have to be like "i was trying to be friends" and theyre like "oh mb" but its too late - the moment is ruined. :(

nba jam was ahead of its time

Player 1: rolls self into ball . Player 2: "I guess I'll just put you in the hoop..."

tries to dribble player 1, gets ejected from the game.