This is a Lying Rookie Cop 

It’s pure reading from a worn out script

Their advance training grants them a preternatural sense of smell.

😢😢😢😢😮😢😢😢😢😮

Overwhelming lie!

​@@GrizzlyUrsusArctosxqq ww2 w2q ha qhqh+I

And that is why yous should always exercise your right to remain silent and refuse FSTs & PBTs. All of those are simply additional points of testimony or video evidence to be used against you.

Easy, American Justice System. One of the worst in the western world.

Testimony is evidence. His testimony is very weak evidence, though. The jury is free to disregard it

Look at the alarming SA cases that people bring up... THIRTY YEARS LATER

This is Amerikkka

yep this prosecutor is out of his class when Larry has the defendant for a client.....I know one other atttorney in Louisville that was much like Larry....he is now Judge Brown. Maybe I will see Larry in his courtroom...which I think Brown is still a judge

I have noticed over time that prosecutors lose at lot of cases when the defendant has a good lawyer. And really high profile cases at that. I don't think prosecutors make good trial lawyers because most cases are plea bargained to rates about 90%. Prosecutors just don't have the trial experience a good defense lawyers have. They are used to just railroading people into plea bargains. It was obvious the DUI guy absolutely knows the rules of evidence and examination. The prosecutor seemed to be clueless at times.

Sidenote… what kinda dumphole has 1 cop, 1 ambulance and 1 firefighter for a whole county. Smh

The tyrants have become accustomed to steamrolling less fortunate clients, you know, the client that ain't got the DUI Guy.

The EMT isn't qualified to determine if someone is over the legal limit of impairment.

@@richardcain7352 i mean in Charlotte we carry the rapid alcohol tests. Can use the blood from the IV flash. They are the same as the instant lactate tests for sepsis protocol and and instant tropinin for TNK administration

@@richardcain7352as a former EMT, you are qualified to voice concern due to what ever is observed. It is often necessary to know in order to avoid any drug interactions.

He bribed someone lol

Definitely dirty

Three of them .... on the way home

It seemed like that judge really wanted to rule in favor of the prosecution.

@@don5062 he did.....but he knew an appeal was coming.

Think how many lives he had screwed over and over and over

​@@stephenstansberry7995 exactly! He does it all the time and gets away with it.

I couldn't make it past the one minute ‼️ annoying!

@@plyer_2502 Who annoyed you?

They care only for revenue

The number of DUI arrests and convictions are often tied to federal funding. Also a guilty verdict protects the municipality from being sued in a civil rights case. So judges often side with the municipality also.

Losing cases for any reason don't look good on a lawyers resume. But I think they could just dismiss i, for lack of evidence of a crime, and not lose face.

​@@pete6300let's not forget CIVIL FORFIETURE where the police department/DAs office gets to share in ill-gotten (by police) gains.

@@CatBuchanan that's true but this is a dui case

He's obviously gotten used to getting his way from judges. In many a county judges think they're in the same "team" as the DA, if not outright drinking buddies...

​@@wape1golfing buddies. Not a lot of them drink in the South😊

@@wape1Absolutely fact, especially in rural parts of Georgia.

Everytime

Sharp as a bowling ball, and his IQ is the same shape: a big round zero.

It must be hard for the defence to determine if they should call him as a witness themselves. What is better? An uneducated cop making guesses, or an EMT with some medical knowledge that never did a real assessment if he was intoxicated? Now, when I write it out, I think Mr Foreman made the right call. But we will see when we have a vertict. Can't wait 😱

I wouldn't say that the fact he is not called as a witness is reasonable doubt in and of itself, but it leaves a lot of unanswered questions in the "lack of evidence" pile. You have to look at what is presented in court, and what facts are not presented in court (as Mr Foreman stated in his opening), but not who are and are not there. That's the reason for Foreman's long objection streak under the cop's testimony. The cop was kinda testifying on behalf of the EMT.

@@AudunWangen that's the point of my speculation about why the EMT isn't a witness - the facts that the EMT could have known about aren't being presented. so what are they?

@@gagenater In the court of public opinion we can speculate about such things, of course, but I don't think the jury should. They should just look at the evidence presented (or not) in court. If I'm going to speculate, I think that the prosecution feared that the EMT could have some conflicting accounts of what happened, or maybe they didn't remember anything about it. He probably didn't do a fair assessment if the accused was intoxicated either way. In that case, it doesn't make sense for them to call him as a witness, because it's basically just another tool the defence can use to discredit the cop's story, and it doesn't do anything to prove guilt. In short: they had an extremely weak case.

@@AudunWangen That's sort of my point. There's 3 people who could assess Danny's condition post accident - the cop, Chyrstal (sp?) and the EMT. The cop made the arrest, so he believes his position. Chyrstal has some motivation to try and protect Danny. The only less interested party is the EMT, and the jury won't hear from them. The fact that they aren't being heard from makes the situation very uncertain - to the point that in my mind it's a reasonably doubt in and of itself.

There are exceptions to the hearsay rule but the person offering the evidence must prove the applicability. Prosecutor saying i dont know what he is going to say is a joke.

It's pretty funny.

If you visited Rockcastle County you would understand. A very poor county full of political shenanigans. An attorney would be treated like a rock star. There are several fine people in the county but they work big farms and take care of their family and neighbors. You won't see the good people have time to get into trouble or have any political interest.

