This Dark vs Clem finals is an ABSOLUTE BANGER. StarCraft 2 

Its maxpax TV hehe

Is no one gunna talk about the shirt?

That main was a tough beach

Even by Winter's high usual standards, that was exceptional; I lolled :D

I think thats the real power of the zerg, to be able to change unit compositions really fast, and the multiple options to be all over the map at the same time

And still losing

​@RubysWrath What do you expect, just build widowmine and you're fine.

@@tonysiouxfan I expect serral. Sadly I can only find him on his games 😭

As an unbiased sc2 enjoyer, I think they need to buff widowmines even more.

​@AntiDoctor-cx2jd The issue is that zergs production method is op as all hell so they only get shitty units to compensate for it. All zerg units are bad. Zerg isnt cost effective. They're just the preferred race of every dominant player in sc2s history.

I haven’t followed sc2 particularly closely recently, but from my perspective, it seems like Zerg are doing fine against everyone other than Clem. So by that logic, the nerfs couldn’t have been too bad. I was expecting a lot more drop off than I’ve seen.

And losing

@@RubysWrath spoilers.

@@Scynn It's not even a spoiler at this point everyone knows zerg is gonna lose if it's not serral in these high level matches.

@@RubysWrathdidn’t Winter mention Dark winning a nice part of his pro games?

Another amazing loss

One day, one year. One life time. It will happen

We really need more players. So many of them aren’t playing rn. We need Zest, PartinG etc back 😭

@@GrippeeTVno reason to. Toss sucks so hard vs T right now

@@IUse2haveALife not arguing that Protoss doesn’t have glaring issues, I’m just saying that when there’s only HerO, MaxPax and maybe Creator, compared to like 5-8 top tier players for the other races because a lot of the great Protoss’s have gone to military service or whatever that the numbers are skewed a bit

@@GrippeeTV As if they were winning two years ago. Thee is a reason Hero was the first protoss GSL champion in 5 years one year AGO!

Dark legit just throwing that last game. Must've been tired or something. What a rollercoaster.

They look like pink Wobbuffets

Clem won the series against Dark without building a Raven so apparently there's a reason for it. Probably because its one less medivac which is a better unit overall for his play style despite not being a detector and because he plans on making enough orbitals for scans which are better. Raven just dies so easy as well. Its not near as good as the BW Science Vessel and isn't support other than detection so its a liability.

dark rolls in banelings insta nuking minimum 1/5 economy...complains about widow mines...

1 : Mines are cloacked while burrowed , even after they fired after the armory is complete! 2: Mines can hit ground AND air for high enough single target dmg to 1 shot many units and deal a rather meaningfull aoe dmg ! 3: Mines don't die upon attacking, & they can recharge! 4: They're cheap and easy to mass produce ( just as banelings ) and overall yeld better results than banelings after these were nerfed !

​@@user-ow2ln3pw7dYes but mines are immobile vs mobile banelings, and 1 mine takes the same supply as 4 banelings. With maxed armies the amount of dmg banelings can deal is quite high.

​@hoffa57 Widowmines are the worst units ever created in starcraft.

@@hoffa57 Mines are more area denial compared to banelings, and force détection out of the opponent They're only immobile while burrowed, and although it's a bit more APM intensive to reposition them during a fight, their présence is far more meaningful than banelings unless You get backed against the Edge of the Map in which case enough banes anihilate almost anything which isn't Armored on the ground! Mines are an anchor/ tactical Point to Lure the ennemy forces in to thin their numbers and hp... banes are slightly more offensive oriented in that regard, but a few mines ( let's Say 5) can kill far more units than banes, also unless they're on Creep, banes can be outrun! Supply wise I can't argue, mines need more!

bruh, dark is literally like the second best in the world right now or something

@@ziliestarrive Can you even tell me how that matters when literally every game we see him play high level ends up being a loss? Ive watched so many games and literally he wins 2 out of 10 times vs terran or protos top players.

Acting as if Dark didn’t totally throw game 5 lol. He would’ve been dead in less than 10 minutes if Clem realized how hard Dark threw the match

@@GrippeeTV There are no prizes for being a fancy loser. Only winners and losers. You don't get props for doing a backflip jumping off the edge of a building. No matter how much I love zerg I can't stand watching them lose so much on anyone not serral.

@@RubysWrath then maybe you need to reevaluate your opinion on players of the race. Is Serral good? Yeah, he’s the best. But he’s the best because he’s BORING. He plays the race exactly to the T the way it was designed to be played and very rarely takes any risks or tries something against the meta. His APM, his overall knowledge of the game isn’t 30%+ win rate above Dark. Dark and a lot of other Zergs just do stupid, stupid shit on the regular. Dark, Solar, Rogue etc easily have the skill to compete on the same level as Serral but it’s their own decision making that make them lose on the regular. Serral isn’t a God who is infinitely better at the game than all of the other top tier Zergs, the only real difference between them is how they choose to play. If Dark stopped all of his batshit shenanigans tomorrow and chose instead to play boring matches without trying any of his usual tricks and cheese I guarantee his win rate would skyrocket.

:p