So in our town in our last election for the District Attorney... We had a couple people who was not even Lawyers running for the job, so how could they even know the law..

Can??? You mean they are very corrupt

He needs a bar complaint with this video as evidence.

I have a feeling he's the only prosecutor after 2AM on days ending in Y, and is used to getting his way...

Indeed

And it needs to come out of the Police retirement fund and or the Mayors and Sherriffs own check. This will keep them honest

No backup. What if he's shot? No backup. What if there's a mass murder? No backup. No body worn cameras. (Like there's no money in that entire county). Insufficient training. What a terrifying state. I hope this video implements change.

​@@sing2me axon international has offered a free BWC and a free year of cloud storage to every officer in the country.....and they can't afford free?

Understaffing is horrible post "defund" movement.

@@williamallen7836 reforming is imperative. Defunding is idiocy.

@@TruthHealsUs totally agree with you. Defunding almost ensures that any attempts at reform will fail.

Similar to small counties all over the country.

This is one of the reasons fly-overs can be so passionate about maintaining their Right to Arms.

Just goes to reinforce why field sobriety tests should ALWAYS be refused by the suspect. Field sobriety tests only serve to strengthen the officer's case, NOT to exonerate the suspect.

@@crisrodriguez4676 Bingo !

Well, he "heard others talk about it" and they were probably talking about how inconvenient they are and how much it costs LAPD or NYPD for their whole systems. He kept talking about a couple cameras inside the precinct. But come on, people know what they cost. We have ring cameras and wildlife trail cameras and people have recording devices all over their cars nowadays. We know that small dept just does stuff they don't want recorded.

Are you forgetting that we're talking about the Government here? 😉 Millions of dollars for a handful of officers sounds spot on to me. The Government will always over spend on these things!

He's used to people that can't afford a lawyer.

This is how country kangaroo courts work if a good ole boy country cop and a good ole boy country prosecutor says you’re guilty you’re guilty boy , we don’t need any damn evidence.

As a society we need to stop infantilizing those 18 years and older. They are not kids. They are adults. This why is why 30+ year olds refusing to move out and start thier adult life, because they are still refered to as kids. At 38 a male is just starting middle age. Half of thier expected life is over. They live up to what is expected of them. Treat & expect them to be kids, and they will continue to behave as such.

​@@williamallen7836funny ppl want call 18+ kids, but they can go fight an die in war for there country . There adult enough for that.

@@williamallen7836 in my eyes, he’s a kid. He looks like he can’t even grow facial hair. I call him a kid, due to his lack of experience. I think you missed the whole point I was trying to make. I was simply stating, the only evidence against this man, is an inexperienced “kid” who just got out of the academy, only been on the road for 9 weeks. He’s very fresh. You’d agree with that, right? The court, jury, everyone is rely on this “kids” “experience”, even when he has very little.

That's Larry's signature move in any courtroom. He sets up ownership of space, jury and witnesses.

Larry does it for dramatic effect and to establish his authority and show lack of fear. And he has explained this previously himself in at least 2 videos so I believe him. It also gets him closer to witnesses which is somewhat intimidating and alarming. Smart guy- our DUI lawyer!

I love your step by step explanation of how a trial is supposed to go. The DA is a damn moron. Maybe that bring just the cop and the good people will believe him move works (maybe) with other defense attys, but not with you. You can tell he gets away with it all the time. How the hell does this DA think he is getting a conviction with absolutely no evidence. I wouldn't be able to even bring charges against someone in this situation. I would be too embarrassed to walk into court and say well people we don't have any evidence because of a stupid rookie mistake, but go ahead and believe the word of said rookie when he says he did the rest of his job like he was trained to do. Really?? Maybe he thinks the people of his district are really just that dumb? Like I said, Moron!!

Don't you know a few cameras would cost $1,000,000-$2,000,000.

@@BigDavie2000 a few cameras would not cost that much.

@@kxngdavid I was alluding to the cops testimony that getting bodycams and dashcams for the county police would cost between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000

@@BigDavie2000 I see that now 🤦‍♂️

One hundred billion dollars... for a go pro.

No evidence, guy wasn't driving or even in the car when the officer, the only witness here, arrives, guy leaves officers presence for hours, they meet back up at hospital because guy chose to leave, etc. No evidence to put him behind the wheel let alone intoxicated over the limit beyond a reasonable doubt, plus driving while intoxicated beyond a reasonable doubt... Although I still wonder which way the jury decided because juries always convict, it's like beyond reasonable doubt to jury means suspected of maybe being guilty.

The Murdaughs proved that already as well didnt they?!

Well the judge would of let the da do whatever he wants . If the defense didn't say anything I feel bad for anyone that cant pay for defence lawyer to care.

You can carry in a courthouse as long as you're LE. But usually not for others/lay people. Where you CANNOT ever bring your guns, is in a detention or correctional centers.

Correct me if I’m mistaken however I believe the sheriffs in the courtroom are armed And it wouldn’t surprise me if the judge wasn’t packing

@@GarryFishermusic you're not wrong, my ex is a Marshal in a large courthouse, of course they're armed ... the only place officers remove the arms & lock them up before stepping foot inside, is a jail or correctional centers. I'm sure you understand why no firearms are allowed on the inside of a secure facility. Literally NOBODY can go in with a gun. The prisons have guns inside but they're in secure places & only certain staff have access to them

They are officers of the court. He is not.

Nothing in it either from what I've heard so far!!

This is part two

Will he post the verdict?